THE HAMMER.

529. The hammer and other tools which give a blow depend for their

action upon inertia. A gigantic hammer might force in a nail by the

mere weight of the head resting on the nail, but with the help of

inertia we drive the nail by blows from a small hammer. We have here

inertia aiding in the production of a mechanical power to overcome the

considerable resistance which the wood opposes to the entrance of the

nail. To drive in the nail usually requires a direct force of some

hundreds of pounds, and this we are able conveniently to produce by

suddenly checking the velocity of a small moving body.

[Illustration: FIG. 71.]

530. The theory of the hammer is illustrated by the apparatus in Fig.

71. It is a tripod, at the top of which, about 9' from the ground, is

a stout pulley C; the rope is about 15' long, and to each end of it A

and B are weights attached. These weights are at first each 14 lbs.

I raise A up to the pulley, leaving B upon the ground; I then let go

the rope, and down falls A: it first pulls the slack rope through, and

then, when A is about 3' from the ground, the rope becomes tight, B

gets a violent chuck and is lifted into the air. What has raised B? It

cannot be the mere weight of A, because that being equal to B, could

only just balance B, and is insufficient to raise it. It must have been

a force which raised B; that force must have been something more than

the weight of A, which was produced when the motion was checked. A was

not stopped completely; it only lost some of its velocity, but it could

not lose any velocity without being acted upon by a force. This force

must have been applied by the rope by which A was held back, and the

tension thus arising was sufficient to pull up B.

531. Let us remove the 14 lb. weight from B, and attach there a weight

of 28 lbs., A remaining the same as before (14 lbs.). I raise A to

the pulley; I allow it to fall. You observe that B, though double the

weight of A, is again chucked up after the rope has become tight. We

can only explain this by the supposition that the tension in the rope

exerted in checking the motion of A is at least 28 lbs.

532. Finally, let us remove the 28 lbs. from B, put on 56 lbs., and

perform the experiment again; you see that even the 56 lbs. is raised

up several inches. Here a tension in the rope has been generated

sufficient to overcome a weight four times as heavy as A. We have then,

by the help of inertia, been able to produce a mechanical power, for a

small force has overcome a greater.

533. After B is raised by the chuck to a certain height it descends

again, if heavier than A, and raises A. The height to which B is

raised is of course the same as the height through which A descends.

You noticed that the height through which 28 lbs. was raised was

considerably greater than that through which the 56 lbs. was raised.

Hence we may draw the inference, that when A was deprived of its

velocity while passing through a short space, it required to be opposed

by a greater force than when it was gradually deprived of its velocity

through a longer space. This is a most important point. Supposing I

were to put a hundredweight at B, I have little doubt, if the rope were

strong enough to bear the strain, that though A only weighs 14 lbs., B

would yet be raised a little: here A would be deprived of its motion in

a very short space, but the force required to arrest it would be very

great.

534. It is clear that matters would not be much altered if A were to be

stopped by some force, exerted from below rather than above; in fact,

we may conceive the rope omitted, and suppose A to be a hammer-head

falling upon a nail in a piece of wood. The blow would force the nail

to penetrate a small distance, and the entire velocity of A would have

to be destroyed while moving through that small distance: consequently

the force between the head of the nail and the hammer would be a very

large one. This explains the effect of a blow.

535. In the case that we have supposed, the weight merely drops

upon the nail: this is actually the principle of the hammer used in

pile-driving machines. A pile is a large piece of timber, pointed and

shod with iron at one end: this end is driven down into the ground.

Piles are required for various purposes in engineering operations. They

are often intended to support the foundations of buildings; they are

therefore driven until the resistance with which the ground opposes

their further entrance affords a guarantee that they shall be able to

bear what is required.

536. The machine for driving piles consists essentially of a heavy

mass of iron, which is raised to a height, and allowed to fall upon

the pile. The resistance to be overcome depends upon the depth and

nature of the soil: a pile may be driven two or three inches with

each blow, but the less the distance the pile enters each time, the

greater is the actual pressure with which the blow forces it downwards.

In the ordinary hammer, the power of the arm imparts velocity to the

hammer-head, in addition to that which is due to the fall; the effect

produced is merely the same as if the hammer had fallen from a greater

height.

537. Another point may be mentioned here. A nail will only enter a

piece of wood when the nail and the wood are pressed together with

sufficient force. The nail is urged by the hammer. If the wood be

lying on the ground, the reaction of the ground prevents the wood from

getting away and the nail will enter. In other cases the element of

_time_ is all-important. If the wood be massive less force will make

the nail penetrate than would suffice to move the wood quickly enough.

If the wood be thin and unsupported, less force may be required to make

it yield than to make the nail penetrate. The usual remedy is obvious.

Hold a heavy mass close at the back of the wood. The nail will then

enter because the augmented mass cannot now escape as rapidly as before.

Experimental Mechanics A Course of Lectures Delivered at the Royal College of Science for Ireland · 第 133 / 171 题