"Newstead Abbey, Oct. 13. 1811.
"You will begin to deem me a most liberal correspondent; but as my
letters are free, you will overlook their frequency. I have sent
you answers in prose and verse[29] to all your late communications,
and though I am invading your ease again, I don't know why, or what
to put down that you are not acquainted with already. I am growing
nervous (how you will laugh!)--but it is true,--really, wretchedly,
ridiculously, fine-ladically _nervous_. Your climate kills me; I
can neither read, write, nor amuse myself, or any one else. My days
are listless, and my nights restless; I have very seldom any
society, and when I have, I run out of it. At 'this present
writing,' there are in the next room three ladies, and I have
stolen away to write this grumbling letter.--I don't know that I
sha'n't end with insanity, for I find a want of method in arranging
my thoughts that perplexes me strangely; but this looks more like
silliness than madness, as Scrope Davies would facetiously remark
in his consoling manner. I must try the hartshorn of your company;
and a session of Parliament would suit me well,--any thing to cure
me of conjugating the accursed verb '_ennuyer_.'
"When shall you be at Cambridge? You have hinted, I think, that
your friend Bland is returned from Holland. I have always had a
great respect for his talents, and for all that I have heard of
his character; but of me, I believe he knows nothing, except that
he heard my sixth form repetitions ten months together, at the
average of two lines a morning, and those never perfect. I
remembered him and his 'Slaves' as I passed between Capes Matapan,
St. Angelo, and his Isle of Ceriga, and I always bewailed the
absence of the Anthology. I suppose he will now translate Vondel,
the Dutch Shakspeare, and 'Gysbert van Amstel' will easily be
accommodated to our stage in its present state; and I presume he
saw the Dutch poem, where the love of Pyramus and Thisbe is
compared to the _passion_ of _Christ_; also the love of _Lucifer_
for Eve, and other varieties of Low Country literature. No doubt
you will think me crazed to talk of such things, but they are all
in black and white and good repute on the banks of every canal from
Amsterdam to Alkmaar.
"Yours ever, B."
[Footnote 28: See the extract from one of his journals, vol. i. p. 94.]
[Footnote 29: The verses in vol. ii. p. 73.]
* * * * *
"My poesy is in the hands of its various publishers; but the 'Hints
from Horace,' (to which I have subjoined some savage lines on
Methodism, and ferocious notes on the vanity of the triple Editory
of the Edin. Annual Register,) my '_Hints_,' I say, stand still,
and why?--I have not a friend in the world (but you and Drury) who
can construe Horace's Latin or my English well enough to adjust
them for the press, or to correct the proofs in a grammatical way.
So that, unless you have bowels when you return to town (I am too
far off to do it for myself), this ineffable work will be lost to
the world for--I don't know how many _weeks._
"'Childe Harold's Pilgrimage' must wait till _Murray's_ is
finished. He is making a tour in Middlesex, and is to return soon,
when high matter may be expected. He wants to have it in quarto,
which is a cursed unsaleable size; but it is pestilent long, and
one must obey one's bookseller. I trust Murray will pass the
Paddington Canal without being seduced by Payne and Mackinlay's
example,--I say Payne and Mackinlay, supposing that the partnership
held good. Drury, the villain, has not written to me; 'I am never
(as Mrs. Lumpkin says to Tony) to be gratified with the monster's
dear wild notes.'
"So you are going (going indeed!) into orders. You must make your
peace with the Eclectic Reviewers--they accuse you of impiety, I
fear, with injustice. Demetrius, the 'Sieger of Cities,' is here,
with 'Gilpin Homer.' The painter[30] is not necessary, as the
portraits he already painted are (by anticipation) very like the
new animals.--Write, and send me your 'Love Song'--but I want
'paulo majora' from you. Make a dash before you are a deacon, and
try a _dry_ publisher.
"Yours always, B."
[Footnote 30: Barber, whom he had brought down to Newstead to paint his
wolf and his bear.]
* * * * *
It was at this period that I first had the happiness of seeing and
becoming acquainted with Lord Byron. The correspondence in which our
acquaintance originated is, in a high degree, illustrative of the frank
manliness of his character; and as it was begun on my side, some egotism
must be tolerated in the detail which I have to give of the
circumstances that led to it. So far back as the year 1806, on the
occasion of a meeting which took place at Chalk Farm between Mr. Jeffrey
and myself, a good deal of ridicule and raillery, founded on a false
representation of what occurred before the magistrates at Bow Street,
appeared in almost all the public prints. In consequence of this, I was
induced to address a letter to the Editor of one of the Journals,
contradicting the falsehood that had been circulated, and stating
briefly the real circumstances of the case. For some time my letter
seemed to produce the intended effect,--but, unluckily, the original
story was too tempting a theme for humour and sarcasm to be so easily
superseded by mere matter of fact. Accordingly, after a little time,
whenever the subject was publicly alluded to,--more especially by those
who were at all "willing to wound,"--the old falsehood was, for the sake
of its ready sting, revived.
In the year 1809, on the first appearance of "English Bards and Scotch
Reviewers," I found the author, who was then generally understood to be
Lord Byron, not only jesting on the subject--and with sufficiently
provoking pleasantry and cleverness--in his verse, but giving also, in
the more responsible form of a note, an outline of the transaction in
accordance with the original misreport, and, therefore, in direct
contradiction to my published statement. Still, as the Satire was
anonymous and unacknowledged, I did not feel that I was, in any way,
called upon to notice it, and therefore dismissed the matter entirely
from my mind. In the summer of the same year appeared the Second Edition
of the work, with Lord Byron's name prefixed to it. I was, at the time,
in Ireland, and but little in the way of literary society; and it so
happened that some months passed away before the appearance of this new
edition was known to me. Immediately on being apprised of it,--the
offence now assuming a different form,--I addressed the following letter
to Lord Byron, and, transmitting it to a friend in London, requested
that he would have it delivered into his Lordship's hands.[31]
"Dublin, January 1. 1810.
"My Lord,
"Having just seen the name of 'Lord Byron' prefixed to a work
entitled 'English Bards and Scotch Reviewers,' in which, as it
appears to me, _the lie is given_ to a public statement of mine,
respecting an affair with Mr. Jeffrey some years since, I beg you
will have the goodness to inform me whether I may consider your
Lordship as the author of this publication.
"I shall not, I fear, be able to return to London for a week or
two; but, in the mean time, I trust your Lordship will not deny me
the satisfaction of knowing whether you avow the insult contained
in the passages alluded to.
"It is needless to suggest to your Lordship the propriety of
keeping our correspondence secret.
"I have the honour to be
"Your Lordship's very humble servant,
"THOMAS MOORE.
"22. Molesworth Street."
[Footnote 31: This is the only entire letter of my own that, in the
course of this work, I mean to obtrude upon my readers. Being short, and
in terms more explanatory of the feeling on which I acted than any
others that could be substituted, it might be suffered, I thought, to
form the single exception to my general rule. In all other cases, I
shall merely give such extracts from my own letters as may be necessary
to elucidate those of my correspondent.]
* * * * *
In the course of a week, the friend to whom I intrusted this letter
wrote to inform me that Lord Byron had, as he learned on enquiring of
his publisher, gone abroad immediately on the publication of his Second
Edition; but that my letter had been placed in the hands of a gentleman,
named Hodgson, who had undertaken to forward it carefully to his
Lordship. Though the latter step was not exactly what I could have
wished, I thought it as well, on the whole, to let my letter take its
chance, and again postponed all consideration of the matter.
During the interval of a year and a half which elapsed before Lord
Byron's return, I had taken upon myself obligations, both as husband and
father, which make most men,--and especially those who have nothing to
bequeath,--less willing to expose themselves unnecessarily to danger.
On hearing, therefore, of the arrival of the noble traveller from
Greece, though still thinking it due to myself to follow up my first
request of an explanation, I resolved, in prosecuting that object, to
adopt such a tone of conciliation as should not only prove my sincere
desire of a pacific result, but show the entire freedom from any angry
or resentful feeling with which I took the step. The death of Mrs.
Byron, for some time, delayed my purpose. But as soon after that event
as was consistent with decorum, I addressed a letter to Lord Byron, in
which, referring to my former communication, and expressing some doubts
as to its having ever reached him, I re-stated, in pretty nearly the
same words, the nature of the insult, which, as it appeared to me, the
passage in his note was calculated to convey. "It is now useless," I
continued, "to speak of the steps with which it was my intention to
follow up that letter. The time which has elapsed since then, though it
has done away neither the injury nor the feeling of it, has, in many
respects, materially altered my situation; and the only object which I
have now in writing to your Lordship is to preserve some consistency
with that former letter, and to prove to you that the injured feeling
still exists, however circumstances may compel me to be deaf to its
dictates, at present. When I say 'injured feeling,' let me assure your
Lordship, that there is not a single vindictive sentiment in my mind
towards you. I mean but to express that uneasiness, under (what I
consider to be) a charge of falsehood, which must haunt a man of any
feeling to his grave, unless the insult be retracted or atoned for; and
which, if I did _not_ feel, I should, indeed, deserve far worse than
your Lordship's satire could inflict upon me." In conclusion I added,
that so far from being influenced by any angry or resentful feeling
towards him, it would give me sincere pleasure if, by any satisfactory
explanation, he would enable me to seek the honour of being henceforward
ranked among his acquaintance.[32]