THE PERSIANS.

The Assyrian system of panelling the lower portions of their buildings

with slabs of alabaster, may be considered as the first step towards

construction in hewn stone, and towards the introduction of the “_coupe

de pierre_” into the number of architectural and ornamental elements.

_It is only in the terraces, and the sub-basements of buildings, in the

primitive ages of art, that hewn stone and its construction appeared to

the eye._ These parts of the buildings were the mason’s oldest domain.

The Persian monuments of Murgaub and Istakir, afford us the means of

observing the second step which decorative art made towards the

principle of construction. They were composed, like their models in

Assyria, of unbaked bricks, of which nothing remains, whilst however,

the direction of the walls is still indicated by marble pillars, which

originally served to strengthen the angles of the walls, and by the

jambs of doors and windows and by niches, with which the walls were

ornamented.

All these parts were ornamented in the Assyrian manner, and testify to

the principles of which we have been speaking. But here we have no

longer slabs, but hewn masses of stone of enormous dimensions,

frequently monoliths. Nevertheless, in spite of their solidity, they

betray their type, in a most remarkable manner, inasmuch as they form a

kind of framework hollowed out internally to receive the mass of masonry

in unbaked brick, which they were designed to cover and to protect, and

which, in the interspaces of the pillars and jambs above-named, were

covered with slabs of marble, or more probably, with panels of

cypress-wood, covered in turn by plates of gold and silver, or it may be

also with richly embroidered stuffs.

An Apology for the Colouring of the Greek Court in the Crystal Palace · 第 32 / 39 题