The poor King, whose commercial difficulties were the keenest satire

upon his Mediaeval propensities, very soon found out that he could not

continue to reign without making some slight concession to the popular

outcry for that "Representation of the People," which, as the last

remnant of the long-forgotten promises of 1813 and 1815, had been

embodied in the law of 1820. He found the least objectionable mode of

satisfying this untoward law in calling together the Standing

Committees of the Provincial Diets. The Provincial Diets had been

instituted in 1823. They consisted for every one of the eight

provinces of the kingdom:--(1) Of the higher nobility, the formerly

sovereign families of the German Empire, the heads of which were

members of the Diet by birthright. (2) Of the representatives of the

knights, or lower nobility. (3) Of representatives of towns. (4) Of

deputies of the peasantry, or small farming class. The whole was

arranged in such a manner that in every province the two sections of

the nobility always had a majority of the Diet. Every one of these

eight Provincial Diets elected a Committee, and these eight Committees

were now called to Berlin in order to form a Representative Assembly

for the purpose of voting the much-desired loan. It was stated that

the Treasury was full, and that the loan was required, not for current

wants, but for the construction of a State railway. But the united

Committees gave the King a flat refusal, declaring themselves

incompetent to act as the representatives of the people, and called

upon His Majesty to fulfil the promise of a Representative

Constitution which his father had given, when he wanted the aid of the

people against Napoleon.

The sitting of the united Committees proved that the spirit of

opposition was no longer confined to the bourgeoisie. A part of the

peasantry had joined them, and many nobles, being themselves large

farmers on their own properties, and dealers in corn, wool, spirits,

and flax, requiring the same guarantees against absolutism,

bureaucracy, and feudal restoration, had equally pronounced against

the Government, and for a Representative Constitution. The King's plan

had signally failed; he had got no money, and had increased the power

of the opposition. The subsequent sitting of the Provincial Diets

themselves was still more unfortunate for the King. All of them asked

for reforms, for the fulfilment of the promises of 1813 and 1815, for

a Constitution and a Free Press; the resolutions to this effect of

some of them were rather disrespectfully worded, and the ill-humored

replies of the exasperated King made the evil still greater.

In the meantime, the financial difficulties of the Government went on

increasing. For a time, abatements made upon the moneys appropriated

for the different public services, fraudulent transactions with the

"Seehandlung," a commercial establishment speculating and trading for

account and risk of the State, and long since acting as its

money-broker, had sufficed to keep up appearances; increased issues of

State paper-money had furnished some resources; and the secret, upon

the whole, had been pretty well kept. But all these contrivances were

soon exhausted. There was another plan tried: the establishment of a

bank, the capital of which was to be furnished partly by the State and

partly by private shareholders; the chief direction to belong to the

State, in such a manner as to enable the Government to draw upon the

funds of this bank to a large amount, and thus to repeat the same

fraudulent transactions that would no longer do with the

"Seehandlung." But, as a matter of course, there were no capitalists

to be found who would hand over their money upon such conditions; the

statutes of the bank had to be altered, and the property of the

shareholders guaranteed from the encroachments of the Treasury, before

any shares were subscribed for. Thus, this plan having failed, there

remained nothing but to try a loan, if capitalists could be found who

would lend their cash without requiring the permission and guarantee

of that mysterious "future Representation of the People." Rothschild

was applied to, and he declared that if the loan was to be guaranteed

by this "Representation of the People," he would undertake the thing

at a moment's notice--if not, he could not have anything to do with

the transaction.

Thus every hope of obtaining money had vanished, and there was no

possibility of escaping the fatal "Representation of the People."

Rothschild's refusal was known in autumn, 1846, and in February of the

next year the King called together all the eight Provincial Diets to

Berlin, forming them into one "United Diet." This Diet was to do the

work required, in case of need, by the law of 1820; it was to vote

loans and increased taxes, but beyond that it was to have no rights.

Its voice upon general legislation was to be merely consultative; it

was to assemble, not at fixed periods, but whenever it pleased the

King; it was to discuss nothing but what the Government pleased to

lay before it. Of course, the members were very little satisfied with

the part they were expected to perform. They repeated the wishes they

had enounced when they met in the provincial assembles; the relations

between them and the Government soon became acrimonious, and when the

loan, which was again stated to be required for railway constructions,

was demanded from them, they again refused to grant it.

This vote very soon brought their sitting to a close. The King, more

and more exasperated, dismissed them with a reprimand, but still

remained without money. And, indeed, he had every reason to be alarmed

at his position, seeing that the Liberal League, headed by the middle

classes, comprising a large part of the lower nobility, and all the

different sections of the lower orders--that this Liberal League was

determined to have what it wanted. In vain the King had declared, in

the opening speech, that he would never, never grant a Constitution in

the modern sense of the word; the Liberal League insisted upon such a

modern, anti-feudal, Representative Constitution, with all its

sequels, Liberty of the Press, Trial by Jury, etc.; and before they

got it, not a farthing of money would they grant. There was one thing

evident: that things could not go on long in this manner, and that

either one of the parties must give way, or that a rupture--a bloody

struggle--must ensue. And the middle classes knew that they were on

the eve of a revolution, and they prepared themselves for it. They

sought to obtain by every possible means the support of the working

class of the towns, and of the peasantry in the agricultural

districts, and it is well known that there was, in the latter end of

1847, hardly a single prominent political character among the

bourgeoisie who did not proclaim himself a "Socialist," in order to

insure to himself the sympathy of the proletarian class. We shall see

these "Socialists" at work by and by.

This eagerness of the leading bourgeoisie to adopt, at least the

outward show of Socialism, was caused by a great change that had come

over the working classes of Germany. There had been ever since 1840 a

fraction of German workmen, who, travelling in France and Switzerland,

had more or less imbibed the crude Socialist or Communist notions then

current among the French workmen. The increasing attention paid to

similar ideas in France ever since 1840 made Socialism and Communism

fashionable in Germany also, and as far back as 1843, all newspapers

teemed with discussions of social questions. A school of Socialists

very soon formed itself in Germany, distinguished more for the

obscurity than for the novelty of its ideas; its principal efforts

consisted in the translation of French Fourierist, Saint-Simonian, and

other doctrines into the abstruse language of German philosophy. The

German Communist school, entirely different from this sect, was formed

about the same time.

In 1844, there occurred the Silesian weavers' riots, followed by the

insurrection of the calico printers of Prague. These riots, cruelly

suppressed, riots of working men not against the Government, but

against their employers, created a deep sensation, and gave a new

stimulus to Socialist and Communist propaganda amongst the working

people. So did the bread riots during the year of famine, 1847. In

short, in the same manner as Constitutional Opposition rallied around

its banner the great bulk of the propertied classes (with the

exception of the large feudal land-holders), so the working classes of

the larger towns looked for their emancipation to the Socialist and

Communist doctrines, although, under the then existing Press laws,

they could be made to know only very little about them. They could not

be expected to have any very definite ideas as to what they wanted;

they only knew that the programme of the Constitutional bourgeoisie

did not contain all they wanted, and that their wants were no wise

contained in the Constitutional circle of ideas.

There was then no separate Republican party in Germany. People were

either Constitutional Monarchists, or more or less clearly defined

Socialists or Communists.

With such elements the slightest collision must have brought about a

great revolution. While the higher nobility and the older civil and

military officers were the only safe supports of the existing system;

while the lower nobility, the trading middle classes, the

universities, the school-masters of every degree, and even part of

the lower ranks of the bureaucracy and military officers were all

leagued against the Government; while behind these there stood the

dissatisfied masses of the peasantry, and of the proletarians of the

large towns, supporting, for the time being, the Liberal Opposition,

but already muttering strange words about taking things into their own

hands; while the bourgeoisie was ready to hurl down the Government,

and the proletarians were preparing to hurl down the bourgeoisie in

its turn; this Government went on obstinately in a course which must

bring about a collision. Germany was, in the beginning of 1848, on the

eve of a revolution, and this revolution was sure to come, even had

the French Revolution of February not hastened it.

What the effects of this Parisian Revolution were upon Germany we

shall see in our next.

LONDON, September, 1851.

FOOTNOTES:

[6] "The Rhenish Gazette." This paper was published at Cologne, as the

organ of the Liberal leaders, Hansemann and Camphausen. Marx

contributed certain articles on the Landtag, which created so great a

sensation that he was offered in 1842--although only 24 years of

age--the editorship of the paper. He accepted the offer, and then

began his long fight with the Prussian Government. Of course the paper

was published under the supervision of a censor, but he, good, easy

man, was hopelessly outwitted by the young firebrand. So the

Government sent a second "special" censor from Berlin, but the double

censorship proved unequal to the task, and in 1843 the paper was

suppressed.

III.

THE OTHER GERMAN STATES.

NOVEMBER 6th, 1851.

In our last we confined ourselves almost exclusively to that State

which, during the years 1840 to 1848, was by far the most important in

the German movement, namely, to Prussia. It is, however, time to pass

a rapid glance over the other States of Germany during the same

period.

As to the petty States, they had, ever since the revolutionary

movements of 1830, completely passed under the dictatorship of the

Diet, that is of Austria and Prussia. The several Constitutions,

established as much as a means of defence against the dictates of the

larger States, as to insure popularity to their princely authors, and

unity to heterogeneous Assemblies of Provinces, formed by the Congress

of Vienna, without any leading principle whatever--these

Constitutions, illusory as they were, had yet proved dangerous to the

authority of the petty princes themselves during the exciting times of

1830 and 1831. They were all but destroyed; whatever of them was

allowed to remain was less than a shadow, and it required the

loquacious self-complacency of a Welcker, a Rotteck, a Dahlmann, to

imagine that any results could possibly flow from the humble

opposition, mingled with degrading flattery, which they were allowed

to show off in the impotent Chambers of these petty States.

The more energetic portion of the middle class in these smaller

States, very soon after 1840, abandoned all the hopes they had

formerly based upon the development of Parliamentary government in

these dependencies of Austria and Prussia. No sooner had the Prussian

bourgeoisie and the classes allied to it shown a serious resolution to

struggle for Parliamentary government in Prussia, than they were

allowed to take the lead of the Constitutional movement over all

non-Austrian Germany. It is a fact which now will not any longer be

contested, that the nucleus of those Constitutionalists of Central

Germany, who afterwards seceded from the Frankfort National Assembly,

and who, from the place of their separate meetings, were called the

Gotha party, long before 1848 contemplated a plan which, with little

modification, they in 1849 proposed to the representatives of all

Germany. They intended a complete exclusion of Austria from the German

Confederation, the establishment of a new Confederation, with a new

fundamental law, and with a Federal Parliament, of the more

insignificant States into the larger ones. All this was to be carried

out the moment Prussia entered into the ranks of Constitutional

Monarchy, established the Liberty of the Press, assumed a policy

independent from that of Russia and Austria, and thus enabled the

Constitutionalists of the lesser States to obtain a real control over

their respective Governments. The inventor of this scheme was

Professor Gervinus, of Heidelberg (Baden). Thus the emancipation of

the Prussian bourgeoisie was to be the signal for that of the middle

classes of Germany generally, and for an alliance, offensive and

defensive of both against Russia and Austria, for Austria was, as we

shall see presently, considered as an entirely barbarian country, of

which very little was known, and that little not to the credit of its

population; Austria, therefore, was not considered as an essential

part of Germany.

As to the other classes of society, in the smaller States they

followed, more or less rapidly, in the wake of their equals in

Prussia. The shopkeeping class got more and more dissatisfied with

their respective Governments, with the increase of taxation, with the

curtailments of those political sham-privileges of which they used to

boast when comparing themselves to the "slaves of despotism" in

Austria and Prussia; but as yet they had nothing definite in their

opposition which might stamp them as an independent party, distinct

from the Constitutionalism of the higher bourgeoisie. The

dissatisfaction among the peasantry was equally growing, but it is

well known that this section of the people, in quiet and peaceful

times, will never assert its interests and assume its position as an

independent class, except in countries where universal suffrage is

established. The working classes in the trades and manufactures of

the towns commenced to be infected with the "poison" of Socialism and

Communism, but there being few towns of any importance out of Prussia,

and still fewer manufacturing districts, the movement of this class,

owing to the want of centres of action and propaganda, was extremely

slow in the smaller States.

Both in Prussia and in the smaller States the difficulty of giving vent

to political opposition created a sort of religious opposition in the

parallel movements of German Catholicism and Free Congregationalism.

History affords us numerous examples where, in countries which enjoy

the blessings of a State Church, and where political discussion is

fettered, the profane and dangerous opposition against the worldly

power is hid under the more sanctified and apparently more

disinterested struggle against spiritual despotism. Many a Government

that will not allow of any of its acts being discussed, will hesitate

before it creates martyrs and excites the religious fanaticism of the

masses. Thus in Germany, in 1845, in every State, either the Roman

Catholic or the Protestant religion, or both, were considered part and

parcel of the law of the land. In every State, too, the clergy of

either of those denominations, or of both, formed an essential part of

the bureaucratic establishment of the Government. To attack Protestant

or Catholic orthodoxy, to attack priestcraft, was then to make an

underhand attack upon the Government itself. As to the German

Catholics, their very existence was an attack upon the Catholic

Governments of Germany, particularly Austria and Bavaria; and as such

it was taken by those Governments. The Free Congregationalists,

Protestant Dissenters, somewhat resembling the English and American

Unitarians, openly professed their opposition to the clerical and

rigidly orthodox tendency of the King of Prussia and his favourite

Minister for the Educational and Clerical Department, Mr. Eickhorn.

The two new sects, rapidly extending for a moment, the first in

Catholic, the second in Protestant countries, had no other distinction

but their different origin; as to their tenets, they perfectly agreed

upon this most important point--that all definite dogmas were

nugatory. This want of any definition was their very essence; they

pretended to build that great temple under the roof of which all

Germans might unite; they thus represented, in a religious form,

another political idea of the day--that of German unity, and yet they

could never agree among themselves.

The idea of German unity, which the above-mentioned sects sought to

realize, at least, upon religious ground, by inventing a common

religion for all Germans, manufactured expressly for their use,

habits, and taste--this idea was, indeed, very widely spread,

particularly in the smaller States. Ever since the dissolution of the

German Empire by Napoleon, the cry for a union of all the _disjecta

membra_ of the German body had been the most general expression of

discontent with the established order of things, and most so in the

smaller States, where costliness of a court, an administration, an

army, in short, the dead weight of taxation, increased in a direct

ratio with the smallness and impotency of the State. But what this

German unity was to be when carried out was a question upon which

parties disagreed. The bourgeoisie, which wanted no serious

revolutionary convulsion, were satisfied with what we have seen they

considered "practicable," namely a union of all Germany, exclusive of

Austria, under the supremacy of a Constitutional Government of

Prussia; and surely, without conjuring dangerous storms, nothing more

could, at that time, be done. The shopkeeping class and the peasantry,

as far as these latter troubled themselves about such things, never

arrived at any definition of that German unity they so loudly

clamoured after; a few dreamers, mostly feudalist reactionists, hoped

for the re-establishment of the German Empire; some few ignorant,

_soi-disant_ Radicals, admiring Swiss institutions, of which they had

not yet made that practical experience which afterwards most

ludicrously undeceived them, pronounced for a Federated Republic; and

it was only the most extreme party which, at that time, dared

pronounce for a German Republic, one and indivisible. Thus, German

unity was in itself a question big with disunion, discord, and, in the

case of certain eventualities, even civil war.

To resume, then; this was the state of Prussia, and the smaller States

of Germany, at the end of 1847. The middle class, feeling their

power, and resolved not to endure much longer the fetters with which

a feudal and bureaucratic despotism enchained their commercial

transactions, their industrial productivity, their common action as a

class; a portion of the landed nobility so far changed into producers

of mere marketable commodities, as to have the same interests and to

make common cause with the middle class; the smaller trading class,

dissatisfied, grumbling at the taxes, at the impediments thrown in the

way of their business, but without any definite plan for such reforms

as should secure their position in the social and political body; the

peasantry, oppressed here by feudal exactions, there by money-lenders,

usurers, and lawyers; the working people of the towns infected with

the general discontent, equally hating the Government and the large

industrial capitalists, and catching the contagion of Socialist and

Communist ideas; in short, a heterogeneous mass of opposition,

springing from various interests, but more or less led on by the

bourgeoisie, in the first ranks of which again marched the bourgeoisie

of Prussia, and particularly of the Rhine Province. On the other hand,

Governments disagreeing upon many points, distrustful of each other,

and particularly of that of Prussia, upon which yet they had to rely

for protection; in Prussia a Government forsaken by public opinion,

forsaken by even a portion of the nobility, leaning upon an army and a

bureaucracy which every day got more infected by the ideas, and

subjected to the influence, of the oppositional bourgeoisie--a

Government, besides all this, penniless in the most literal meaning of

the word, and which could not procure a single cent to cover its

increasing deficit, but by surrendering at discretion to the

opposition of the bourgeoisie. Was there ever a more splendid position

for the middle class of any country, while it struggled for power

against the established Government?

LONDON, September, 1851.

IV.

AUSTRIA.

NOVEMBER 7th, 1851.

We have now to consider Austria; that country which, up to March,

1848, was sealed up to the eyes of foreign nations almost as much as

China before the late war with England.

As a matter of course, we can here take into consideration nothing but

German Austria. The affairs of the Polish, Hungarian, or Italian

Austrians do not belong to our subject, and as far as they, since

1848, have influenced the fate of the German Austrians, they will have

to be taken into account hereafter.

Revolution and Counter-Revolution; Or, Germany in 1848 · 第 2 / 10 段