JAPAN AND FOREIGN CAPITAL[1]

Japan, far from becoming antagonistic to the occidental nations, as it

was prognosticated by some of the Continental journalists, has given

another proof of her readiness for the identification of her economic

interests with those of the occidental people.

Hitherto in Japan there has been no law which regulated the mortgaging

of a railway, or a mining enterprise, or a factory, together with its

working system, as a corporation, that is to say, mortgaging the whole

system of a railway, a mining enterprise, or a factory as an economic

whole, comprising not only each particular material object but also all

the organic components of its working system as the subject matter of

mortgage. A radical change has now been effected in the matter.

According to the Japanese laws there are two methods for a commercial

company in contracting a debt. One is the ordinary borrowing of money

from a creditor, and the other is borrowing in the shape of debentures

by public subscription. Now in ordinary borrowing of money the liability

may be secured by mortgage, but the debentures could not be secured by

mortgage, although of course the liability extends to the whole property

of the company.

The first effect of the new change is the provision which enables

companies to guarantee debentures by mortgage, and the second effect is

the provisions which relate to the creations of economic corporations of

railways, mining works, or factories for the special purpose of

instituting mortgages of their economic entity.

To make the matter easier to comprehend, I will first explain it with

regard to railways.

The permission of the Government originally given to the company is in

the nature of a licence or concession which is to be viewed more in the

light of a personal matter of the original company, and therefore it

could not be a subject matter of a public auction, and therefore

according to the old law, if a railway company becomes bankrupt, all the

material property, either movable or immovable, would go to new hands,

but the licence itself cannot but become extinct with the dissolution of

the original company, viz. the original grantee.

This being so, if a railway company fails to fulfil its liability for

debenture and goes into bankruptcy, the ultimate result would be that

the railway system would be broken up, and the creditors would get their

satisfaction only from the sale of each piece of the material property

sold by public auction. Even in the case of ordinary debt, whereby all

the material property can be mortgaged, the result would be practically

the same.

All these inconveniences have now been removed by a series of new laws

passed by the last session of the Imperial diet and promulgated on March

13, 1905, by the Imperial Government. The articles of the laws are very

numerous and minute, so that it would be unnecessary to dwell upon them

here in detail, but the more important parts may be summarised as

follows:

_(a)_ The economic entity of a railway company may be constituted a

special economic corporation for the purpose of mortgage.[2]

_(b)_ In default of payment of the mortgage liability, the whole, _i.e._

the corporation, may be subjected to auction. This provides the means

for transferring, together with the material properties, the original

permission of the Government, namely, the licence, to the purchaser,

viz. a new company.

_(c)_ A company, which in reality may be taken as a syndicate, may be

formed for advancing money by means of debentures. Such company may

acquire legal recognition and may represent the creditors of debentures.

It forms a particular kind of commercial company, and is called 'trust

company.'

_(d)_ At the option of the creditors, means of compulsory control of the

railway in the interest of creditors are also provided for in the laws.

_(e)_ Special provisions are made to meet the cases where the syndicate

and investors are of foreign nationality: namely, the means of

recognising foreign syndicates by the Japanese Government, and also the

means of affording convenience for foreign investors.

_(f)_ Further provisions are made for facilitating the registration of

constituting the said corporation, and the registration of the mortgage

thereof, for these affairs, as far as railways are concerned, are now

entrusted, by the new laws, to the Minister of Communications, to whose

control the railways belong, and not to the local courts of law, as is

the case with all other kinds of mortgages.

This change of our laws gives very great facility to foreign investors

who may be willing to lend money on railway securities.

The case of mining enterprises were similar because they are also based

on licences. For them also much the same changes have been effected by

the new laws, so that their economic entity may now be mortgaged in the

interests of either an ordinary creditor or investors in debentures.

The cases of ordinary factories differ in origin from those of the

railways or mines, they not being based on a concession or licence like

railway or mining enterprises. But for them also the new laws have made

provisions for the means of constituting corporations for the purpose of

guaranteeing debenture by mortgage. Provisions have also been made for

guaranteeing debenture by mortgaging ships, any definite property either

immovable or movable, or any legal claims which are secured by written

instruments.

[1] The _Outlook_.

[2] The law also permits the companies constituting such a corporation

of a part of the whole for a similar object. But as its general purport

does not materially differ, I omit its account in order to avoid

confusion.--_The Author_.

A Fantasy of Far Japan; Or, Summer Dream Dialogues · 第 67 / 93 题