In last analysis slavery may have been, probably was, the cause of the

war; but, historically, it was not the motive. Lincoln's words--"I

will save the Union with slavery, or I will save it without slavery,

as the case may demand"--voiced the feeling prevalent in the military

services, and also the will of the great body of the Northern people,

whom he profoundly understood and in his own mental advance

illustrated. I cannot but think that such an aim was more

statesmanlike than would have been the attempt to overturn immediately

and violently an entire social and economical system, for the

establishment of which the current generation was not responsible. In

the long run, to allow the tares of bondage to stand with the wheat of

freedom was wiser than the wish prematurely to uproot. It had become

the definite policy of the enemies of slavery to girdle the tree, by

strict encompassing lines, leaving it to consequent sure process of

decay. Its friends forced the issue. To the ones and to the others the

harvest of generations, in the form it took, came unexpected and

suddenly--a day of judgment, a crisis, like a thief in the night. It

is a consummate proof of the accuracy of popular instinct, given time

to work, that the uprising of 1861 rested upon recognition of the

fact that the cause of the nation and of the world depended more upon

the preservation of a single authority over all the territory

involved, upon the consequent avoidance of future permanent

oppositions, than it did upon the destruction of a particular

institution, the life of which might be protracted, but under

conditions of union must wane and ultimately expire. The gradual

progress of decision by the American people was wiser than the abrupt

action asked by foreign impatience; and abolition came with less shock

and more finality as a military measure than it could as a political.

Its advisability was more evident. If statesmanship is shown in

bringing popular will to accord with national necessity, Lincoln was

in this most sagacious; but not the least element in the tribute due

him is that he was the barometer of popular impulse, measuring

accurately the invisible force upon which depended the energy of that

stormy period.

Before taking final leave of my shore experiences at the Naval

Academy, I will recall, as among them, the superb comet of the autumn

of 1858, which we at the school witnessed evening after evening in

October of that year, during the release from quarters following

supper. After the lapse of so nearly a half-century, the survivors of

those who saw that magnificent spectacle must be in a minority among

their contemporaries, whether of that day or this. Since its

disappearance there has been visible one other notable comet, which I

remember waking my children after midnight to see; but compared with

that of 1858, whether in size or in splendor, it was literally as

moonlight unto sunlight, or, in impression, as water unto wine. As the

astronomers compute the period of return for the earlier at two

thousand years, more or less, we of that generation were truly

singular in our opportunity of viewing this, among the very few "most

magnificent of modern times." The tail, broadening towards the end,

with a curve like that of a scimitar, was in length nearly a fourth of

the span of the heavens, and its brightness that of a full moon. My

memory retains the image with all the tenacity of eighteen.

* * * * *

Corresponding in some measure to the summer encampment at the Military

Academy, the Naval gave the three months from July to September,

inclusive, to shipboard and the sea. In both institutions the period

was one of study interrupted, in favor of out-door work; but at West

Point it was accompanied by a degree of social entertainment

impossible to ship conditions. There were two theories as to the

conduct of the practice cruises. One was that they should be confined

to home waters, where regular hours and systematized instruction in

"doing things" would suffer little interference from weather; the

other was to make long voyages, preferably to Europe, leaving to the

normal variability of the ocean and the watchful improvement of

occasions the burden of initiating a youth into practical acquaintance

with the exigencies of his intended profession. Personally I have

always favored the latter, being somewhat of the opinion of the old

practical politician--"Never contrive an opportunity." Naturally an

opportunist, the experience of life has justified me in rather

awaiting than contriving occasions. One learns more widely and more

thoroughly by reefing topsails when it has to be done, than by doing

it at a routine hour, without the accompaniments of the wind, the wet,

and the lurching, which give the operation a tone and a tonic--the

real thing, in short. Doubtless we may wait too long, like Micawber,

even for a reef-topsail gale to turn up, though the ocean can usually

be trusted to be nasty often enough; but, on the other hand, one over

sedulously bent on making opportunity is apt to be too preoccupied to

see that which makes itself. Truth, doubtless, lies between the

extremes.

In my day long cruises had unquestioned preference; and, whatever

their demerits otherwise, they were certainly eye-openers, even to

those who, like myself, had obtained some intelligent impression of

ships at sea. As instruction in seamanship was then never attempted,

neither by work nor book, until after the second year, we went on

board not knowing one mast from another, so far as teaching went. How

far initial ignorance could go may be illustrated by an incident, to

be appreciated, unluckily, only by seamen, which happened in my

hearing. We had then been nearly two months on board, when one who had

improved his opportunities was displaying his acquirements by the

pleasing method of catechising another. He asked: "Do you know what

the topsail-tie is?" The rejoinder, perfectly serious, was: "Do you

mean the cross-tie?" The topsail-tie being one of the principal

"ropes" in a ship, the ignorance was really symptomatic of character;

and had not the hero of it been long dead, I would not have preserved

it, even incog. I fear it may be cited against my view of practice

cruises, as proving that systematic training is better than

picking-up; to which my reply would be that the picking-up showed

aptitude--or the reverse--if only some means could be devised of

making it tell in selection, as it assuredly did in character. But at

the beginning, despite any little previous inklings, we were all quite

green. I still recall the innocent astonishment when we anchored in

Hampton Roads, after the run down the Chesapeake, and the boatswain,

as by custom, pulled round the ship to see the yards square and

rigging taut. Semaphore signalling was not then used, as later; and

his stentorian lungs conveyed to us distinct sounds, bearing meanings

we felt could never be compassed by us. "Haul taut the main-top

bowlines!" "Haul taut the starboard fore-topgallant-sheet." "Maintop,

there! Send a hand up and square the bunt gaskets of the

topgallant-sail!" "By Jove!" said one of the admiring listeners,

"there's seamanship for you!" We all silently agreed, and I dare say

many thought we might as well give it up and go home. Such excellence

was not for us.

The subsequent process of picking-up was attended sometimes by

comical, as well as painful, incidents. Peter Simple's experiences, as

told by Marryat, were not yet quite obsolete in practice. A story ran

of one, not long before my "date," who, having been sent on two or

three bootless errands by unauthorized jesters, finally received from

a person in due authority the absurd-sounding, but legitimate, message

to have the jackasses put in the hawse-holes.[7] "Oh no," he replied,

resentfully, "I have been fooled often enough! That I will not do." I

can better vouch for another, which happened on my first practice

cruise. In a sailing-ship properly planned, the balance of the sails

is such that to steer her on her course the rudder need not be kept

more to one side than the other; the helm is then amidships. But error

of design, or circumstances, such as a faulty trim of the sails or the

ship inclining in a strong side-wind, will sometimes so alter the

influencing forces that the helm has to be carried steadily on one

side, to correct the ship's disposition to turn to that side. She is

then said to carry weather helm or lee helm, as the case may be; and

the knowing ones used to assert noticeable differences of sailing in

certain conditions. In many ships to carry a little weather helm was

thought advantageous, and it was told of a certain deck-officer--he

who repeated the story to me made the late Admiral Porter the

hero--that the ship being found to sail faster in his watch than in

any other, the commander sent for him and asked the reason. "Well,

sir," replied the lieutenant, "I will tell you my secret. As soon as

the officer I relieve is gone below and out of sight, while the watch

is mustering, I walk forward, look round at things generally, and say

casually to the captain of the forecastle: 'Just slack off a little of

this jib-sheet.' Then about ten minutes before eight bells, after the

last log of the watch has been hove, while the men are rousing to go

below, I go forward again and say, 'Come here, half a dozen of us, and

get a pull of the jib-sheet;' and I turn the deck over to my relief

with the jib well flattened in." In result, the frigate during his

watch, and his only, carried a weather helm. My own experience of

sailing ships was neither prolonged enough nor responsible enough to

estimate just what weight to attach to these impressions, but they

existed; and in any case, as the helm varying far from amidships

showed something wrong, the question was frequent to the helmsman,

"How does she carry her helm?" varied sometimes to, "What sort of helm

does she carry?" Now we had among our green midshipmen one from the

West, tall, angular, swarthy, with a coal-black eye which had a trick

of cocking up and out, giving a queer, perplexed, yet defiant cast to

his countenance; moreover, he stuttered a little, not from

imperfection of organs, but from nervous excitability. We had also a

lieutenant from far down East, red-haired, sanguine of complexion,

bony of structure, who had a gesture of tossing his hair and head

back, and looking tremendously leonine and master of the

situation--monarch of all he surveyed. The two were naturally

antagonistic, as was amusingly shown more than once; but on this

occasion the midshipman was at the "lee wheel," not himself steering,

but helping the steersman in the manual labor. To him the lieutenant,

pausing in his stride and tilting his chin in the air, says: "Mr.

----, what sort of helm does she carry?" ----, who had never heard of

weather or lee helms, and probably was not yet recovered from the

effects of the boatswain's seamanship, twisted his eye and his head,

looking more than ever confounded and saucy, and stammered: "I--I--I'm

not sure, sir, but I think it's a wooden one." Tableau!--as the French

say.

In position on board we were midshipmen indeed, in a sense probably

somewhat different from that which first gave birth to the title. We

were not seamen; and it could scarcely be claimed that we were in any

full sense officers, much as we stuck to that designation. We stood

midway. There was a tradition in the British service that a

midshipman, though in training for promotion, did not, while in the

grade, rank with the boatswain or gunner, who had no future prospects,

and who, with the carpenter, stood in a class by themselves. Marryat,

who doubtless drew his characters from life, tells us that the gunner

who sailed with Mr. Midshipman Easy was strong on the necessity for

the gunner mastering navigation, and had many instances in point where

all the officers had been killed down to the gunner, who in such case

would have been sadly handicapped by ignorance of navigation. I fancy

the doubt seldom needed to be settled in service; the duties of

midshipman and boatswain could rarely come into collision, if each

minded his own business. By luck, just after writing these words, I

for the first time in my life have found a plausible derivation for

midshipman.[8] It would appear that in the days immediately after the

flood the vessels were very high at the two ends, between which there

was a deep "waist," giving no ready means of passing from one to the

other. To meet this difficulty there were employed a class of men,

usually young and alert, who from their station were called

midshipmen, to carry messages which were not subject for the trumpet

shout. If this holds water, it, like forecastle, and after-guard, and

knightheads, gives another instance of survival from conditions which

have long ceased.

Whatever the origin of his title, it well expressed the anomalous and

undefined position of the midshipman. He belonged, so to say, to both

ends of the ship, as well as to the middle, and his duties and

privileges alike fell within the broad saying, already quoted, that

what was nobody's business was a midshipman's. When appointed as such,

in later days, he came in "with the hay-seed in his hair," and went

out fit for a lieutenant's charge; but from first to last, whatever

his personal progress, he remained, as a midshipman, a handy-billy. He

might be told, as Basil Hall's first captain did his midshipmen, that

they might keep watch or not, as they pleased--that is, that the ship

had no use for them; or he might be sent in charge of a prize, as was

Farragut, when twelve years old, doubtless with an old seaman as

nurse, but still in full command. Anywhere from the bottom of the hold

to the truck--top of the masts--he could be sent, and was sent; every

boat, that went ashore had a midshipman, who must answer for her

safety and see that none got away of a dozen men, whose one thought

was to jump the boat and have a run on shore. Between times he passed

hours at the mast-head in expiation of faults which he had

committed--or ought to have committed, to afford a just scapegoat for

his senior's wrath. As Marryat said, it made little difference: if he

did not think of something he had not been told, he was asked what his

head was for; if he did something off his own bat, the question arose

what business he had to think. In either case he went to the mast-head.

Of course, at a certain age one "turns to mirth all things of earth,

as only boyhood can;" and the contemporary records of the steerage

brim over with unforced jollity, like that notable hero of Marryat's

"who was never quite happy except when he was d----d miserable."

Such undefined standing and employments taught men their business, but

provided no remedy for the miscellaneous social origin of midshipmen.

In the beginning of things they were probably selected from the smart

young men of the crew; often also from the more middle-aged--in any

event, from before the mast. Even in much later days men passed

backward and forward from midshipman to lower ratings; Nelson is an

instance in point. When a man became a lieutenant, he was something

fixed and recognized, professionally and socially. He might fall below

his station, but he had had his chance. In the British navy many most

distinguished officers came from anywhere--through the hawse-holes, as

the expression ran; and a proud boast it should have been at a time

when every Frenchman in his position had to be of noble blood. What

was all very well for captains and lieutenants, once those ranks were

reached, was not so easy for midshipmen. We know in every walk of life

the woes of those whose position is doubtful or challenged; and what

was said to his crew by Sir Peter Parker, an active frigate captain

who was killed in Chesapeake Bay in 1814, "I'll have you touch your

hat to a midshipman's jacket hung up to dry" (curiously reminiscent of

William Tell and Gessler's cap), not improbably testifies to

equivocalness even at that late date. The social instinct of seamen is

singularly observant and tenacious of their officers' manners and

bearing. I have known one, reproved for a disrespect, say, sullenly:

"I have always been accustomed to sail with gentlemen." In the

instance the comment was just, though not permissible. Deference might

be conceded to the midshipman's jacket, but it could not cover defects

of a certain order.

The midshipman's berth, as attested by contemporary sketches, was

peopled by all sorts in age, fitness, and manners. In one of the many

tales I devoured in youth, a middle-aged shellback of a master's mate,

come in from before the mast, says with an oath to an aristocratic

midshipman: "Isn't my blood as red as yours?" Still, even in the

British navy, with its fine democratic record, the social rank was

more regarded than the military. His Majesty's ship _So-and-So_ was

commanded by John Smith, Esquire; and I have heard this point of view

stated by competent authority as accounting for the address--George

Washington, Esquire--placed by Howe on the letter which Washington

refused to accept because not carrying the rank conferred on him by

Congress. This does not, however, explain away the "etc., etc.," which

followed on the cover. John Byng, Esquire, Admiral of the Blue, would

thus be of higher consideration as Esquire than as Admiral. Even in

our own service I remember an old log, the pages of which were headed,

"Cruise of the U. S. Ship _Preble_, commanded by J. B. M----,

Esquire."

In the practice cruises the social question did not arise. Independent

of the democratic tendency of all boys' schools, where each individual

finds his level by natural gravitation, the Naval Academy, for reasons

before alluded to, has been remarkably successful in assimilating its

heterogeneous raw material and turning out a finished product of a

good average social quality. Beyond this, social success or failure

depends everywhere upon personal aptitudes which no training can

bestow. But as officers we were nondescript. There were too many of

us; and for the most the object was to acquire a sufficient seaman's

knowledge, not an officer's. Yet, curiously enough, so at least it

seemed to me, there was a disposition on the part of some to be

jealous of any supposed infringement of our prerogative to be treated

as "a bit of an officer." Ashore or afloat, we made our own beds or

lashed our own hammocks, swept our rooms, tended our clothes, and

blacked our boots; our drills were those of the men before the mast,

at sails and guns; all parts of a seaman's work, except cleaning the

ship, was required and willingly done; but there was a comical

rebellion on one occasion when ordered to pull--row--a boat ashore for

some purpose, and almost a mutiny when one lieutenant directed us to

go barefooted while decks were being scrubbed, a practice which,

besides saving your shoe-leather, is both healthy, cleanly, and, in

warm weather, exceedingly comforting. Some asserted that the

lieutenant in question, who afterwards commanded one of the

Confederate commerce-destroyers, and from his initials (Jas. I.) was

known to us as Jasseye, had done this because he had very pretty feet

which he liked to show bare, and we must do the same; much as Germans

are said to train their mustaches with the emperor's. At all events,

there was great wrath, which I supposed I should have shared had I not

preferred bare feet--not for as sound reasons as the lieutenant's. It

stands to reason, however, that that imputation was slanderous, for

there were no appreciative observers, unless himself. Why waste such

sweetness on the desert air of a lot of heedless midshipmen? With so

many details regulated--if not enforced--from the length of our hair

to the cut of our trousers, it did seem hypercritical to object to

going shoeless for an hour. But who is consistent? The uncertainty of

our position kept the chip on the shoulder.

V

MY FIRST CRUISE AFTER GRADUATION--NAUTICAL CHARACTERS

1859-1861

At the moment of graduation, in the summer of 1859, I had a narrow

escape from the cutting short of my career, resembling that which a

man has from a railway accident by missing the train. To a certain

extent the members of classes were favored in forming groups of

friends, and choosing the ship to which they would be sent. Myself and

two intimates applied for the sloop-of-war _Levant_, destined for the

Pacific by way of Cape Horn; our motive being partly the kind of

vessel, supposed by us to favor professional opportunity, and partly

the friendship existing between one of us and the master of the

_Levant_, a graduate of two or three years before, who had just

completed his examinations for promotion. Luckily for us, and

particularly for me, as the only one of the three who in after life

survived middle age, the frigate _Congress_ was fitting out, and her

requirements for officers could not be disregarded. The _Levant_

sailed, reached the Pacific, and disappeared--one of the mysteries of

the deep. We very young men had the impression that small vessels were

better calculated to advance us professionally, because, having fewer

officers, deck duty might be devolved on us, either to ease the

regular watch officers or in case of a disability. This prepossession

extended particularly to brigs, of which the navy then had several.

This was a pretty wild imagining, for I can hardly conceive any one

in trusting such a vessel to a raw midshipman. It is scarcely an

exaggeration to say they were all canvas and no hull--beautiful as a

dream, but dangerous to a degree, except to the skilful. As it was, an

unusual proportion of them came to grief. Our views were doubtless

largely, if unconsciously, affected by the pleasing idea of

prospective early importance as deck officers. The more solid opinion

of our seniors was that we would do better to pause awhile on the

bottom step, under closer supervision; while as for vessel, the order,

dignity, and scale of performance on big ships were more educative,

more formative of military character, which, and not seamanship, is

the leading element of professional value. "Keep them at sea," said

Lord St. Vincent, "and they can't help becoming seamen; but attention

is needed to make them learn their business with the guns." I have

already mentioned that, at the outbreak of the War of Secession, it

was this factor which decided the authorities to give seniority to the

very young lieutenants over the volunteers from the merchant service,

most of whom had longer experience and (though by no means all of

them) consequent ability as seamen.

After graduating, my first cruise was upon what was then known as the

Brazil Station; by the British called more comprehensively the

Southeast Coast of America. After the war the name and limits were

judiciously changed. It became then the South Atlantic Station, to

embrace the Cape of Good Hope, and, generally, the coasts of South

America and Africa, with the islands lying between, such as St. Helena

and the Falklands. From the point of view of healthy activity for the

ships and their companies, and specifically for the education of

younger officers, this extension was most desirable. In the earlier

time long periods were spent in port, because there really was not

enough that required doing. Our captain once kept the ship at sea for

a fortnight or more, "cruising;" that is, moving about within certain

limits back and forth. In war-time this is frequent, if not general;

but then it is for a specific purpose, conducive to the ends of war.

In peace, cruising ends in itself; it is like a "constitutional;"

beneficial, no doubt, but not to most men as healthily beneficial as

the walk to the office, with its definite object and the incidental

amusement of the streets. A _terminus ad quem_ is essential to the

perfection of exercise, bodily or mental. As it was, Montevideo, in

the river La Plata, and Rio de Janeiro were the two chief ports

between which we oscillated, with rare and brief stays elsewhere or at

sea.

From Sail to Steam, Recollections of Naval Life · 第 8 / 26 段