VOL. I--OCTOBER, 1916--No. 4

THE WORK OF THE SOCIETY FOR THE PROPAGATION OF THE GOSPEL IN FOREIGN PARTS

AMONG THE NEGROES IN THE COLONIES

The Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts was

organized in London in the year 1701. During the eighteenth century the

British Colonies of the New World constituted the principal field of

missionary endeavor for this organization. There were then in North America

250,000 settlers, whole colonies of whom were living in heathenism while

others were adhering to almost every variety of strange faiths. The work of

proselyting these people was too important to be intrusted to individual

enterprise and too extensive to be successfully prosecuted by the heads of

the Church only. The ministrations of the Established Church were then

limited to a few places in Virginia, New York, Maryland and the cities of

Boston and Philadelphia. To supply this deficiency the Society endeavored

to use missionaries as a direct means to convert the heathen of all races,

whether Europeans, Indians or Negroes. There were cruel masters who

objected to the conversion of their slaves,[1] but that any race should be

denied the message of salvation because of its color was ever repudiated by

the Society. From the very beginning of this work the conversion of the

Negroes was as important to the Society as that of bringing the whites or

the Indians into the church. Such dignitaries of the church, as Rev. Thomas

Bacon and Bishops Fleetwood, Lowth, Sanderson and Wilson, ever urged this

duty upon their brethren at home and abroad.[2]

The first really effective work of the Society was done in South Carolina.

Reverend Mr. Thomas of Goose Creek Parish in that State early instructed

the Indian and Negro slaves of his vicinity. He directed his attention to

the Negroes in 1695 and ten years later counted among his communicants

twenty blacks, who with several others "well understanding the English

tongue," could read and write. He further said, in 1705: "I have here

presumed to give an account of one thousand slaves so far as they know of

it and are desirous of Christian knowledge and seem willing to prepare

themselves for it, in learning to read, for which they redeem the time

from their labor. Many of them can read the Bible distinctly and great

numbers of them were learning when I left the province."[3]

This work, however, had not proceeded without much opposition. The

sentiment as to the enlightenment of the blacks was largely that of the

youth who resolved never to go to the holy table while slaves were

received there. Others felt like the lady who inquired: "Is it possible

that any of my slaves should go to heaven, and must I see them there?"[4]

The earnest workers sent out by the Society, however, did not cease to

labor in behalf of the Negroes and the number of masters willing to have

their slaves instructed gradually increased. Among these liberal owners

were John Morris, of St. Bartholomew's, Lady Moore, Captain David Davis,

Mrs. Sarah Baker at Goose Creek, Landgrave Joseph Morton and his wife of

St. Paul's, the Governor and a member of the Assembly, Mr. and Mrs.

Skeen,[5] Mrs. Haigue and Mrs. Edwards. So successful were the efforts of

Mrs. Haigue and Mrs. Edwards that they were formally thanked by the

Society for their care and good example in instructing the Negroes of whom

no less than twenty-seven prepared by them, including those of another

planter, were baptized by the Reverend E. Taylor of St. Andrew's within

two years.[6]

Other less liberal masters refused to allow their slaves to attend Mr.

Taylor for instruction, but some of them were induced to teach the blacks

the Lord's Prayer. The result even from this was so successful that there

came to the church more Negroes than could be accommodated. So great was

their desire for instruction that had it not been for the opposition of

their owners, almost all of them would have been converted. "So far as

the missionaries were permitted," says one, "they did all that was

possible for their evangelization, and while so many professed Christians

among the planters were lukewarm, it pleased God to raise to himself

devout servants among the heathen, whose faithfulness was commended by the

masters themselves. In some of the congregations the Negroes or blacks

constituted one half of the communicants."[7]

This interest of the clergy in the Negroes of South Carolina continued in

spite of opposition. Rev. Mr. Guy, of St. Andrew's Parish, said that he

baptized "a Negro man and a Negro woman" in 1723, and Rev. Mr. Hunt,

minister of St. John's Parish, reported in that same year that "a slave, a

sensible Negro, who can read and write and comes to church, is a Catechumen

under probation for Baptism which he desires."[8] A new impetus too was

given the movement about 1740. Influenced by such urgent addresses as those

of Dr. Brearcroft, and Bishops Gibson, Wilson and Seeker, the workers of

the Society were aroused to proselyting more extensively among the Negroes.

In 1741 the Bishop of Canterbury expressed his gratification at the large

number of Negroes who were then being brought into the church.[9]

A decided step forward was noted in 1743. That year a school for Negroes

was opened by Commissary Garden and placed in charge of Harry and Andrew,

two colored youths, who had been trained as teachers at the cost of the

Society. This establishment was a sort of training school for bright young

blacks who felt called to instruct their fellow countrymen. For adults who

labored during the day it was an evening school. It was successfully

conducted for more than twenty years. In 1763 the institution was for some

unknown reason closed after being conducted in the face of many

difficulties and obstructions, although this was the only educational

institution in that colony for its 50,000 blacks.[10]

Some good results were obtained by the missionaries of the Society of

North Carolina, but difficulties were also encountered there. The chief

trouble seems to have been that missionaries of that colony were

"frustrated by the slave owners who would by no means permit" their Negroes

to be baptized, "having a false notion that a christened slave is by law

free."[11] "By much importunity," says an investigator, Mr. Ransford of

Chowan (in 1712) prevailed on Mr. Martin to let him baptize three of his

Negroes, two women and a boy. "All the arguments I could make use of,"

said he, "would scarce effect it till Bishop Fleetwood's sermon (in 1711)

... turned ye scale."[12] Mr. Rumford succeeded, however, in baptizing

upwards of forty Negroes in one year. In the course of time, when the

workers overcame the prejudice of the masters, a missionary would sometimes

baptize fifteen to twenty-four in a month, forty to fifty in six months,

and sixty to seventy in a year.[13] Reverend Mr. Newman, a minister in

North Carolina, reported in 1723 that he had baptized two Negroes who could

say the Creed, the Lord's Prayer, the Ten Commandments, and gave good

sureties for their further information.[14] According to the report of Rev.

C. Hall, the number of conversions there among Negroes for eight years was

355, including 112 adults, and "at Edenton the blacks generally were

induced to attend service at all these stations, where they behaved with

great decorum."[15]

In the Middle and Southern Colonies these missionaries had the cooperation

of Dr. Thomas Bray. In 1696 he was sent to Maryland by the Bishop of

London to do what he could toward the conversion of adult Negroes and the

education of their children.[16] Bray's most influential supporter was M.

D'Alone, the private secretary of King William. D'Alone gave for the

maintenance of the cause a fund, the proceeds of which were first used to

employ catechists, and later to support the Thomas Bray Mission after the

catechists had failed to give satisfaction. At the death of this

missionary the task was taken up by certain of his followers known as the

"Associates of Dr. Bray."[17] They extended their work beyond the bounds

of Maryland. These benefactors maintained two schools for the benefit of

Negroes in Philadelphia. About the close of the French and Indian War,

Rev. Mr. Stewart, a missionary in North Carolina, found there a school for

the education of Indians and Negroes conducted by "Dr. Bray's

Associates."[18]

Georgia too was not neglected. The extension of the work of Dr. Bray's

associates into the colony made an opening there for taking up the

instruction of Negroes. The Society joined with these workers for

supporting a schoolmaster for Negroes in 1751 and an improvement in the

slaves was soon admitted by their owners.[19] In 1766 Rev. S. Frink, a

missionary toiling in Augusta, found that he could neither convert the

Indians nor the whites, who seemed to be as destitute of religion as the

former, but succeeded in converting some Negroes.[20]

In Pennsylvania the missionary movement found less obstacles to the

conversion of Negroes than to that of the Indians. In fact, the

proselyting of Negroes in the colony was less difficult than in some other

parts of America. The reports of the missionaries show that slaves were

being baptized there as early as 1712.[21] About this time a Mr. Yeates,

of Chester, was commended by the Rev. G. Ross "for his endeavors to train

up the Negroes in the knowledge of religion."[22] Moved by the appeal of

the Bishop of London, other masters permitted the indoctrination of their

slaves in the principles of Christianity. At Philadelphia the Rev. G. Ross

baptized on one occasion 12 adult Negroes, "who were examined before the

congregation and answered to the admiration of all who heard them.... The

like sight had never been seen before in that church."[23] Rev. Mr.

Beckett, minister in Sussex County, Pennsylvania, said in 1723 that he had

admitted two Negro slaves and that many Negroes constantly attended his

services.[24] The same year Rev. Mr. Bartow baptized a Negro at West

Chester.[25] Rev. Mr. Pugh, a missionary at Appoquinimmick, Pennsylvania,

said, in a letter written to the Society in 1737, that he had received a

few blacks and that the masters of the Negroes were prejudiced against

their being Christians.[26] Rev. Richard Locke christened eight Negroes in

one family at Lancaster in 1747 and another Negro there the following

year.[26a] In 1774 the Rev. Mr. Jenney reported that there was "a great

and daily increase of Negroes in this city who would with joy attend upon

a catechist for instruction"; that he had baptized several, but was unable

to add to his other duties; and the Society, ever ready to lend a helping

hand to such pious undertakings, appointed the Rev. W. Sturgeon as

catechist for the Negroes at Philadelphia.[27] The next to show diligence

in the branch of the work of the Society was Mr. Neill of Dover. He

baptized as many as 162 within 18 months.[28]

The operations of the Society did not seem to cover a large part of New

Jersey. The Rev. Mr. Lindsay wrote of the baptizing of a Negro at Allerton

in 1736.[29] The reports from the missions of New Brunswick show that a

large number of Negroes had attached themselves to the church. This

condition, however, did not obtain in all parts of that colony. Yet

subsequent reports show that the missionary spirit was not wanting in that

section. The baptism of black children and the accession of Negro adults

to the church were from time to time reported from that field.[30]

The most effective work of the Society among Negroes of the Northern

colonies was accomplished in New York. In that colony, the instruction of

the Negro and Indian slaves to prepare them for conversion, baptism, and

communion was a primary charge oft repeated to every missionary and

schoolmaster of the Society. In addition to the general efforts put forth

in the colonies, there was in New York a special provision for the

employment of sixteen clergymen and thirteen lay teachers mainly for the

evangelization of the slaves and the free Indians. For the Negro slaves a

catechizing school was opened in New York City in 1704 under the charge of

Elias Neau. This benevolent man, after several years' imprisonment because

of his Protestant faith, had come to New York to try his fortunes as a

trader. As early as 1703 he called the attention of the Society to the

great number of slaves in New York "who were without God in the world, and

of whose souls there was no manner of care taken"[31] and proposed the

appointment of a catechist to undertake their instruction. He himself

finally being prevailed upon to accept this position, obtained a license

from the Governor, resigned his position as elder in the French church and

conformed to the Established Church of England, "not upon any worldly

account but through a principle of conscience and hearty approbation of

the English liturgy."[32] He was later licensed by the Bishop of London.

Neau's task was not an easy one. At first he went from house to house, but

afterwards arranged for some of the slaves to attend him. He succeeded,

however, in obtaining gratifying results. He was commended to the Society

by Rev. Mr. Vesey in 1706 as a "constant communicant of our church, and a

most zealous and prudent servant of Christ, in proselyting the miserable

Negroes and Indians among them to the Christian Religion, whereby he does

great service to God and his church."[33] Further confidence in him was

attested by an act of the Society in preparing at his request "a Bill to

be offered to Parliament for the more effectual Conversion of the Negro

and other Servants in the Plantations, to compell Owners of Slaves to

cause children to be baptized within 3 months after their birth and to

permit them when come to years of discretion to be instructed in the

Christian Religion on our Lord's day by the Missionaries under whose

ministry they live."[34]

Neau's school suffered greatly in 1712 because of the prejudice engendered

by the declaration that instruction was the main cause of the Negro riot

in that city. For some days Neau dared not show himself, so bitter was the

feeling of the masters. Upon being assured, however, that only one Negro

connected with the school had participated in the affair and that the most

criminal belonged to the masters who were openly opposed to educating

them, the institution was permitted to continue its endeavors, and the

Governor extended to it his protection and recommended that masters have

their slaves instructed.[35] Yet Neau had still to complain thereafter of

the struggle and opposition of the generality of the inhabitants, who were

strongly prejudiced with a horrid motive thinking that Christian knowledge

"would be a means to make the slave more cunning and apter to

wickedness."[36] Not so long thereafter, however, the support of the best

people and officials of the community made his task easier. Neau could say

in 1714 that "if the slaves and domestics in New York were not instructed

it was not his fault."[37] The Governor, the Council, Mayor, the Recorder

and the Chief Justice informed the Society that Neau had performed his

work "to the great advancement of religion in general and the particular

benefit of the free Indians, Negro slaves, and other Heathens in those

parts, with indefatigable zeal and application."[38]

Neau died in 1722. His work was carried on by Mr. Huddlestone, Rev. Mr.

Whitmore, Rev. Mr. Colgan, Rev. R. Charlton, and Rev. S. Auchmutty. From

1732 to 1740 Mr. Charlton baptized 219 slaves and frequently thereafter

the number admitted yearly was from 40 to 60.[39] The great care exercised

in preparing slaves for the church was rewarded by the spiritual knowledge

which in some cases was such as might have put to shame many persons who

had had greater advantages. Rev. Mr. Auchmutty, who served from 1747 to

1764, reported that there was among the Negroes an ever-increasing desire

for instruction and "not one single Black" that had been "admitted by him

to the Holy Communion" had "turned out bad or been in any shape a disgrace

to our holy Profession."[40]

The interest in the enlightenment of Negroes too extended also to other

parts of the colony. In 1737 Rev. Mr. Stoupe wrote of baptizing four black

children at New Rochelle.[41] Mr. Charlton had taken upon himself at New

Windsor the task of instructing these unfortunates before he entered upon

the work in New York City. At Staten Island too he found it both practical

and convenient "to throw into one the classes of his white and black

catechumens."[42] Rev. Charles Taylor, a schoolmaster at that place, kept

a night school "for the instruction of Negroes, and of such as" could not

"be spared from their work in the day time."[43] Rev. J. Sayre, of

Newburgh, followed the same plan of coeducation of the races in each of

the four churches under his charge.[44] Rev. T. Barclay, an earnest worker

among the slaves in Albany, reported in 1714 "a great forwardness" among

them to embrace Christianity "and a readiness to receive

instruction."[45] He found much opposition among certain masters, chief

among whom were Major M. Schuyler and his brother-in-law Petrus

Vandroffen. Sixty years later came the report from Schenectady that there

were still to be found several Negro slaves of whom 11 were sober, serious

communicants.[46]

These missionaries met with more opposition than encouragement in New

England. The Puritan had no serious objection to seeing the Negroes saved,

but when the conversion meant the incorporation of the undesirable class

into the state, then so closely connected with the church, many New

Englanders became silent. This opposition, however, was not effective

everywhere. From Bristol, Rev. J. Usher wrote in 1730 that several Negroes

desired baptism and were able "to render a very good account of the hope

that was in them," but he was forbidden by their masters to comply with

the request. Yet he reported the same year that among others he had in his

congregation "about 30 Negroes and Indians," most of whom joined "in the

public service very decently."[47] At Newtown, where greater opposition

was encountered, Rev. J. Beach seemed to have baptized by 1733 many

Indians and a few Negroes.[48] The Rev. Dr. Cutler, a missionary at

Boston, wrote to the Society in 1737 that among those he had admitted to

his church were four Negro slaves.[49] Endeavoring to do more than to

effect nominal conversions, Doctor Johnson, while at Stratford, had

catechetical lectures during the summer months of 1751, attended by many

Negroes and some Indians, as well as whites, "about 70 or 80 in all." And

said he: "As far as I can find, where the Dissenters have baptized 2, if

not 3 or 4 Negroes or Indians, I have four or five communicants."[50] Dr.

Macsparran conducted at Narragansett a class of 70 Indians and Negroes

whom he frequently catechized and instructed before the regular

service.[51] Rev. J. Honyman, of Newport, had in his congregation more

than 100 Negroes who "constantly attended the Publick Worship."[52]

It appears then that the Negroes were instructed by the missionaries in

all of the colonies except some remote parts of New England, Virginia and

Maryland. The Established Church had workers among the white persons in

those colonies but they did not always direct their attention to the

slaves. This does not mean, however, that the slaves in those parts were

entirely neglected. There were at work other agencies to bring them to

the light. And so on it continued until the outbreak of the Revolution,

when the work of these missionaries was impeded and in most cases brought

to a close.

The Journal of Negro History, Volume 1, January 1916 · 第 272 / 317 题