CHAPTER VIII

MR. JOWETT AND OTHER FRIENDS

Let every dawn of morning be to you as the beginning of life, and

every setting sun be to you as its close--then let every one of

these short lives leave its sure record of some kindly thing done

for others.--RUSKIN.

The last chapter was largely concerned with Miss Nightingale's activity

in public affairs and with acquaintanceships which she formed in

connection with them. In such affairs she was forcible, clear-sighted,

methodical. Sir Bartle Frere, on first making her acquaintance, had said

to a friend that it was "a great pleasure to meet such a good man of

business as Miss Nightingale." But she was many-sided, and even in her

converse with men or women on public affairs she was generally something

more than a good "man of business." Much of her influence was due to the

fact that so many of those who first saw her as a matter of affairs

became her friends, and that to the qualities of a good man of business

she added those of a richly sympathetic nature.

This aspect of Miss Nightingale's life and character has already been

illustrated sufficiently in the case of her relations with Matrons,

Superintendents, and Nurses. It may be discerned clearly enough, too, in

the account of her official work with Sidney Herbert and other of her

earlier allies. But it was as marked in her later as in her earlier

years, and in relation to the men as to the women with whom she was

brought into touch. In reading her collection of letters from various

doctors and officials of all sorts, I have been struck many times with a

quick change of atmosphere. The correspondence begins on a formal note.

Her correspondent will be "pleased to make the acquaintance of a lady so

justly esteemed," etc., etc. The interview has taken place, or a few

letters have passed, and then the note alters. Wives or sons or

daughters have been to see her, or kindly inquiries and messages have

been sent, and the correspondence becomes as between old family friends.

Young and old alike felt the sympathetic touch of Miss Nightingale's

manner. The name of Mr. J. J. Frederick has been mentioned in earlier

pages. He was a junior clerk in the War Office when Miss Nightingale

first made his acquaintance. Not many months had passed before she was

helpfully interested both in his family and in various good works to

which he devoted his spare time. There is much correspondence, during

the years with which we were concerned in the last chapter, with

Mr. (now Sir Robert) Morant, at that time tutor in the Royal Family of

Siam. Miss Nightingale had made his acquaintance before he left for

Siam; and he came to see her when he was on leave in England, "leave

apparently meaning," she wrote (Sept. 24, 1891), "working on his Siamese

subjects 23 hours out of the 24." She became almost as much interested

in Siamese affairs as in those of India itself; but the letters show

that the public interest was combined with a personal, and almost

motherly, affection. Mr. J. Croft, on the staff at St. Thomas's, who had

for many years been medical instructor to the Nightingale Probationers,

resigned that post in 1892, and in returning thanks for a testimonial

described the pleasure he had found in working under "so lovable and

adorable a leader as Miss Nightingale." Colonel Yule had first made Miss

Nightingale's acquaintance in an official capacity as the member of the

India Council charged with sanitary affairs, but he soon came to love

her as a friend. In 1889 he was ill, and wrote her a valedictory letter

(May 2), in which, after giving advice about some official matters, he

said: "As long as I live, but I am not counting on that as a long

period, it will be a happiness to think that I was brought into

communication with you--useless as I fear I have been in your great

task: in fact my strength had already begun to fail. And so, dear Miss

Nightingale, I take my leave: let it be with the words of the 4th Book

of Moses, ch. vi., and those that come after us will put in your mouth

those of Job, xxix."[238] His strength failed more rapidly; and in his

last illness he craved to know that Miss Nightingale had not forgotten

him. She sent him a message of fervent gratitude. "I will look at it not

as misapplied to myself," he answered (Dec. 17, a few days before his

death), "but as part of the large and generous nature which you are

ready to apply to others who little deserve it. I praise God for the

privilege of having known you. I am sunk very low in strength, and

cannot write with my own hand, so use that of one of my oldest and

dearest friends. God bless and keep you to the end, as you have been for

so many years, a pillar in Christ's Kingdom of Love and of this state of

England. Ever, with the deepest affection and veneration, your faithful

servant, H. Yule." The strength of her older friend and fellow-worker,

Dr. Sutherland, ebbed rapidly, and he did not long survive his

retirement. He died in July 1891. He was in great weakness at the end,

and was hardly able to read or to speak; but his wife said that she had

received a letter from Miss Nightingale with messages for him. To her

surprise he roused himself once more, read the letter through, and said,

"Give her my love and blessing." They were almost his last words.

[238] Numbers vi. 24-26: "The Lord bless thee, and keep thee," etc. Job

xxxi. 11-16: "When the ear heard me, then it blessed me," etc.

II

The affectionate sympathy which Miss Nightingale gave to her friends was

not lacking to her relations. In 1889 one of the dearest of them, her

"Aunt Mai," had died at the age of 91. Her husband, the "Uncle Sam" of

earlier chapters, had died eight years before; and the widow's

bereavement seems to have done away with such estrangement as there had

been between her and her niece. They resumed their former affectionate

correspondence on religious matters, and Miss Nightingale was again the

"loving Flo" of earlier years. "Dearest friend," she wrote on the card

sent with flowers when her aunt died; "lovely, loving soul; humble mind

of high and holy thought."

Miss Nightingale was not one of those persons who keep their tact and

kindly consideration for the outside world and think indolent

indifference or rough candour good enough for the family circle. I have

been told a little anecdote which is instructive in this connection.

Miss Irby came into the garden hall at Lea Hurst one day, fresh from an

interview with Miss Nightingale. "I must tell you," she said, laughing,

to one of Miss Nightingale's younger cousins, "what Florence has just

said; it's so like her. She said to me, 'I wonder whether R. remembered

to have that branch taken away that fell across the south drive.' I

said, 'I will ask her.' 'Oh, no,' said Florence, 'don't ask her that.

Ask her _whom_ she asked to take the branch away.'" This is only a

trifle; but the method of the thing was very characteristic. Miss

Nightingale was a diplomatist in small affairs as in great. She was

careful not to run a risk of making mischief through intermediaries. She

took real trouble to that end, and never seemed to find anything in this

sort too much to do. Her influence with every member of her family was

used to make relations between them better and more affectionate. With

many of the younger generation of her cousins and other kinsfolk she

maintained affectionate relations. She regulated her hours very

strictly, as we have heard, but she found time, especially in her later

years, to see some of these young friends repeatedly. When she did not

see them, she liked to be informed of their comings and goings, their

doings and prospects, their marriages and belongings. She held in deep

affection the memory of Arthur Hugh Clough, and she loved tenderly her

cousin, Mr. Shore Smith. She entertained a generous solicitude for Mr.

Clough's family; and the family of her cousin, Shore, were especially

close to her. A little note to Mrs. Shore Smith--one of

hundreds--illustrates incidentally Miss Nightingale's love of flowers

and their insect friends:--

10 SOUTH STREET, _April_ 24, 1894. Dearest, I feel so anxious to

know how you are. Thank you so much for your beautiful Azaleas

which have come out splendidly, and the yellow tulips. The smell

of the Azaleas reminds me so of Embley. On a tulip sat a poor

little tiny, tiny, pretty little snail of a sort unknown to me. He

said: "I was so happy in my garden on my tulip, and I was kidnapped

into that horrid box. And whatever am I to do?" So we carried him

out and carefully put him among the shrubs in the boxes on the

leads (lilacs). But my opinion is that he is very particular about

his diet and that his opinion was that he could find nothing worthy

of his acceptance there. He must either have been drowned in the

water-spout, or dree'd the penalty of being particular. Now I

return to our brutality in letting you go without even partaking of

"Baby's bottle." My kindest regards to Baby and its Mama. Ever your

loving F. N.

Miss Nightingale was godmother to Mr. and Mrs. Hugh Bonham Carter's son,

Malcolm. With Norman, an Indian Civilian, a younger son of Mr. Henry

Bonham Carter, she kept up a correspondence. She was much attached to

Miss Edith Bonham Carter,[239] who had taken up nursing, and there were

several other relations who saw her and in whom she was much interested.

The number of family letters which she preserved is very large; and

among them those relating to the family into which her sister had

married are almost as numerous as those relating to her own kith and

kin. For Margaret Lady Verney, in particular, Miss Nightingale

entertained a deep admiration and a most tender affection. She was

attached also to Sir Harry's younger son, Mr. Frederick Verney, who in

these later years helped her in many of her undertakings, and whom she

in turn helped greatly in his. A few of her own family letters, covering

a large space of time, will best show the pleasantly affectionate terms,

now grave, now gay, on which she placed herself with her relations:--

(_To Mrs. Clough._) 35 SOUTH STREET, _Jan._ 2 [1873]. I lit upon

the edition of Byron (without _Don Juan_) which we wished for.

There are two vols. more than in our edition, which may be trash.

But _Childe Harold_,--the descriptions of Greece in the Tale:

Poems,--Chillon,--but above all _Manfred_: there is nothing like it

in the world, especially the last scene. The Spirit there is really

a spirit--the only spirit out of Job and Saul. The Ghost in

_Hamlet_ is surely a very gross unpleasant dead-alive unburied man,

with the most vulgar full-bodied sentiments, clamouring for

vengeance on his murderer (not even so spirit-like as a dying man),

quite unlike what his son describes him--a Thief and Impostor, I am

sure, going to take the spoons. _Manfred_, to my mind, stands

alone, and is the most spiritual view of immortality, of what hell

and heaven really are, of any poetry in the world. One only wonders

how Byron ever wrote it.

(_To a niece_,[240] _who was going to College._) 10 SOUTH STREET,

_August_ 22 [1881]. MY VERY DEAREST R.--Aunt Florence is filled

with you and your going to Girton. I can say nothing I would and,

saying nothing, I would ask those greatest of the

"heathens"--Plato, Aeschylus, Thucydides--to say much to you.

Aeschylus, whose _Prometheus_ is evidently a foreshadowing of, or,

if you like it better, the same type (with Osiris of Egypt) as,

Christ: the one who brought "gifts to men," who defied "the powers

that be" (the "principalities" and "powers" of evil), who suffered

for men in bringing them the "best gifts" (the "fire from heaven"),

who _could_ only give by suffering himself, and who finally "led

captivity captive." It seems to me that I see in nothing so much

the _history of God_--in the religions of the world which M. Mohl

learnt Oriental languages to write--as in these great

"heathens"--Persian, Chinese, Indian, Greek also, and Latin too,

but specially Aeschylus and Plato; and perhaps, too, in

Physiology--the _greatness_ of His work, the silence of His work,

what spirit He is of. His "glory" and poorness of spirit--and that

to be "poor of spirit" constitutes His glory, if to be poor of

spirit means utter unselfishness, perfect freedom from self and

from the very thought of self, and from affectations and from

"_vain_ glory." My very dearest child, fare you very well--very,

very well is the deepest prayer of AUNT FLORENCE.

(_To a niece who had taken up vegetarianism._) 10 SOUTH STREET,

_Nov._ 8 [1887]. DEAREST--I send you two "vegetables" in their

shells. We shall have some more fresh ones to-morrow. A new potato

is, I assure you, _not_ a vegetable. It is a mare's egg, laid by

her, you know, in a "mare's nest." No vegetarian would eat it. I

send you some Egyptian lentils. I have them every night for supper,

done in milk, which I am not very fond of. The delicious thing is

lentil soup, as made every day by an Arab cook in Egypt, over a

handful of fire not big enough to roast a mosquito.... Ever your

loving AUNT FLORENCE.

(_To a niece, who was full of the co-operative movement._) 10

SOUTH STREET, _July_ 14 [1888]. DEAREST--Your co-operative

usefulness is delightful. If it is not in the lowest degree vulgar,

I should ask if I might give them some books. But I suppose this is

contrary to all Co-operative principle. Lady Ashburton is gone to

Marienbad, to distribute Bibles and Tracts in Czech-ish. There is a

very large Co-operative Estate about 20 miles distant on the

borders of the Forest, which she has seen and believes to be

entirely successful. And I have charged her to send me home (for

you) details--and of course to prove its success. You see how my

manners and principles have been corrupted by you, the youthful

prophet. If you observe aberration, do not lay it at my door. It is

sad how youth corrupts old age. Your faithful and loving old

(co-operative) Aunt, FLORENCE NIGHTINGALE.

(_To Mrs. Vaughan Nash._) CLAYDON HOUSE, _Jan._ 3 [1895]. I have

never thanked you, except in my heart, which is always, for my

beautiful book--Villari's _History of Florence_: its first two

centuries. It does look so interesting, and I have always been

interested in Florentine history above all others. I think it was

from studying Sismondi's _Républiques Italiennes_ when I was a

young girl (book now despised--you rascal!) and from knowing

Sismondi himself afterwards at Geneva. The end of this Villari does

look so very enthralling, where he traces the causes of the decline

and fall of the Florentine Republic--its very wealth and commerce

assisting its ruin, and shows how its "Commune" could not develop

into a "State" (that may help some reflections on Indian Village

Communities). But I do not see that he shows--tho' as I am reading

backwards, like the Devil, I may come to it--how different were the

Florentine ideas of Liberty from ours. With them it was that

everybody should have a share in governing everybody else; with us,

that everybody should have the power of self-development without

hurting anybody else. I remember Villari's _Savonarola_ well: it

must have been published 30 or 40 years ago. (I always had an

enthusiasm for Savonarola.) It was heavy, learned, impartial,

exhaustive. It was my father's book: he read it much. I think I

told you that I possess copies of the last things that Savonarola

ever wrote--Commentaries on two Psalms--not a word against his

enemies and persecutions, or any mention of them, or indeed any

lamentation at all, but all one long and fervent aspiration after a

perfect re-union with the Father of light and love. Good Fenzi,

Evelina Galton's husband, had these copies made for me from the

originals in the Palazzo Vecchio.

(_To Norman Bonham Carter._) 10 SOUTH STREET, _August_ 2 [1895]....

You will see by the accounts of the General Election how the

Conservatives have got in by an enormous majority, and the Liberals

are discomfited. But I am an old fogey, and have been at this work

for 40 years. And I have always found that the man who has the

genius to know how to find details, and the still greater genius of

knowing how to apply them will win, and party does not signify at

all. My masters[241]--that is, Sir Robert Peel's school, never

cared for place, but always worked for both sides alike. I learn

the lesson of life from a little kitten of mine, one of two. The

old cat comes in and says, very cross, "I didn't ask you in here, I

like to have my Missis to myself!" And he runs at them. The bigger

and handsomer kitten runs away, but the littler one _stands her

ground_, and when the old enemy comes near enough kisses his nose,

and makes the peace. That is the lesson of life, to kiss one's

enemy's nose, always standing one's ground. I am rather sorry for

Lord Salisbury. A majority is always in the wrong.

(_To Louis Shore Nightingale._[242]) 10 SOUTH STREET, _Dec._ 21

[1896]. I have been thinking a great deal of what you said on both

sides about a Church at Lea. I wish you could consult some one, not

Church-y, like Harry B. C., upon it. What you say that, if the

Church is to be done, the proprietors and trustees of Lea Hurst

should not set themselves against it is true. The Church is like

the Wesleyans, another Christian sect--not to be put down. On the

other hand, the Church is now more like the Scribes and Pharisees

than like Christ. The Bishops and the High Church look upon work

among Dissenters as work among the heathen. They would upset all

the present work in Lea and Holloway if they could. Christ would

have laughed at the "Validity of Orders" difficulty of the present

day. He would have no dogma. His Dogmas were, He tells us

distinctly, Unselfishness, Love to God and our neighbour. He takes

the Ten Commandments to pieces and shows us the spirit of them

(without which they are nothing) in the Sermon on the Mount. He

even ridicules Sabbath observance. What are now called the

"essential doctrines" of the Christian religion He does not even

mention. A High Churchman and especially a H. Ch.'s wife would

upset everything.... Ever your loving AUNT F.

(_To Norman Bonham Carter._) _August_ 27 [1897].... I wish you

God-speed, my dear friend. India is a glorious field, provided you

keep out of "little wars." As you are not a military man, there is

just a chance that you may not have perverse views on this subject.

I see Charlie sometimes. He is a very good fellow, tho' a military

man. But then his mind is not warped by "Frontier Wars." And I know

at Dublin he did a good deal for the men. One of our nurses, Sister

Snodgrass, who died just after she had gone out to foreign service,

was some years in Dublin military fever wards. She did so much for

them, and got many of her orderlies to reform their lives. When

they heard of her death, they cried like children. I know how hard

worked you are. So am I. But your Father helps me with his

excellent judgment. God bless you.

(_To Louis Shore Nightingale._) 10 SOUTH ST., _Dec._ 23 [1898]. I

send a small contribution to your journey. I approve of

Switzerland, but wish you could prick on to Italy. I always do. If

you make a bother about this bit of paper, you will find that, in

the words of the immortal Shakespeare, "Ravens shall pick out your

eyes and eagles eat the same." I have the Doctor coming this

afternoon, whom I dare not put off, from considerations of the same

nature. If you are so good as to come, please come at 5--for only

half an hour, that is till 5.30.

[239] Daughter of Mr. John Bonham Carter (see Vol. I. p. 29).

[240] Not really a niece, but Miss Nightingale was "Aunt Florence" to all

her cousins in the second generation; as also to the children of

some old friends.

[241] She was writing, it will be observed, on the anniversary of Sidney

Herbert's death.

[242] Younger son of Mr. Shore Smith, who had assumed the name of

Nightingale in 1893.

Multiply such letters largely; add to them letters of a like kind,

_mutatis mutandis_, addressed to her "children" in the nursing world;

bring further into count her solicitude for servants and dependents: and

it will be seen how faithfully Miss Nightingale followed the words

placed at the head of this chapter--words which she had copied out as "A

New Year's Greeting" for 1889. She had a soft place in her heart even

for criminals who despitefully used her. In July 1892 burglary was

committed in her house in South Street. It was in the early morning, and

she espied the burglar resting for a moment with his spoils (some of her

plate and her maid's money) in a hiding-place behind the house. If her

maids or the police or both had been more alert, the malefactor would

have been arrested. Her sense for efficiency was outraged, but she

relented when the Inspector came to see her. "Perhaps it was just as

well that you didn't catch the man," she said with a twinkle, "for I am

afraid you don't do them much good when you lock them up." She was fond

of the police, and during the Jubilee year admired from her window their

handling of the crowds. She noted the long hours; made friends with the

Inspector at Grosvenor Gate, and sent supplies of hot tea and cakes for

his men.

III

There was a time, as we have heard, when Miss Nightingale's friendship

with Mr. Jowett, though it did not diminish, yet became sensible, on her

side at least, of a certain discomfort;[243] but that time was short.

Later years brought occasion for a renewal of more effective sympathy;

and as old age began to steal upon them, the friends held closer

together. Mr. Jowett was deeply interested in many of Miss Nightingale's

later Indian interests--especially in those that related to education,

whether in India itself or of Indians and Indian civil servants in this

country. He introduced to her Miss Cornelia Sorabji, whom he befriended

at Oxford. He talked and corresponded much with Miss Nightingale about

University courses in relation to India. "I want to prove to you," he

wrote (Oct. 14, 1887), "that your words do sometimes affect my flighty

or stony heart and are not altogether cast to the winds. Therefore I

send you the last report of the Indian Students, in which you will

perceive that agricultural chemistry has become a reality; and that,

owing to YOU (though I fear that, like so many other of your good deeds,

this will never be known to men), Indian Students are reading about

agriculture, and that therefore Indian Ryots may have a chance of being

somewhat better fed than hitherto." When Lord Lansdowne had settled down

in India, Mr. Jowett thought that he might without impertinence write to

his friend and tell him what he should do to become "a really great

Viceroy." What should be suggested? Perhaps Miss Nightingale would

consider? She took the hint most seriously: the education of Viceroys

was a favourite occupation with her. Without disclosing the particular

occasion, she took many advisers into council, and discussed with them

what reforms might most usefully be introduced. She forwarded her views

to Oxford, and they filtered through Mr. Jowett to Simla. Mr. Jowett

continued throughout these years to see Miss Nightingale frequently, and

generally stayed with her once or twice a year--either in London or at

Claydon. In 1887 he was staying in South Street when he was taken ill.

Miss Nightingale found him "a very wilful patient"; he would not take

the complete rest which she and the doctor considered essential; and she

had to enter into a secret plot with Robert Browning to keep him from

the excitement of seeing friends. "I am greatly ashamed," he wrote on

his return to Oxford (Oct. 13), "at the trouble and interference to your

work which I caused. The recollection of your infinite kindness will

never fade from my mind." She sent him elaborate instructions for the

better care of his "Brother Ass," the body. "How can I thank you enough

for your never ending kindness to me? May God bless you 1000 times in

your life and in your work. I sometimes think I gossip to you too much.

It is due to your kindness and sympathy, and you know that I have no one

else to gossip to." From this time forward Miss Nightingale was

constantly solicitous about her friend's health, and entered into

regular correspondence with his housekeeper, Miss Knight, who was

grateful for being allowed to share her anxieties with so high an

authority on matters of health. During Mr. Jowett's illnesses, Miss

Nightingale had daily letters or telegrams sent to her reporting the

patient's condition in much detail. This was her regular practice in the

case of relations or friends for whom she was solicitous. Such bulletins

were especially numerous during the fatal illness of her cousin, Miss

Hilary Bonham Carter. Miss Nightingale thought, no doubt, that her

request for daily particulars would keep the nurses up to the mark; and

sometimes it was that she had herself recommended the nurse. There were

bulletins of the kind sent to her about Lady Rosebery, whose

acquaintance she had made, as already related, in 1882. Lord Rosebery

was during some years an occasional caller at South Street.

[243] See above, p. 240.

The friendship of Miss Nightingale and Mr. Jowett was to have been

commemorated between themselves in an interesting way, for Mr. Jowett

desired to contribute towards a scheme which occupied much of Miss

Nightingale's time during 1890 and 1891. It was connected with one of

the ruling thoughts of her life. She was, as I have said, a Passionate

Statistician. Statistics were to her almost a religious exercise. The

true function of theology was to ascertain "the character of God." Law

was "the thought of God." It was by the aid of statistics that law in

the social sphere might be ascertained and codified, and certain aspects

of "the character of God" thereby revealed. The study of statistics was

thus a religious service. In the sphere of immediate application, she

had pointed out thirty years before[244] that there were enormous masses

of statistical data, already pigeon-holed in government offices or

easily procurable by government action, of which little or no use was

made. Statistics, said Lord Brougham, in a passage already quoted, were

to the legislator as the compass or the lead to the navigator; but the

actual course of legislation was too often conducted without any such

compass or lead at all. "The Cabinet Ministers," she now wrote,[245]

"the army of their subordinates, the Houses of Parliament have for the

most part received a University education, but no education in

statistical method." The result was that legislation is "not

progressive, but see-saw-y." "We legislate without knowing what we are

doing. The War Office has on some subjects the finest statistics in the

world. What comes of them? Little or nothing. Why? Because the Heads

don't know how to make anything of them (with the two exceptions of

Sidney Herbert and W. H. Smith). Our Indian statistics are really better

on some subjects than those of England. Of these no use is made in

administration. What we want is not so much (or at least not at present)

an accumulation of facts as to teach the men who are to govern the

country the use of statistical facts." She gave particular instances of

the kind of questions which she desired to see thoroughly explored by

the statistical method. What had been the result of twenty years of

compulsory education? What proportion of children forget all that they

learnt at school? What result has the school-teaching on the life and

conduct of those who do not forget it? Or, again, what is the effect of

town life on offspring, in number and in health? What are the

contributions of the several classes (as to social position and

residence) to the population of the next generation? Some of the

questions which she hoped to see solved by the statistical method came

near to those with which a later generation is familiar under the name

of Eugenics. Her friend M. Quetelet had made a beginning in the science

of "Social Physics." Both he and Dr. Farr had hoped that she would carry

on the work. She had often talked with Mr. Jowett on the subject, and

now a scheme was suggested. She would give a sum of money, and he a like

amount, and between them they would found at Oxford a Professorship or

Lectureship in Applied Statistics. They agreed first to consult various

friends and experts. Mr. Jowett seems to have discussed the matter with

Mr. Arthur Balfour and Professor Alfred Marshall. Of Mr. Balfour, he

wrote (Dec. 4, 1890) that "he has more head and power of thinking than

any statesman whom I have ever known." Miss Nightingale on her side

called into council Mr. Francis Galton, who took up the idea warmly and

elaborated a detailed scheme. He raised, however, a preliminary

objection. A Professor at Oxford or Cambridge of any subject which is

not a principal element in an examination "School" is a Professor

without a class, and often sinks into somnolence. He suggested that the

Professorship would be more useful if attached to the Royal Institution.

Mr. Jowett, who had perhaps entered into the scheme from interest rather

in Miss Nightingale than in the subject, was not very helpful in matters

of detail, but he was ready to acquiesce in any scheme which Miss

Nightingale adopted. He made only two conditions; first, that he should

be allowed to contribute; and next, that the Professorship should be

called by her name. Mr. Galton went on with his plans which, as they

were developed, were found to require a very large sum of money. Miss

Nightingale, whose resources were in great part tied up by settlements,

consulted her trustees. They did not deny that she could put down

£4000,--the sum which Mr. Galton's scheme seemed to require as her

contribution,--but they were not passionate statisticians and did not

underrate the objections to such a gift. Meanwhile time was passing;

Mr. Galton was busy with other things, and Miss Nightingale herself,

being much occupied during this year (1891) with other affairs, laid the

scheme aside.

[244] See Vol. I. p. 435.

[245] In a letter of 1891 to Mr. Jowett.

Mr. Jowett, moreover, was very ill in the same year--having a serious

heart attack, from which he barely recovered and which was premonitory

of the end. At the beginning of October he spent a few days at Claydon

with Sir Harry Verney and Miss Nightingale. On returning to Oxford he

was worse. "You will be tired of hearing from me," he said to her in a

dictated letter of farewell (Oct. 16), "and I begin to think that I may

as well cease. Many interesting things have been revealed to me in my

illness, of which I should like to talk to you. I never had an idea of

what death was, or of what the human body was before, and am very far

from knowing now. I am always thankful for having known you. I try to go

on to the end as I was. I hope you will do so too; it is best. I hope

that you may continue many years, and that you may do endless kindnesses

to others. Will you cast a look sometimes on my old friends, Miss Knight

and Mrs. [T. H.] Green, and my two young friends, F. and J.? It would

please me if you could say a word to them from time to time. But perhaps

it is rather drivelling to try and make things permanent which are

already passing away. Ever yours affectionately, B. J." He thought that

he was on the point of death, and in a will made at this time he

bequeathed "£2000 to Miss Nightingale for certain purposes." It was the

sum which he had meant to contribute to the "Nightingale Professorship

of Statistics." He rallied, however, and begged her to do as she had

offered, and come over from Claydon to see him. "I am delighted to

hear," he wrote (Nov. 18), "that you will do me the honour to come to

Balliol to see me. Acland will send his carriage for you to the station.

It will be a great event for me to have a visit from you." Mr. Jowett

was spared for nearly two years, and he still came from time to time to

see her. "I want to hold fast to you, dear friend," he wrote (May 26,

1892), "as I go down the hill. You and I are agreed that the last years

of life are in a sense the best, and that the most may be made of them

even at a time when health and strength may seem to be failing." In

August 1893 Mr. Jowett was again very ill. He dictated a letter to Miss

Nightingale, commending some of his friends to her once more. He rallied

a little and came up to London to stay with Mr. and Mrs. Lewis

Campbell. On September 18 he dictated his last letter to Miss

Nightingale: "We called upon you yesterday in South Street, but finding

no one at home supposed you had migrated to Claydon. Fare you well! How

greatly am I indebted to you for all your affection. How large a part

has your life been of my life. There is only time I think for a few

words." On October 1 he died at the house of Mr. Justice Wright in

Hampshire, to which he had gone a few days before. "Do you know," wrote

Miss Nightingale to Mrs. Clough (Nov. 7), "that he sometimes felt glad

in the society of 'Clough' during his last illness? He was in London at

the house of those dear Lewis Campbells for doctoring and nursing from

September 16 to 23rd. He was lying in the way he liked--silent, with

Mr. Lewis Campbell sitting beside him--when suddenly he opened his eyes

and said, 'Oh, is it you? I thought it was Clough.'" Pinned to Miss

Nightingale's letter, there is one which Mr. Jowett had written,

thirty-two years before, to Mrs. Clough on the death of his friend, her

husband. In it he had said: "I loved him and think of him daily. I

should like to have the memory of him, and also of Miss Nightingale,

present with me in death, as of the two persons whose example I value

most, as having 'walked by faith.'"

Miss Nightingale had other bereavements at this time. "I have lost," she

wrote, "the three nearest to me in twelve months" (1893-94). In February

1894, Sir Harry Verney died, and she felt the loss of "his courage, his

courtesy, his kindness." In August, her cousin, Mr. Shore Smith,

died--"her boy" of the old days, whom throughout his life she had

regarded with something of a mother's love; nor had she ever forgotten

the fond and dutiful affection which he had shown towards her own

mother. Miss Nightingale felt the three losses deeply, but a note of

serenity marked her old age. "This is a sad birthday, dearest," she

wrote a little later; "but let me send a few roses to say what words

cannot say. There is so much to live for. I have lost much in failures

and disappointment, as well as in grief; but, do you know, life is more

precious to me now in my old age." The place left vacant by Mr. Jowett's

death was in some respects filled henceforth by the Rev. Thory Gage

Gardiner, who from time to time administered the Sacrament to Miss

Nightingale in her room, and in whose work in South London she came to

take a lively interest.

The Professorship which Mr. Jowett and Miss Nightingale were to have

founded was never realized. Miss Nightingale had laid the scheme aside

at the end of 1891--"with a sore heart," she said, for it had been "an

object of a lifetime." Mr. Jowett, knowing that she had abandoned the

scheme, had omitted his bequest in a new will made during his last

illness. But when three years later she in turn came to make her will

she still had the scheme in mind. It was a trust, she used to say,

committed to her by M. Quetelet and Dr. Farr, and it was connected with

memories of Mr. Jowett. She gave accordingly "to Francis Galton £2000

for certain purposes," and declared that "the same shall be paid in

priority to all other bequests given by her Will for charitable and

other purposes." Her hope was that the £2000 would suffice for some

_educational_ work in the use of Statistics, but Mr. Galton differed,

and in the following year she revoked the bequest by Codicil. A

pencilled note found among her Papers gives the reason: "I recall or

revoke the legacy of £2000 to Mr. Francis Galton because he does not

think it sufficient for the purpose I wished and proposes a small

Endowment for _Research_, which I believe will only end in endowing some

bacillus or microbe, and I do not wish that."

IV

Miss Nightingale's life, said Mr. Jowett, had been a large part of his.

That his life had also been a large part of hers, this Memoir will have

shown. Few men or women had known him so well, and into the inscription

which she sent with her flowers she distilled her memories: "In loving

remembrance of Professor Jowett, the Genius of Friendship, above all the

Friend of God." Among the many letters which she received about his

death none touched or interested her so much as those of Lord

Lansdowne:--

SIMLA, _October_ 11. Our dear old friend is, as far as his bodily

presence in our midst is concerned, lost to us. It is a real sorrow

to me. I had no more constant friend, and I cannot express the

gratitude with which I look back to his unfailing interest in all

that befell me and to his help and guidance at times when they were

most needed. His saying that he meant to get better "because he had

yet so much to do" is touching and characteristic. He was one who

would never have sate down and said that his task was done, or that

he was entitled to rest from toil for the remainder of his days. It

would, however, be very far from the truth to think that his work was

at an end because he is no longer here to carry it on with his own

hands.

SIMLA, _October_ 25. Of all the true and appreciative words which

you have written of him, none seem to me truer than those in which

you speak almost impatiently of the shallow fools who thought that

he had "no religion." His religion always seemed to me nearer to

that which _The_ Master taught his followers than that of any other

man or woman whom I have met, and I doubt whether any one of our

time has done so much to spread true religion and Christianity in

the best sense of the word.

All this was precisely and profoundly what Miss Nightingale felt about

her friend. Of all men whom she had known, none seemed to her to have

led a Christian life more consistently than Mr. Jowett. In her thoughts

about him she had only one regret. It was that their friendship had

never resulted in any formal re-statement of religious doctrine. She had

not been able to put into any such form as satisfied him the scheme of

Theodicy which they had discussed during thirty years, and he had

devoted too much time, she thought, to criticism and too little to

reconstruction. But in religious practice, how rich was his legacy--both

in precept and in example! In letters of his later years, no thought had

been more often expressed by Mr. Jowett than that of Browning's _Rabbi

Ben Ezra_--a poem which he was constantly recommending to Miss

Nightingale. And there was another poem which he sent her: _The Song

Celestial_, translated from the Mahâbhârata by Sir Edwin Arnold. "I

think," he wrote (Nov. 6, 1886), "it expresses some of the deepest

thoughts of the human heart." These two poems which Miss Nightingale

read, marked, and learnt, were to set the note of her last years.

The Life of Florence Nightingale, vol. 2 of 2 · 第 8 / 11 章