CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION.

Produced by Tom Roch, Stephanie Eason, and the Online

Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net. (This

file was produced from images produced by Core Historical

Literature in Agriculture (CHLA), Cornell University.)

THE NEGRO FARMER

By CARL KELSEY

A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA IN

PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR

THE DEGREE OF PH. D.

Printed and on sale by

JENNINGS & PYE

CHICAGO

1903

PRICE FIFTY CENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER PAGE

I. Introduction 5

II. Geographic Location 9

III. Economic Heritage 22

IV. Present Situation 29

Virginia 32

Sea Coast 38

Central District 43

Alluvial Region 52

V. Social Environment 61

VI. The Outlook 67

VII. Agricultural Training 71

Population Maps 80

=OLD-TIME NEGROES.=

CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION.

In the last three hundred years there have been many questions of

general interest before the American people. It is doubtful, however, if

there is another problem, which is as warmly debated to-day as ever and

whose solution is yet so uncertain, as that of the Negro. In the second

decade of the seventeenth century protests were being filed against

black slavery, but the system was continued for nearly 250 years. The

discussion grew more and more bitter, and to participation in it

ignorance, then as now, was no bar. The North had less and less direct

contact with the Negro. The religious hostility to human bondage was

strengthened by the steadily increasing difference in economic

development which resulted in the creation of sectional prejudices and

jealousies. The North held the negro to be greatly wronged, and accounts

of his pitiable condition and of the many individual cases of ill

treatment fanned the flames of wrath. The reports of travelers, however,

had little influence compared with the religious sentiments which felt

outraged by the existence of bond servitude in the land. Through all the

years there was little attempt to scientifically study the character of

the problem or the nature of the subject. A mistaken economic sentiment

in the South and a strong moral sentiment at the North rendered such

studies unnecessary, if not impossible. The South, perceiving the

benefits of slavery, was blind to its fundamental weaknesses, and the

North, unacquainted with Negro character, held to the natural equality

of all men. Thus slavery itself became a barrier to the getting of an

adequate knowledge of the needs of the slave. The feeling grew that if

the shackles of slavery were broken, the Negro would at once be as other

men. The economic differences finally led to the war. It is not to be

forgotten that slavery itself was not the cause of the war, nor was

there any thought on the part of the Union leaders to make the blacks

citizens. That this was done later was a glowing tribute to their

ignorance of the real demands of the situation. The Republican party of

to-day shows no indication of repeating this mistake in the newly

acquired islands. I would not be understood as opposing suffrage of the

blacks, but any thoughtful observer must agree that as a race they were

not prepared for popular government at the time of their liberation. The

folly of the measures adopted none can fail to see who will read the

history of South Carolina or Mississippi during what is called

"Reconstruction."

Immediately after the war, new sources of information regarding the

Negro were afforded the North. The leaders of the carpet-bag regime,

playing political games, circulated glowing reports of the progress of

the ex-slaves. A second class of persons, the teachers, went South, and

back came rose-colored accounts. It might seem that the teacher could

best judge of the capacity of a people. The trouble is that in the

schools they saw the best specimens of the race, at the impressionable

period of their lives, and under abnormal conditions. There is in the

school an atmosphere about the child which stimulates his desire to

advance, but a relapse often comes when ordinary home conditions are

renewed. Moreover, it is well known that the children of all primitive

races are very quick and apt up to a certain period in their lives,

excelling often children of civilized peoples, but that this disappears

when maturity is reached. Hence, the average teacher, not coming in

close contact with the mass of the people under normal surroundings,

gives, although sincerely, a very misleading picture of actual

conditions. A third class of informants were the tourists, and their

ability to get at the heart of the situation is obvious. There remain to

be mentioned the Negro teachers and school entrepreneurs. Naturally

these have presented such facts as they thought would serve to open the

purses of their hearers. Some have been honest, many more

unintentionally dishonest, and others deliberately deceitful. The

relative size of these classes it is unnecessary to attempt to

ascertain. They have talked and sung their way into the hearts of the

hearers as does the pitiful beggar on the street. The donor sees that

evidently something is needed, and gives with little, if any, careful

investigation as to the real needs of the case. The result of it all has

been that the testimony of those who knew far more than was possible for

any outsider, the southern whites, has gone unheeded, not to say that it

has been spurned as hostile and valueless. The blame, of course, is not

always on one side, and as will be shown later, there are many southern

whites who have as little to do with the Negro, and consequently know as

little about him, as the average New Yorker. This situation has been

most unfortunate for all concerned. It should not be forgotten that the

question of the progress of the Negro has far more direct meaning for

the southerner, and that he is far more deeply interested in it than is

his northern brother, the popular impression to the contrary

notwithstanding. It is unnecessary to seek explanations, but it is a

pleasure to recognize that there are many indications that a better day

is coming, and indications now point to a hearty co-operation in

educational efforts. There are many reasons for the change, and perhaps

the greatest of these is summed up in "Industrial Training."

The North is slowly learning that the Negro is not a dark-skinned

Yankee, and that thousands of generations in Africa have produced a

being very different from him whose ancestors lived an equal time in

Europe. In a word, we now see that slavery does not account for all the

differences between the blacks and whites, and that their origins lie

farther back. Our acquaintance with the ancestors of the Negro is

meager. We do not even know how many of the numerous African tribes are

represented in our midst. A good deal of Semitic blood had already been

infused into the more northern tribes. What influence did this have and

how many descendants of these tribes are there in America? Tribal

distinctions have been hopelessly lost in this country, and the blending

has gone on so continuously that perhaps there would be little practical

benefit if the stocks could be determined to-day. It is, however, a

curious commentary on the turn discussions of the question have taken,

that not until 1902 did any one find it advisable to publish a

comprehensive study of the African environment and to trace its

influence on subsequent development. Yet this is one of the fundamental

preliminaries to any real knowledge of the subject.

In close connection with the preceding is the question of the mulatto.

Besides the blending of African stocks there has been a good deal of

intermixture of white blood. We do not even know how many full blooded

Africans there are in America, nor does the last census seek to

ascertain. Mulattoes have almost entirely been the offspring of white

fathers and black mothers, and probably most of the fathers have been

boys and young men. Without attempting a discussion of this subject,

whose results ethnologists cannot yet tell, it is certain that a half

breed is not a full blood, a mulatto is not a Negro, in spite of the

social classification to the contrary. The general belief is that the

mulatto is superior, either for good or bad, to the pure Negro. The

visitor to the South cannot fail to be struck with the fact that with

rare exceptions the colored men in places of responsibility, in

education or in business, are evidently not pure negroes. Even in

slavery times, the mulattoes were preferred for certain positions, such

as overseers, the blacks as field hands. Attention is called to this

merely to show our ignorance of an important point. Some may claim that

it is a matter of no consequence. This I cannot admit. To me it seems of

some significance to know whether mulattoes (and other crosses) form

more than their relative percentage of the graduates of the higher

schools; whether they are succeeding in business better than the blacks;

whether town life is proving particularly attractive to them; whether

they have greater or less moral and physical stamina, than the blacks.

The lack of definite knowledge should at least stop the prevalent

practice of taking the progress of a band of mulattoes and attempting to

estimate that of the Negroes thereby. It may be that some day the

mulatto will entirely supplant the black, but there is no immediate

probability of this. Until we know the facts, our prophecies are but

wild guesses. It should be remembered that a crossing of white and black

may show itself in the yellow negro or the changed head and features,

either, or both, as the case may be. A dark skin is, therefore, no sure

indication of purity and blood.[1]

It is often taken for granted that the Negro has practically equal

opportunities in the various parts of the South, and that a fairly

uniform rate of progress may be expected. This assumption rests on an

ignorance of the geographical location of the mass of blacks. It will be

shown that they are living in several distinct agricultural zones in

which success must be sought according to local possibilities.

Development always depends upon the environment, and we should expect,

therefore, unequal progress for the Negroes. Even the highest fruits of

civilization fail if the bases of life are suddenly changed. The

Congregational Church has not flourished among the Negroes as have some

other denominations, in spite of its great activity in educational work.

The American mode of government is being greatly modified to make it fit

conditions in Porto Rico. The manufacturers of Pennsylvania and the

farmers of Iowa do not agree as to the articles on which duties should

be levied, and it is a question if the two have the same interpretation

of the principle of protection. Different environments produce different

types. So it will be in the case of the Negro. If we are to understand

the conditions on which his progress depends, we must pay some attention

to economic geography. That this will result in a recognition of the

need for shaping plans and methods according to local needs is obvious.

The present thesis does not pretend to be a completed study, much less

an attempt to solve the Negro problem. It is written in the hope of

calling attention to some of the results of this geographic location as

illustrated in the situation of the Negro farmer in various parts of the

South.

The attempt is made to describe the situation of the average man. It is

fully recognized that there are numbers of exceptions among the Negroes

as well as among the white school teachers, referred to above. That

there is much in the present situation, both of encouragement and

discouragement, is patent. Unfortunately, most of us shut our eyes to

one or the other set of facts and are wildly optimistic or pessimistic,

accordingly. That there may be no misunderstanding of my position, let

me say that I agree with the late Dr. J. L. M. Curry in stating that: "I

have very little respect for the intelligence or the patriotism of the

man who doubts the capacity of the negro for improvement or usefulness."

The Negro Farmer · 第 1 / 7 章