Were it not for the power the atmosphere has of dispersing the solar

light, and scattering it in various directions, no objects would be

visible to us out of direct sunshine; every shadow of a passing cloud

would involve us in midnight darkness; the stars would be visible all

day; and every apartment into which the sun had not direct admission

would be involved in the obscurity of night. This scattering action of

the atmosphere on the solar light is greatly increased by the

irregularity of temperature caused by the sun, which throws the

atmosphere into a constant state of undulation; and by thus bringing

together masses of air of different temperatures, produces partial

reflections and refractions at their common boundaries, by which means

much light is turned aside from a direct course, and diverted to the

purposes of general illumination.[6] In the upper regions of the

atmosphere, as on the tops of very high mountains, where the air is too

much rarefied to reflect much light, the sky assumes a black appearance,

and stars become visible in the day time.

Although the atmosphere is usually so transparent, that it is invisible

to us, yet we as truly move and live in a fluid as fishes that swim in

the sea. Considered in comparison with the whole earth, the atmosphere

is to be regarded as a thin layer investing the surface, like a film of

water covering the surface of an orange. Its actual height, however, is

over a hundred miles, though we cannot assign its precise boundaries.

Being perfectly elastic, the lower portions, bearing as they do, the

weight of all the mass above them, are greatly compressed, while the

upper portions having little to oppose the natural tendency of air to

expand, diffuse themselves widely. The consequence is, that the

atmosphere undergoes a rapid diminution of density, as we ascend from

the earth, and soon becomes exceedingly rare. At so moderate a height as

seven miles, it is four times rarer than at the surface, and continues

to grow rare in the same proportion, namely, being four times less for

every seven miles of ascent. It is only, therefore, within a few miles

of the earth, that the atmosphere is sufficiently dense to sustain

clouds and vapors, which seldom rise so high as eight miles, and are

usually much nearer to the earth than this. So rare does the air become

on the top of Mount Chimborazo, in South America, that it is incompetent

to support most of the birds that fly near the level of the sea. The

condor, a bird which has remarkably long wings, and a light body, is the

only bird seen towering above this lofty summit. The transparency of the

atmosphere,--a quality so essential to fine views of the starry

heavens,--is much increased by containing a large proportion of water,

provided it is perfectly dissolved, or in a state of invisible vapor. A

country at once hot and humid, like some portions of the torrid zone,

presents a much brighter and more beautiful view of the moon and stars,

than is seen in cold climates. Before a copious rain, especially in hot

weather, when the atmosphere is unusually humid, we sometimes observe

the sky to be remarkably resplendent, even in our own latitude.

Accordingly, this unusual clearness of the sky, when the stars shine

with unwonted brilliancy, is regarded as a sign of approaching rain; and

when, after the rain is apparently over, the air is remarkably

transparent, and distant objects on the earth are seen with uncommon

distinctness, while the sky exhibits an unusually deep azure, we may

conclude that the serenity is only temporary, and that the rain will

probably soon return.

FOOTNOTE:

[6] Sir J. Herschel.

LETTER X.

THE SUN.

"Great source of day! best image here below

Of thy Creator, ever pouring wide,

From world to world, the vital ocean round,

On Nature write, with every beam, His praise."--_Thomson._

THE subjects which have occupied the preceding Letters are by no means

the most interesting parts of our science. They constitute, indeed,

little more than an introduction to our main subject, but comprise such

matters as are very necessary to be clearly understood, before one is

prepared to enter with profit and delight upon the more sublime and

interesting field which now opens before us.

We will begin our survey of the heavenly bodies with the SUN, which

first claims our homage, as the natural monarch of the skies. The moon

will next occupy our attention; then the other bodies which compose the

solar system, namely, the planets and comets; and, finally, we shall

leave behind this little province in the great empire of Nature, and

wing a bolder flight to the fixed stars.

The _distance_ of the sun from the earth is about ninety-five millions

of miles. It may perhaps seem incredible to you, that astronomers should

be able to determine this fact with any degree of certainty. Some,

indeed, not so well informed as yourself, have looked upon the

marvellous things that are told respecting the distances, magnitudes,

and velocities, of the heavenly bodies, as attempts of astronomers to

impose on the credulity of the world at large; but the certainty and

exactness with which the predictions of astronomers are fulfilled, as an

eclipse, for example, ought to inspire full confidence in their

statements. I can assure you, my dear friend, that the evidence on which

these statements are founded is perfectly satisfactory to those whose

attainments in the sciences qualify them to understand them; and, so far

are astronomers from wishing to impose on the unlearned, by announcing

such wonderful discoveries as they have made among the heavenly bodies,

no class of men have ever shown a stricter regard and zeal than they for

the exact truth, wherever it is attainable.

Ninety-five millions of miles is indeed a vast distance. No human mind

is adequate to comprehend it fully; but the nearest approaches we can

make towards it are gained by successive efforts of the mind to conceive

of great distances, beginning with such as are clearly within our grasp.

Let us, then, first take so small a distance as that of the breadth of

the Atlantic ocean, and follow, in mind, a ship, as she leaves the port

of New York, and, after twenty days' steady sail, reaches Liverpool.

Having formed the best idea we are able of this distance, we may then

reflect, that it would take a ship, moving constantly at the rate of ten

miles per hour, more than a thousand years to reach the sun.

The diameter of the sun is towards a million of miles; or, more exactly,

it is eight hundred and eighty-five thousand miles. One hundred and

twelve bodies as large as the earth, lying side by side, would be

required to reach across the solar disk; and our ship, sailing at the

same rate as before, would be ten years in passing over the same space.

Immense as is the sun, we can readily understand why it appears no

larger than it does, when we reflect, that its distance is still more

vast. Even large objects on the earth, when seen on a distant eminence,

or over a wide expanse of water, dwindle almost to a point. Could we

approach nearer and nearer to the sun, it would constantly expand its

volume, until finally it would fill the whole vault of heaven. We could,

however, approach but little nearer to the sun without being consumed by

the intensity of his heat. Whenever we come nearer to any fire, the heat

rapidly increases, being four times as great at half the distance, and

one hundred times as great at one tenth the distance. This fact is

expressed by saying, that the heat increases as the square of the

distance decreases. Our globe is situated at such a distance from the

sun, as exactly suits the animal and vegetable kingdoms. Were it either

much nearer or much more remote, they could not exist, constituted as

they are. The intensity of the solar light also follows the same law.

Consequently, were we nearer to the sun than we are, its blaze would be

insufferable; or, were we much further off, the light would be too dim

to serve all the purposes of vision.

The sun is one million four hundred thousand times as large as the

earth; but its matter is not more than about one fourth as dense as that

of the earth, being only a little heavier than water, while the average

density of the earth is more than five times that of water. Still, on

account of the immense magnitude of the sun, its entire quantity of

matter is three hundred and fifty thousand times as great as that of the

earth. Now, the force of gravity in a body is greater, in proportion as

its quantity of matter is greater. Consequently, we might suppose, that

the weight of a body (weight being nothing else than the measure of the

force of gravity) would be increased in the same proportion; or, that a

body, which weighs only one pound at the surface of the earth, would

weigh three hundred and fifty thousand pounds at the sun. But we must

consider, that the attraction exerted by any body is the same as though

all the matter were concentrated in the centre. Thus, the attraction

exerted by the earth and by the sun is the same as though the entire

matter of each body were in its centre. Hence, on account of the vast

dimensions of the sun, its surface is one hundred and twelve times

further from its centre than the surface of the earth is from its

centre; and, since the force of gravity diminishes as the square of the

distance increases, that of the sun, exerted on bodies at its surface,

is (so far as this cause operates) the square of one hundred and twelve,

or twelve thousand five hundred and forty-four times less than that of

the earth. If, therefore, we increase the weight of a body three hundred

and fifty-four thousand times, in consequence of the greater amount of

matter in the sun, and diminish it twelve thousand five hundred and

forty-four times, in consequence of the force acting at a greater

distance from the body, we shall find that the body would weigh about

twenty-eight times more on the sun than on the earth. Hence, a man

weighing three hundred pounds would, if conveyed to the surface of the

sun, weigh eight thousand four hundred pounds, or nearly three tons and

three quarters. A limb of our bodies, weighing forty pounds, would

require to lift it a force of one thousand one hundred and twenty

pounds, which would be beyond the ordinary power of the muscles. At the

surface of the earth, a body falls from rest by the force of gravity, in

one second, sixteen and one twelfth feet; but at the surface of the sun,

a body would, in the same time, fall through four hundred and

forty-eight and seven tenths feet.

The sun turns on his own axis once in a little more than twenty-five

days. This fact is known by observing certain dark places seen by the

telescope on the sun's disk, called _solar spots_. These are very

variable in size and number. Sometimes, the sun's disk, when viewed with

a telescope, is quite free from spots, while at other times we may see a

dozen or more distinct clusters, each containing a great number of

spots, some large and some very minute. Occasionally, a single spot is

so large as to be visible to the naked eye, especially when the sun is

near the horizon, and the glare of his light is taken off. One measured

by Dr. Herschel was no less than fifty thousand miles in diameter. A

solar spot usually consists of two parts, the _nucleus_ and the _umbra_.

The nucleus is black, of a very irregular shape, and is subject to great

and sudden changes, both in form and size. Spots have sometimes seemed

to burst asunder, and to project fragments in different directions. The

umbra is a wide margin, of lighter shade, and is often of greater extent

than the nucleus. The spots are usually confined to a zone extending

across the central regions of the sun, not exceeding sixty degrees in

breadth. Fig. 23 exhibits the appearance of the solar spots. As these

spots have all a common motion from day to day, across the sun's disk;

as they go off at one limb, and, after a certain interval, sometimes

come on again on the opposite limb, it is inferred that this apparent

motion is imparted to them by an actual revolution of the sun on his own

axis. We know that the spots must be in contact, or very nearly so, at

least, with the body of the sun, and cannot be bodies revolving around

it, which are projected on the solar disk when they are between us and

the sun; for, in that case, they would not be so long in view as out of

view, as will be evident from inspecting the following diagram. Let S,

Fig. 24, page 106, represent the sun, and _b_ a body revolving round it

in the orbit _a b c_; and let E represent the earth, where, of course,

the spectator is situated. The body would be seen projected on the sun

only while passing from _b_ to _c_, while, throughout the remainder of

its orbit, it would be out of view, whereas no such inequality exists in

respect to the two periods.

[Illustration Fig. 23.]

[Illustration Fig. 24.]

If you ask, what is the _cause_ of the solar spots, I can only tell you

what different astronomers have supposed respecting them. They attracted

the notice of Galileo soon after the invention of the telescope, and he

formed an hypothesis respecting their nature. Supposing the sun to

consist of a solid body embosomed in a sea of liquid fire, he believed

that the spots are composed of black cinders, formed in the interior of

the sun by volcanic action, which rise and float on the surface of the

fiery sea. The chief objections to this hypothesis are, first, the _vast

extent_ of some of the spots, covering, as they do, two thousand

millions of square miles, or more,--a space which it is incredible

should be filled by lava in so short a time as that in which the spots

are sometimes formed; and, secondly, the _sudden disappearance_ which

the spots sometimes undergo, a fact which can hardly be accounted for by

supposing, as Galileo did, that such a vast accumulation of matter all

at once sunk beneath the fiery flood. Moreover, we have many reasons for

believing that the spots are _depressions_ below the general surface.

La Lande, an eminent French astronomer of the last century, held that

the sun is a solid, opaque body, having its exterior diversified with

high mountains and deep valleys, and covered all over with a burning sea

of liquid matter. The spots he supposed to be produced by the flux and

reflux of this fiery sea, retreating occasionally from the mountains,

and exposing to view a portion of the dark body of the sun. But it is

inconsistent with the nature of fluids, that a liquid, like the sea

supposed, should depart so far from its equilibrium and remain so long

fixed, as to lay bare the immense spaces occupied by some of the solar

spots.

Dr. Herschel's views respecting the nature and constitution of the sun,

embracing an explanation of the solar spots, have, of late years, been

very generally received by the astronomical world. This great

astronomer, after attentively viewing the surface of the sun, for a long

time, with his large telescopes, came to the following conclusions

respecting the nature of this luminary. He supposes the sun to be a

planetary body like our earth, diversified with mountains and valleys,

to which, on account of the magnitude of the sun, he assigns a

prodigious extent, some of the mountains being six hundred miles high,

and the valleys proportionally deep. He employs in his explanation no

volcanic fires, but supposes two separate regions of dense clouds

floating in the solar atmosphere, at different distances from the sun.

The exterior stratum of clouds he considers as the depository of the

sun's light and heat, while the inferior stratum serves as an awning or

screen to the body of the sun itself, which thus becomes fitted to be

the residence of animals. The proofs offered in support of this

hypothesis are chiefly the following: first, that the appearances, as

presented to the telescope, are such as accord better with the idea that

the fluctuations arise from the motions of clouds, than that they are

owing to the agitations of a liquid, which could not depart far enough

from its general level to enable us to see its waves at so great a

distance, where a line forty miles in length would subtend an angle at

the eye of only the tenth part of a second; secondly, that, since clouds

are easily dispersed to any extent, the great dimensions which the solar

spots occasionally exhibit are more consistent with this than with any

other hypothesis; and, finally, that a lower stratum of clouds, similar

to those of our atmosphere, was frequently seen by the Doctor, far below

the luminous clouds which are the fountains of light and heat.

Such are the views of one who had, it must be acknowledged, great

powers of observation, and means of observation in higher perfection

than have ever been enjoyed by any other individual; but, with all

deference to such authority, I am compelled to think that the hypothesis

is encumbered with very serious objections. Clouds analogous to those of

our atmosphere (and the Doctor expressly asserts that his lower stratum

of clouds are analogous to ours, and reasons respecting the upper

stratum according to the same analogy) cannot exist in hot air; they are

tenants only of cold regions. How can they be supposed to exist in the

immediate vicinity of a fire so intense, that they are even dissipated

by it at the distance of ninety-five millions of miles? Much less can

they be supposed to be the depositories of such devouring fire, when any

thing in the form of clouds, floating in our atmosphere, is at once

scattered and dissolved by the accession of only a few degrees of heat.

Nothing, moreover, can be imagined more unfavorable for radiating heat

to such a distance, than the light, inconstant matter of which clouds

are composed, floating loosely in the solar atmosphere. There is a

logical difficulty in the case: it is ascribing to things properties

which they are not known to possess; nay, more, which they are known not

to possess. From variations of light and shade in objects seen at

moderate distances on the earth, we are often deceived in regard to

their appearances; and we must distrust the power of an astronomer to

decide upon the nature of matter seen at the distance of ninety-five

millions of miles.

I think, therefore, we must confess our ignorance of the nature and

constitution of the sun; nor can we, as astronomers, obtain much more

satisfactory knowledge respecting it than the common apprehension,

namely, that it is an immense globe of fire. We have not yet learned

what causes are in operation to maintain its undecaying fires; but our

confidence in the Divine wisdom and goodness leads us to believe, that

those causes are such as will preserve those fires from extinction, and

at a nearly uniform degree of intensity. Any material change in this

respect would jeopardize the safety of the animal and vegetable

kingdoms, which could not exist without the enlivening influence of the

solar heat, nor, indeed, were that heat any more or less intense than it

is at present.

If we inquire whether the surface of the sun is in a state of actual

combustion, like burning fuel, or merely in a state of intense ignition,

like a stone heated to redness in a furnace, we shall find it most

reasonable to conclude that it is in a state of ignition. If the body of

the sun were composed of combustible matter and were actually on fire,

the material of the sun would be continually wasting away, while the

products of combustion would fill all the vast surrounding regions, and

obscure the solar light. But solid bodies may attain a very intense

state of ignition, and glow with the most fervent heat, while none of

their material is consumed, and no clouds or fumes rise to obscure their

brightness, or to impede their further emission of heat. An ignited

surface, moreover, is far better adapted than flame to the radiation of

heat. Flame, when made to act in contact with the surfaces of solid

bodies, heats them rapidly and powerfully; but it sends forth, or

_radiates_, very little heat, compared with solid matter in a high state

of ignition. These various considerations render it highly probable to

my mind, that the body of the sun is not in a state of actual

combustion, but merely in a state of high ignition.

The solar beam consists of a mixture of several different sorts of rays.

First, there are the _calorific_ rays, which afford heat, and are

entirely distinct from those which afford light, and may be separated

from them. Secondly, there are the _colorific_ rays, which give light,

consisting of rays of seven distinct colors, namely, violet, indigo,

blue, green, yellow, orange, red. These, when separated, as they may be

by a glass prism, compose the _prismatic spectrum_. They appear also in

the rainbow. When united again, in due proportions, they constitute

white light, as seen in the light of the sun. Thirdly, there are found

in the solar beam a class of rays which afford neither heat nor light,

but which produce chemical changes in certain bodies exposed to their

influence, and hence are called _chemical_ rays. Fourthly, there is

still another class, called _magnetizing_ rays, because they are capable

of imparting magnetic properties to steel. These different sorts of rays

are sent forth from the sun, to the remotest regions of the planetary

worlds, invigorating all things by their life-giving influence, and

dispelling the darkness that naturally fills all space.

But it was not alone to give heat and light, that the sun was placed in

the firmament. By his power of attraction, also, he serves as the great

regulator of the planetary motions, bending them continually from the

straight line in which they tend to move, and compelling them to

circulate around him, each at nearly a uniform distance, and all in

perfect harmony. I will hereafter explain to you the manner in which the

gravity of the sun thus acts, to control the planetary motions. For the

present, let us content ourselves with reflecting upon the wonderful

force which the sun must put forth, in order to bend out of their

courses, into circular orbits, such a number of planets, some of which

are more than a thousand times as large as the earth. Were a ship of war

under full sail, and it should be required to turn her aside from her

course by a rope attached to her bow, we can easily imagine that it

would take a great force to do it, especially were it required that the

force should remain stationary and the ship be so constantly diverted

from her course, as to be made to go round the force as round a centre.

Somewhat similar to this is the action which the sun exerts on each of

the planets by some invisible influence, called gravitation. The bodies

which he thus turns out of their course, and bends into a circular orbit

around himself, are, however, many millions of times as ponderous as the

ship, and are moving many thousand times as swiftly.

LETTER XI.

ANNUAL REVOLUTION.--SEASONS

"These, as they change, Almighty Father, these

Are but the varied God. The rolling year

Is full of Thee."--_Thomson._

WE have seen that the apparent revolution of the heavenly bodies, from

east to west, every twenty-four hours, is owing to a real revolution of

the earth on its own axis, in the opposite direction. This motion is

very easily understood, resembling, as it does, the spinning of a top.

We must, however, conceive of the top as turning without any visible

support, and not as resting in the usual manner on a plane. The annual

motion of the earth around the sun, which gives rise to an apparent

motion of the sun around the earth once a year, and occasions the change

of seasons, is somewhat more difficult to understand; and it may cost

you some reflection, before you will settle all the points respecting

the changes of the seasons clearly in your mind. We sometimes see these

two motions exemplified in a top. When, as the string is pulled, the top

is thrown forwards on the floor, we may see it move forward (sometimes

in a circle) at the same time that it spins on its axis. Let a candle be

placed on a table, to represent the sun, and let these two motions be

imagined to be given to a top around it, and we shall have a case

somewhat resembling the actual motions of the earth around the sun.

Letters on Astronomy in which the Elements of the Science are Familiarly Explained in Connection with Biographical Sketches of the Most Eminent Astronomers · 第 7 / 33 段