Nothing can convince us more fully of the complete mastery which

astronomers have at last acquired over these erratic bodies, than to

read in the Edinburgh Review for April, 1835, the paragraph containing

the final results of all the labors and anticipations of astronomers,

matured as they were, in readiness for the approaching visitant, and

then to compare the prediction with the event, as we saw it fulfilled a

few months afterwards. The paragraph was as follows: "On the whole, it

may be considered as tolerably certain, that the comet will become

visible in every part of Europe about the latter end of August, or

beginning of September, next. It will most probably be distinguishable

by the naked eye, like a star of the first magnitude, but with a duller

light than that of a planet, and surrounded with a pale nebulosity,

which will slightly impair its splendor. On the night of the seventh of

October, the comet will approach the well-known constellation of the

Great Bear; and between that and the eleventh, it will pass directly

through the seven conspicuous stars of that constellation, (the Dipper.)

Towards the end of November, the comet will plunge among the rays of the

sun, and disappear, and will not issue from them, on the other side,

until the end of December."

Let us now see how far the actual appearances corresponded to these

predictions. The comet was first discovered from the observatory at

Rome, on the morning of the fifth of August; by Professor Struve, at

Dorpat, on the twentieth; in England and France, on the twenty-third;

and at Yale College, by Professor Loomis and myself, on the

thirty-first. On the morning of that day, between two and three o'clock,

in obedience to the directions which the great minds that had marked out

its path among the stars had prescribed, we directed Clarke's telescope

(a noble instrument, belonging to Yale College) towards the

northeastern quarter of the heavens, and lo! there was the wanderer so

long foretold,--a dim speck of fog on the confines of creation. It came

on slowly, from night to night, increasing constantly in magnitude and

brightness, but did not become distinctly visible to the naked eye until

the twenty-second of September. For a month, therefore, astronomers

enjoyed this interesting spectacle before it exhibited itself to the

world at large. From this time it moved rapidly along the northern sky,

until, about the tenth of October, it traversed the constellation of the

Great Bear, passing a little above, instead of "through" the seven

conspicuous stars constituting the Dipper. At this time it had a

lengthened train, and became, as you doubtless remember, an object of

universal interest. Early in November, the comet ran down to the sun,

and was lost in his beams; but on the morning of December thirty-first,

I again obtained, through Clarke's telescope, a distinct view of it on

the other side of the sun, a moment before the morning dawn.

This return of Halley's comet was an astronomical event of transcendent

importance. It was the chronicler of ages, and carried us, by a few

steps, up to the origin of time. If a gallant ship, which has sailed

round the globe, and commanded successively the admiration of many great

cities, diverse in language and customs, is invested with a peculiar

interest, what interest must attach to one that has made the circuit of

the solar system, and fixed the gaze of successive worlds! So intimate,

moreover, is the bond which binds together all truths in one

indissoluble chain, that the establishment of one great truth often

confirms a multitude of others, equally important. Thus the return of

Halley's comet, in exact conformity with the predictions of astronomers,

established the truth of all those principles by which those predictions

were made. It afforded most triumphant proof of the doctrine of

universal gravitation, and of course of the received laws of physical

astronomy; it inspired new confidence in the power and accuracy of that

instrument (the calculus) by means of which its elements had been

investigated; and it proved that the different planets, which exerted

upon it severally a disturbing force proportioned to their quantity of

matter, had been correctly weighed, as in a balance.

I must now leave this wonderful body to pursue its sublime march far

beyond the confines of Uranus, (a distance it has long since reached,)

and take a hasty notice of two other comets, whose periodic returns have

also been ascertained; namely, those of Biela and Encke.

Biela's comet has a period of six years and three quarters. It has its

perihelion near the orbit of the earth, and its aphelion a little beyond

that of Jupiter. Its orbit, therefore, is far less eccentric than that

of Halley's comet; (see Frontispiece;) it neither approaches so near the

sun, nor departs so far from it, as most other known comets: some,

indeed, never come nearer to the sun than the orbit of Jupiter, while

they recede to an incomprehensible distance beyond the remotest planet.

We might even imagine that they would get beyond the limits of the sun's

attraction; nor is this impossible, although, according to La Place, the

solar attraction is sensible throughout a sphere whose radius is a

hundred millions of times greater than the distance of the earth from

the sun, or nearly ten thousand billions of miles.

Some months before the expected return of Biela's comet, in 1832, it was

announced by astronomers, who had calculated its path, that it would

cross the plane of the earth's orbit very near to the earth's path, so

that, should the earth happen at the time to be at that point of her

revolution, a collision might take place. This announcement excited so

much alarm among the ignorant classes in France, that it was deemed

expedient by the French academy, that one of their number should prepare

and publish an article on the subject, with the express view of

allaying popular apprehension. This task was executed by M. Arago. He

admitted that the earth would in fact pass so near the point where the

comet crossed the plane of its orbit, that, should they chance to meet

there, the earth would be enveloped in the nebulous atmosphere of the

comet. He, however, showed that the earth would not be near that point

at the same time with the comet, but fifty millions of miles from it.

The comet came at the appointed time, but was so exceedingly faint and

small, that it was visible only to the largest telescopes. In one

respect, its diminutive size and feeble light enhanced the interest with

which it was contemplated; for it was a sublime spectacle to see a body,

which, as projected on the celestial vault, even when magnified a

thousand times, seemed but a dim speck of fog, still pursuing its way,

in obedience to the laws of universal gravitation, with the same

regularity as Jupiter and Saturn. We are apt to imagine that a body,

consisting of such light materials that it can be compared only to the

thinnest fog, would be dissipated and lost in the boundless regions of

space; but so far is this from the truth, that, when subjected to the

action of the same forces of projection and solar attraction, it will

move through the void regions of space, and will describe its own orbit

about the sun with the same unerring certainty, as the densest bodies of

the system.

Encke's comet, by its frequent returns, (once in three and a third

years,) affords peculiar facilities for ascertaining the laws of its

revolution; and it has kept the appointments made for it with great

exactness. On its return in 1839, it exhibited to the telescope a

globular mass of nebulous matter, resembling fog, and moved towards its

perihelion with great rapidity. It makes its entire excursions within

the orbit of Jupiter.

But what has made Encke's comet particularly famous, is its having first

revealed to us the existence of a _resisting medium_ in the planetary

spaces. It has long been a question, whether the earth and planets

revolve in a perfect void, or whether a fluid of extreme rarity may not

be diffused through space. A perfect vacuum was deemed most probable,

because no such effects on the motions of the planets could be detected

as indicated that they encountered a resisting medium. But a feather, or

a lock of cotton, propelled with great velocity, might render obvious

the resistance of a medium which would not be perceptible in the motions

of a cannon ball. Accordingly, Encke's comet is thought to have plainly

suffered a retardation from encountering a resisting medium in the

planetary regions. The effect of this resistance, from the first

discovery of the comet to the present time, has been to diminish the

time of its revolution about two days. Such a resistance, by destroying

a part of the projectile force, would cause the comet to approach nearer

to the sun, and thus to have its periodic time shortened. The ultimate

effect of this cause will be to bring the comet nearer to the sun, at

every revolution, until it finally falls into that luminary, although

many thousand years will be required to produce this catastrophe. It is

conceivable, indeed, that the effects of such a resistance may be

counteracted by the attraction of one or more of the planets, near which

it may pass in its successive returns to the sun. Still, it is not

probable that this cause will exactly counterbalance the other; so that,

if there is such an elastic medium diffused through the planetary

regions, it must follow that, in the lapse of ages, every comet will

fall into the sun. Newton conjectured that this would be the case,

although he did not found his opinion upon the existence of such a

resisting medium as is now detected. To such an opinion he adhered to

the end of life. At the age of eighty-three, in a conversation with his

nephew, he expressed himself thus: "I cannot say when the comet of 1680

will fall into the sun; possibly after five or six revolutions; but

whenever that time shall arrive, the heat of the sun will be raised by

it to such a point, that our globe will be burned, and all the animals

upon it will perish."

Of the _physical nature_ of comets little is understood. The greater

part of them are evidently mere masses of vapor, since they permit very

small stars to be seen through them. In September, 1832, Sir John

Herschel, when observing Biela's comet, saw that body pass directly

between his eye and a small cluster of minute telescopic stars of the

sixteenth or seventeenth magnitude. This little constellation occupied a

space in the heavens, the breadth of which was not the twentieth part of

that of the moon; yet the whole of the cluster was distinctly visible

through the comet. "A more striking proof," says Sir John Herschel,

"could not have been afforded, of the extreme transparency of the matter

of which this comet consists. The most trifling fog would have entirely

effaced this group of stars, yet they continued visible through a

thickness of the comet which, calculating on its distance and apparent

diameter, must have exceeded fifty thousand miles, at least towards its

central parts." From this and similar observations, it is inferred, that

the nebulous matter of comets is vastly more rare than that of the air

we breathe, and hence, that, were more or less of it to be mingled with

the earth's atmosphere, it would not be perceived, although it might

possibly render the air unwholesome for respiration. M. Arago, however,

is of the opinion, that some comets, at least, have a solid nucleus. It

is difficult, on any other supposition, to account for the strong light

which some of them have exhibited,--a light sufficiently intense to

render them visible in the day-time, during the presence of the sun. The

intense heat to which comets are subject, in approaching so near the sun

as some of them do, is alleged as a sufficient reason for the great

expansion of the thin vapory atmospheres which form their tails; and the

inconceivable cold to which they are subject, in receding to such a

distance from the sun, is supposed to account for the condensation of

the same matter until it returns to its original dimensions. Thus the

great comet of 1680, at its perihelion, approached within one hundred

and forty-six thousand miles of the surface of the sun, a distance of

only one sixth part of the sun's diameter. The heat which it must have

received was estimated to be equal to twenty-eight thousand times that

which the earth receives in the same time, and two thousand times hotter

than red-hot iron. This temperature would be sufficient to volatilize

the most obdurate substances, and to expand the vapor to vast

dimensions; and the opposite effects of the extreme cold to which it

would be subject in the regions remote from the sun would be adequate to

condense it into its former volume. This explanation, however, does not

account for the direction of the tail, extending, as it usually does,

only in a line opposite to the sun. Some writers, therefore, suppose

that the nebulous matter of the comet, after being expanded to such a

volume that the particles are no longer attracted to the nucleus, unless

by the slightest conceivable force, are carried off in a direction from

the sun, by the impulse of the solar rays themselves. But to assign such

a power to the sun's rays, while they have never been proved to have any

momentum, is unphilosophical; and we are compelled to place the

phenomena of comets' tails among the points of astronomy yet to be

explained.

Since comets which approach very near the sun, like the comet of 1680,

cross the orbits of all the planets, the possibility that one of them

may strike the earth has frequently been suggested. Still it may quiet

our apprehensions on this subject, to reflect on the vast amplitude of

the planetary spaces, in which these bodies are not crowded together, as

we see them erroneously represented in orreries and diagrams, but are

sparsely scattered at immense distances from each other. They are like

insects flying, singly, in the expanse of heaven. If a comet's tail lay

with its axis in the plane of the ecliptic when it was near the sun, we

can imagine that the tail might sweep over the earth; but the tail may

be situated at any angle with the ecliptic, as well as in the same plane

with it, and the chances that it will not be in the same plane are

almost infinite. It is also extremely improbable that a comet will cross

the plane of the ecliptic precisely at the earth's path in that plane,

since it may as probably cross it at any other point nearer or more

remote from the sun. A French writer of some eminence (Du Sejour) has

discussed this subject with ability, and arrived at the following

conclusions: That of all the comets whose paths had been ascertained,

none _could pass_ nearer to the earth than about twice the moon's

distance; and that none ever _did pass_ nearer to the earth than nine

times the moon's distance. The comet of 1770, already mentioned, which

became entangled among the satellites of Jupiter, came within this

limit. Some have taken alarm at the idea that a comet, by approaching

very near to the earth, might raise so high a _tide_, as to endanger the

safety of maritime countries especially: but this writer shows, that the

comet could not possibly remain more than two hours so near the earth as

a fourth part of the moon's distance; and it could not remain even so

long, unless it passed the earth under very peculiar circumstances. For

example, if its orbit were nearly perpendicular to that of the earth, it

could not remain more than half an hour in such a position. Under such

circumstances, the production of a tide would be impossible. Eleven

hours, at least, would be necessary to enable a comet to produce an

effect on the waters of the earth, from which the injurious effects so

much dreaded would follow. The final conclusion at which he arrives is,

that although, in strict geometrical rigor, it is not physically

impossible that a comet should encounter the earth, yet the probability

of such an event is absolutely nothing.

M. Arago, also, has investigated the probability of such a collision on

the mathematical doctrine of chances, and remarks as follows: "Suppose,

now, a comet, of which we know nothing but that, at its perihelion, it

will be nearer the sun than we are, and that its diameter is equal to

one fourth that of the earth; the doctrine of chances shows that, out of

two hundred and eighty-one millions of cases, there is but one against

us; but one, in which the two bodies could meet."

La Place has assigned the consequences that would result from a direct

collision between the earth and a comet. "It is easy," says he, "to

represent the effects of the shock produced by the earth's encountering

a comet. The axis and the motion of rotation changed; the waters

abandoning their former position to precipitate themselves towards the

new equator; a great part of men and animals whelmed in a universal

deluge, or destroyed by the violent shock imparted to the terrestrial

globe; entire species annihilated; all the monuments of human industry

overthrown;--such are the disasters which the shock of a comet would

necessarily produce." La Place, nevertheless, expresses a decided

opinion that the orbits of the planets have never yet been disturbed by

the influence of comets. Comets, moreover, have been, and are still to

some degree, supposed to exercise much influence in the affairs of this

world, affecting the weather, the crops, the public health, and a great

variety of atmospheric commotions. Even Halley, finding that his comet

must have been near the earth at the time of the Deluge, suggested the

possibility that the comet caused that event,--an idea which was taken

up by Whiston, and formed into a regular theory. In Gregory's Astronomy,

an able work, published at Oxford in 1702, the author remarks, that

among all nations and in all ages, it has been observed, that the

appearance of a comet has always been followed by great calamities; and

he adds, "it does not become philosophers lightly to set down these

things as fables." Among the various things ascribed to comets by a late

English writer, are hot and cold seasons, tempests, hurricanes, violent

hail-storms, great falls of snow, heavy rains, inundations, droughts,

famines, thick fogs, flies, grasshoppers, plague, dysentery, contagious

diseases among animals, sickness among cats, volcanic eruptions, and

meteors, or shooting stars. These notions are too ridiculous to require

a distinct refutation; and I will only add, that we have no evidence

that comets have hitherto ever exercised the least influence upon the

affairs of this world; and we still remain in darkness, with respect to

their physical nature, and the purposes for which they were created.

LETTER XXVII.

METEORIC SHOWERS.

"Oft shalt thou see, ere brooding storms arise,

Star after star glide headlong down the skies,

And, where they shot, long trails of lingering light

Sweep far behind, and gild the shades of night."--_Virgil._

FEW subjects of astronomy have excited a more general interest, for

several years past, than those extraordinary exhibitions of shooting

stars, which have acquired the name of meteoric showers. My reason for

introducing the subject to your notice, in this place, is, that these

small bodies are, as I believe, derived from nebulous or cometary

bodies, which belong to the solar system, and which, therefore, ought to

be considered, before we take our leave of this department of creation,

and naturally come next in order to comets.

The attention of astronomers was particularly directed to this subject

by the extraordinary shower of meteors which occurred on the morning of

the thirteenth of November, 1833. I had the good fortune to witness

these grand celestial fire-works, and felt a strong desire that a

phenomenon, which, as it afterwards appeared, was confined chiefly to

North America, should here command that diligent inquiry into its

causes, which so sublime a spectacle might justly claim.

As I think you were not so happy as to witness this magnificent display,

I will endeavor to give you some faint idea of it, as it appeared to me

a little before daybreak. Imagine a constant succession of fire-balls,

resembling sky-rockets, radiating in all directions from a point in the

heavens a few degrees southeast of the zenith, and following the arch of

the sky towards the horizon. They commenced their progress at different

distances from the radiating point; but their directions were uniformly

such, that the lines they described, if produced upwards, would all have

met in the same part of the heavens. Around this point, or imaginary

radiant, was a circular space of several degrees, within which no

meteors were observed. The balls, as they travelled down the vault,

usually left after them a vivid streak of light; and, just before they

disappeared, exploded, or suddenly resolved themselves into smoke. No

report of any kind was observed, although we listened attentively.

Beside the foregoing distinct concretions, or individual bodies, the

atmosphere exhibited _phosphoric lines_, following in the train of

minute points, that shot off in the greatest abundance in a

northwesterly direction. These did not so fully copy the figure of the

sky, but moved in paths more nearly rectilinear, and appeared to be much

nearer the spectator than the fire-balls. The light of their trains was

also of a paler hue, not unlike that produced by writing with a stick of

phosphorus on the walls of a dark room. The number of these luminous

trains increased and diminished alternately, now and then crossing the

field of view, like snow drifted before the wind, although, in fact,

their course was towards the wind.

From these two varieties, we were presented with meteors of various

sizes and degrees of splendor: some were mere points, while others were

larger and brighter than Jupiter or Venus; and one, seen by a credible

witness, at an earlier hour, was judged to be nearly as large as the

moon. The flashes of light, although less intense than lightning, were

so bright, as to awaken people in their beds. One ball that shot off in

the northwest direction, and exploded a little northward of the star

Capella, left, just behind the place of explosion, a phosphorescent

train of peculiar beauty. This train was at first nearly straight, but

it shortly began to contract in length, to dilate in breadth, and to

assume the figure of a serpent drawing itself up, until it appeared like

a small luminous cloud of vapor. This cloud was borne eastward, (by the

wind, as was supposed, which was blowing gently in that direction,)

opposite to the direction in which the meteor itself had moved,

remaining in sight several minutes. The point from which the meteors

seemed to radiate kept a fixed position among the stars, being

constantly near a star in Leo, called Gamma Leonis.

Such is a brief description of this grand and beautiful display, as I

saw it at New Haven. The newspapers shortly brought us intelligence of

similar appearances in all parts of the United States, and many minute

descriptions were published by various observers; from which it

appeared, that the exhibition had been marked by very nearly the same

characteristics wherever it had been seen. Probably no celestial

phenomenon has ever occurred in this country, since its first

settlement, which was viewed with so much admiration and delight by one

class of spectators, or with so much astonishment and fear by another

class. It strikingly evinced the progress of knowledge and civilization,

that the latter class was comparatively so small, although it afforded

some few examples of the dismay with which, in barbarous ages of the

world, such spectacles as this were wont to be regarded. One or two

instances were reported, of persons who died with terror; many others

thought the last great day had come; and the untutored black population

of the South gave expression to their fears in cries and shrieks.

Letters on Astronomy in which the Elements of the Science are Familiarly Explained in Connection with Biographical Sketches of the Most Eminent Astronomers · 第 26 / 33 段