SOCIAL STANDING.

But at this very time, while they were rapidly assimilating the best

results of modern culture and winning the respect and confidence of the

learned, the Jews of Germany were still laboring under an odious system

of special laws, and beheld themselves excluded from the common rights

of citizenship. The manly effort of Dohm in their behalf had as yet

availed nothing; the voice of bigotry was still supreme in the councils

of the sovereign. And yet they felt themselves to be the equals of those

whom the law unjustly ranked their superiors, and longed to see the

barriers done away that still divided them from their fellow-men. Many

of their number had amassed fortunes, and expended their wealth with

commendable prudence and generosity. They supported needy students,

founded libraries, extended their knowledge, and refined their tastes.

Even the Jewish maidens followed the general impulse toward self-culture

that was setting with such force in the Jewish community. In particular

the works of Schiller and Goethe, as they successively appeared at this

period, inflamed their enthusiasm, and none were more zealous than

they in spreading the fame and influence of the new school of German

literature. Still they were taught to consider themselves an inferior

class, and were despised as such. The position of equality which the

narrowness of the laws denied them they were resolved to achieve by the

weight ol character and the force of spiritual attractions. Henrietta de

Lemos, a young girl of singular beauty and attainments, had at this time

become the wife of Dr. Herz, of whom we have casually spoken above in

his connection with Kant. She is described as tall, graceful, possessing

a face in which the features of Hellenic and Oriental beauty were

blended in exquisite harmony; while the sobriquet of the "Tragic

Muse," by which she became known, denoted the majestic nobleness of

her presence. Under the guidance of competent masters she had acquired

considerable proficiency in many of the modern and ancient languages,

and to a mind stored with various knowledge was added the mellow charm

of a most sweet and loving disposition. Attracted by her fame and

captivated by her genius, the most eminent men of the day sought the

privilege of her society. The art of conversation, which had till then

received but little attention in the Prussian capital, was for the first

time cultivated in the _salon_ of Henrietta Herz. Sparkling wit and

profound philosophy were alike encouraged. Statesmen high in the service

of their country sought the amenities of these delightful gatherings.

Alexander and Wilhelm von Humboldt, Gentz, Schleier-macher, Friedrich

von Schlegel, Mirabeau, Dorothea, the daughter of Mendelssohn, Rahel,

afterwards wife of Varnhagen von Ense, were among the intimates of her

circle. Christians and Jews met here on terms of mutual deference, and

forgot for a while the paltry distinctions which still kept them

asunder in the world without. And yet these distinctions, senseless in

themselves, were full of ominous meaning to those who felt their

burden. Young men eager for advancement in life found their religion

an insuperable obstacle in their way. The professions, the army, the

offices of the government, were closed against them. On the threshold of

every higher career they were rudely repulsed, unless they embraced

the base alternative of changing their creed to satisfy their ambition.

Under these circumstances that fidelity to the faith of the fathers

which had so long marked the conduct of the Jews began seriously

to waver, and in many instances gave way. Not, indeed, that the new

converts became true and loyal Christians. On the contrary, they

considered the rite of baptism a mere hollow form, and left it to the

state, which had insisted upon their conformance, to justify the deep

disgrace that was thus brought upon the Christian sacraments. Moreover,

a certain laxity in the interpretation of dogma had at this time

become widely prevalent, which greatly assisted them in setting their

conscience at ease. Rationalism had stripped the positive religions

of much of their substance and individuality. To none of them was an

absolute value allowed. They were regarded as forms in which a principle

higher than all forms had found an imperfect and temporary expression.

Even the influence of Schleiermacher tended rather to obliterate than to

define the outlines of the contending creeds. Schleiermacher, the author

of a Protestant revival in Germany, spoke the language of Pantheism,

and his opinions are deeply suffused with the spirit of Pantheistic

teachings. He defines religion to be the sense of dependence on the

Infinite, the Universal. To the fact that different men in different

ages have been variously affected by the conception of the Infinite

he ascribes the origin of the different creeds. Theological dogmas,

according to him, cannot claim to be true in the sense of scientific or

philosophical propositions. They approach the truth only in so far as

they typically express certain emotional processes of our soul, and

those dogmas are nearest the truth which typify emotions of the most

noble and exalted character. Allowing Christianity to be what its

learned expounders had defined it, intelligent Jews could hardly find

it difficult to assume the Christian name. It is estimated that in the

course of three decades full one half of the Jewish community of Berlin

were nominally Christianized.

How thoroughly conventional, at the same time, the use of the term

Christian had become may be judged from a letter addressed by David

Friedlander, a friend of Mendelssohn's, to Councillor Teller of

the Consistory, in which he offered, on behalf of himself and some

co-religionists, to accept Christianity in case they might be permitted

to omit the observance of the Christian festivals, to reject the

doctrine of the Trinity, of the divinity of Jesus, and, in fact,

whatever is commonly regarded as essentially and specifically Christian.

It is true the reply of the Councillor was not encouraging.

Creed and Deed: A Series of Discourses · 第 29 / 36 题