The Romance of American Geography

In traveling over the undulating prairies of many States of the Union,

huge granite boulders are seen lying solitary, as if dropped by some

passing cloud, having no kindred in the rocky formations environing,

but being absolute foreigners in a strange land. There they lie,

prone, chiseled by some forgotten art, and so solitary as to bring a

tinge of melancholy to the reflection of the thoughtful. In certain

regions these boulders are so numerous and so various in size as to be

used in building foundations, and sometimes entire habitations. These

rocks were dropped in remote centuries by passing icebergs, and are

solitary memorials of the ice-drift across our continent. The crafts

on which they voyaged were wrecked long ago. They were passengers on

"Some shattered berg, that, pale and lone,

Drifts from the white north to the tropic zone,

And in the burning day

Melts peak by peak away,

Till on some rosy even

It dies, with sunlight blessing it."

This instance may be taken as a parable, suggesting the history

embodied in names of localities, lakes, straits, rivers, cities,

hamlets, States. Those names are the debris of a dead era; and for

one, I can not escape the wonder and the pathos of these shattered

yesterdays, which have a voice, calling, as in hoarse whispers sad with

tears, "We are not, but we were."

Though we are little given to so esteeming the study, there is romance

in geography, learned by us when lads and lasses--not because we would,

but because we must--and such study was difficult and unsavory. The

catalogue of names we learned, perforce, was dreary as the alphabet;

and not a memory of pleasure lingers about the book in which we

studied, save that, in cramped, sprawling hand, upon the margin is

written the name of some little sweetheart beside our own,--and dead

long since. No, geography was not romantic. That was a possession we

never suspected. But romance is ubiquitous, like flowers of spring,

sheltering where we little anticipate.

To a lover of history, however, few studies will prove so fascinating

as a study of names in geography. Finding a few at random, feel the

thrill of the history they embody--history and reminiscence:

Providence, Roger Williams named the city so when himself was a

refugee; Fort Wayne, named for General "Mad Anthony" Wayne, who

destroyed the Indian scourge in the Northwest Territory in 1792;

Raleigh, so yclept for that chiefest friend of American colonization

among Englishmen, Sir Walter Raleigh; Council Grove, because, in the

Indian days, there, in a grove--rare in the prairie country of

Kansas--the Red Men met for counsel; Astoria, bearing name of that

famous fortune-maker in the fur country of the West and North; Buffalo

Lake, reminding us that there the buffalo tramped in days seeming now

so remote, when the buffalo rode, like a mad cavalry troop, across the

wide interior plains of our continent; Eagle River, for here this royal

bird used to love to linger as if it were his native stream. These are

the scattered, miscellaneous reminiscences of men and acts, and things

and achievements. In Kansas is a village called Lane, a name which, to

the old settler in Kansas, is big with meaning, seeing it brings to

life one of the strange, romantic, contradictory, and brilliant

characters of the "Squatter Sovereignty" days, when Jim Lane wrought,

with his weird and wonderful eloquence, his journeys oft, and his

tireless industry, in championing the cause of State freedom. Him and

his history, reading like a tale told by a campfire's fitful light,

this name embodies. What an archive of history does such a name

become! Portage is a name pregnant with memories of the old days of

discovery, when America was still an unknown limit. "Grand Portage"

you shall see on the map, neighboring the Great Lakes, whereby you see,

as through a magic glass, the boats, loaded on the shoulders when

navigation was no longer possible, and the journey made over the

watershed till a stream was followed far enough to float the birch-bark

canoe once more. Prairie is another word full of interest. Pampas is

a word, Peruvian in origin, designating the prairies of South America;

while prairie is a French word, meaning meadow. Pampas is the Peruvian

word for field. The words are synonyms, but come from different

hemispheres of the world. Does it not seem strange that a word

descriptive of these treeless wildernesses of North America should be a

gift, not of the Indian hunter who used to scurry across them swift as

an arrow of death, but should really be the gift of those hardy and

valorous French voyagers who had no purpose of fastening a name on the

flower-sown, green meadows that swayed in the wind like some emerald

sea? So the Incas have christened the plains of South America, and the

French adventurer the plains of North America! Though, who that

crosses our prairies, sweet with green, and lit with flowers like lamps

of many-colored fires, thinks he is speaking the speech of the French

trapper of long ago? Savannah is an Indian word, meaning meadow, and

gives name to these dank meadowlands under warmer skies, where reeds

and swamp-grasses grow; and the name of Savannah in Georgia is thus

bestowed. How much we owe! Who has not helped us? Nor does the

traveler through the castellated steeps of the "Bad Lands" know, nor

probably does he care, that this caption came from the far-traveling

French trapper, whose venturesome and tireless feet have made him at

home in all places on our continent. How valuable, however, must be

these names to one who cares to familiarize himself with the knowledge

and romance of those pioneers of geography! Of like origin is "butte."

The voyager saw those isolated peaks, too high to be called hills and

too low to be called mountains, and said they are buttes

(knolls)--names which cling to them as tenaciously as their shadows.

In a word, I have found this study a breath blown from far mountain

ranges of history; and this breath upon the face has made an hour of

life grow young and beautiful, for which reason I now write the story

of my pleasure. The North American continent lends itself with

peculiar grace to such a study as is here suggested, because its story

lies under the eyes of history. 'Twas scarcely an hour ago, in the

world's day, since Columbus found out this continent, and, with a

giant's hand, swung its huge doors inward for the centuries to enter;

and all those discoveries are our commonplace knowledge. What tribes

were here, Prescott and Parkman have told us in thrilling narratives;

and columns of eager colonists we have seen press their way along the

seashore, into forests, over mountains, across deserts, never halting,

save to catch breath as a climber of a mountain does,--on, on, till a

continent is white with the tents of millions. But the Indian

aborigine, for whom the tepee was portable habitation, and the stretch

of plain and hill and lake and river, hunting-ground or

battle-ground,--the Indian is mainly the reminiscence of an old man's

straggling speech; and these names he has left, clinging to lake and

river and hamlet, are his memorial. In Montezuma's empire, where once

a barbaric splendor held court and set in tragic splendor, lurid even

yet at these centuries' remove, what is left save a vocabulary or a

broken idol lying black and foreboding in some mountain stream? Or

those discoverers whose adventurous deeds are part of the world's

chosen treasure, what but their names are written on the streams or

hills? The import of these observations is this, that from American

geography we may, with reasonable accuracy and detail, decipher this

romantic history. In those newer parts of our continent names have too

often lost the flavor of history; have, in truth, done so, save in

isolated instances. The "Smithtons" and "Griggsby Stations" are

monotonous and uninteresting, and the Tombstones are little short of

sacrilege. In the crush of movers' wagons there appeared to be a

scramble for names of any sort. Places multiply, imagination is

asleep, and names nearest at hand are most readily laid hold of; yet,

even in such a dearth of originality and poetry, scant names flash out

which remind you of the morning names in our continent's history. A

Springdale reminds you that colonists here found a dale, gladdened with

living springs; or an Afton suggests how some exiled Scot salved his

heart by keeping near his exile a name he loved. Our day will, in the

main, attach names for simple convenience, as they put handles on

shovels. Such names, of course, are meaningless. The day for

inventing names is past, or seems so. We beg or borrow, as the

surveyor who marched across the State of New York, with theodolite and

chain and a classical atlas, and blazed his way with Rome, and Illyria,

and Syracuse, and Ithaca,--a procedure at once meaningless and dense.

Greece nor Rome feels at home among us, nor should they.

History is a method of remembrance, and names are a method of

remembrance also, the two conspiring to the same end. When the Saxon,

sailing across seas, found a rude home in England, he named his new

home Saxonland, and there are East and West and South Saxons; and so,

Essex and Wessex and Sussex. In like manner, emigrants from various

shores across the grim Atlantic kept the memory and names of that dear

land from which they sailed; and by running your eyes over those

earlier colonies, you shall see names--aboriginal and imported--and so

learn, in an infallible way, who first pitched tents on that soil.

This tracking dead races over seas by the local designations they have

left has always fascinated my thought. Those names are verily planted

in the earth, and grow like trees that refuse to die. Through

centuries of turbulence and slaughter and racial transplanting, see how

some Roman words stay and refuse to go, knowing as little of retreat as

a Roman legion! "Chester" and "coin," as good old English terminals,

are tense with interest, since they as plainly record history as did

minstrels in old castle hall. Chester is the Roman "castra," camp, and

where the name occurs across Britain, indicates with undeviating

fidelity that there, in remote decades, Roman legions camped and the

Roman argent eagle flashed back morning to the sun. Coin is a

contraction for "colonia," indicating that at the place so designated a

Roman colonia received honors at the hands of the Roman Senate. In

other words, these locative terminals are as certainly bequeathed

England by the Roman occupancy as is London Tower. "Ton" is historical

too, but is footprint of another passing race--namely the Gaul,

defeated of Caesar on many a bloody field--and is a contraction of

"tuin," meaning garden, appearing in Ireland as "dun," meaning

garrison, both indicating an inclosure, and so becoming a frequent

terminal for names of cities, as Huntingtuin or tun, probably

originally a hunting-tower or hamlet. A second form of "ton" is our

ordinary "town," which, as often as we use, we are speaking the tongue

of the Trans-Alpine Gauls, taking a syllable from the word of a

half-forgotten people. From yet another source is the locative "ham."

Chester is of Roman origin, tun is of Gaelic; but "ham" is Anglo-Saxon,

and means village, whence the sweet word home. Witness the use of this

suffix in Effingham and the like. "Stoke" and "beck" and "worth" are

also Saxon. "Thorpe" and "by" are Danish, as in Althorp and Derby.

These reminiscent instances from over seas will serve to illuminate the

thought under discussion--the historical element embodied in the names

of localities. As in these three locatives we track three distinct

peoples through England, we may, by the same method, fall on the

footprints of divers civilizations in our New World.

Thus far we have touched at random, as one does on a holiday. Now,

seriously, as on a journey of discovery, may we take staff in hand to

trace, if possible, the elusive march of populations by the ashes of

their campfires, as Evangeline did the wanderings of Gabriel, her

beloved.

The Dutch, more's the pity, have left scant memorials of their American

empire. "Knickerbocker's History of New York" has effectually laughed

them out of court; but, notwithstanding, they were mighty men, whose

idiosyncrasies we readily catch at as a jest, but whose greatness

breaks on us slowly, as great matters must. "Kill" was a Dutch word,

meaning creek, a terminal appearing in many of the few words they have

left us, such as Fishkill, Peekskill, Wynantskill, Catskill. Along the

banks of streams, with names like these, one could see ragged Rip Van

Winkle, with his dog and gun, with shambling hunter's gait, or come

silently on solemn Dutch burghers, solemnly playing ninepins in the

shadows. Brooklyn (Breuchelin) is Dutch, as are Orange, Rensselaer,

Stuyvesant, Rhinebeck, Rhinecliff, Vanbrunt, Staatsburg, Rotterdam,

Hague, Nassau, Walloonsack, Yonkers, and Zurich. Wallabout, a borough

of Brooklyn (Waalbogt), means Walloon's Bay, thus having a

religio-historical significance. Nor dare we omit that river, noble as

an epic, named after a Dutch discoverer, who, first of Europeans, flung

the swaying shadows of foreign sails on its beautiful waters. Hudson

is a prince among triumphant and adventurous discoverers. And I never

sail past the Palisades, by summer or gorgeous autumn, when all the

hills are blood and flame, without reverting in thought to Hudson, who

gave the stream to our geography and his name to the stream, nor forget

that he was set adrift in the remote and spacious sea, which likewise

bears his name; though well it may, for it is doubtless his grave; for,

set adrift by mutineers, he was crushed by icefloes, or fell asleep in

death in that winter sea. But Hudson River and Hudson Bay will make

him as immortal as this continent. All men shall know by them that

Heinrich Hudson hath sailed this way. So much, then, for following

along dim paths once trod by a Dutch burgher's tramp of empire.

Of the Swedes, who, under their victorious king, Gustavus Adolphus, the

Protestant, settled New Sweden (now known as New Jersey), are left only

dim footprints, the path of them being all but lost, though,

fortunately, sufficiently plain to trace the emigration of a race.

These Swedish emigrants and founders of what they hoped would prove a

State, never attained a supremacy, their enemies, who were their

immediate neighbors and fellow-emigrants from Protestant States, so

speedily overwhelming them--first the Dutch, succeeded by the

inevitable Saxon. Bergen, the first Swedish settlement, in comparative

isolation, still whispers the story of Gustavus Adolphus's statecraft

and vision, and seems a solitary survivor of an old camp of emigrants

voyaging by stream and plain, and all slain by famine and disease and

Indian stealth and pioneer's hardship, save himself. Nordhoff and

Stockholm and Pavonta are scattered reminders of an attempted

sovereignty which is no more.

Protestantism made valorous attempt to preempt this New World of North

America for civil and religious liberty and the Reformed faith. A look

at their breadth of plan must be a benefit to us and a praise to those

who planned so large things for the glory of God. That they acted

independently of each other shows how wide-spread this thirst for

liberty and this love for the kingdom of God. I know few things that

stir me more. Swedish Lutherans settled New Sweden; the Dutch Walloons

settled New Holland; the Baptists, Rhode Island; the Quakers,

Pennsylvania; the Huguenots, the Carolinas; the Puritans, New England.

The Anglican Church only incidentally, and not of intention, settled

Virginia. Catholicism seized and holds South America, Central America,

and Mexico, but in the United States was represented only by the colony

of Maryland, planted by Lord Baltimore, and bears mark of his religious

faith in naming his plantation after Mary, the Catholic queen, his own

name appearing in the name of its present metropolis, Baltimore. In

days when in England the Catholic was under ban, he founded this colony

as a Canaan for Roman Catholics. Spanish Catholics worked their way

along the Pacific Coast, and French Catholicism sailed up the St.

Lawrence and down the Mississippi, though the latter territory now

belongs to the Protestant faith. Admiral Coligny, an illustrious son

of France, attempted planting the Huguenots in America, though this

colonizing experiment has left scant memorial of Huguenot occupancy,

because the destruction of this colony by Spanish Catholics was so

sudden and so utter; yet the Carolinas are witness to this hazard and

hope, bearing the name of the infamous King Charles IX. How terrible

is the irony when we recall how this same ruler, after whom Coligny

named his land of refuge for persecuted Protestants, was author of the

most malignant religious massacre on record--the Massacre of St.

Bartholomew! In Beaufort and Carteret may be discovered reminiscences

of an expedition whose close was disastrous, yet heroic.

Everybody has contributed to giving names to the States; therefore

attention to them as a class is fitting. England gave name to

Maryland, as suggested in another paragraph; to New York, named in

honor of the Duke of York, afterward known as James II, of evil memory;

Virginia, so styled by Sir Walter Raleigh, that pattern of chivalry, in

honor of his queen, Elizabeth; New Jersey, after Jersey, the island;

Rhode Island, after the Island of Rhodes; Delaware, after Lord de la

Warre, early governor of Virginia; Pennsylvania, after William Penn,

the good; New Hampshire, after Hampshire, in England, as New England

was, in love, called after the motherland; Georgia, named for George

II, by philanthropic General Oglethorpe, who brought hither his colony

of debtors,--such the contributions of England to our commonwealth of

names. America has supplied one State a name, Washington; and who more

or so worthy to write his name upon a State as George Washington, first

Commander-in-chief and President? Spain has christened these

Commonwealths: Florida, the land of flowers; California; Colorado,

colored; Nevada. We must thank France for these: Maine, for a province

in France; Vermont, green mountains; the Carolinas; Louisiana, a name

attached by the valorous La Salle, in fealty to his prince, calling

this province, at the mouth of the river he had followed to its

entrance into the ocean, after Louis XIV, the then darling of the

French people. Mexico is remembered in two instances: New Mexico and

Texas. Italy has a memorial, bestowed in gratitude by America. The

District of Columbia, with its capital, Washington, reminds men forever

that Columbus discovered and Washington saved America. Besides this,

to Italy's credit, or discredit--I know not which--must be charged the

giving title to two continents. Amerigo Vespucci has lent his name to

one hemisphere of the world. Other States bear Indian captions. Those

wandering hunters have lost their hunting-grounds; but we can not

forget whose hunting-grounds they were so long as the Indian name

clings to the Territory where he is not, but his name shall remain as

his monument. Indiana is generic, the land of the Indian. With this

exception, the States are called after tribes or by some Indian name:

Alabama, Tennessee, Illinois, Iowa, Ohio, Michigan, Nebraska, Kansas,

the Dakotas (who will forget when Hiawatha passed to the land of the

Dakotahs for his wooing?), Wyoming, Oregon, Idaho, and the like. With

such names, we are once more sitting in the woodland, by the wigwam, as

we did a century ago. The memory haunts us. Thus much for the racial

element in cognomens of States.

Now again to set out on the journey on the trail of vanished peoples!

The Spanish invasion of America, now, as we recall its story, big with

pathos and remorse, the pathos predominating, now that the last rag of

a province has been torn from their feeble hands,--the evacuation of

Havana, with its sorry pomp of exhuming Columbus's dust, is one of the

saddest sights history has called men to look upon. Columbus, a

foreigner, gave Spain a New World; and foreigners of still another

blood have taken away what by right never belonged to Spanish

sovereignty. Just as this fate is, we can but feel the immense pathos

of the Spanish evacuation of the New World. French discoverers hugged

the rivers, as by some deep affinity. Spaniards, conversely, made

march without thought of riverways. They were accustomed to deserts in

their own land, and feared them not in a remote hemisphere. They

swarmed in the desert. Nothing daunted them. Spain's best blood

poured into the New World, a fact which doubtless accounts, in part,

for the devitalized energies and genius of this mother country of their

birth and hopes and initiative. "Florida" is a Spanish tide-mark.

"St. Augustine" is a gravestone of history, marking the mound where

lies the dust of the first permanent colony planted in America. The

Spaniard headed toward the southern provinces of America, as the

Englishman to the east, and the Frenchman to the north and central

provinces. Spain held southward. Though the colony of Florida was

retained till, in the year 1819, the subtle diplomacy of John Quincy

Adams added this peninsula of flowers to the Union of States, it had no

aggressive value as a basis of discovery or colonization. The base of

Spanish operations was Mexico, the fair land of their conquest. Spain

exploited her energies in Mexico and Peru. She was mad with a lust for

gold. Her galleons made these lands bankrupt. But Spaniards dared to

lose themselves in desert or forests. The discovery and conquest of

Peru is mad with turbulent courage and adventure. This we can not

deny; and the discovery of the Amazon by a brother of Pizarro is a

story to thrill a sluggard into a sleepless waking. We see these

heroic days, and forgive much of Spanish misrule and avarice. De Soto,

crowding through jungles of undergrowth and miasms, through tribes of

hostile men, though stimulated by the wild lust for gold, is for all a

brave chapter in the world's biography; and to see him buried in the

massive river he discovered is to make other than the tender-hearted

weep. To see on the map of the Union "Llano Estacado" is to give, as

it were, the initials of heroic names. Spain, which staked these

plains, will walk across them no more. They did this service for

others. Were they fine-fibered enough to feel these losses, the sorrow

we feel for their exit would be intensified; but their centuries of

misrule have certified to their all but utter lack of any finer

sentiment or sense of high responsibility. Give them what honor we

may. Recall their departed glory, and let it light the sky, if only

for a moment, like a flash of lightning. Spaniards were little less

given to naming their settlements "Saint" than the French. From

Mexico, up the long Pacific Coast, they affixed names which will remain

perpetually as the sole memorial that once these banished dons held

sway in the United States. These names cluster in the Southern United

States, touching immediately on their chief dependency, Mexico; but are

still in evidence farther away, though growing scanter, as footprints

in a remote highway. Rio Grande, Del Norte, Andalusia, and the

charming name affixed to a charming mountain range, Sierra Nevada,--how

these names rehabilitate a past! Nevada and Andalusia! One needs

little imagination to see the flush that gathered on the dusky cheek of

the old Spanish discoverer when he calmed, in part, his homesickness by

giving his wanderings the name of the dear home from which he came, and

kindled his pride into a fire, like the conflagration of mountain

pines, by telling the New World the names of his ancestral land. But

his "San" and "Santa" are frequent as tents upon a battle-field when

the battle is spent. "Corpus Christi"--how Spanish and Catholic that

is! San Antonio, Santa Fe, Cape St. Lucas. In Florida: Rio San Juan,

Ponce de Leon, Cape San Blas, Hernando, Punta Rosa, Cerro de Oro, are

indicative of the growing communities in that peninsula after the

invasion located at St. Augustine. But of all the parts of the United

States, New Mexico is most honeycombed with Spanish locatives. Passing

that way, one seems not to be in America, but in Spain. Spain is

everywhere. Their names are here strewn thick as battle soldiers

sleeping on the battle-field: Las Colonias, Arayo Salado, Don Carlos

Hill, Cerillos, Dolores, San Pambo, Canon Largo, Magdalene Mountains,

San Pedro. Thence these names creep up into Utah, though there they

are never numerous: Santa Clara, Escalante Desert, Sierra Abaja; and

farther north, reaching to all but hand-clasp with the French Du Chasne

River, is San Rafael River. St. Xavier, San Miguel, Santa Monica,

Santa Cruz, San Francisco, San Gabriel,--can you not in these names

hear the Spanish languishing speech and see the Jesuit pioneer?

Eldorado, Sacramento, El Paso, Los Angeles, are footprints of the

Spanish discoverer. And Cape Blanco, in far-away Oregon, probably

represents the farthest campfire of the Spanish march. In his area the

don was indefatigable. De Soto marched like a conqueror. Coronado

found his way into Missouri, Kansas, and Colorado. La Junta, in

Kansas, may mark the subsidence of the wave of Spanish invasion, and

Kansas was part of the kingdom of "Quivera." Eugene Ware, the Kansas

poet, who, under the _nom de plume_ of "Ironquill," has written

graceful and musical poems, has told of Coronado's excursion into this

now populous and fertile region:

A Hero and Some Other Folks · 第 16 / 35 题