THE DEMORALIZATION OF GIRLS
The rôle which a girl is expected to play in life is first of all
indicated to her by her family in a series of æsthetic-moral definitions
of the situation. Civilized societies, more especially, have endowed the
young girl with a character of social sacredness. She has been the
subject of a far-going idealization. “Virginity” and “purity” have
almost a magical value. This attitude has a useful side, though it has
been overdone. The girl as child does not know she has any particular
value until she learns it from others, but if she is regarded with
adoration she correspondingly respects herself and tends to become what
is expected of her. And so she has in fact a greater value. She makes a
better marriage and reflects recognition on her family.
But we must understand that this sublimation of life is an investment.
It requires that incessant attention and effort illustrated in document
No. 36 (p. 62) and goes on best when life is economically secure. And
there are families and whole strata of society where life affords no
investments. There is little to gain and little to lose. Social workers
report that sometimes overburdened mothers with large families complain
that they have no “graveyard luck”—all the children live. In cases of
great neglect the girl cannot be said to fall, because she has never
risen. She is not immoral, because this implies the loss of morality,
but a-moral—never having had a moral code.
55. Nine of the fifteen families [of the working class in Rome] are
formed on a non-legitimate basis.... In fourteen of the fifteen families
there is habitual obscenity.... The children hear and repeat the
obscenity and are laughed at. Each member lives on the average on 25
lire a month.... Criminals and prostitutes frequent the homes and have
liaisons with the girls. Mothers, going to work, leave the children with
a prostitute.... The finer sentiments are notably lacking. Brothers and
sisters quarrel and fight.... Fights are habitual in eight of the
fifteen families.... The sentiment of modesty and delicacy does not
develop in the young. The regard for the child is expressed in the
remark of a father (about children who were not fed and picked up scraps
on the street): “Let them have food when they make their own
living.”[57]
56. Any person who has dwelt among the denizens of the slums cannot fail
to have brought home to him the existence of a stratum of society of no
inconsiderable magnitude in which children part with their innocence
long before puberty, in which personal chastity is virtually unknown,
and in which “to have a baby by your father” is laughed at as a comic
mishap.[58]
57. The experiences of Commenge in Paris are instructive on this point.
“For many young girls,” he writes, “modesty has no existence; they
experience no emotion in showing themselves completely undressed, they
abandon themselves to any chance individual whom they will never see
again. They attach no importance to their virginity; they are deflowered
under the strangest conditions, without the least thought or care about
the act they are accomplishing. No sentiment, no calculation, pushes
them into a man’s arms. They let themselves go without reflexion and
without motive, in an almost animal manner, from indifference and
without pleasure.” He was acquainted with forty-five girls between the
ages of twelve and seventeen who were deflowered by chance strangers
whom they never met again; they lost their virginity, in Dumas’s phrase,
as they lost their milk-teeth, and could give no plausible account of
the loss.... A girl of fourteen, living comfortably with her parents,
sacrificed her virginity at a fair in return for a glass of beer, and
henceforth begun to associate with prostitutes. Another girl of the same
age, at a local fête, wishing to go round on the hobby horse,
spontaneously offered herself to the man directing the machinery for the
pleasure of a ride.... In the United States, Dr. W. T. Travis Gibb,
examining physician to the New York Society for the Prevention of
Cruelty to Children, bears similar testimony to the fact that in a
fairly large proportion of “rape” cases the child is the willing victim.
“It is horribly pathetic,” he says, “to learn how far a nickel or a
quarter will go towards purchasing the virtue of these children.”[59]
58. In round numbers nine tenths of the delinquent girls and three
fourths of the delinquent boys come from the homes of the poor.
Sixty-nine per cent of the girls and 38 per cent of the boys come from
the lowest class, the “very poor”, the class in which there exists not
merely destitution, but destitution accompanied by degradation, or
destitution caused by degradation....
In Table 19 it appears that 31 per cent of the delinquent boys and 47
per cent of the delinquent girls before their appearance in court had
lost one or both parents by death, desertion, imprisonment, or similar
misfortune, and that they had not had the benefit of the wholesome
discipline which normal family life affords....
These children come in many instances from homes in which they have been
accustomed from their earliest infancy to drunkenness, immorality,
obscene and vulgar language, filthy and degraded conditions of
living....
Among the 157 girls in the State Training School from Chicago, for whom
family schedules were obtained, 31 were the daughters of drunken
fathers, 10 at least had drunken mothers, 27 had fathers who were of
vicious habits, 16 had immoral, vicious, or criminal mothers, while 12
belonged to families in which other members than the parents were
vicious or criminal. In at least 21 cases the father had shirked all
responsibility and had deserted the family.
There were also among these girls 11 who were known to be illegitimate
children or children who had been abandoned, and there were 10 who had
been victims of gross cruelty. Forty-one had been in houses of
prostitution or had been promiscuously immoral, one having been “a
common street walker” at the age of eleven. Four had sisters who had
become immoral and had been committed to such institutions as the
Chicago Refuge for Girls or the house of correction, while in seven
cases two sisters had been sent to Geneva; nine had brothers who had
been in such institutions as the parental school, the John Worthy
School, the Bridewell, the state reformatory at Pontiac, or the state
penitentiary at Joliet.
The worst cases of all are those of the delinquent girls who come from
depraved homes where the mother is a delinquent woman, or from homes
still more tragic where the father has himself abused the person of the
child. As a result of the interviews with the girls in the State
Training School at Geneva, it appeared that in 47 cases the girl alleged
that she had been so violated by some member of her family. In 19 cases
the father, in 5 the uncle, in 8 the brother or older cousin had wronged
the child for whom the community demanded their special protection. In
addition to these cases discovered at Geneva, the court records show
that in at least 78 other cases the girl who was brought in as
delinquent had been wronged in this way—in 43 of these cases by her own
father. In families of this degraded type it is found, too, not only
that the girl is victimized by her father but that she is often led to
her undoing by her mother or by the woman who has undertaken to fill a
mother’s place. It was found, for example, that in 189 cases where the
girl was charged with immorality, the mother or the woman guardian—an
aunt, a grandmother, or an older sister with whom the girl lived—was
implicated in the offense if not responsible for it....
Attention should be called to the fact that degraded and drunken habits
of life are not the peculiar product of large cities. The personal
interviews with the girls at Geneva who came from the smaller cities and
rural communities of the state, together with the statements in the
school records regarding the circumstances responsible for their
commitment, show a degradation in family life which parallels that found
in the homes of many of the Chicago children. Out of 153 of these
country girls, 86 were the children of fathers with intemperate habits,
and 13 had intemperate mothers. In 31 cases the girl’s delinquency had
been caused by her father or some other relative.[60]
59. Helen comes from a large family, there being eight children. Her
father is a miner and unable to support the older girls. She was told at
the age of fourteen that she was old enough to support herself and to
get out. She came to Chillicothe because of the draftees from Western
Pennsylvania, some of whom had been her acquaintances. She came to
Chillicothe with $30.00 given her by a man in Ellsworth, but we could
never learn his name.
The girl was found living in a dirty basement room with “Mag” Strawser,
a character of local repute, and spent every evening either at the
movies or at the public dance halls with soldiers. She was taken home
from the movies and an effort was made to place her in a decent room,
but twice she ran away and back to the same environment. The Juvenile
Judge wrote to the father, asking him to send money for her return home,
but he responded by saying that he didn’t want the girl home as she must
make her own living. As he couldn’t send her money she was sent back
with money furnished by Protective Bureau. Three months later she was
picked up in the park with soldiers. At the time she was dressed like a
trapeze performer, in pink satin trimmed with eider down, grotesque in
the extreme. She escaped from the Detention Home and three days later
was picked up in the woods back of the Base Hospital with five soldiers.
Upon examination, was found to have gonorrhea.... In a few weeks she had
developed from the little red hood and mittens with the stout shoes of
the foreigner into a painted-cheeked brow-blacked prostitute. She had
her name and address written on slips of paper that she passed out to
soldiers on the streets. She was never able to give the names of
soldiers with whom she cohabited, but upon first acquaintance would lend
her bracelet or ring without hesitation.[61]
60. Evelyn claims to know absolutely nothing of her family or relations.
Was found in a room in a hotel, where she had registered as the wife of
a soldier. Seemed entirely friendless and alone. Had scarcely any
clothing, and there was no evidence of refinement to be found about her.
She is small, slight and anæmic, has an active syphilis as well as an
acute gonorrhea. At first she seemed to be entirely hardened, not caring
what any one thought of her or what became of her. Later however she
broke down and was just a poor broken-hearted child. Admits to many
dreadful experiences for her tender years. Claims for the past year has
been on the vaudeville stage and has had illicit relations with a number
of members of the company. Left the troop at Wilkesbarre, Pennsylvania.
Here she picked up with a soldier who brought her to Columbus, Ohio, and
she has been picking up soldiers on the streets and going out with them
in taxis.
The only person who could be reached having an acquaintance with the
girl is Mrs. Harding at Columbus. She wrote us that her daughter Gladys
had become acquainted with her while on a visit to Wheeling where the
girl was working as a little household drudge in a private home. When
the girl came to Columbus she came to the Harding home and was treated
as one of the family until she became incorrigible, when she went to the
working girls’ home.
Evelyn believes herself to be an illegitimate child. From her earliest
recollection she was in a Catholic institution. Was placed out when she
was nine years old and from that time has been in many cities, in
private homes, in institutions and out again. Has had no supervision of
any kind. Has sought companionship and friendliness of any one that
would show her any affection. Did not seem to feel that she had done
anything very wrong. It seems to be a case of society’s neglect to an
orphan. She was taken to the Isolation Hospital for treatment for
syphilis infection and escaped within 24 hours.[62]
61. Frances was 12 years old when in July, 1912, a probation officer of
the Juvenile Court reported that she remained out late nights, sometimes
all night, refused to obey father or mother, would go into a room and
lock the door, compelling parents to force an entrance, etc. When 14
years old she was brought into court on the complaint of her mother that
she kept bad company and was known in the neighborhood as a depraved
child, being accused by one neighbor of stealing a bracelet. She had
been on probation and the reports had been fairly encouraging. Every
little while there were reports of disobedience with threats of sending
her to an institution, followed by improved conduct for a while. For a
short time Frances had tried boarding outside her home.
At the hearing in court her mother testified: “She did not want to go to
work and also stayed away from home nights, would not tell where....
When I looked for her I almost got a licken from the old man. He says I
did not have to look for her when she was no good. He licked me many
times on account of her; does not want me to go to look for her.” The
officer stated: “The father is a hard drinker and very quarrelsome. Sets
very bad example for the children. The other children [4 younger ones at
home] seem to get along and mind the mother, but this girl and an older
married sister were the wayward ones.” Frances said her father sometimes
struck her with a strap when he got drunk. Her mother drank but was
never intoxicated. She was sent to the House of Good Shepherd where she
remained a full year and “made good.” There was no complaint against her
there. Her mother then applied for her release on the ground that she
had rheumatism and a new baby 6 months old.
An investigation of the home was made. The neighbors reported the
“family are quarreling, parents continually drunk, use vile language,
and while well fed and kept, the environment is such that just as soon
as the girls become self-supporting they leave home. Mr. Sikora is
abusive to his wife, insanely jealous, charges his wife with immorality
constantly.” Probation officer was called to house to put down a
disturbance one night at 9 P.M. The mother, when questioned, admitted
that an older daughter, now 18 years old, had had a “wild” career and
then married. The next daughter left home because of complaints of her
staying out late nights. She had been in the House of the Good Shepherd,
was not 17 years old and her mother knew nothing of her whereabouts.[63]
62. Catherine was sent to the industrial class at Geneva when only nine
years old, apparently for immorality. She said her mother was a very
“nice woman” but her father was a “poor sort of father.” He drank, beat
her mother and was in jail “a lot of times.” Two years after she entered
the school her mother took sick. Catherine was allowed to return to her
until she died three months later. The father disappeared and Catherine
returned to Geneva. Catherine had an uncle in Wisconsin whom she had not
seen for 4 years and a brother, who considered Catherine “wild” and was
willing she should stay in Geneva.
The Genevan authorities reported that Catherine was hard to control at
first but after she had been made to see that the whole world was not
against her, she settled down, became very obedient and was one of their
best girls. She had nothing vicious about her, was easily influenced for
good and showed she had a great deal of good in her and much energy,
which if properly directed would make her develop into a good woman.
When Catherine was fourteen years old her brother had her released from
Geneva on parole to him. He took her to live with him in Rockford, Ill.,
where he had the reputation of being a very industrious man. He got
Catherine a job, topping stockings in a factory for $7.00 a week and
took all her earnings. Catherine worked steadily and well for six
months.
Catherine got acquainted with her brother’s sister-in-law, Jennie
Sopeka, a girl ten years older, with an exceedingly bad reputation. Ever
since she came from New York six years before she had led a
disgracefully immoral life, was known to have a venereal disease, which
was thought to be affecting her mind. Catherine said she knew nothing of
this girl when she came to see her and proposed they go to Chicago “to
have a nice time and nice clothes.” But Catherine left Rockford with
Jennie at once. They came to Chicago and registered at the Imperial
Hotel. For a week some man supported them. They then became acquainted
with two junior medical students.... These boys called on them at the
hotel and after a two weeks’ acquaintance took them and another girl to
their rooms. All lived together for about two weeks. The police then
raided the apartment, arrested the boys and Jennie and the other girl.
Catherine happened to be out when the raid was made, but the following
day she called at the police station to know what had become of her
friends and she was detained there. The boys were charged with rape, as
Catherine was under the age of consent. Jennie, who was going under one
of her many aliases, was fined $50.00 and sent to the House of
Correction. She was later accused of pandering.
Every one felt sorry for Catherine. The Court said: “It seems as if she
had never had a chance, but it would be dangerous to give her one now.”
The Probation officer also felt sympathetic, though she thought
Catherine had had a chance in Rockford and had not tried quite hard
enough. Her brother refused to take her back into his home and the Court
was in a quandary what to do with her. At first she said she would do
housework, especially taking care of children, as she was very fond of
babies and would like to be a nurse. Later, however, she decided she
would not do housework and asked to be sent back to Geneva. This the
Court would not do, and Catherine was sent to the House of Good
Shepherd.[64]
63. Carrie is a colored girl, 23 years of age at the time of her
commitment. She was sentenced to Bedford for possessing heroin. She was
born on Long Island—the illegitimate child of a notorious thief and
prostitute known only as “Jennie.” She was adopted when fifteen months
old and went to public school until she was fifteen, in spite of which
at the time of her commitment she could read and spell only with great
difficulty. Foster mother was a very poor housekeeper, went out to work,
and the rooms she occupied were unspeakably filthy. Carrie had served
five previous terms in the New York City Workhouse and 30 days in White
Plains jail. She was first sentenced to the House of The Good Shepherd,
but returned to the Court on account of her color. She was then sent to
Inwood House and returned for the same reason. She had been committed to
the Workhouse Hospital for treatment for the drug habit. She had
practiced prostitution since she was fifteen years of age, during which
time she lived for considerable periods with two consorts, by one of
whom she had a child, born in the New York City Workhouse. She had used
drugs steadily for eight years, beginning with opium and more recently
using cocaine and heroin. Her foster mother states that she was always a
difficult child and very stubborn. When she was as young as nine years
old the neighbors complained of her immoral conduct with young boys on
roofs and cellars. She seemed to have no feeling of shame.
Physical examination showed Carrie’s condition to be fair. The mental
examination showed her to be a trifle over nine years by the
Stanford-Binet tests. Her attitude was that she preferred the life of
prostitution and planned to return to it upon her release. It was felt
that she would be a bad influence in the Reformatory and that in view of
her sociological as well as her mental history she should be given
permanent custodial care.[65]
I was present in a Juvenile Court when a young girl who showed charm and
dignity was brought in for stealing from department stores an
astonishing number of pretty things—a mirror, beads, a ring, a powder
box, etc.—all on the same afternoon. And she did not forget to include a
doll for her baby sister. The inquiry brought out that she worked in a
book bindery in a suburb of the city. She had not lost a day for two
years, until laid off temporarily. Then she visited the city. She gave
all her pay, which was $9.00 a week, to her mother. Of this her mother
returned ten cents for the girl’s own use. The girl had no other blemish
and her thoughtfulness in stealing the doll for her sister created some
consternation. On the advice of the court the mother agreed to increase
the girl’s allowance to twenty-five cents a week.
On another occasion a father was asked by the court what he had to
suggest in the case of his girl who had left home and was on the
streets. He complained that she had not been bringing in all her pay.
When told he must not look at the matter in that way, that he had
obligations as a parent, he said, “Do what you please with her. She
ain’t no use to me.”
The beginning of delinquency in girls is usually an impulse to get
amusement, adventure, pretty clothes, favorable notice, distinction,
freedom in the larger world which presents so many allurements and
comparisons. The cases which I have examined (about three thousand) show
that sexual passion does not play an important rôle, for the girls have
usually become “wild” before the development of sexual desire, and their
casual sexual relations do not usually awaken sex feeling. Their sex is
used as a condition of the realization of other wishes. It is their
capital. In the cases cited below Mary (case No. 64) begins by stealing
to satisfy her desire for pretty clothes and “good times”, then has
sexual relations for the same purpose. Katie (No. 65) begins as a
vagabond and sells her body just as she does occasional work or borrows
money, in order to support herself on her vagabonding tours, sexual
intercourse being only a means by which freedom from school work is
secured. In the case of Stella (No. 66) the sexual element is part of a
joy ride, probably not the first one. Marien (No. 67) treats sexual life
as a condition of her “high life”, including restaurants, moving
pictures, hotels, and showy clothes. Helen (No. 68) said, “I always
wanted good clothes.” To the young girl of this class sexual intercourse
is something submitted to with some reluctance and embarrassment and
something she is glad to be over with. Nothing can show better the small
importance attached to it than the plain story of the many relations of
Annie (No. 69). She objects only to being used by a crowd.
64. When Mary was 14 years old she was arrested on the charge of
stealing some jewelry and a dress and waist, altogether worth $100.
While employed as domestic she had entered a neighboring flat through
the dining-room window and helped herself. When arrested she said her
father and mother were dead. But it was found they were both alive. The
mother said she was glad the police had gotten hold of Mary, who stole
and refused to work. The probation officer stated that the home was very
poor, the father would often not work and they had made Mary begin to
work when 12 years old and give all her wages to them.
Mary had obtained her present position by going to Gad’s Hill Center a
month and a half before and representing herself as an orphan. She had
tried to throw the neighbor off her track by going to her with a story
of a “big noise” she had heard in the flat, but they had searched her
and found the stolen things. Her employer also complained that Mary had
taken clothing from her and hidden it. Mary was sent to the House of the
Good Shepherd, but after her mother’s death in April, 1915, she was
given some housework to do. On Dec. 17, 1915, she took $1 from her aunt
and went away. She was sent to the Home for the Friendless. From there
she wrote the probation officer complaining that the girl friends with
whom she had been staying refused to let her have her clothes.
On Jan. 4, 1916, work was found for Mary at $7 a week. She worked one
half day and then disappeared. She was located Jan. 10 and admitted
remaining over night at a hotel four different nights with men. She
didn’t know their names.... “I was drove away from home by my aunt. How
could I stay there?”
“Q. to aunt: Did you drive Mary away from your home?
“A. Yes. She took $1 and I did not want her home.
“Officer: I found out something since then. When she came from the House
of the Good Shepherd she worked at housework and took two rings there
and silk stockings and underwear.
“Q. You hear, Mary? Why did you do that?
“A. Because I did not have no clothes.”[66]
65. Katie, 13 years old. August 22, 1913, in court. Picked up by an
officer late at night after having wandered about the streets the two
nights previous. Begged not to be taken home.... The home is poor. The
mother sometimes goes out to work, leaving the girl at home alone.
Parents are not capable of giving her the protection and supervision she
ought to have. Though the mother claimed she had proper care she wanted
her sent to an institution for a few months and then to have her home
again. Girl sent to St. Hedwig’s. She was released in October and
behaved well for a few months, helping with the new baby at home.
April 16, 1914, brought to court with another younger girl for having
stolen money and a watch from the purse of a woman in the shower-bath
room in Eckhard Park.
Katie told the court she did not know why she left home, that she often
left home and wandered around—could not control wandering impulse and
habit she had fallen into, that when she left she worked in a hat
factory half a day, for which she received 75 cents, which she used for
meals, and on Feb. 14th she secured work and remained at it until
arrested April 1st. Josephine, the younger girl, told the court that
Katie asked her to go to a show with her. On the way Katie said her hair
was falling down and suggested going into the park to arrange it. They
went to the shower-bath rooms and Katie wished to take a bath. They
looked into different bathrooms and in one room saw a purse which Katie
suggested taking, saying she wanted money for a nickel show. Josephine
took the purse and hid it under the bench, but when the owner complained
to the matron and threatened the girl with prison, Katie confessed and
gave the purse back, putting most of the blame on Josephine. As it was
proved that Josephine did not have a proper home atmosphere she was sent
to the House of the Good Shepherd, while Catherine, who was a good girl,
according to her mother, except for her wandering impulses, and who had
never before stolen, was paroled.
May 19, 1914, held at police station. Claims to have known Robert Smith,
a colored man 64 years of age, for several years. He lives in 2
rooms.... Learning that girls went there she too went and had immoral
relations with Mr. Smith at different times. On one occasion he gave her
15 cents and other occasions 25 cents.... [She said] “I went away from
home that day. My uncle [father] wanted to send me away to school, so I
ran away.... I stayed [away 3 days and spent the night] in front of our
house in the hallway.”
Katie was sent to the House of Good Shepherd and released at her
parents’ request at the end of May, 1915, and behaved until July 31, she
was arrested in a rooming house with 2 young men. She had intercourse
with one, 21 years old, whom she knew before she was sent away and whom
the officer described as a “bum.” A social worker testified: “I met the
girl at the police station ... and I suggested that she be sent to the
House of Good Shepherd, but she was very much prejudiced by her past
years there.... I told her that if she met boys on the street she
couldn’t protect herself. She was very indignant in the police station.”
At her mother’s request she was given another chance but was soon
arrested for going with another girl, a saloon keeper and a
photographer. When asked by the court what she had to say for herself
she replied, “I don’t care what you do; I deserve it.” But she requested
to be sent to Geneva instead of the House of The Good Shepherd—“they all
say it is better.” She ran away from Geneva after a few weeks but was
apprehended through an anonymous telephone message from a house on S.
Michigan Ave. After she was sent back to Geneva she again escaped.[67]
66. Stella was 15 years old when she told this story to the Juvenile
Court: “On the night of June 7, 1916, about 8 o’clock Helen Sikowska and
I were standing at the corner.... Mike and Tomczak and another Mike came
along in an automobile and Helen asked them for a ride. We went quite a
ways, and then Tomczak said he wanted to [have intercourse with] me. He
said if we did not do it he would not take us home.... They drove up in
front of a saloon and all three of the fellows went in the saloon and
stayed there about one hour. Helen and I sat in the car and waited for
them. They came out and we started back for home. We drove for a ways,
and when we came to a place where there was no houses they stopped the
machine and said it was broke. Tomczak went to sleep. Mike, the driver
of the car, got out and took me with him and walked me over the prairie.
There he knocked me down and ... did something bad to me.... Then they
took us back home.”[68]
67. Marien was arrested for acting “obstreperous” with another girl in a
railway waiting room. She had no underclothing on when arrested [in
June]. She was 16 years old, had left home before Easter and had been
going much to shows and moving picture theaters. She told a police woman
that she had been drugged on the North side and carried to a room by two
men on different nights.... Marien said she had “no fault to find” with
her home, her father and mother were kind to her.
The following letter was received from her while she was away: “Dear
Mother, I am feeling fine. Everything is all right, don’t worry about
me. I am leading high life because I am an actress. I got swell clothes
and everything, you wouldn’t know me. I had Clara down town one day I
was out with the manager. She had a nice time.... I never had such nice
times in all my life. Everybody says that I am pretty. I paid 65 dollars
for my suit and 5 dollars had [hat], 6 dollars shoe 3 gloves 2 dollar
underwar 5 dollar corest. Know I have hundred dollars in the bank but I
want you to write a letter and say youll forgive me for not telling the
truht but I will explain better when I see you and will return home for
the sake of the little ones. I will bring a hundred dollars home to you
and will come home very time I can its to expensive to liv at a hotel
now sent the letter to me this way General Devilery Miss Marion
Stephan.”
Her father testified: “After Easter got a letter from her something like
that one only more in it. She was rich and everything else, which is not
so. So she says answer me quick as you can because I to go Milwaukee
tomorrow. And I answer it right away to come home as soon as possible.
Thought maybe the letter would reach her and heard nothing more until 3
weeks ago and then this letter come and I begging her to come home and
be ... a good girl. She come home and asked if wanted to stay home now
and she feel very happy that she is home and thought maybe she would
behave.... Next day she said she was going for her clothes ... and I
says I go with you. And I could not go and left my boy and girl to go
with her Sunday. And she left them in the park and did not come home.
Then she was back again Tuesday and in the evening when I come home from
work she was not there.”[69]
68. “When I saw sweller girls than me picked up in automobiles every
night, can you blame me for falling too?”
Pretty Helen McGinnis, the convicted auto vamp of Chicago, asked the
question seriously. She has just got an order for a new trial on the
charge of luring Martin Metzler to Forest Reserve Park, where he was
beaten and robbed. The girl went on:
“I always wanted good clothes, but I never could get them, for our
family is large and money is scarce. I wanted good times like the other
girls in the office. Every girl seemed to be a boulevard vamp. I’d seen
other girls do it, and it was easy.”[70]
69. Annie was brought into the Juvenile Court when she was 15 years old.
Her story was as follows: She first had relations with a man 7 months
before. He was an usher in the Eagle Theater. She went many times to
this theater and saw him often. Once she stayed in the theater after the
show and they had relations. He later left town but she had his address.
Then she met a boy who sold papers in her neighborhood. Another fellow
introduced him as “John Johnson” and she knew him under that name,
though it was not his right one. They used to go to the park together
and had intercourse once in the hallway of her home. She was not sure
who the next man was but thought his name was “Nick.” She met him in a
theater and knew him for two weeks.
Later she met Simon Craw in an ice-cream parlor, flirted with him and
they became acquainted. He asked her to go joy riding. She said “no”,
but made a date with him to go to Lawy’s Theater. After the show they
went to the ice-cream parlor and had hot chocolate. She told him she was
afraid to go home so late—it was 12 P.M. He talked to a man and then
said a friend had offered to let them have his room in the Triangle
Hotel. She did not want to go at first, but he said if anything came up
in court he would marry her. Simon’s friend took them to his room and
went after coal. Meanwhile she and Simon had relations. The boys went to
bed and she sat up all night in a chair, none of them undressing.
A week later, on Sunday evening she met Simon in the ice-cream parlor at
7 P.M. They stayed until 8 o’clock and then went to Lawy’s Theater. They
returned to the ice-cream parlor and Simon introduced a soldier whose
name she forgot. She told them she did not want to go home as it was 11
P.M. and she had promised to be home at 8 P.M. The soldier said he knew
that the proprietor of the Ohio Hotel would let all three of them have
one room for the night. She said: “I don’t want to go. I don’t want to
be used by everybody.” Simon said: “You don’t have to,” and they
persuaded her to go.[71]
Doctor Katharine B. Davis, formerly superintendent of the New York State
Reformatory for women, at Bedford Hills, has made a careful analysis of
the life-histories of 647 prostitutes committed to that institution from
New York City which throws light on the conditions under which girls
begin their sexual delinquency. The study shows that very few
prostitutes come from homes where all the conditions are good,—good
family life, opportunity for education, economic security. The
occupations of the fathers show a low economic status. Of the 647 girls
only 15, or 2.4 per cent, had fathers belonging to the professional
classes, and this category is stretched to include a veterinary surgeon,
a colored preacher, a trained nurse, a musician, etc. Thirty-four
fathers were farmers or farmhands, 29 shopkeepers, 1 a brewer, 5 sea
captains, 1 gambler, 106 cases where there were no records, and the
remaining fathers were mainly laborers or artisans, plasterer, plumber,
peddler, miner, shoemaker, blacksmith, hod-carrier. Also janitor,
porter, cook, waiter, coachman, street sweeper, teamster, elevator man,
sandwich man, etc.[72]
As to the schooling of the girls, “fifty individuals, or 7.72 per cent,
cannot read or write any language. Of these 15 are American born.
Thirty-two can read and write a foreign language; 45.3 per cent have
never finished the primary grades, while an additional 39.72 per cent
never finished the grammar grades. Thirteen individuals had entered but
not finished high school; only four individuals had graduated from high
school; three had had one year at a normal school, and one out of 647
cases had entered college.” In addition, the average wage of the girls
who had worked was very low. This point was determined in only 162
cases. “The average minimum,” says Doctor Davis, “is $4 and the average
maximum $8. It will be noted that even the average maximum is below $9,
an amount generally conceded to be the minimum on which a girl can live
decently in New York City.”[73]
In comparison with this the girls reported relatively high wages from
prostitution. The average weekly maximum, as reported by 146 girls, was
$71.09, and the average weekly minimum, as reported by 95 girls, was
$46.02. Thirty-eight girls gave figures of $100 or more, up to $400.[74]
These statements, as Doctor Davis says, are to be taken “with
allowances”, but other statistics show that the earnings of prostitutes
are about four times as great as the same girl could make at work.
An attempt was made also in this investigation to determine the causes
leading up to prostitution from the standpoint of the girl. Two hundred
and seventy-nine girls gave 671 reasons. That is, some of them gave a
number of reasons. Among these reasons 306 were bad family life (in 166
cases no father or mother or neither); 55, bad married life; 48, desire
for pleasure (theater, food, clothes); 38, desire for money; 17, “easy
money”; 20, lazy, hated work; 13, dances; 15, love of the life; 9, stage
environment; 4, tired of drudgery; 5, idle or lonely; 4, sick, needed
the money; 10, no sex instruction; 2, white slave; 3, desertion by
lover; 10, lover put girl on street; 10, “ruined anyway”; 7, previous
use of drink or drugs; 1, ashamed to go home after first escapade; 75,
bad company; 5, couldn’t support self; 1, couldn’t support self and
children; 13, couldn’t find work.[75]
In spite of the bad economic conditions apparent here and in any report
on prostitution it is remarkable that very few girls ever allege actual
want or hunger as a reason for entering prostitution. In Doctor Davis’
list only 23 girls named something like this among the 671 reasons.
There is no doubt that economic determinism is present, that if they had
an abundance of money they would not lead the life, but they are
unstabilized as the result of a comparison between what they have and
what they want and what others have. The servant class affords the best
illustration. Between 37 and 60 per cent of professional prostitutes
have been servant girls, according to different reports from different
countries. The average is perhaps 50 per cent. Yet this class is well
fed and housed, they supply a universal demand and have no economic
anxieties. But they are treated as an inferior class, shown no
courtesies, come and go by the back door; their work is monotonous and
long, and they rebel against what they call “that hard graft”, and seek
pleasure, response, and recognition in the evening.
The cases which I have cited do not represent at all, and the report of
Doctor Davis represents only slightly, a large and equivocal class of
girls who participate in prostitution without becoming definitely
identified with it. The present tendency of irregular sex life is
definitely toward limited and occasional sexual relations on the part of
girls who have more or less regular work, and the line between the
professional and the amateur prostitute has become vague.
The usual beginning is in connection with an acquaintanceship, keeping
company, which is not necessarily regarded by either side as preliminary
to marriage but as a means of having a good time. The charm of the girl
is an asset, a lure, which she may use as a means of procuring
entertainment, affection, and perhaps gifts. Where marriage was assumed
as an object of association, marriage was also assumed as the payment
which the girl would ultimately make as her contribution to the expense
of the association, but in the more casual associations of the “great
society” there has grown up a code that the girl shall pay something as
she goes, and she does not pay in cash but in favors. Girls of the class
who have “fellows” tend to justify sexual intimacy if they are “going to
marry”, if the man says he will marry if there are “consequences”, if
the relation is with only one man, and not for money. These are called
“charity girls” by the professional prostitutes. When the girl has had
some experience in sexual life she will multiply and commercialize her
casual relationships. Girls talk of these matters, say “they all do it”,
create a more favorable opinion of it, and show the less sophisticated
girl how to make easy money.
The shop or office girl who makes sexual excursions does not usually
become a public prostitute. Her work is more attractive, her income
better, she has more class, frequently a home, and she may often find
marriage among her acquaintances. There are also girls who do not work,
who live in comfortable homes, and are yet found on the street; married
women who prostitute themselves in order to have luxuries; women who go
on the street when work is slack and return to work; others who limit
their relations to a small group of men; mistresses who are promiscuous
between periods when they are kept by one man; factory girls and other
workers who regularly supplement the work of the day by work on the
street. There is thus a general tendency to avoid identification with
the prostitute class. Illegal sexual relations are becoming more
individualized. Even regular prostitution is not and has never been so
fixed a status as we should suppose; it is rather a transitory stage
from which the girl seeks to emerge by marriage or otherwise. In his
profound work on French prostitution Parent-Duchatelet pointed out that
“prostitution is for the majority only a transitory stage; it is
abandoned usually during the first year. Very few prostitutes continue
until extinction.”[76] And this is confirmed by other reports.
Document No. 70 represents a type of organization which has arisen in
connection with occasional prostitution, and in No. 71 the girl operates
independently.
70. Mrs. X seems to take great pride in the fact that her girls are
always fresh, young and attractive. She will not have a prostitute in
her place who has ever been in houses of ill-fame.... These girls, she
said, will never do in a quiet place. They love excitement, the music,
lights and large business at small prices. They also want to have
cadets. Once she took such a girl, but she could not keep her as she
longed to return to the excitement of her former life and her cadet. The
girls who do come to her are in many instances from surrounding towns or
from other States. They stay long enough to earn a few clothes and then
return home, where they tell other girls of the easy way they earned
their clothes. She has a list of 20 or 22 girls who have been with her
at different times. They come and go.
One of the girls now in the flat is called Rosie. This girl lives in
Iowa, and was so wild at home that her mother could do nothing with her,
so she came to Chicago. Sometimes Rosie and the keeper have a quarrel
and the girl returns home. After awhile she writes and says she wants to
return to the flat, so Mrs. X sends her a ticket. Rosie is one of a
family of three or four boys and three girls. One of these sisters,
called Violet, has also been an inmate of the flat and comes
occasionally. Rosie’s mother says she realizes that Mrs. X can do more
with her daughter than she can, so she allows her to come [not knowing
what is happening]. The last time Violet was in the flat she stayed 10
days and earned $50.00, then went home again. She is 25 years old. Rosie
is younger and a good money maker. During July, Rosie earned $156.00 as
her share. During 27 days in August she earned $171.00.
The men who come to this flat are mostly married. Mrs. X says they are
“gentlemen” and do not make any trouble. They prefer a place that is
quiet and secret. Other customers are buyers from commercial houses,
bringing out of town men who are here to purchase goods. In addition to
this there are many traveling men who bring friends who gradually become
regular customer.... The business depends largely on the telephone
service. The girls are summoned to go to similar flats about town if
they are needed, and in turn Mrs. X secures girls from other flats when
her regular inmates are out when a customer calls. For instance, on
September 20th the investigator was in the flat when only one girl was
at home. In a few moments a telephone call came for the girl Helen to go
to a flat near by. On September 30th a phone call came for three girls
to go to a restaurant in Madison Street and report in the back room
where they had been the previous night.[77]
71. American girl, twenty-one years old, semi-prostitute, typical of a
certain class one grows to know. Works as salesgirl in one of the high
class shops—a pretty girl, languid manner but businesslike; popular with
business associates. Has a very clear skin, grey-blue eyes, perfect
features. Father is a contractor, mother a hard-worked woman whose
morals, personally, are beyond reproach but who regards her daughter’s
affairs as only partly her business, preferring to let surmising take
the place of knowledge.
She grew up the eldest of seven children, went through grammar school
and through one year at the high school, then to work. She was bright
and was soon promoted to position of salesgirl, where she worked in an
atmosphere of luxury and, with a cleverness very common in this type,
aped the manners and dress of the women she served. She had been a shy
child and had never confided in her parents about feelings or her
comings and goings, and they left her absolutely untaught, except that
she attended church regularly (Roman Catholic) and was expected to do as
she was told.
Sex had been a closed book to her and, as she was naturally cold and
unawakened, she was not tempted as some girls are. She did not care
about being loved, but the wish to be admired was strong within her and
love of adornment superseded all else, particularly when she realized
she was more beautiful than most girls.
The department store is sometimes a school for scandal. Many rich women
are known by sight and are talked over, servants’ gossip sometimes
reaching thus far, the intrigues between heads of departments and
managers are hinted at and the possibility of being as well dressed as
some one else becomes a prime consideration.
Freedom from household cares, independence of home obligations, and
parental weakness all began to have their effect.
When she was seventeen years old she was first approached by college
students who wanted her to go to dinners, dances, to the theatre, and
for motor rides. This was innocent enough for a time. She did not dare
do anything wrong because of the Church and her traditional standard of
virtue. Then she met an artist who asked her to pose for him, and she
consented; and after several sittings he asked her to pose in the nude.
Five dollars an hour was a temptation, for it meant almost a whole
week’s work in the store (she got seven there) so she consented, not
telling her mother. Then her knowledge of sex began. This man kissed
her, glorying in her beauty and promised her everything she wanted if
she would be his mistress. Shocked, yet tempted, she hesitated. She was
not at all passionate, but he roused in her her dominant emotion—love of
power, conquest over men—and she realized in one short week that this
was to be her life’s exciting game.
Other girls in the shop began to tell her their experiences. The career
of a clandestine prostitute seemed rather the common thing. The good
girls seemed rather pathetic and poverty struck; most of them were
homely anyway; but there was her virtue to consider, the Church, the
future. She would want to marry some one who would appreciate her
beauty, who would demand that her womanhood be unscathed. She must
compromise. She would give the man all that he wanted without losing her
virtue technically. No man would have her completely. Then she could
play the game. She had never heard of the perversions of sex, but she
soon learned them and practised her arts with no sense of shame.
She has no use for the working man—indeed, her life for the last four
years has been a mixture of shop work or posing in the day and luxury at
night. It would be impossible for her to live at home in an atmosphere
of soapsuds and babies, hard work and poverty.
When forced to think out the situation as it is, she is fair-minded.
Virtue to her has become a technicality. She is not harmed and no man is
strong enough to overcome her if she herself is frigid. She likes to be
kissed and adores to rouse men’s passions. She thinks many girls are
like her who have never given themselves wholly to men, but most of them
are more easily roused. She seldom stays all night with a man. She likes
to “keep them guessing.” Besides her mother would make trouble if she
stayed out all night. If she thinks she is at a dance, she says nothing
about her coming in late.
She admits her scorn of her own station in life but says the
luxury-loving age is responsible for that, that no girl who loves pretty
things (which most women do) is going to be content with shabby clothes
and stupid makeshifts if she can be as feminine and as lovely as other
women who do not work and yet have their hearts’ desires. She does not
think she does the men harm; in fact, she is a good companion and
coarseness of speech is repugnant to her. She smokes cigarettes but
drinks very little. She admits she has no motive in life except to
marry, some day, a man who has a good deal of money. She could easily
marry a rich man; several have already asked her but she intends to wait
a while. She knows the pleasures of the intellect are not for her. She
says excitement has been her master and that nothing else in the world
matters greatly. Cold and superficial, she admits she is not much of a
woman but denies that her conscience is dead,—says it has never been
born. The girls who are mistresses to one man have more womanly
qualities than she because they are aroused and fully developed.
She has no desire for children, does not care for them, but has no
aversion to having one. It would have to be a pretty baby and must be
brought up nicely. Clutter, pots and pans and drudgery are as remote
from her life as if she had been born a princess.
“Probably I am spoiled,” she says, “but there are hundreds of others
like me, though most of them are too human to resist sex temptation
themselves. There are three types of people responsible for a vast
number of girls like me: Mothers who spoil their daughters—anything
rather than have them household drudges like themselves; society women
who make the poor girl’s lot seem harder to her than she can bear; and
the men who are glad to use the working girl for everything in life but
marriage. Personally I am to blame, of course, but I consider myself
swept by the current—glad to drift—yes; but afraid to think where it may
end. I have never been in love. Something is still sleeping in me.
Perhaps it will come to life some day.”[78]
The last document is very significant. The girl’s schematization of life
is further from the bordel and nearer the strategic form of marriage
recommended by the wife in document No. 49 (p. 87).
In none of the documents in this chapter up to this point is an
unfortunate love affair or a betrayal with promise of marriage mentioned
as the cause of later delinquency. Girls do make these representations,
and very often, but they are always to be discounted, and for two
reasons. In the first place girlhood and womanhood have been idealized
to the degree that this explanation is expected and the girl wishes to
give it. Betrayal is the romantic way of falling, the one used in the
story books and movies. Many girls have finished stories of this kind
which they relate when asked to tell about their lives. In addition, a
seduction does usually accompany the first adventure into the world, as
we have seen in the documents (Nos. 64–69), but we saw also that sex in
these cases was used, as a coin would be used, to secure adventure and
pleasure. On the other hand, not a few girls have tragedies in
connection with courtship, promises of marriage, pregnancy, and
childbirth which demoralize them when they had no previous tendency to
demoralization. In a few cases girls yield to their own sexual desire.
72. Ellen is twenty years old. When her mother died six years ago
her father immediately remarried and she went to an aunt in
Poughkeepsie, but when her aunt found out she had broken connections
with her father, she turned her out.... The aunt is an old maid
living alone in a nice house, with one servant. She stayed with her
one year. The aunt made it evident that she disliked Ellen. She did
housework in Rochester, and then went to Poughkeepsie and later to
Albany. She has worked as a maid, and as a salesgirl in a department
store, but would not give the name nor any information regarding her
employer.
Nine months ago she attended a Knights of Columbus banquet with a
girl friend, where she was introduced to a man who began to call
upon her shortly afterward and they became intimate. She was invited
to his mother’s home, together with a great many other friends, who
were evidently people of wealth, she says. His mother did not know
that she was a working girl, because he furnished her with clothing.
She further states that his mother never knew that her son had had
immoral relations or that he even expected to marry her. She is sure
that the mother would not allow the marriage because Ellen is a
Catholic. She says his mother owns a garage which her son manages.
He often took her for long rides in the machine to road houses and
recently had intercourse with her twice during such trips. On the
first such occasion he promised to marry her, bought her a small
diamond ring for which he paid $98, and the other day when he
proposed a trip to New York, he said he
had secured a marriage license. Said they would be married here in New
York City and return to Albany to live. When they arrived with their
friends, another girl and a man, she states she asked him where they
were to be married and he said: “No, we’re young yet and don’t have to
be; let’s have a good time first.” She said that scared her and she got
out of the car near the park on Second Avenue. She hid in the bushes and
finally came out, looked around, but did not see them anywhere. She
accosted a policeman and said to him, “Arrest me; do anything you like,
but I have got to have a place to go to.” She said he laughed at her and
said she was crazy and wanted to know what was the matter. So she told
him a little of her story. He said he would look after her when off his
beat, but in the meantime she should stay in a Catholic Church nearby,
which she says she did. When the officer came off his beat he came and
took her to the police station. She says she would not marry the man now
if he could be found and if he were willing. She feels that he has
disgraced her before all her friends and consequently she does not want
to see any of them.
Her great ambition was to be a trained nurse. She has applied at
different hospitals and every one has refused her because she has not
enough education. She says that she will do anything or give up anything
to realize this ambition. She would be very happy if she could even
become a child’s nurse and would be willing to live on a very small
salary while she is training. She prefers to stay in New York as there
is less probability of her seeing the man again.... Religion means a
great deal to her and would like to see a priest in a day or two.[79]
73. I was born at Marietta, Ohio, December 22, 1902. My father at that
time was making pretty good money. He was an oil man. He was discouraged
over a loss and was working on a farm. We moved to one farm and lived
there two years when the house burned with but little saved. From there
we moved on to another farm and lived there about two years. At a
failure of crops we moved again to Tennessee.... I worked about three
months on a railroad grade, doing men and boys’ work. I made $2.50 a day
working 10 hours. I was dumping the cars, laying track, carrying
water—just anything they needed some one to do, just anything to fill
in. There was about 20 of us girls. I saved about $90 out of my wages
during those three months beside paying my board at home and buying my
clothes. Father borrowed this $90 when we got to Morgantown, saying his
money was all gone and saying that he would have to have some money to
keep the family until the household goods came. [I had planned to use my
money to pay my school expenses, but father said he couldn’t afford to
send me to school, so I went to work in a restaurant, but father wanted
me to work in a private family and I went to the home of Mrs. Jernigan.]
Most of the management of the house was left for me to do, as the woman
was away from home most of the time. She wanted to be going out all the
time; she never stayed at home. Just so long as the work was taken care
of she didn’t care. There were four children. I had to do all the work
and take care of the children. She was gone most of the time. It was the
26th of January, 1919. For the last two or three weeks before that I
noticed he was getting familiar. I didn’t seem to realize anything of it
at the time. He treated me just like one of the family until the 26th.
Mr. Jernigan was not able to go to Sunday School. He was sick so he told
his wife and that was the excuse she made to the Sunday School
superintendent and to his pupils. Before she went she asked me to see
that he got his medicine because he might doze off and not take it on
time, but to be sure he got it on time. He was sitting in the living
room before the fire, in a big lounging chair when I brought his
medicine to him first. I got him his medicine and I started to go away
and he asked me why I was in such a big hurry for. I told him that if I
was to get the work done and dinner ready on time as Mrs. Jernigan was
going out that afternoon, and if I didn’t keep busy I wouldn’t get it
accomplished. He says, “Oh, hang the work! You don’t have to be working
all the time.” I told him that that was what I was there for and that
that was what they were paying me for and it was not for him to detain
me and cause Mrs. Jernigan inconvenience as well as myself. He says,
“All right, you don’t like Daddy Joe any more.” That was what they
called him, Daddy Joe. I tried to reason with him that I cared for him
just as much as I ever did but that I must get my work done. He said I
could at least sit down on the edge of his chair awhile and I thought I
would as I would get away quicker rather than by arguing with him. He
started to caress and make over me and I tried to get away, saying that
that wouldn’t do that he was to go on asleep or amuse himself, that I
must get my work done. But he refused to let me go. He kept making over
me until he got my passions aroused and until he had no control over
himself at all, and though a sick man, he picked me up and carried me
upstairs and there he ruined me. I didn’t realize the harm he was doing
me.... I didn’t feel that I wanted to work there any more. I was ashamed
to meet the look of Mrs. Jernigan. It seemed that I couldn’t get
interested in my work and in about a week I asked for about a couple of
weeks’ vacation. I went to a friend of mine at Flemington. I stayed
there the two weeks and a few days over, but I telephoned Mrs. Jernigan
that if she could get some one for my place to do so, that I didn’t know
exactly when I would be back, I was going to stay a few days longer. But
when I got back she had not succeeded in getting any one. Mr. Jernigan
came to see me where I was at the time and promised that he wouldn’t
repeat his actions as before if I would go back. He said Mrs. Jernigan
would think of me just as my parents, and I was just as anxious to
conceal my wrong then as he. So I went back. I was there about two weeks
and he didn’t keep his promise. I told my parents that I was going to
leave there.
I started back in the restaurant life then again. I met a young man who
seemed very interested in me. I was discouraged and disgusted with the
way I was living and the restaurant life began to have its effect on me
then, and I decided that I would accept his proposal and that we would
get married. But one thing happened and then another until we had to
postpone it and it was just a plan of his, I found out later. He had
coaxed me into improper relationship with him once. Then he started
running around town with other girls. When I asked him what he meant by
that kind of action he said he had come to the conclusion that I was too
young to know what it was to get married, that I had just better drop
that idea altogether. I was discouraged and disgusted with myself that I
could be led into anything so easily.... [I married a man who was very
surly and associated with negro women, infected me with gonorrhoea, told
the workers in the mine that I had infected him, and finally
disappeared.]
I went home and my sister’s husband came to live with us and I seemed to
know him better than I did before. He had just come back from the Army
and he was the only comfort I had, so I talked with him. When a girl
gets the blues she falls harder than ever. He had a fight with those at
the mines who repeated the story that my husband told. It was about the
first of March when we had a physical relation and at that time I was
made pregnant.[80]
74. In this case a girl of American parentage was a bright and
attractive type. Her mother had been a prostitute for years and had
provided a home in which the standards were so degrading that the courts
had given the five other daughters to relatives six years previous. The
girl in question was sent to live with a widowed uncle and his two
daughters, who welcomed her to a home of many comforts and interests,
but allowed at the same time much unsupervised recreational time. During
afternoons of leisure she found many opportunities to spend hours in the
company of a married man in the neighborhood, and a few years later at
the age of 16 she gave birth to an illegitimate child.
Her father died when she was two years old. During the next few years
the home life was deplorable. The family suffered much through poverty,
and the mother was so neglectful of her children that the neighbors
brought about her arrest. At an early age this girl had witnessed many
immoral scenes, and she said that when she was only 8 years old she
remembered seeing her mother in bed with a man. It was also reported
that she had locked one of the daughters in a room with a man, receiving
payment from him for this opportunity.
When this young girl went to live with her uncle and two older cousins
in her tenth year, she found an excellent home. The family attended
church regularly, and she took an active part in the services. It was
noted that after she started an intimacy with the father of her child
she failed to speak at the prayer meeting. At school she was considered
one of the most promising girls in her class and much above the average
in her school work. She reached the sophomore year and left because of
her pregnancy. She was associated with a group of good friends and was
much enjoyed by her cousins. They had little time to give her, as one
attended college and the other held a responsible position in a business
house. After school hours she had the afternoon to herself. She was not
allowed to go out evenings except when chaperoned by older people. In
appearance she was an attractive type, with fresh coloring and a
childish, innocent expression. Her uncle stated that she had always been
a good girl, was quiet and obedient, and had never showed any tendency
to run after the boys. Her child was born at a private maternity home
and was healthy and robust and greatly beloved by the mother, who
declared that she would never give her up. Later the child was placed
out with the mother and both did extremely well.
Her sex history is as follows. She met the father by chance going home
from school, when she accidentally ran into him. After this she happened
to see him occasionally, and their casual meetings finally terminated in
an intimacy. She knew the father three years and had relationships with
him in the woods for a year and a half before the birth of her child.
The girl said, “When I was 13 there came to me an awful longing for some
one to love me and kiss me at night. I thought it was a mother’s love I
wanted, but when this man talked to me I thought that was what I wanted.
I had no wish to do wrong but longed to be loved.” For some time this
man made love to her and represented himself as her truest friend. He
told her that because she was an orphan she needed such a friendship.
For many months there was no sexual intimacy between them. Finally he
began to ask her questions concerning her menstrual periods and
afterwards generally instructed her in sex matters. Following this
conversation she frequently had relationships with him and did not learn
that he was married until some months later. She declared that she loved
and trusted the father of her child, and even after she became pregnant
said that she could not regret her sexual relations with him or feel
that she had done wrong. Meantime she had been twice assaulted by a man
of loose character.
This is her statement regarding her attitude at this time: “He was not
wholly to blame, because as soon as a man speaks to me concerning these
things I get so aroused that I do not know what I am doing.” Both men
were arrested, and the judge was unable to establish paternity. He gave
the father, so called, a suspended sentence of one year and ordered him
to support the child.... It was interesting to note the girl’s attitude
after confinement. She said, “I wonder if these men who had intercourse
with me didn’t feel beforehand that it would be an easy thing to do,
since my mother had been so bad.”[81]
75. At sixteen Patty was a dreadful flirt, a fairly good student, and an
adept at every kind of sport. About this time she made friends with a
girl whom all the girls knew, but only slightly. There were rumors about
her family which the girls heard long before their elders, but knowing
nothing of real facts they kept their surmises to themselves, gossiped
and wondered. Patty spent much time at this girl’s house and her aunt
did not interfere. Soon stories began to be whispered. Boy students went
to call on the girls and stayed very late. Patty always stayed with this
girl when her parents were away. The servants in the house knew the
facts of the case and had been bribed to keep still. All of Patty’s
friends were desperate but loyal. No one would tell on her. Patty kissed
the boys and ran after them. Olive, her friend, did worse things—but
what? Led by this wholly bad girl, Patty was living the life of a
wilful, passionate, little harlot, her heart wholly rebellious, her keen
sex instincts wholly aroused. Class protection saved her for a long
time. None of the boys quite dared to seduce her, but as time went on
there were plenty of people who believed the worst and finally she let
herself go completely. Soon after she became pregnant. Before this her
aunt had stopped her friendship with Olive, but when she became quiet,
wild-eyed, and shy, no one could believe the awful truth. The news
spread like wild-fire and Patty left the town. One of the boys was
anxious to marry her but she admitted she was not sure which of three
boys was the father of her child and said she would not marry any one.
She lived in the country with some good people and motherhood woke all
the emotions of her best self. The baby lived only a short time and she
came to her home town to visit her aunt, apparently for the purpose of
being confirmed in her old church. She was the same fascinating girl
with a sudden dignity of womanhood that amazed every one. People talked
of her bravery in facing them all and no one would have dared to be
anything but nice to her. Even the gossips realized that Patty was
something of a person, after all. She went abroad after this, studied,
and traveled. She was as talkative as ever and did every wild and
impetuous thing which struck her fancy but with a contradictory element
of reserve too elusive to explain. Her chaperone, who knew nothing of
her past, often commented on the fact that Patty could manage the
men,—no one presumed to take liberties with her.
When twenty-three she lost her heart to a man ten years her senior, a
strong character with a dominant personality. When he told Patty he
loved her, she flung herself in his arms and told the whole story
rapidly, truthfully, without thought of the consequences. He held her
close while she sobbed and quieted her as no one had ever quieted Patty
before. “Hush, dear,” he said. “Of course it was necessary to tell me;
we will never speak of it again. I know how much you need me. You have
always needed me. I think I can make you happy.”
Patty ends the story by saying that in this man she found the refuge
which was her salvation. Though intellectually her superior, her husband
is stimulated by her active mind. Their sex relation is perfect. She has
plenty of friends, both men and women, and he loves and admires her.
Their home is comfortable, secure. They have two lovely children—a boy
and a girl.
This woman realizes the faults of her nature. In looking back she thinks
she flew blindly as a bird would fly, yet never without a subconscious
realization of her folly. Her impulses were merely stronger than her
control. She thinks she is probably more dependent upon a sex life than
many women, yet intellectually she has developed wonderfully and is
really a splendid woman, albeit too nervous, oversensitive, and
frail.[82]
76. American girl, 19 years old, pregnant. Many elements of the feminine
mind are demonstrated in her sincerity and truthfulness of
understanding. Had no previous knowledge of sex life; did not know men
were like that; did not know her own nature and the awakening of passion
within herself was overwhelming.
Came to Boston a year ago. Lives with another girl, good as far as she
knows. They have never talked about men’s relation with women. It is
hard for her to talk about intimate matters, so she does not know how
her friend feels. Is a Roman Catholic, but there is no good of her going
to church now. She thinks the man would marry her, but how could she
marry a man like that? Does not want him to kiss her now. When it was
explained to her that this might be because she was pregnant, she was
again interested. Perhaps, because how was it she loved to have him kiss
her before? Motherhood is natural to her, but to face society unmarried
seems an impossibility. When she speaks of her baby, her face lights
with a look which is not sentimentalism. “Oh I could love it if I could
only let it be born.” None of her family could ever know she was like
“that.” “That” means that she could have a child when it is not right to
have one. She had not a clear memory of her temptation and actual sex
experience. “I was as much to blame as he was, for he did not make me,
but I did not realize quite what I was doing, I felt numb. I had so much
feeling I had none.”
This girl is difficult to describe. Unusual because with only a little
help she could understand herself, probably with the whole of her
nature, which few women do. Has the rare gift of seeing things as they
are when she wishes to see them differently. Never had much education,
went through grammar school, could have gone to high school but wanted
to go to work. Works in a restaurant. Earns five dollars a week with
meals and tips. Lives with another girl and together they pay $3 a week
for their room. Met this man on the street. “All the girls do that.” He
did not mean to harm her, she thinks; there was no talk of wrong doing
at first; just good friends. “He is a strong man, makes me do things,
yet asks me about everything we do. I cannot quite explain it.” (The
truthful feminine mind again, the civilized desire to be a comrade
warring against the primitive woman who wishes to be captured. Women of
this type are particularly sensitive, apparently, particularly to be
desired by the masculine mind.)
This girl is wholly natural. She came to me in an impulsive way. “I know
a girl who knows a girl who knew you. I must tell some one so I came to
you. I am in trouble.” Religion is remote to her as a personal
experience. “That is a different part of myself—the part I dream with. I
hate myself now. I do not feel like myself, but yet I feel differently.
I can never be the same again.”
Many girls of this kind, unmarried and pregnant, do not realize
motherhood. It is a misery remote from their consciousness, not a part
of their being. With this girl it is. She is 100 per cent feminine, it
seems to me, yet with a spirit which is brave and fine. If her maternal
instinct dominates, the child will be born. If consciousness to outside
influence gets the better, she will have an abortion. I should say it
was an even chance, but no one will decide it for her. She is glad of
advice, humble in the asking, and sincere, but weighs it all, and
another’s mind but shows her her own opinion more clearly. Married the
man; perfectly happy.[83]
77. Prostitute, twenty-four years old, of English parentage. Lived in
this country since she was ten years old. Typical English type, high
cheek bones, clear skin, bold grey eyes; womanly in bearing, with a
contradictory dignity and boldness of speech and manner. Went to school
through grammar grade, began to work at fifteen. Had nothing in common
with her family, had no sex training, did not talk to her mother about
things she felt deeply. She said, “I was fond of my mother, but we were
not intimate; one does not talk to one’s mother.” Worked at housework,
then restaurant work, left home and boarded alone. Was wild and
irresponsible, did not understand life, wanted fun and novelty. When
eighteen met a business man with plenty of money who was kind to her.
There was no talk of marriage. Went with him for three months before sex
relation was established. Finally became pregnant. Her family found her
and issued a complaint against her as a stubborn child. Her baby was
born in a hospital and afterwards she continued to live an irresponsible
life but without immorality. “There was only one man in the world for
me,” she said, “no one seemed to understand that.” She was misunderstood
and was ultimately sentenced to prison, her child cared for by the
State.
She is reticent about the father of her child. She swore upon the
witness stand she did not know the father of her child, to protect him.
He never knew that she was pregnant. In prison she learned much evil.
Her life with this one man had been almost innocent, a first realization
of sex. She knew nothing about prostitutes, of perverts, of “French
immorality”, all of which she learned from other girls and women in
prison. She was told a girl was a fool to work hard for nothing when she
could have everything for the price of a spirit of adventure. Her love
of her child was real and earnest. When she came from prison she went to
work in a family with her child. She became of age while here. All the
furies of her nature were aroused by her dealings with social workers
who judged her wrongly. Her antagonism was interpreted as hardness.
“They thought I was a jailbird or something like that. They took the
baby away and put it in a place where I could not see it; even the
family where I had worked did not know where it was.”
About this time she met some of her prison acquaintances. They made fun
of her attempt at virtue. “Why wouldn’t I listen to them? They were all
the companions I had had for ten months. The State drove me on the
street because I wouldn’t be meek and was saucy to them. I meant to
support my baby and they took it away. I’m not a proper person to bring
up a child. I’m not, but they (‘they’ is most of the world) made me what
I am.”
She is now a regular prostitute. She lives in a tiny apartment of one
room, bath, and kitchenette, a cheerless place with a telephone which
looks business-like. She helps in the office of the place and cares for
some other apartments, and earns enough to pay her rent and a little
more. The rest she earns immorally.
“I was innocent,” she said, “until I was 18. I went on the streets for
excitement and fun. People said and thought all sorts of things about me
which were not true,—my family, the court people, and all. My mother
would never have known about the baby if the State hadn’t blabbed. Why
do they have to tell a person’s private affairs and sins? My mother had
enough trouble without having mine thrust on her. I ought to bear my own
troubles without breaking her heart. Social workers think they’re such
saints.
“Nowadays girls go wrong younger. Today there are girls on the Common at
night, thirteen and fourteen, who know everything bad there is to know.
I am not a café girl. You would be disgusted with the café girls. If the
city really wants to stop this sort of thing why don’t they shut up the
cafés? Some of those girls are awful; some of them are desperate. On the
street few girls speak to men. It is the other way round. If a girl is
alone on the streets at night the men know what she is there for. There
is more money in New York than Boston. I’m not a real sporting girl.
They have to be bad, that is willing to do anything a man wants. They
get $25, whatever they want, if they are attractive enough, but a girl
has to be bad all through to satisfy such men. I usually get $10,
sometimes $5 if the man is nice but poor. No girl need go with men that
make it worse. It’s bad enough. I never go with a man who has been
drinking much and only with a certain kind of men.” As far as could be
learned this type bears a resemblance to the kind of man who is the
father of her child. She says she still loves him. She has seen him
sometimes on the street. It is a temptation but she keeps away. “It
makes me tremble and feel sick; besides I wouldn’t give him the
satisfaction of knowing they took the child away. Oh, how I hate them
all. It’s a fierce life. There are two kinds of prostitutes, the ones
who would get out of the life any minute if they could earn a decent
living any other way, and the ones who were born to the life. Silly
fools! they wouldn’t be satisfied with anything else. (The
feeble-minded?) Why do I live so if I hate it? What else can I do? I
have no education; any work I can get is hard work and I am not strong.
I worked for a family all summer as a second girl. My back ached all the
time. A maid goes in the back door and out of the back door. In this
life she can be comfortable, get plenty to eat, plenty of good clothes,
and she is as good as the men with whom she goes.
“I generally get home by eleven or twelve o’clock, sometimes I stay all
night. I never have visitors here; I never go with but one man in a
night. No one here knows me. What people don’t know won’t hurt them. I
generally go to a hotel. Most decent men would rather go to a hotel and
pay the extra price for a room. Such hotels are not apt to be raided. I
don’t long for the life at all. I cared for that one man. I mean to save
money and I am a little ahead. We don’t hate the men half as much as we
hate ourselves. They could stop before it was too late if any one would
really sympathize with their love of freedom and understand them. Social
workers say, “I want to help you”; they just preach. Many of them are
women of education. They expect a girl to know all that they know with
their years of experience when she is just ignorant. What can she know
of herself and men and the world? Things are all wrong between men and
women—I don’t know why. People with education ought to think about it.
More than half the men we girls meet are married men. The women get
tired of their husbands; the husbands get tired of them. Sometimes the
wives are sick, sometimes they don’t understand a man’s nature; they are
cold and unsympathetic and drive them to girls like us.
“I pretend as far as I can. One might as well do it in the same spirit
as any other distasteful work. It may wear out one’s soul but it doesn’t
wear out one’s body as much as house work or factory or store work. I
haven’t been to church in seven years. I can’t believe much in God. It’s
hard to see the justice in anything and the so-called good people think
they are so perfect.”
This woman with all her hardness and bitterness cries when she speaks of
her child. When I came away she acted the hostess very prettily, picked
up my books for me, and showed a gentle side of her nature. “No, I
haven’t minded talking of myself,” she said. “Please come again. I have
no real friends—you will always find me here alone, and sad.”[84]
Pregnancy and illegal motherhood are among the most tragic of all
situations and tend to deprive the girl of her sense of worth, to
isolate her socially, and to handicap her economically. But when the
girl is not already prepared for demoralization the recuperation in
these cases is greater than we should expect. It is a disaster like
other disasters, such as sickness and loss of fortune, and a
reconstruction of life may follow, perhaps on a lower level. The
attitude toward an otherwise orderly girl who has had a sexual
experience or borne a child is not so severe as formerly. Frequently the
girl marries, often she marries the father of the child. In his study of
five hundred unmarried mothers Kammerer says:
“It appears that 48, or 9.6 per cent, of the women in this study married
the father of their illegitimate child either before or after
confinement; 37 or 7.4 per cent married a man not the father of their
child. Figures in regard to the unmarried mother are probably
considerably lower than they would have been had it been possible to
observe the situation longer. According to the German experience over 30
per cent of the mothers of illegitimate children marry before their
child reaches the age of three years.”[85] And since it has been
calculated by Adele Schreiber[86] that 50 per cent of all German women
are unmarried between the ages of 20 and 30 it appears that the chance
to marry on the part of the unmarried mother is very good. (In Germany,
however, it is half-customary among peasants and the lower city classes
to begin sexual relations before marriage and to marry when pregnancy
follows.) At any rate it appears that prostitution is not recruited
largely from the victims of love affairs.
The most sensational aspect of the girl’s delinquency is connected with
white slavery and the character called “pimp”, “cadet”, or “souteneur.”
If a young and simple girl is abducted or captured in the most brutal
and audacious way she may nevertheless become broken and submissive, as
an animal is broken and trained. She will then be put on the street to
“hustle”, or in a house, and her earnings collected. She is held first
by fear and then acquires habits and works with the system, like a
trained animal. Frequently there is marriage or pretense of marriage and
the girl finds that the next step is to go on the street. This is the
typical procedure of the white slaver. In addition he purchases girls
who are already “broken in” and transfers girls who are already
prostitutes from place to place, as notably from Galicia or Hungary to
South America.
The other side of the matter, the relation of the girl to the pimp, is
connected with her desire for response. When for any reason a girl is
“ruined”, on the street, used as a convenience by everybody, she is in a
condition of great and unnatural isolation and loneliness and craves a
relationship which is personal and intimate. Her attachment to the pimp
is simply an underworld love affair. He is her man. She is jealous and
he is jealous. She works and brings her earnings as if she were earning
in another business. Sometimes her pimp will not allow her to enter the
room until she has put $10 under the door. If he abuses her,
particularly if he is jealous, she rather welcomes this as a sign of his
attachment. That the girl supports a pimp to protect her and keep her
out of trouble with the police is not the main element. In European
cities where girls are registered by the police and protected as far as
possible from this exploitation, they nevertheless support pimps, and in
some cities the number doing this is as much as 90 per cent of the
registered prostitutes.
It frequently happens also that a girl is drawn or drifts out of her
family and community into a bad gang, as in case No. 78, becomes
identified with them by assimilation, and cannot free herself. She may
then be kept by one of the men or sold into a house. Cases No. 79 and
No. 80 are typical of the psychology of the girl in this relation.
78. I am a girl 18 years old and am from a Polish village. Now I am an
orphan. I was two years old when my mother died. Several years later my
father left for America and left me with my grandfather. After spending
several years in America, my father brought me here to New York. I was
then 15 years old. I soon went to work and earned $5 a week. My father
took the money from me and supported me. And now my troubles begin.
After I was here several months, I became acquainted with a boy and
through him I became acquainted with several other boys. I was yet young
and did not very well understand that the boys accompanied me for their
pleasure and not out of friendship. When my father found it out, he
began to argue with me in a good way; but as he could not persuade me in
a good way, for I did not then understand that it was dear friendship of
a father to his child, he began to beat me. After my father gave me a
good beating, I became mad; left the house and entered on a wrong path.
My father remained alone and dejected and was forced to marry. I now
have a stepmother and I am staying away and I feel that I am falling. I
feel that my body is fading along with my soul. When I look at my
companions, who shun me, who do not want to know me on account of my
immoral life, I envy them. I now realize how bad and wrong my life is;
and I see my future in dark colors.
Now when I want to disengage myself from the charlatans and licentious
scoundrels in man’s image, I cannot do it. My heart is bound to them. I
am attracted to them as to a magnet. When I do not see them for a day, I
am almost crazy.
I do not know what to do. The question is; how can I wean myself from
the boys, my murderers.... Perhaps it would have been well for me to
leave New York altogether and go to some other city?[87]
79. Five pimps were playing cards in a restaurant on Seventh Avenue. The
day was very hot. During the afternoon the girl who is “hustling” for
one of them came into the restaurant wearing a heavy velvet suit. The
wife of the proprietor asked, “What are you doing, wearing a suit like
that in this kind of weather?” She replied that though she was bringing
home eight, ten, and twelve dollars every night, she could not afford a
new dress. “He needs it for gambling,” she said, pointing to her pimp.
Leaving the table in anger he deliberately slapped her in the face.
“Didn’t you pay $32 for that suit?” he said. “What more do you
want?”[88]
80. I met [a police officer] in June 1917.... I fell in love with him
right away, to tell the truth. I had been having trouble with my husband
and had tried to divorce him, but couldn’t. Anyhow, we were separated.
When I was with my husband I was a good girl, and didn’t go out with
other men.... I won’t say that he asked me to go into the life I began
to lead. That was my own choice. I wasn’t any innocent child. But he
told me he could “help” me a lot in the life. He told me, first, to keep
within the bounds of his inspection district, and to walk Broadway
between 42d Street and 109th, but never to go beyond those lines, or
else he couldn’t protect me.... After I had taken a man home, and then
the man had left the apartment, Ginton would come in and get some money.
How much? Oh—25 per cent, sometimes, or 50 per cent, or maybe even 100
per cent. He was always saying, “Honey, I need money. I have to have
$25”, or sometimes he would ask for $10 or $20—never less than $10. Oh,
I couldn’t begin to figure how much I gave him. But I didn’t mind that.
I loved him, and I always had plenty of money for myself, anyhow.... I
don’t mind the money, but I do mind his saying he doesn’t know me. I’d
have given him anything I had—I would even now, I think. See this ring?
Well, that’s worth $3000. He asked me for it once, and I was going to
give it to him, except the other girls wouldn’t let me. I’ve bought him
lots of clothes—and you might ask him about the belt with the gold
buckle I gave him for a present. Oh—he knows me, all right.
After seeing my folks and talking to them and having them treat me
nicely, I made up my mind that when I got back to New York I was going
to give up the life I had been leading and get a job and go straight. So
I got a place in a hairdresser’s shop at 85th Street and Broadway that
paid me $25 a week.
He didn’t like that, and told me so. I guess it was because he wasn’t
getting any more money from me. Anyhow, I hadn’t been at work long
before he came into the hairdresser’s and said to the boss, “You’d
better get rid of that girl; she’s a prostitute.” So I was discharged.
I made another try and got a job in a millinery shop on Broadway, near
95th Street. The same thing happened. He told the people I was working
for that I was a street woman, so they had to let me go. He had me
discharged from a third job in a store in the same neighborhood. It was
impossible for me to get any kind of straight work because of him. I had
to go back to the street.[89]
Italians and Jews have been noticeably identified with white slavery.
The Italian methods are particularly atrocious, showing the same
desperation as their black-hand operations. At the same time Italian
girls and Irish are the most intractable among the nationalities. The
Jewish operations tend to the form of business organization.
81. I come to this country when I fourteen years old with my mother and
father and brothers and sisters. My father go back to Italy three years
ago when sick. I work as operator and earn $3 a week. Then I get $6 and
for two years I make $9. I walk with my friend Florence who live in same
street and we meet Frank Marino drinking soda. He ask me if I have a
drink and I say “No”, and he say, “Come on, don’t be bashful, take a
drink.” After we take a drink he say, “I take you girls to moving
pictures.” I say, “No, I can’t.” He say, “Oh, come on; I own a moving
picture place; it do you no harm to go.” We went into a place after a
while. When we come out, he say, “You come again to-morrow; I take you
again.” I say, “No, I can’t go, my mother would not like.” He walk home
with me and I say to him, “If you want to know me, come in; here’s the
house; I live here.” He say, “No, you meet me on Wednesday and I take
you to moving pictures.” I told him “No.” He say, “Yes, you come.”
Florence say, “You go; maybe he’s your luck; you get married. He seem
like a nice fellow.” So I say, “You go with me and I go. I afraid to go
alone.” Wednesday we go again and I not tell my mother. Saturday I go
with him again and Florence too. He introduce her so she had man, called
Jim, to take her. When we come out he say, “I take you now to see my
mother and sisters on Charles Street.” I not want to go; I was afraid,
but he say, “Florence and Jim go too; my mother and sisters want to see
you.”
So we go and he want me to go upstairs and I say, “No, I afraid.” He
say, “Oh, you have a bad mind; you think bad. My mother is upstairs
waiting for you; come on.” I step into the hall and he shut the door and
Florence outside. Then he say, “Come upstairs; don’t have such a bad
mind,” and I say, “Why not Florence come too?” and he say, “Oh, Jim got
a key, he come.” We get upstairs, he push me in a room and lock the
door. He say, “Now I got you here I do what I want,” and I say “No”, and
I try to get out and I can’t. Then he takes out a pistol and hold it
right up against my ear. He know I was a good girl, and I say, “Are you
going to marry me? If you don’t, I kill myself. I will jump out the
window.”
I go home to my mother and I tell her. She faint. I most crazy and she
too. She says, “He must marry you and your brother must not know or he
kill him.” We are a respectable family and my father he has property. I
see Frank after this and tell him he must marry me now that he knows I a
good girl, and he say he would and on next Tuesday we go to City Hall.
He takes out license and we was married by some man there. Then he takes
me to a furnished room. All the time we was in this room he just bring
me things to eat like crackers, cheese and a little wine. He twice try
to make me go on the streets and the first time he beat me and pull my
hair and knock me around; he show me a pistol till I faint on the floor
and then he throw water over me and tell me not to be so foolish.
One day he take me out with his cousin Jim and his wife Rosie. She’s
bad; she goes on the streets. She say, “Why don’t you do what he wants
you? Look at me! I have good clothes,” and she showed me a diamond pin.
“I get that by doing bad business.” I say, “I go to my mother if he not
want to take care of me, or I go to work, and Frank go to work and we
have rooms. We buy a little furniture. We not need things so fine.” And
my husband, he say, “What you look like with this kind of clothes.” I
say, “My mother buy me this suit, it good enough.”
One day he comes in, he bring me a little short dress and red garters
and big red bows for my hair. He say, “You put on.” I say, “No, I not
put on. I shamed.” Then he slap me and beat me and put pistol to my face
and I go way from him and I go down to Carmine Street to Mary, who is a
good woman and some relation to him, and I tell her about it. She say,
“My God! Is he so bad?” She send for him and say, “What you mean when
you get a good girl? What for you want to put her in this bad life?” And
he say, “Oh, I don’t want to; I just crazy,” and he say, “Come home, I
not ask you any more.”
We go home and his cousin Jim is there and we have coffee to drink and
he put something in the coffee. And by and by my head go round and I
stupid and he say, “Come out in the air”, and I go out and get on the
car and we go some place on the Battery in a house and he leave me
there. Pretty soon a man come and he say, “Why you not undressed?” and I
say, “I not undress. I not bad girl. I married. I not want to be bad.”
And he say, “Then you get out of my house. I not want to get into
trouble,” and I go back. I afraid to go home because I get married
without my brother seeing the man I marry.
Then Frank say, “I got work in a barber-shop, come.” We go down to
Houston and Mott Street and there he get ticket and money and then we go
to Gran Central, and get on train. This was Wednesday of the next week
when we married. It was six o’clock and we rode and it gets to be nine
o’clock and I say, “Where we go? How long it takes?” He say, “We going
to Chicago!” Then I cry, “Now I know you put me in the bad life.” He
say, “You make noise on train, I kill you.” We get to Chicago and he
take me to a house where a man live, his name is Nino Sacco. There he
show me razors and pistols and say, “You do not do what I tell you, you
be dead.” One day I get out, but that man Sacco, he come after me and
take me back. Another time I get out of the house, but every time they
catch me and take me back. Then I get sick and cannot do business, and
they say, “She no good”, and my husband he write to my brother and say,
“You want your sister back, you be on Bleecker Street in drug store, and
I give you back your sister. You bring $100 and I give you your sister.”
Then he bring me to New York. He say to me, “You put police on me you be
dead girl. I not ’feard for myself, I can get free. I know how. I have
had other girls; but you try and I kill you.” Then we met my brother. He
gave Frank $100 and he took me home. I wait two days, then I tell
police. Frank he get arrested and then we found he had another wife. I
was only one month in Chicago, but my life is spoiled and my family
ruined and I sick and can’t work. [Marino and Sacco were sentenced to
five years in prison.][90]
82. I am a girl from Galicia. I am neither old nor young. I am working
in a shop like other girls. I have saved up several hundred dollars.
Naturally, a young man began to court me and it is indeed this that we
girls are seeking. I became acquainted with him through a Russian
[Jewish] matchmaker who for a short while boarded with a countryman of
mine. He is really handsome and, as the girls call it, “appetizing.” But
he is poor, and this is no disgrace. He became dearer to me every day.
One day he told me he was in want owing to a strike, so I helped him
out. I was never stingy with him and besides money also bought him a
suit of clothes and an overcoat.... Who else did I work for if not him?
In short we became happily engaged.
Some time after, we hired a hall in Clinton Street and we were on our
way to the bank to draw some money for the wedding expenses and also to
enter the savings in both our names. On the way we passed some of his
countrymen who were musicians, and we needed music, so we stopped in. He
introduced me as his bride. I offered to have them play at our wedding.
Incidentally, I inquired about my fiancé and they gave good opinions of
him. Only a musician’s boy pitifully gazed at me and remarked, when my
fiancé was not near us: “Are there not enough people from the old
country to ask for their opinion?” I understood the hint and asked him
for an address, which he gave me. Meanwhile, we were late for the bank,
and fortunately, too. I could hardly wait for evening when I rushed over
to his countryman and inquired about him. They were surprised at my
questions and told me he had a wife and three children in —— Street. As
I later found out she was the same woman whom he introduced me to as his
boarding mistress.... I cannot describe my feelings at that time. I
became a mere toy in the mouths of my countrymen. But what more could I
do than arrest him? But his wife and children came to court and had him
released.
I found out of the existence of a gang of wild beasts, robbers who prey
upon our lives and money. I then advertised in a Jewish newspaper,
warning my sisters against such a “fortune” as befell me. I was not
ashamed and told of my misfortune wherever I came and gave warnings. The
East Side has become full of such “grooms”, “matchmakers”, “mistresses”,
“sisters”, and “brothers.” Inquire of their countrymen. There are plenty
of their kind.
A girl from my country has also married one of the band, the one who was
my former matchmaker. To the warnings that he had a wife and child in
Europe, she replied, “Well, if she comes she will be welcome.” And good
countrymen did indeed send for her and she came with a four-year-old
boy. Her predicament is horrible to describe. She is poor and lonely and
my countrywoman did not welcome her as she boasted, and her husband
said: “Whoever sent for you may support you.”[91]
White slavery has never been a quantitatively important factor as the
beginning of delinquency and together with the cadet system it is
passing out, partly as the result of public indignation and severe
penalties, and partly as the result of the changing attitude of the
women concerned, who have become “wise” and are going more “on their
own.” Many of them scorn the pimp. The change is a part of the general
individualization.