INVERSE INHERITANCE.

Mr. Galton contends that the reproductive elements become sterile when

used in forming and maintaining the individual, and that only a small

proportion of them are so used.[68] He holds that the next generation

will be formed entirely, or almost entirely, from the residue of

undeveloped germs, which, not having been employed in the structure and

work of the individual, have been free to multiply and form the

reproductive elements whence future individuals are derived. Hence the

singular inferiority not infrequently displayed by the children of men

of extraordinary genius, especially where the ancestry has been only of

a mediocre ability. The valuable germs have been used up in the

individual, and rendered sterile in the structure of his person. Hence,

too, the "strong tendency to deterioration in the transmission of every

exceptionally gifted race." Mr. Galton's hypothesis "explains the fact

of certain diseases skipping one or more generations," and it "agrees

singularly well with many classes of fact;" and it is strongly opposed

to the theory of use-inheritance. The elements which are used die almost

universally without germ progeny: the germs which are _not_ used are the

great source of posterity. Hence, when the germs or gemmules which

achieve development are either better or worse than the residue, the

qualities transmitted to offspring will be of an inverse character. If

brain-work attracts, develops _and sterilizes_ the best gemmules, the

ultimate effect of education on the intellect of posterity may differ

from its immediate effect.

Are the Effects of Use and Disuse Inherited? An Examination of the View Held by Spencer and Darwin · 第 49 / 70 题