CHAPTER XI.

THE CURE--NEW CONSTRUCTIONS--THE INITIATIVE.

_Pyramus_.--'Write me a prologue, and let the prologue _seem to say,

we will do no harm_ with our _swords_ [spears]... and for the more

better assurance, tell them that I, Pyramus, am not Pyramus, but

Bottom the weaver. This will put them out of fear.'--_Shake-spear_.

'Truth and reason are common to every one, and are no more his who

spoke them first, than his who spoke them after. Who follows another

follows nothing, finds nothing, seeks nothing.'

'Authors have hitherto communicated themselves to the people by some

_particular_ and _foreign_ mark. _I_, the first of any, by my

_universal being. Every man_ carries with him _the entire form_ of

human condition.'

'And besides, though I had a _particular_ distinction _by myself_,

what can it distinguish when I am no more? Can it point out and favor

_inanity_?'

'_But_ will thy manes such a gift bestow

_As to make violets from thy ashes grow_?'

_Michael de Montaigne_.

_Hamlet_.--'To thine own self be true,

And it doth follow as the night the day

Thou canst not then be false to any man.'

'To know a man well, were to know him-self.'

The complaint of the practical men against the philosophers who make

such an outcry upon the uses and customs of the world as they find it,

that they do not undertake to give us anything better in the place of

them; or if they do, with their terrible experiments they leave us

worse than they find us, does not apply in this case. Because this is

science, and not philosophy in the sense which that word still

conveys, when applied to subjects of this nature. We all know that the

scientific man is a safe and brilliant practitioner. The most

unspeculative men of practice have learned to prefer him and his arts

to the best empiricism. It is the philosophers we have had in this

field, with their rash anticipations,--with their unscientific

pre-conceptions,--with a _pre-conception_, instead of a fore-knowledge

of the power they deal with, commanding results which do not,--there

is the point,--which do not follow.

Let no one say that this reformer is one of those who expose our

miserable condition, without offering to improve it; or that he is one

of those who take away our gold and jewels with their tests, and leave

us no equivalent. This is no destroyer. He will help us to save all

that we have. He is guarding us from the error of those who would let

it alone till the masses have taken the work in hand for themselves,

without science. '_That_ is the way to lay all flat.'

He is not one of those, 'who to _make clean, efface_, and who cure

diseases by death.' To found so great a thing as the state anew; to

dissolve that so old and solid structure, and undertake to recompose

it as a whole on the spot, is a piece of work which this chemist,

after a survey of his apparatus, declines to take in; though he fairly

admits, that if the question were of 'a new world,' and not 'a world

already formed to certain customs,' science might have, perhaps, some

important suggestions to make as to the original structure. And yet

for all that, it is a scientific practice that is propounded here. It

is a scientific innovation and renovation, that is propounded; the

greatest that was ever propounded,--total, absolute, but not sudden.

It is a remedy for the world as it is, that this reformer is

propounding.

New constructions according to true definitions, scientific

institutions,--institutions of culture and regimen and cure, based on

the recognition of the actual human constitution and laws,--based on

an observation as diligent and subtle, and precepts as severe as those

which we apply to the culture of any other form in nature,--that is

the proposition. 'It were a strange _speech_ which, spoken or spoken

oft, should reclaim a man from a vice to which he is by nature

subject.' 'Folly is not to be cured by bare admonition.' This plan of

culture and cure involves not the knowledge of that nature which is in

all men only, but a science, enriched with most careful collections of

all the specific varieties of that nature. The fullest natural history

of those forces that are operant in the hourly life of man, the most

profound and subtle observation of the facts of this history, the most

thoroughly scientific collection of them, make the beginning of this

enterprise. The propounder of this cure will have to begin with the

secret disposition of every man laid open, and the possibilities of

human character exhausted, by means of a dissection of the entire form

of that human nature, which every man carries with him, and a

solar-microscopic exhibition of the several dispositions and tempers

of men, in grand ideal portraits, conspicuous instances of them, where

the particular disposition and temper is 'predominant,' as in the

characterisation of Hamlet, where it takes all the persons of the

drama to exhibit characteristics which are more or less developed in

all men. Those natural peculiarities of disposition that work so

incessantly and potently in this human business, those 'points of

nature,' those predetermining forces of the human life, must come

under observation here, and the whole nature of the passions also, and

a science of 'the will,' very different from that philosophy of it

which our metaphysicians have entertained us with so long. He will

have all the light of science, all the power of the new method brought

to bear on this study. And he will have a similar collection, not less

scientific, of the history of the human fortunes and their necessary

effects on character; for these are the points that we must deal with

'by way of application, and to these all our labour is limited and

tied; for we cannot fit a garment except we take a measure of the form

we would fit it to.' Nothing short of this can serve as the basis of a

scientific system of human education.

But this is not all. It is the human nobility and greatness that is

the end, and that 'craves,' as the noble who is found wanting in it

tells us, 'a noble cunning.' It is no single instrumentality that

makes the apparatus of this culture and cure. Skilful combinations of

appliances based on the history of those forces which _are_ within our

power, which 'we _can_ deal with by way of alteration,' forces 'from

which the _mind suffereth_,' which have operation on it, so potent

that 'they can almost change the stamp of nature,'--that they can make

indeed, 'another nature,'--these are the engines,--this is the

machinery which the scientific state will employ for its ends. These

are the engines, this is the machinery that is going to take the place

of that apparatus which the state, as it is, finds such need of. This

is the machinery to 'prevent the fiend,' which the scientific

statesman is propounding.

'I would we were all of ONE MIND, and one mind _good_' says our Poet.

'O _there_ were desolation of gallowses and gaolers. I speak against

my present profit,' [he adds,--he was speaking not as a judge or a

lawyer, but as a _gaoler_,] 'I speak against my present profit, but my

wish hath a _preferment_ in it.'

(A _preferment_?)--That is the solution propounded by science, of the

problem that is pressing on us, and urging on us with such violent

appeals, its solution. 'I would we were all of one _mind_, and one

mind _good_. My wish hath a _preferment_ in it.'

'Folly is not to be cured by bare admonition.' 'It were a strange

speech which, spoken, or spoken oft, should cure a man of _a vice_ to

which he is _by nature subject_,'--_subject_--by _nature_.--That is

the _Philosopher_. 'What _he cannot help in his nature_ you account _a

vice_ in him,' says the poor citizen, putting in a word on the

_Poet's_ behalf for Coriolanus whose education, whatever Volumnia may

think about it, was not scientific, or calculated to reduce that

'partliness,' that disorganizing social principle, whose subsequent

demonstrations gave her so much offence. Not admonition, not preaching

and scolding, and not books only, but institutions, laws, customs,

habit, education in its more limited sense, 'association, emulation,

praise, blame,' all the agencies 'from which the mind suffereth,'--

which have power to change it, in skilfully compounded recipes and

regimen scientifically adapted to cases, and not prescribed only, but

enforced,--_these_ make the state machinery--these are the engines

that are going to 'prevent the fiend,' and educate the 'one mind,'--

_the one mind good_, which is the sovereign of the common-WEAL,--'my

wish hath a preferment in it,'--the one only man who will make when he

is crowned, not Rome, but _room_ enough for us all,--who will make

when he is crowned such desolation of gallowses and gaolers. These are

the remedies for the diseases of the state, when the scientific

practitioner is called in at last, and permitted to undertake his

cure. But he will not wait for that. He will not wait to be asked. He

has no delicacy about pushing himself forward in this business. The

concentration of genius and science on it, henceforth,--the _gradual_

adaptation of all these grand remedial agencies to this common end,--

this end which all truly enlightened minds will conspire for,--find to

be _their own_,--this is the plan;--this is the sober day-dream of

the Elizabethan Reformer; this is the plot of the Elizabethan

Revolutionist. This is the radicalism that he is setting on foot.

This is the cure of the state which he is undertaking.

We want to command effects, and the way to do that is to find causes;

and we must find them according to the new method, and not by

reasoning it thus and thus, for the result is just the same, this

philosopher observes, as if we had not reasoned it thus and thus, but

some other way. That is the difficulty with that method, which is in

use here at present, which this philosopher calls 'common logic.' Life

goes on, life as it is and was, in the face of our reasonings; but it

goes on in the dark; the phenomena are on the surface in the form of

EFFECTS, and all our weal and woe is in them; but the CAUSES are

beneath unexplored. They are able to give us certain impressions of

their _natures_; they strike us, and blast us, it may be, by way of

teaching us _something_ of their powers; but _we do not know them_;

they are within our own souls and lives, and we do not _know_ them;

not because they lie without the range of a scientific enquiry, but

_because_ we will not apply to them _the scientific method_; because

the old method of 'preconception' here is still considered the true

one.

The plan of this great scientific enterprise was one which embraced,

from the first, the whole body of the common-weal. It concerned itself

immediately and directly with all the parts and members of the social

state, from the king on his throne to the beggar in his straw. Its aim

was to disclose ultimately, and educate in every member of society

that entire and noble form of human nature which 'each man carries

with him,' and whereby the individual man is naturally and

constitutionally a member of the common-weal. Its proposition was to

develop ultimately and educate--successfully educate--in each integer

of the state, the integral principle--the principle whereby in man the

true conservation and integrity of the part--the virtue, and felicity,

and perfection, of the part, tend to the weal of the whole--tend to

perfect and advance the whole.

'To thine own self be true,

And it doth follow as the night the day,

Thou canst not then be false to any MAN.'

'Know thy-SELF. Know thy-self.'

This enterprise was not the product of a single individual mind, and

it is important that this fact should be fully and unmistakeably

enunciated here; because the illustrious statesman, and man of

letters, who assumed, in his own name and person, that part of it

which could then be openly exhibited, the one on whom the great task

of perfecting and openly propounding the new method of learning was

devolved, is the one whose relation to this enterprise has been

principally insisted on in this volume.

The history of this great philanthropic association--an association of

genius, a combination of chief minds, from which the leadership and

direction of the modern ages proceeds, the history of this

'_society_,' as it was called, when the term was still fresh in that

special application; at least, when it was not yet qualified by its

application to those very different kinds of voluntary individual

combinations--'bodies of neighbourhood' within the larger whole, to

which that movement has given rise; the history of _this_

society,--this first 'Shake-spear Society'--much as it is to our

purpose, and much as it is to the particular purpose of this volume,

can only be incidentally treated here. But as this work was originally

prepared for publication in the HISTORICAL KEY to the Elizabethan

Tradition which formed the FIRST BOOK of it, it was the part of that

great Political and Military Chief, and not less illustrious Man of

Letters, who was recognised, in his own time, as the beginner of this

movement and the founder of English philosophy, which was chiefly

developed.

And it is the history of that 'great unknown'--that great Elizabethan

unknown, for whose designs there was needed then a veil of a closer

texture--of a more cunning pattern than any which the exigencies of

modern authorship tend to fabricate, which must make the key to this

tradition;--it is the history of that great unknown, whose incognito

was a closed vizor,--that it was death to open,--a vizor that _did_

open once, and--the sequel is in our history, and will leave 'a brand'

upon the page which that age makes in it,--'the age that _did_ it, and

_suffered_ it, _to the end of the world_.' So says _the Poet_ of that

age, ('Age, thou are shamed.' 'And peep about to find ourselves

_dishonourable graves_'). It is the history of the Tacitus who could

not wait for a better Caesar. It is the history of the man who was

sent to the block, _they_ tell us, who are able to give us those

little secret historic motives that do not get woven always into the

larger story; it is the history of the man who (if his family

understood it) was sent to the block for the repetition, in his own

name, of the words--the very words which he had written with his

'goose-pen,' as he calls it, years before--which he had written under

cover of the 'spear' that was 'shaken' in sport, or that shook with

fear,--under cover of 'the well turned and true filled lines in each

of which he seems to _shake a lance as brandished_ in the eyes of

_Ignorance_,' without suspicion--without challenge, from the crowned

Ignorance, or the Monster that crowned it. It is the history of this

unknown, obscure, unhonoured Father of the Modern Age that _unlocks_

this tradition.

It is the secret friend and 'brother' of the author of the Novum

Organum, whose history unlocks this tradition. And when shall the

friendship of such 'a twain' gladden our earth again, and build its

'eternal summer' in our common things? When shall a 'marriage of true

minds' so even be celebrated on the lips and in the lives of men

again? It is the friend and literary partner of our great recognised

philosopher--his partner in his 'private and retired arts,' and in his

cultivation of 'the principal and supreme sciences,' in whose history

the key to this locked up learning is hidden.

It was an enterprise which originated in the Court of Queen Elizabeth,

in that little company of wits, and poets, and philosophers, which was

the first-fruit of the new development of the national genius, that

followed the revival of the learning of antiquity in this island--the

fruit which that old stock began manifestly to bud and blossom with,

about the beginning of the latter half of that Queen's reign. For it

was the old northern genius, under the influence, not of the revival

of the learning of antiquity only, but of that accumulated influence

which its previous revival on the Continent brought with it here;

under the influence, too, of that insular nurture, which began so soon

to colour and insulate English history;--'Britain is a world by

itself,' says Prince Cloten, 'and we will nothing pay,' etc.--it was

the old northern genius nurtured in the cradle of that 'bravery' which

had written its page of fire in the Roman Caesar's story--which had

arrested the old classic historian's pen, and fired it with a poet's

prophecy, and taught _him_ too how to pronounce from the old _British_

hero's lip the burning speech of _English_ freedom;--it was that which

began to show itself here, then, in that new tongue, which we call the

'_Elizabethan_.' It was that which could not fit its words to its

mouth as it had a mind to do under those conditions, and was glad to

know that 'the audience was deferred.' That was the thing which found

itself so much embarrassed by the presence of 'a man of prodigious

fortune at the table,' who had leave 'to change its arguments with a

magisterial authority.' It was that which was expected to produce its

speech to 'serve as the base matter to illuminate'--not the

_Caesar_--but the Tudor--the Tudor and the Stuart: the last of the

Tudors and the first of the Stuarts. 'AGE, _thou_ art shamed.' It was

the true indigenous product of the English nationality under that

great stimulus, which made that age; and the practical determination

of the English mind, and the spirit of the ancient English liberties,

the recognition of the common dignity of that form of human nature

which each man carries entire with him--the sentiment of a common

human family and brotherhood, which this race had brought with it from

the forests of the North, and which it had conserved through ages of

oppression, went at once into the new speculation, and determined its

practical bent, and shaped this enterprise.

It was an enterprise which included in its plan of operations an

immediate influence upon the popular mind--the most direct, immediate,

and radically reforming influences which could be brought to bear,

under those conditions, upon the habits and sentiments of the

ignorant, custom-bound masses of men;--those masses which are, in all

their ignorance and unfitness for rule, as the philosopher of this age

perceived, 'that greater part which carries it'--those wretched

statesmen, under whose rule we are all groaning. 'Questions about

clothes, and cookery, and law chicanery,' are the questions with which

the new movement begins to attract attention--a universally favourable

attention--towards its beneficent purposes, and to that new command of

'effects' which arms them. But this is only 'to show an abused people

that they are not wholly forgotten.' To improve the external condition

of men, to 'accommodate' man to those exterior natural forces, of

which he had been, till then, the 'slave,'--to minister to the need

and add to the comforts of the king in his palace, and 'Tom' in his

hovel,--this was the first scientific move. This was a movement which

required no concealment. Its far-reaching consequences, its elevating

power on the masses, its educational power, its revolutionary power,

did not lie within the range of any observation which the impersonated

state was able to bring to bear at that time upon the New Organum and

its reaches.

But this was not the only scientifically educational agency which this

great Educational Association was able to include, even then, in its

scheme for the culture and instruction of the masses--for the culture

and instruction of that common social unit, which makes the masses and

determines political predominance. Quite the most powerful

instrumentality which it is possible to conceive of, for purposes of

direct effect in the way of intellectual and moral stimulus, in that

stage of a popular development, was then already in process of

preparation here; the 'plant' of a wondrous and inestimable machinery

of popular influence stood offering itself, at that very moment, to

the politicians with whom this movement originated, urging itself on

their notice, begging to be purchased, soliciting their monopoly,

proposing itself to their designs.

A medium of direct communication between the philosophic mind, in its

more chosen and noblest field of research, and the minds of those to

whom the conventional signs of learning are not yet intelligible,--one

in which the language of action and dumb show was, by the condition of

the representation, predominant,--that language which is, as this

philosophy observed, so much more powerful in its impression than

words,--not on brutes only, but on those 'whose eyes are more learned

than their ears,'--a medium of communication which was one tissue of

that 'mute' language, whereby the direction, 'how to _sustain_ a

tyranny _newly usurped_,' was conveyed once, stood prepared to their

hands, waiting the dictation of the message of these new Chiefs and

Teachers, who had taken their cue from Machiavel in exhibiting the

arts of government, and who thought it well enough that the people

_should_ know how to _preserve_ tyrannies _newly usurped_.

Those 'amusements,' with which governments that are founded and

sustained, 'by cutting off and _keeping low_ the grandees and

nobility' of a nation, naturally seek to propitiate and divert the

popular mind,--those amusements which the peoples who sustain

tyrannies are apt to be fond of--'he loves no plays as _thou_ dost,

_Antony_,'--that 'pulpit,' from which the orator of Caesar stole and

swayed the hearts of the people with his sugared words; and his dumb

show of the stabs in Caesar's mantle became, in the hands of these new

conspirators, an engine which those old experimenters lacked,--an

engine which the lean and wrinkled Cassius, with his much reading and

'observation strange' and dangerous, looking through of the thoughts

of men; and the grave, high-toned Brutus, with his logic and his

stilted oratory, could not, on second thoughts, afford to lack. It was

this which supplied the means of that 'volubility of application'

which those 'Sir Oracles,' those 'grave sirs of note,' 'in observing

their well-graced forms of speech,' it is intimated, 'might easily

want.'

By means of that 'first use of the parable,' whereby (while for the

present we drop 'the argument') it serves to illustrate, and bring

first under the notice of the senses, the abstruser truths of a new

learning,--truths which are as yet too far out of the road of common

opinion to be conveyed in other forms,--these amusements became, in

the hands of the new Teachers and Wise Men, with whom the Wisdom of

the Moderns had its beginning, the means of an insidious, but most

'grave and exceedingly useful,' popular instruction.

But the immediate influence on the common mind was not the influence

to which this association trusted for the fulfilment of its great plan

of social renovation and advancement. That so aspiring _social_

position, and that not less commanding position in the world of

letters, built up with so much labour, with such persistent purpose,

with a pertinacity which accepted of no defeat,--built up _expressly_

to this end,--that position from which a new method of learning could

be openly propounded, in the face of the schools, in the face of the

Universities, in the face and eyes of all the Doctors of Learning

then, was, in itself, no unimportant part of the machinery which this

political association was compelled to include in the plot of its

far-reaching enterprise.

That trumpet-call which rang through Europe, which summoned the

scholasticism and genius of the modern ages, from the endless battles

of the human dogmas and conceits, into the field of true

knowledge,--that summons which recalled, and disciplined, and gave the

word of command to the genius of the modern ages, that was already

tumultuously rushing thither,--that call which was _able_ to command

the modern learning, and impose on it, for immediate use, the New

Machine of Learning,--that Machine which, even in its employment in

the humblest departments of observation, has already formed, ere we

know it, the new mind, which has disciplined and trained the modern

intelligence, and created insidiously new habits of judgment and

_belief_,--created, too, a new stock of truths, which are accepted as

a part of the world's creed, and from which the whole must needs be

evolved in time,--this, in itself, was no small step towards securing

the great ends of this enterprise. It was a step which we are hardly

in a position, as yet, to estimate. We cannot see what it was till the

nobler applications of this Method begin to be made. It has cost us

something while we have waited for these. The letter to Sir Henry

Savile, on 'the Helps to the Intellectual Powers,' which is referred

to with so much more iteration and emphasis than anything which the

surface of the letter exhibits would seem to bear, in its brief hints,

points also this way, though the effect of mental exercises, by means

of other instrumentalities, on the habits of a larger class, is also

comprehended in it. But the formation of new intellectual habits in

men liberally educated, appeared to promise, ultimately, those larger

fruits in the advancement and culture of learning which, in 'the

hour-glass' of that first movement, could be, as yet, only prophecy

and anticipation. The perfection of the Human Science, then first

propounded, the filling up of 'the Anticipations' of Learning, which

the Philosophy of _Science_ also included in its system,--not rash and

premature, however, and not claiming _the place_ of _knowledge_, but

kept apart in a place by themselves,--put down as anticipations, _not

interpretations_,--the filling up of this outline was what was

expected as the ultimate result of this proceeding, in the department

of speculative philosophy.

But in that great practical enterprise of a social and political

renovation--that enterprise of 'constructions' according to true

definitions, which this science fastens its eye on, and never ceases

to contemplate--it was not the immediate effect on the popular mind,

neither was it the gradual effect on the speculative habits of men of

learning and men of intelligence in general, that was chiefly relied

on. It was the secret tradition, the living tradition of that

intention; it was the tradition whereby that association undertook to

continue itself across whatever gulfs and chasms in social history

'the fortunes of our state' might make. It was that _second_ use of

the fable, which is 'to wrap up and conceal'; it was that 'enigmatic'

method, which reserves the secrets of learning for those 'who by the

aid of an instructor, or by their own research, are able to pierce the

veil,' which was relied on for this result. It was the _power_ of that

tradition, its generative power, its power to reproduce 'in a better

hour' the mind and will of that 'company'--it was its power to develop

and frame that _identity_ which was the secret of this association,

and its new principle of UNION--that identity of the 'one mind, and

one mind good,' which is the human principle of union--that identity

which made a common name, a common personality, for those who worked

together for that end, and whose WILL in it was '_one_.' A name, a

personality, a philosophic unity, in whose great radiance we have

basked so long--a name, a personality whose secret lies heavy on all

our learning--whose secret of power, whose secret of inclusiveness and

inexhaustible wealth of knowledge, has paralysed all our criticism,

'made marble'--as Milton himself confesses--'made marble with _too

much conceiving_.' 'Write me a prologue, and let the prologue _seem_

to say [in dumb action], we will do no harm with our swords.' 'They

all flourish their swords.' 'There is but _one mind_ in all these men,

and that is bent against Caesar'--Julius Caesar.

'Even so the race

Of SHAKE-SPEAR's mind and _manners brightly shines_,

In his _well turned_ and _true filed_--lines;

In each of which he seems to SHAKE a LANCE,

As _brandished_ at the eyes of--Ignorance,'

[We will do _no harm_, with our--WORDS [it _seems_ to

say.]--_Prologue_.]

It was the power of the Elizabethan Art of Tradition that was relied

on here, that 'living Art'; it was its power to reproduce this

Institution, through whatever fatal eventualities the movement which

these men were seeking then to anticipate, and organize, and control,

might involve; and though the Parent Union _should be_ overborne in

those disastrous, not unforeseen, results--overborne and

forgotten--and though other means employed for securing that end

should fail.

It is to that posthumous effect that all the hope points here. It is

the _Leonatus Posthumus_ who must fulfil this oracle.

'Now with the drops of this most balmy time

My love looks fresh, and death to me subscribes;

Since, spite of him, I'LL live in this poor rhyme,

While he insults o'er dull and speechless tribes;

And _thou_ in this shall find thy monument,

When _tyrants' crests and tombs of brass_ are spent.'

'Not marble, nor the gilded monuments [_Elizabethan_ AGE.]

Of _Princes_ shall outlive this _power_-ful rhyme.'

[This is our unconscious Poet, who does not know that his poems are

worth printing, or that they are going to get printed--who does not

know or care whether they are or not.]

'But you shall shine more bright in these contents,

Than unswept stone besmear'd with sluttish time.

When wasteful war _shall statues_ overturn [iconoclasm],

And _broils_ [civil war] root out the work of masonry,

Nor Mars his sword, nor war's quick fire shall burn

The _living record_ of _your memory_.'

[What is it, then, that this prophet is relying on? Is it a

manuscript? Is it the recent invention of goose-quills which he is

celebrating here with so much lyrical pomp, in so many, many lyrics?

Here, for instance:--]

'His _beauty_ shall in _these black lines_ be seen,

And _they_ shall live, and he in them still green.'

And here--

'O where, alack!

Shall _time's best jewel_ from _time's chest_ lie hid?

Or what _strong hand_ can hold his swift foot back?

Or _who_ his spoil of beauty can forbid?

O none, unless _this_ miracle [this _miracle_] have might,

that in _black ink_--'

Is this printer's ink? Or is it the ink of the prompter's book? or the

fading ink of those loose papers, so soon to be 'yellowed with age,'

scattered about no one knew where, that some busy-body, who had

nothing else to do, might perhaps take it into his head to save?

'_O none_, unless this miracle'--THIS MIRACLE, the rejoicing scholar

and man of letters, who was not for an age, but for all time,

cries--defying tyranny, laughing at princes' edicts, reaching into his

own great assured futurity across the gulfs of civil war, planting his

feet upon that sure ground, and singing songs of triumph over the

spent tombs of brass and tyrants' crests; like that orator who was to

make an oration _in public_, and found himself a little straitened in

_time_ to fit his words to his mouth _as he had a mind to do_, when

_Eros_, one of his _slaves_, brought him word that the audience was

deferred till the next day; at which he was so _ravished with joy_,

that he _enfranchised him_. '_This miracle_.' He knows what miracles

are, for he has told us; but none other knew _what_ miracle this was

that he is celebrating here with all this wealth of symphonies.

'O _none_, unless this miracle have might,

That in black ink _my_ love may still _shine bright_.'

['My love,'--wait till you know what it is, and do not think to know

with the first or second reading of poems, that are on the surface of

them scholastic, academic, mystical, obtrusively enigmatical. Perhaps,

after all, it is _that_ Eros who was _enfranchised_, emancipated.]

'But thy eternal summer shall not fade,

Nor lose possession of that _fair_ thou _owest_ [thou _owes_!],

Nor shall death brag thou wanderest in his shade,

When in _eternal lines_ to time thou growest.

So long as men can breathe, or eyes can see,

So _long_ lives _this_, and this _gives life_ to--thee!

But here is our prophecy, which we have undertaken to read with the

aid of this collation:--

'When wasteful war shall statues overturn,

And broils root out the work of masonry;

Nor Mars his sword, nor war's quick fire shall burn

The _living_ record of your memory.

'Gainst death, _and_ all _oblivious enmity_,

_Shall_ YOU _pace forth_. _Your_ praise shall still find room,

Even _in the eyes_ [collateral sounds] _of all posterity_,

That wear this world out to the ending doom.

_So_, till _the_ JUDGMENT that YOURSELF _arise_ [_till_ then],

You live in _this_, and dwell in _lovers_' eyes.'

See the passages at the commencement of this chapter, if there be any

doubt as to this reading.

'In lover's _eyes_.'

_Leonatus Posthumus_. Shall's have a Play of _this_? Thou scornful Page,

There lie _thy part_. [To _Imogen_ disguised as _Fidele_.]

The consideration which qualified, in the mind of the Author of the

Advancement of Learning, the great difficulty which the question of

civil government presented at that time, is the key to this 'plot.'

For men, and not 'Romans' only, 'are like sheep;' and if you can but

get some _few_ to go right, the _rest will follow_. That was the plan.

To create a better leadership of men,--to form a new order and union

of men,--a new nobility of men, acquainted with the doctrine of their

own nature, and in league for its advancement, to seize _the

'thoughts_' of those whose law is the law of the larger activity, and

'_inform_ them with nobleness,'--was the plan.

For these the inner school was opened; for these its ascending

platforms were erected. For these that 'closet' and 'cabinet,' where

the 'simples' of the Shake-spear philosophy are all locked and

labelled, was built. For these that secret 'cabinet of the Muses,'

where the Delphic motto is cut anew, throws out its secret lures,--its

gay, many-coloured, deceiving lures,--its secret labyrinthine

clues,--for all lines in this building meet in that centre. All clues

here unwind to that. For these--for the minds on whom the continuation

of this enterprise was by will devolved, the key to that cabinet--the

historical key to its inmost compartment of philosophic mysteries, was

carefully laboured and left,--pointed to--pointed to with immortal

gesticulations, and left ('What I cannot speak, I point out with my

finger'); the key to that '_Verulamian_ cabinet,' which we shall hear

of when the _fictitious_ correspondence in which the more secret

history of this time was written, comes to be opened. That cabinet

where the subtle argument that was inserted in the Poem or the Play,

but buried there in its gorgeous drapery, is laid bare in prose as

subtle ('I here scatter it up and down indifferently for verse');

where the new truth that was spoken in jest, as well as in parables,

to those who were without, is unfolded,--that truth which moved unseen

amid the gambols of the masque,--preferring to raise questions rather

than _objections_,--which stalked in, without suspicion, in 'the

hobby-horse' of the clown,--which the laugh of the groundlings was so

often in requisition to cover,--that 'to _beguile_ the time looked

_like the time_,'--that 'looked like _the flower_, and _was_ the

serpent under it.'

For these that secret place of confidential communication was

provided, where 'the argument' of all these Plays is opened without

respect to the 'offence in it,'--to its utmost reach of abstruseness

and subtlety--in its utmost reach of departure from 'the road of

common opinion,'--where the Elizabethan secrets of Morality, and

Policy and Religion, which made the Parables of the New Doctrine, are

unrolled, at last, in all the new, artistic glories of that 'wrapped

up' intention. This is the second use of the Fable in which we resume

that dropped argument,--dropped for that time, while Caesar still

commanded his thirty legions; and when the question, 'How long to

philosophise?' being started in the schools again, the answer returned

still was, 'Until our armies cease to be commanded by fools.' This is

that second use of the Fable where we find the moral of it at

last,--that moral which our moralists have missed in it,--that moral

which is not 'vulgar and common-place,' but abstruse, and out of the

road of common opinion,--that moral in which the Moral Science, which

is _the Wisdom of the Moderns_, lurks.

It is to these that the Wise Man of our ages speaks (for we have

him,--we do not wait for him), in the act of displaying a little, and

folding up for the future, his plan of a Scientific Human Culture; it

is to these that he speaks when he says, with a little of that

obscurity which 'he mortally hates, and would avoid if he could': 'As

Philocrates sported with Demosthenes,' you may not marvel, Athenians,

that Demosthenes and I do differ, for _he_ drinketh water, and _I_

drink wine; and like as we read of an ancient parable of the two gates

of sleep '... so if we put on _sobriety_ and _attention_, we shall

find it _a sure maxim in knowledge_, that the pleasant liquor of wine

is the more vaporous, and the braver gate of ivory sendeth forth the

falser dreams.' ['_I_,' says 'Michael,' who is also in favour of

'sobriety,' and critical upon excesses of all kinds, '_I_ have ever

observed, that _super_-celestial theories and _sub_-terranean

_manners_ are in singular accordance.']

And in his general proposal to lay open 'those parts of learning which

lie fresh and waste, and not improved and converted by the industry of

man, to the end that such _a plot_, made and committed to memory, may

both minister light to any public designation, and also serve to

excite _voluntary_ endeavours,' he says, 'I do foresee that of those

things which I shall enter and register as deficiencies and omissions,

many will conceive and censure that some of them are already done, and

extant, _others to be but curiosities_ and things of no _great use_'

[such as the question of style, for instance, and those 'particular'

arts of tradition to which this remark is afterwards applied]--and

others to be of too great difficulty--and almost impossibility--to be

compassed and effected; but for _the two first, I refer myself to

particulars_; for the last,--touching impossibility,--I take it those

things are to be held possible, which may be done by _some person_,

though not _by every one_; and which may be done by _many_, though not

by _any_ one; and which may be done in succession of ages, though

_not_ within the hour-glass of one man's life; and which may be done

by _public designation_, though not by private endeavour.

That was 'the plot'--that was the plan of the Elizabethan Innovation.

THE ENIGMA OF LEONATUS POSTHUMUS.

'When as a lion's whelp shall, to himself unknown, without

seeking find, and be embraced by a piece of tender air; and

when from a stately cedar shall be lopped branches, which,

being dead many years, shall after revive, be jointed to the

old stock, and freshly grow; then shall Posthumus end his

miseries, Britain be _fortunate_, and flourish in peace and

plenty.'

THE VERULAMIAN CABINET, AND ITS WORKMANSHIP.

Here, for instance, is a specimen of the manner in which scholars who

write about these times, allude to the reserved parts of this

philosophy, and to those 'richer and bolder meanings,' which could not

then be inserted in the acknowledged writings of so great a person.

This is a specimen of the manner in which a posthumous collection and

reintegration of this philosophy, and a posthumous emancipation of it,

is referred to, by scholars who write from the Continent somewhere

about these days. Whether the date of the writing be a little earlier

or a little later,--some fifty years or so,--it does not seem to make

much difference as to the general intent and purport of it.

Here is a scholar, for instance, whose main idea of life on this

planet it appears to be, to collect the philosophy, and protect the

posthumous fame of the Lord Bacon. For this purpose, he has

established a literary intimacy, quite the most remarkable one on

record--at least, between scholars of different and remote

nationalities--between himself and two English gentlemen, a Mr. Smith,

and the Rev. Dr. Rawley. He writes from _the Hague_ but he appears to

have acquired in some way a most extraordinary insight into this

business.

'Though I thought that I had already _sufficiently showed_ what

veneration I had for the illustrious Lord Verulam, yet I shall take

such care for _the future_, that it may not possibly be denied, that I

endeavoured most zealously to make this thing known to _the learned

world_. But neither shall this design of setting forth _in one volume

all the Lord Bacon's works, proceed without consulting you_'--[This

letter is addressed to the Rev. Dr. _Rawley_, and is dated a number of

years after Lord Bacon's death]--'without consulting you, and without

inviting _you_ to cast in _your symbol_, worthy such an excellent

edition: that so the _appetite_ of the reader'--[It was a time when

symbols of various kinds--large and small--were much in use in the

learned world]--'that so the _appetite_ of the reader, provoked

already by his _published_ works, may be further gratified _by the

pure novelty of so considerable an appendage_.

'For the _French interpreter_, who patched together his things I know

not whence, and tacked that motley piece to him; they shall not have

place in this great collection. But _yet_ I hope to obtain your leave

to publish a-part, as _an appendix_ to _the Natural History_,--_that

exotic work_,--_gathered together_ from _this and the other place_

(_of his lordship's writings_), [that is the true account of it] and

by me translated into--_Latin_.

'For seeing the genuine pieces of the Lord Bacon are already extant,

and in many hands, it is necessary that _the foreign reader_ be given

to understand _of what threads the texture of that book consists_, and

how much of truth there is in that which that shameless person does,

in his preface to the reader, so stupidly write of you.

'My brother, of blessed memory, turned his words _into Latin_, in the

First Edition of the Natural History, having some suspicion of the

fidelity of an unknown author. I will, in the Second Edition, repeat

them, and with just severity animadvert upon them: that they, into

whose hands that work comes, may know it to be rather patched up of

many distinct pieces; how much soever the author _bears himself upon

the specious title of Verulam. Unless, perhaps_, I should particularly

suggest _in your name_, that these words were _there inserted_, by way

of _caution_; and lest malignity and rashness should any way blemish

the fame of so eminent a person.

'If my fate would permit me to live according to my wishes, I would

fly over into England, that I might behold whatsoever remaineth in

your Cabinet of the Verulamian workmanship, and at least make my eyes

witnesses of it, if the possession of the merchandise be yet denied to

the public. At present I will support the wishes of my impatient

desire, _with hope of seeing, one day, those_ (_issues_) which _being

committed to faithful privacy, wait the time till they may safely see

the light_, and not be _stifled_ in their birth.

'I wish, _in the mean time_, I could have a sight of the copy of the

Epistle to Sir Henry Savil, concerning the Helps of the Intellectual

Powers: for I am persuaded, as to the _other Latin_ remains, that I

shall not obtain,_for present use_, the removal of _them_ from the

place in which they now are.'

Extract of a letter from Mr. Isaac Gruter. Here is the beginning of

it:--

'TO THE REV. WM. RAWLEY, D.D.

'Isaac Gruter wisheth much health.

'Reverend Sir,--It is not just to complain of the slowness of your

answer, seeing that _the difficulty of the passage_, in the season in

which you wrote, _which was towards winter_, might _easily_ cause it

to come _no faster_; seeing _likewise_ there is so much to be found in

it which may gratify desire, and _perhaps so much the more, the longer

it was ere it came to my hands_. And although I had little to send

back, besides my thanks for _the little Index_, yet _that seemed to me

of such moment_ that I would no longer _suppress_ them: especially

because I accounted it a crime to have suffered _Mr. Smith_ to have

been without an answer: Mr. Smith, my most kind friend, and to whose

care, in my matters, I owe _all regard_ and affection, yet without

diminution of that (part and that no small one neither) in which Dr.

Rawley hath place. So that the souls of us three, so throughly

agreeing, may be aptly said to have united in a _triga_.'

It is not necessary, of course, to deny the historical claims of the

Rev. Dr. Rawley, who is sufficiently authenticated; or even of Mr.

Smith himself, who would no doubt be able to substantiate himself, in

case a particular inquiry were made for him; and it would involve a

serious departure from the method of invention usually employed in

this association, which did not deal with shadows when contemporary

instrumentalities were in requisition, if the solidarity of Mr. Isaac

Gruter himself should admit of a moment's question. The precautions of

this secret, but so powerful league,--the skill with which its

instrumentalities were selected and adapted to its ends, is

characterised by that same matchless dramatic power, which betrays

'the source from which it springs' even when it 'only plays at

working.'

But if any one is anxious to know who the _third person_ of this triga

really was, or is, a glance at the Directory would enable such a one

to arrive at a truer conclusion than the first reading of this letter

would naturally suggest. For this is none other than the person whom

the principle of this triga, and its enlightened sentiment and bond of

union, already _symbolically_ comprehended, whom it was intended to

comprehend ultimately in all the multiplicity and variety of his

historical manifestations, though it involved a deliberate plan for

reducing and suppressing his many-headedness, and restoring him to the

use of his one only mind. For though the name of this person is often

spelt in three letters, and oftener in one, it takes all the names in

the Directory to spell it in full. For this is none other than the

person that '_Michael_' refers to so often and with so much emphasis,

glancing always at his own private name, and the singular largeness

and comprehensiveness of his particular and private constitution. 'All

the world knows me in my book, and my book in me.' '_I_, the first of

any, by my universal being. Every man carries with him the entire form

of human condition.'

But the name of Mr. _Isaac Gruter_ was not less comprehensive, and

could be made to represent the whole _triga_ in an emergency, as well

as another; ['I take so great pleasure in being judged and known that

it is almost indifferent to me in _which of the two forms_ I am so']

though that does not hinder him from inviting Dr. Eawley to cast in

_his symbol_, which was 'so _considerable an appendage_.' For though

the very smallest circle sometimes represents it, it was none other

than the symbol that gave name to the theatre in which the illustrated

works of this school were first exhibited; the theatre which hung out

for its sign on the outer wall, 'Hercules and his load too.' At a time

when 'conceits' and 'devices in letters,' when anagrams and monograms,

and charades, and all kinds of 'racking of orthography' were so much

in use, not as curiosities merely, but to avoid another kind of

'racking,' a cipher referred to in this philosophy as the 'wheel

cipher,' which required the letters of the alphabet to be written in a

circle to serve as a key to the reading, supplies a clue to some of

these symbols. _The first three letters_ of the alphabet representing

the whole _in_ the circle, formed a character or symbol which was

often made to stand as a 'token' for a proper name, easily spelt in

that way, when phonography and anagrams were in such lively and

constant use,--while it made, at the same time, a symbolical

representation of the radical doctrine of the new school in

philosophy,--a school then _so_ new, that its 'Doctors' were compelled

to 'pray in the aid of simile,' even in affixing their names to their

own works, in some cases. And that same letter which was capable of

representing in this secret language either the _microcosm_, or 'the

larger whole,' as the case required (either with, or without the _eye_

or _I_ in it, sending rays to the circumference) sufficed also to

spell the name of the Grand Master of this lodge,--'who also was a

_man_, take him for _all in all_,'--the man who took two hemispheres

for '_his symbol_.' That was the so considerable appendage which his

friend alludes to,--though 'the natural gaiety of disposition,' of

which we have so much experience in other places, and which the

gravity of these pursuits happily does not cloud, suggests a glance in

passing at another signification, which we find alluded to also in

another place in Mrs. Quickly's '_Latin_.' Mere frivolities as these

conceits and private and retired arts seem now, the Author of the

Advancement of Learning tells us, that to those who have spent their

labours and studies in them, they seem great matters, referring

particularly to that cipher in which it is possible to write _omnia

per omnia_, and stopping to fasten the key of it to his 'index' of

'the principal and supreme sciences,'--those sciences 'which being

committed to _faithful_ privacy, wait the time when they may safely

see the light, and not be stifled in their birth.'

New constructions, according to true definitions, was _the

plan_,--this _triga_ was the initiative.

The Philosophy of the Plays of Shakspere Unfolded · 第 11 / 13 章