SECTION 150. That if any governor of any State shall fail to make a

report within nine months after the passage of this Act that at least

twenty local associations have been organized as in this Act provided,

then and in that event the allotment of the six thousand dollars to pay

the expenses for the organization of at least twenty local associations

in his State may be used proportionately to pay the expenses, if any,

of organizing local associations in any other State or States in excess

of the required number necessary to establish a State association--that

is, the amount remaining unearned by any of the States shall be

apportioned to the several States reporting more than twenty local

associations directly in proportion to the number in excess thereof,

preference, however, always being given to the States whose average

expenses are lowest for the organization of their several associations.

MR. LAWYER: Gentlemen, this concludes the results of our labor and I

want to express the solicitude of your committee in proposing this bill

and the hope that it may in a large measure meet your expectations.

UNCLE SAM: Well, boys, speaking for the crowd, I want to say that I did

not believe that the committee would be able to make its report for

a month. Upon my soul, I did not expect that they would ever make so

satisfactory a report. They seem to have thoroughly comprehended all

the subjects we have discussed and to have produced a Financial and

Banking Bill that will meet every question that can possibly arise; one

that will protect every individual bank in its independence; one that

will protect every commercial zone in its independence; and one that

will protect my reserves against the demands of all the rest of the

world.

MR. LAWYER: Those are precisely the things we have striven to

accomplish, Uncle Sam.

MR. MERCHANT: During the past week I ran into a friend of mine who

is in the banking business and considering that we were practically

through with our work, I told him what I had been doing the past four

months without giving him your names. "Well," he said, "I want to give

you a pointer. If you are following along the trail of the Aldrich

scheme you had better drop it; you had better save your time, because

the people are on to that deal and they won't stand for it. You will

have to make it clear that you are working from an entirely different

point of view."

This remark of his opened my eyes and I am going to suggest that we

spend one night demonstrating the striking, the fundamental points of

difference between our bill and that Aldrich scheme.

MR. MERCHANT: I am convinced that we should do that very thing and I

propose and move that we meet next Wednesday night for that purpose.

MR. BANKER: To make a clean job of our work, I believe that is

essential; because hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars have

been expended in promoting that scheme, therefore, I second that motion.

UNCLE SAM: The motion is carried and now good night, all.

* * * * *

To you, UNCLE SAM, we, the representatives of the FARMERS, BANKERS,

LAWYERS, LABORING-MEN, MERCHANTS and MANUFACTURERS, dedicate the result

of our endeavor, our future services, indeed, our lives; and we pledge

our callings, every one of them, to continue the work here begun with

that degree of vigilance and patriotism of which this great cause is

worthy, confident that the result of our efforts will be to safeguard

your honor and establish you upon the solid foundations of a sound

Financial and Banking System.

[Illustration:

WONT YOU WALK INTO MY PARLOR

SAID THE SPIDER

TO THE

FLY

THE ALDRICH PLAN AND PLOT EXPOSED]

SEVENTEENTH NIGHT

ALDRICH PLAN AND PLOT EXPOSED

UNCLE SAM: From what you boys intimated the other night, I got the

impression that the so-called Aldrich scheme demonstrated almost

everything that we should not do in working out a financial and banking

system. It must have been more or less of a warning to you, then, when

you started out.

MR. LAWYER: To tell the truth, I had become so convinced of its

ulterior purposes from the standpoint of management, that I never

studied it seriously from an economic point of view, until this last

week.

MR. BANKER: My position was just the reverse of that of Mr. Lawyer, for

while I had studied it from an economic point of view and that of a

practical banker, and had become so convinced of its utter unsoundness

on the one hand, and unfitness for use to ninety-nine out of every

hundred of American banks, I never dug into the soul of its management,

until the past week. So we compared notes, and found the situation

particularly interesting.

MR. MERCHANT: Before you go any further, I want to read something from

a speech, delivered in Congress March 29, 1910, two years before the

Aldrich plan was born. You are all doubtless aware that the Aldrich

scheme was nothing more nor less than an attempt to transfer to this

country the German scheme of note issue and banking generally.

MR. LABORINGMAN: I heard the other day, that the Aldrich bill was

deader than a door-nail. Why do we want to spend any time on that? Or,

are you fellows like the Irishman, who said that he was kicking a dead

dog to teach him that there was such a thing as punishment after death?

MR. MERCHANT: You must remember, Mr. Laboringman, that error is always

repeating itself, and that sin and iniquity never die; so, the economic

blunders of the Aldrich Bill and its administrative purposes should be

exposed and held up as a lesson and an illustration to guide us in the

future.

What I wanted to read, was a part of Congressman Fowler's speech,

delivered in the House of Representatives. Referring to the German

banking situation, he said:

"The position of both England and France, under present conditions,

would seem sound and impregnable from a governmental as well as a

banking point of view. Each has planted itself upon the gold standard,

with certain precautions peculiar to its circumstances. Germany, on the

other hand, has not pursued the course of England, with its limited

gold reserve, forcing the public into the deposit and check system to

meet the current demands of trade. This would have been impossible

without a long-continued ruinous revolution, considering that there

is a quarterly settlement in Germany that calls for an expansion in

currency amounting to $125,000,000. Nor has Germany pursued the course

of France, which has a gold reserve large enough to meet any test or

burden that either the Government or the commerce of Germany might have

imposed upon it, but has adopted a middle course which has not the

strength of the position of either England or France, nor the credit

facility of France.

"Its gold reserve is of the halfway sort, and its bank note issue is

also of the halfway sort. The result is that the financial and banking

situation of Germany must necessarily prove weak upon the first great

test when the bank notes of the Imperial Bank of Germany must be made a

legal tender.

"Indeed, upon the declaration of war by Germany or against Germany, the

first step taken in a financial way would be for her to declare her

bank notes a legal tender. It is hardly problematical what would soon

happen, with the wide divergence between her gold fund and the amount

of her note issue."

Gentlemen, within eighteen months after he made that statement, when

war seemed probable with France, Germany made her bank notes a legal

tender.

Further along in the same speech, commenting upon the unsoundness of

the German plan, he said:

"Imagine for a moment a central bank in the United States, like the

Imperial Bank of Germany, issuing all our bank note currency and these

notes going into the reserves of our myriad of banks as the basis of

loans which, under our system, in turn become our deposits.

"The natural, first, and immediate effect would be an expansion of

credit, an inflation to just the extent to which the notes were used

for reserves.

"As soon as the situation became obviously dangerous, a halt would be

called and a contraction in loans would follow. But a contraction of

loans calls for liquidation, and liquidation produces an exigent demand

for currency. We all learned that lesson only so short a time ago as

1907.

"But in the very face of the increased demand for more currency the

currency would be contracting, because the loans would be reduced by

calling in bank notes which were being used for reserves; or, in other

words, the loans called would be paid in bank notes.

"For every $100,000 of notes so called in the loans might be reduced to

an average of $500,000, and yet this very process of liquidation would

be concurrently destroying the only instruments of credit that would

adequately meet the demand created by forced contraction. It would

clearly lead to self-destruction, to commercial suicide.

"The best thought of England recognizes this subtle but obviously

destructive contradiction in the use of credit, and therefore opposes

the use of credit notes by the Bank of England."

_Gentlemen, the fact that we can force our banks to carry a specified

amount of reserves and of a specified quality, by the power of

taxation, will preclude the use of bank notes as reserves in the United

States._

Mr. Fowler then concludes as follows:

"There are then, in addition to all of the objections to the Bank of

France, three other unanswerable objections to the establishment in

this country of any central organization approaching in character the

Imperial Bank of Germany:

"_First_: It would give us a financial and banking structure so weak

that it could not stand any great strain such as necessarily comes with

a great war, if, indeed, it were not so weak as to lead to a suspension

of gold payments even in time of peace.

"_Second_: No thought whatever should be given to any suggestion that

makes it possible for one bank credit to be used in the reserves of

another bank and so substitute any form of credit for gold in our bank

reserves.

"Unless gold alone is ultimately recognized as fit for bank reserves,

we shall continue to pay dearly for our mistake until it is corrected.

"_Third_: No proposal whatever should be entertained by us that

involves the possibility of the suspension of gold payments, for no

country can become the clearing house of the world that is not a free

market for gold. The United States and not England ought to be the

clearing house of the world."

These words, as I have said, were spoken about two years before Mr.

Aldrich attempted to import the German Bank into this country.

MR. BANKER: That is very interesting and prophetic, but not more so

than his speech at the Republican Club of New York, January 20, 1912.

Let me read that to you, gentlemen, by way of an exposition of the

economic faults of the so-called Aldrich scheme. He said:

"I wish to speak purely from an economic point of view and to cover

only one single phase of the proposal; its dangerous expansion,

unbounded inflation and certain expulsion of gold from the country.

"'_First_: Nothing should ever go into the reserves of the banks of a

country except what is coined out of its standard of value.

"'_Second_: The poorer money always drives out the better.'

"Every single note of the so-called Reserve Association used in the

reserves of our banks will displace just that much gold and drive it

out of the country.

"Judged, therefore, from a purely economic point of view, I assert that

the Reserve Association plan is the most unsound, the most dangerous;

indeed, it is absolutely the worst proposal that has been brought

forward for serious consideration by any respectable body of men since

the adoption of the Constitution, with the two following exceptions:

First, the issue of legal tender money by the Government such as

greenbacks; second, the free and unlimited coinage of silver at the

ratio of 16 to 1.

"An officer of one of the largest banks of the United States recently

used this language: 'Mr. Fowler, it is incredible that we should be

called upon to consider such a proposition.'

"If this is really true, how does it happen, that so many business men

and so many bankers approve it, is a most natural inquiry. The cause is

not difficult to perceive.

"There is not a business man nor hardly a banker who is not even now

still living in a state of fright from the terror of 1907. One thought

alone seems to have taken possession of the country to the exclusion of

everything else, and that thought is this: That we must hereafter be

able to convert our commercial credits into bank or current credits.

There seems to be something approaching madness; indeed, there seems

to be an insane haste lest they be caught again, possibly tomorrow,

certainly next fall. But they need not worry, for danger is not

imminent; 1907 will not come again right away.

"During the past two years up to the present time the entire thought

of the country has been directed to a mere mechanism to achieve this

result, without any reference to or consideration whatever of those

fundamental, eternal principles of banking economics that demand

recognition and obedience if we are to escape the frightful penalties

which their violation always inflicts.

"In the outset I want to lay down two fundamental laws that I wish were

burned into the minds of every banker and every business man within the

borders of this republic. They are these:

"One--Nothing should ever be counted as a reserve which is not coined

out of the standard of value. Our standard of value is gold, therefore

nothing should go into the reserves of our banks except gold.

"Two--The poorer money always drives out the better.

"I hope that whoever hears these words will commit these two laws to

memory, for they are as fundamental and eternal in their operation as

the law of gravitation.

"I assert that the plan of the so-called reserve association is in

direct violation of the first of these laws, and will put the second

law into operation to a dangerous and destructive degree.

"Every intelligent student knows that the plan proposes to transport

to this country the German system of banking, which I assert has

completely broken down at home during the past six months. Now, if

this system has broken down in Germany, where there are a few great

banks with hundreds of millions of assets and not more than 500 banks

all told, what can you expect it to do here with more than 25,000

individual, independent banks, directly responsible to their depositors?

"The following letter was given to me by an officer of one of our

largest banks, accompanied with these words:

"'I realize that in giving you this letter I am, in a way, betraying a

business confidence, but I regard it as my patriotic duty to give it to

you, to use in any way you may see fit. For what would happen to this

bank if we should send out such a letter to our depositors? Our doors

would be closed inside of twenty-four hours.'"

The letter referred to was written by the Deutsche Bank of Berlin,

which has assets approximating $500,000,000, and is as follows:

"'In consequence of the restrictions recently made by the Imperial

Bank, with regard to the supply of money at the end of every quarter

of the year, we are, to our regret, compelled to ask you, when drawing

against your account with us upon our head office and our branches

by mail, kindly to advise us by cable of such drafts on them as are

likely to come forward for payment during the last three working days

of the quarter and the following two working days, so as to enable us

to provide from here especially the necessary funds at the office drawn

upon.

"'As to cable transfers which, during the five days in question, you

may have to order on our head office or branches, to the debit of your

account with us, we shall feel obliged by your ordering them only if

you can advise us by cable one day before, the amounts to be placed by

us to your debit on receipt of such advice, or ordering upon us for

mail transfer from here.

"'The foregoing, of course, does not apply to small amounts.'

"As a further proof that the system has broken down at home, let us see

what has been going on in Germany during the past six months to further

demonstrate the weakness of their system.

"The great banks of Germany have been scouring the markets of the

world, going into every nook and corner, hunting for gold. At what

price? Was it at 5 per cent, 6 per cent, 7 per cent, 8 per cent, 9

per cent, 10 per cent? No. The New York _Evening Post_, in its annual

review, says it was from 12 per cent to 20 per cent. I have been

credibly informed that the great banks of Germany, with hundreds of

millions of assets, were borrowing money in our own markets at 7-1/2

per cent and 1-1/2 per cent for three months, or upwards of 13 per cent.

"I was told of one loan to one of the largest banks in Berlin, running

for a whole year at 7 per cent.

"Think of it! What would the condition in our country have to be before

The National City, The Bank of Commerce and the First National of New

York, and the First National and Continental Commercial of Chicago,

were scouring all quarters of the globe for gold and paying from 15 to

20 per cent for the loans?

"The Imperial Bank of Germany could not save the few great banks of

Germany. What would the same kind of an institution in the United

States do for 25,000 independent banks under the same circumstances,

all pulling at the skirts of this proposed financial balloon? The

Imperial Bank could not make real money out of paper credit when the

crisis came.

"Let me ask the 25,000 individual independent banks of America, what

they would do when the day of contraction and refusal came? Where would

you go for gold with your comparatively small capital and limited

credit?

"The financial situation in Germany is by far the weakest of all the

great nations of Europe and the cause is not far to find nor difficult

to detect.

"Their notes, which are based upon only 33 per cent of gold and 66

per cent of commercial credits, are used as reserves and made the

basis of additional credits. Economically speaking, whenever a bank

puts anything into its reserves it makes that thing a legal tender

and exactly to that extent displaces that much gold, if gold is the

standard of value.

"During the ten years from 1900 to 1910 the gold accumulated by Russia

amounted to upward of $200,000,000; that accumulated by France, upward

of $300,000,000; that accumulated by England, where nothing but gold

is treated as reserves and where there has been comparatively little

growth in business, $32,000,000. The United States accumulated

$1,100,000,000, while Germany, with all her development of trade during

the last ten years, accumulated only $40,000,000 of gold when it ought

to have been ten times as much, all things considered, or $400,000,000.

If she had done this she would not have been compelled to send her

great financial institutions all over the globe in search of gold and

been compelled to pay 15 per cent and 20 per cent for it."

Gentlemen, within sixty days after those words were uttered, this

conversation was reported to have taken place. The German Emperor asked

Herr Havenstein, the President of the Imperial Bank of Germany, whether

Germany was prepared, financially, to carry on a war with a first-class

power. Herr Havenstein said: "No." To this the German Emperor replied,

"I do not want that answer to that question when I ask it again."

Herr Havenstein immediately called the managers of the thirty great

banks together, and told them that they must collect at least a

15 per cent reserve. To this they protested, saying that it meant

the accumulation of at least $250,000,000 in gold; but Havenstein

persisted and insisted upon his demand. Now, gentlemen, if you add the

$40,000,000 they had accumulated, to what Havenstein insisted that they

should accumulate, or $250,000,000, you have $300,000,000 as a minimum.

It is altogether probable that $400,000,000 was nearer what they should

have accumulated.

It should be noted in this very connection, that Germany recently

appointed a commission to investigate her banking system, and that

this commission reported that the individual banks of Germany should

carry their own reserves, precisely as Congressman Fowler has always

contended, declaring that it is especially important in the case of our

individual, independent banking system. From what has been said, it has

been demonstrated that every criticism that he has made of the German

system, has been confirmed by their own subsequent action.

The rest of his speech was as follows:

"Mark this: If we did not have the $346,000,000 United States notes or

greenbacks, the $650,000,000 of legal tender silver and a part of the

$750,000,000 national bank notes in the reserves of our banks, we would

now have in the United States $2,500,000,000 of gold instead of only

$1,850,000,000. Does all this prove nothing to us?

"Every intelligent student of economics knows that after Alexander

Hamilton, with the acquiescence and approval of Jefferson, had fixed

the ratio of the gold and silver dollar in 1792, a differential of

only one-half to one per cent drove all the gold out of the country by

1832, and that from 1834 to 1860 the changed ratio drove every dollar

of silver out of circulation. Who does not know that from 1861 to 1865

the issue of fiat Government paper drove every dollar of gold out of

the country; that for seventeen years we were off the gold standard,

resuming specie payments in 1879?

"Has any banker over fifty years of age forgotten the silver struggle

from 1879 to 1894, when, because of the silver purchase act by which we

only added $50,000,000 a year to our reserve money, we came to the very

precipice of repudiation and national dishonor?

"These four great and significant lessons have been taught us--since

the establishment of this Government--the poorer money invariably

drives out the better, and yet we are confronted by such stuff as the

following falling from the lips of the reputed author of the so-called

Reserve Association:

"'The banks will be able to replenish their reserves indefinitely.' The

counterpart of this proposition is that the banks will be able to make

loans indefinitely. Think of such a proposition! And again, he says it

was deemed necessary 'to provide such effective regulation of discounts

and note issues as would enable the organization to respond promptly at

all times to normal or unusual demands for credit or currency without

danger of undue expansion or inflation.' If this proposition survives

at all it will be as the curiosity of the century. I submit that

neither of these propositions could have emanated from a mind capable

of thinking in the terms of economics.

"I assert that if we adopt a sound financial system in the near future

we shall have in the course of ten years upward of $3,000,000,000,

possibly $3,500,000,000, of gold in the United States. I assert further

that if we adopt the proposed so-called reserve association scheme we

shall have at the end of five years thereafter in the neighborhood of

only $1,250,000,000, allowing for a differential of $250,000,000 either

way as a possibility. In other words, we would have as a result not

more than 40 per cent and possibly not more than 30 per cent of the

gold that we shall have if we pursue a wise economic policy.

"The scheme provides that any deposits with the association may count

as reserves; also that any of its notes may be held as reserves.

"Since the average reserve of all national banks is and has been for

many years about 20 per cent, let us assume, first, that a national

bank called 'X' has $5,000,000 of deposits and holds a 20 per cent

reserve, or $1,000,000 of gold; second, that X National Bank deposits

this million of gold with the reserve association; third, that a

national bank called the 'Y National Bank' exchanges $1,000,000

of commercial paper for $1,000,000 of the notes of the reserve

association, which it puts into its reserves.

"In the course of time it will have a million of deposits, largely

in the shape of loans based upon this million of notes; so that the

original $1,000,000 which stood guard over $5,000,000 of debts now is

called upon to protect $12,000,000 of debts, or only about an 8 per

cent reserve as against 20.

"The X National Bank owes $5,000,000 of deposits against $1,000,000

deposited with the association. The association owes the X National

Bank the $1,000,000 deposited with it and $1,000,000 of notes

outstanding which it issued to the Y National Bank. The Y National

Bank has liabilities outstanding of $5,000,000 with the notes as

reserves, or a net expansion and inflation of $7,000,000.

"It has been assumed or claimed by some advocates of the scheme

that probably $1,000,000,000 of gold would be deposited with the

association, in which event there would be an expansion and inflation

of $7,000,000,000, or a total liability of $12,000,000,000 where now

there are only $5,000,000,000.

"While this expansion and this inflation have been going on the notes

have been going into the banks as reserves, and a corresponding amount

of gold has been driven out of the banks and out of the country.

"Now, mark you, I have not pursued this expansion, this inflation,

beyond the 50 per cent gold reserve for all the liabilities of the

reserve association. When you turn your imagination to all the

possibilities remaining in rediscounts, borrowing direct, acceptances

and falling in your reserves, and the credits which grow out of

credits directly and indirectly, the prospect becomes bewildering. The

expansion and inflation becomes a matter of planetary distances and

astronomical figures. The proposal leads into the nebulous somewhere,

into the bottomless nowhere.

"Every student recognizes that the weakest point in our national bank

system is the superimposed credit resulting from the deposits with our

reserve cities and then with our central reserve cities. But in the

very face of that fact here is a proposal that accentuates that fault

one hundred fold.

"The strangest thing about this whole proposal is that it is based

upon the fact that we have not sufficient capacity for expansion and

inflation of credit. Will any one say that what we wanted during the

years of 1913-4-5-6-7 was more inflation? Does not every intelligent

student of banking economics know that what we should have had was some

way of checking the delirium instead of increasing the mad speculation?

"To determine now what we want we must first ascertain with some degree

of accuracy just what happened.

"Until we come to realize that there are two distinct kinds of capital

involved in our banking business, and learn to treat them according

to their peculiarities, we shall continue to have the same kind of

trouble, to a greater or less degree, that we have had in the past.

"There is the trust fund or the savings of the people and money

belonging to estates or the investment fund. Then there is the

commercial fund or that capital engaged in production and trade. The

law should compel the segregation or separation of these two funds, so

that we know with some degree of certainty whether the investment fund

has all been exhausted and our commercial funds or capital are being

encroached upon and absorbed in fixed investments. This is precisely

what happened by 1907.

"To illustrate this thought, let us assume that a railroad needs one

hundred flatcars to carry its peculiar freight and needs one hundred

passenger cars for the accommodation of the people. It is self-evident

that if the road uses all the flatcars and half the passenger cars to

carry its freight, the balance of the passengers will have to make some

other provision for transportation or walk. This is just what occurred

in 1907, and a great many people are still walking as a result of

that misadventure. Liquidation is still going on, with a probability

that we shall be well into 1913 before normal or really good business

conditions will prevail all round.

"Now, it is apparent that if this diagnosis is correct, the bankers

did not cause the panic, as is so frequently charged. Indirectly, the

bankers had a good deal to do with bringing it about, but not in the

manner usually supposed. The way they helped it on was this:

"The great syndicates or underwriting bankers adopted the practice of

simply notifying rich men and bankers all over the country that to them

so much of some issue of bonds had been allotted. Those to whom they

had been allotted, influenced, on the one hand by flattery and on the

other by fear, lest if they refused to absorb what had been set apart

for them they would be ignored in the future, took the allotment at all

hazard.

"This forcing process went on until commerce broke down, because it had

been robbed of its necessary capital and has not been able to replace

it since, out of earnings."

MR. MERCHANT: Mr. Banker, do you believe that to be a correct statement?

MR. BANKER: Believe it! I know it. There is no doubt whatever that the

banks generally are under a kind of duress. They know that if trouble

comes, they must go to the powers that be. When these underwritings are

put out, and we bankers are notified that we are expected to take a

certain amount, we feel compelled, half compelled at least, to respond,

precisely as Mr. Fowler stated, and, as a natural consequence, the

commercial fund of the country is sapped and absorbed, and transferred

to passive investments, which, when the break occurs, become to all

intents and purposes fixed investments because you cannot dispose of

them at all.

What we must do, and what I am sure we have accomplished in the bill we

have prepared, is to set every individual bank free, absolutely free,

from any domination or influence of any kind, direct or indirect. Take

my bank as an illustration of what I mean. Today I am living in a kind

of terror of the possibility of 1907 coming again, because I have no

way of protecting myself, except through my correspondents, and, under

present conditions, that is no guarantee, as the banks may all break

down again as they did then. This, you will remember, is due to the

fact that we have no real economic reserve in the United States today.

All the reserves are loaned out all the time.

Let me call your attention to what my position will be, under the bill

we have prepared.

_First_: I shall be able to furnish all the currency I need, by simply

converting book debts or deposits into note debts or currency, up to

twice the amount of my capital, if necessary. That is, I can regularly

issue $100,000, the amount of my capital, and by going to my Board of

Control, $100,000 additional. But, if I did this, I would not increase

my liabilities a single dollar, but simply change the form of them from

deposits to notes.

MR. MERCHANT: Have you any doubt about the people taking your bank

notes, as you suggest?

MR. BANKER: None, whatever. You see, in the first place, they do not

come to the bank because they fear the bank cannot pay them; but,

because when one of these shocks to credit comes, there is a tremendous

demand for cash of some kind. You will remember, that in 1893 and 1907,

when currency was sold in New York, it did not make any difference

what it was: gold or gold certificates, silver or silver certificates,

United States notes or bank notes--anything that was cash brought the

same premium. But, suppose the question should arise and a man should

ask, are these notes good? He would not hesitate long after I gave him

these facts:

_First_: That they were a first lien upon all my assets.

_Second_: That there was a gold guarantee fund amounting to $60,000,000

in the treasury of the American Reserve Bank, to redeem them if my bank

failed.

_Third_: That the American Reserve Bank with $1,250,000,000 would

redeem the notes in case my bank failed.

MR. LABORINGMAN: Well, Mr. Banker, do you know what I would do, if I

had a deposit in your bank, under those circumstances, and got scared

of you? I would give you a check for my deposit, take your notes, and

hold them until the storm blew over. That's what I would do.

UNCLE SAM: There, can you beat that as a precaution against accidents?

Mr. Laboringman never will get left, if you will give him half a chance.

MR. MANUFACTURER: Under those circumstances, of course, the question of

goodness of the notes would never arise. The people would soon think

only of the great central gold reserve, which would always be before

their eyes.

MR. BANKER: In addition to my note issue, I would have the same

recourse to my bank correspondent in New York that I have today, and

he would then be in a far better position to assist me than he is

now, because of his additional resources. Besides, I could fall in my

required cash reserves, which would be about $100,000 down to $25,000,

without any danger to my bank; because of my greatest, final, and

practically inexhaustible resource, The Board of Control, which has

examined my bank, knows my assets, and will give me any amount of gold

to protect me in case of necessity.

MR. MERCHANT: I see, your exact condition is known to the Board of

Control; and the Board of Control has access to the gold in the

American Reserve Bank, and could get fifty or one hundred million

dollars to protect itself, if necessary.

MR. BANKER: That is so. My last protection is the American Reserve

Bank, which actually holds reserves, real reserves, not United States

bonds, United States notes, silver certificates, chips, and whetstones,

nor any old thing; but gold, in unlimited quantities, to all intents

and purposes.

Now don't you see, gentlemen, that if you will place me in that

position, I will be absolutely free and independent of any bank in the

United States, and of all banking influences of whatever kind--simply

because my final appeal is to a great coöperative fund, in which I

have a common interest with all my fellow-bankers, and I know that my

protection is absolute?

MR. MANUFACTURER: Yes, and I see another very important, all-important

fact growing out of that situation; the complete liberation of every

bank in that zone, as well as your bank; indeed, every bank in every

zone would be absolutely liberated.

MR. MERCHANT: Yes, and I see more than the liberation of all the

individual banks. I see the complete liberation of every commercial

zone or section of the country from every other commercial zone or

section of the country; as each zone will look for its protection to

the American Reserve Bank, the holder of the great coöperative gold

fund, that is more than ample for any emergency that can possibly arise.

MR. LAWYER: Mr. Banker, how would you fare under the Aldrich scheme, if

you wanted $100,000 of currency to use to move the crops in the fall?

MR. BANKER: I am glad that you have asked for a comparison of our plan

with the Aldrich scheme, under the same conditions.

I could not have any accommodation whatever, unless I first subscribed

for an amount of stock in his scheme, equal to 20 per cent of my

capital, and I had paid up 10 per cent, or one-half of it, or $10,000.

Then, I must have a deposit or balance with his institution, possibly

as much as $20,000, if I wanted to borrow as much as $100,000. Even

then, I could not get any accommodation unless I had notes or paper

that had less than twenty-eight days to run. But country bankers such

as I am have no short time paper worth speaking of, and any of the

paper or notes that might happen to be coming due within twenty-eight

days would be the paper of people who do not want it sold and collected

at some remote city. They usually want to pay a part and renew a part,

so that, practically, I could not get any accommodation along that line.

Indeed, I do not believe that there is one bank in a hundred in the

United States that could use the scheme at all directly. Now, if I

should go into that scheme I would have to become a member of what they

call a local association. If I had no twenty-eight day paper, I would

then have to go to my local association with my hat in one hand, and

my grip full of notes in the other, and ask them to guarantee my paper

for me, by paying a commission for such guarantee. Of course, some of

the officers of the local association would be from my particular

neighborhood, and competing with me for business. I would not want to

confess to my local fellow-bankers by asking their help in ordinary

times, and I would not want to put into their hands the paper of my

customers, and so expose their business to their neighbors. The result

would probably be that I would resort to my correspondent banker, just

as I am doing today. Of course, the large banks might have plenty

of twenty-eight day paper, and could turn it over to the branch of

Aldrich's Central Bank, and get some of the notes about which we have

already heard something and supply me.

Now, let me suppose that I could use an average of $100,000 of currency

throughout the year, and that I keep that amount of paper up all the

time, for the purpose of supplying myself with currency of the Aldrich

make; you can see that it would cost me 6 per cent upon $100,000, or

$6,000 per annum.

Mark this, put it in your pipes and smoke it, that under our plan,

allowing for the cost of my reserve of 15 per cent on $100,000 of

notes, or 6 per cent on $15,000, or $900, and allowing my tax of 2 per

cent on $100,000 of notes, or $2,000, it would make a total cost of

only $2,900. My bank would, as you can see, be the loser of $3,100 by

using the Aldrich scheme as against our plan. Do not fail to remember

that the largest part of the 2 per cent tax on the notes under our plan

will go to pay off the greenbacks.

Again, I want you to keep in mind the expense and trouble of shipping

out the commercial paper, and looking after it throughout the year, and

the interminable nuisance of buying just the right amount of currency

every day, as compared with issuing your own notes, precisely as your

customers want currency. You see, I will be getting back some of my

notes every day through the Clearing House, as they will then be sent

to the Clearing House with the checks and drafts, just as they are in

Canada.

MR. MERCHANT: Of course, if you can save $3,100 on your currency every

year, and a large amount of additional expense, as well as an endless

amount of trouble, you can afford to share your gain with us fellows.

MR. BANKER: Most certainly, and you may depend upon it, that all the

extra expense that we incur will come out of our borrowers.

MR. MANUFACTURER: As you say, there cannot be one bank in a hundred

that would ever have what you call twenty-eight day paper. I know I

would not want you, and I am sure that Mr. Merchant there would not

want you, to take our paper to some local association and ask to have

it guaranteed unless there was a panic and everybody was in the same

boat. The whole scheme looks absurd and impractical.

MR. BANKER: Your opinion is confirmed by one of our most prominent

country bankers, who said, "This proposition is impractical,

unparalleled, and useless."

MR. MERCHANT: Mr. Banker, if you should ask your city banker

correspondent from whom you purchased the Central Bank notes, upon what

he relied, when he gave you the notes, what would he say?

MR. BANKER: He would undoubtedly say that he relied upon the credit of

my bank, and upon the paper I turned over to him in exchange for the

Central Bank notes.

MR. MERCHANT: Well, if your credit and the paper with your endorsement

are good enough for that banker, why are they not good enough security

for your own bank notes?

MR. BANKER: They certainly would be; especially since I would be under

the supervision of the Board of Control, and my notes would be secured

by being a first lien upon my whole assets; by a guarantee fund, and by

the total amount of gold held by the American Reserve Bank.

MR. MERCHANT: Mr. Banker, you spoke of belonging to a local association

if you should go into the Aldrich scheme. How many of those

associations would there be in the United States?

MR. BANKER: No one could tell until they got through organizing them.

The banks now have about two billion dollars of capital, and two

billion dollars of surplus, or a total of four billion dollars. The

scheme provides that any number of banks representing $5,000,000 of

capital and surplus could form an association. If they succeeded in

driving all the banks of the country into it, as was evidently their

intention, you see there could be about 800 of these local associations

engaged in guaranteeing their associates, if they wanted to, after

prying into their private business.

MR. MERCHANT: That is the worst feature I have heard yet, because it

would let all the cliques and cabals get together and run things by

manipulation. Don't you think so?

MR. BANKER: I certainly do think so. Bankers above all things do not

want to expose their business to their immediate neighbors in the

banking business.

You will remember that in the plan that we have just submitted, we

confined all knowledge to the boards of control, of which there is to

be no more than forty-two, possibly only twenty-eight, and that we

required all members of the Board of Control to disassociate themselves

from all banking connections in their respective zones.

MR. LABORINGMAN: Yes, but you have seven districts in every one of

your zones, don't you? That would make two hundred and ninety-four

districts, if you should have as many as forty-two zones, would it not?

Or one hundred and ninety-six if you have only twenty-eight zones. I am

sure my arithmetic is right, for I am fairly good at figures.

MR. BANKER: Yes, your figures are right, but you must remember

this--that the only purpose for the creation of the districts in our

plan, as we have constituted them, is to prevent combinations and

cabals, and guarantee a fair and evenly distributed representation of

all parts of every zone.

These districts exist only for the single purpose of the organization

of the commercial zones--the election of members to the Board of

the Bankers' Council and to the Board of Control. When this is

accomplished, their work is done.

MR. LABORINGMAN: Oh, I see, you would only have at most forty-two

organizations in the United States that would have any actual business

to do.

MR. BANKER: That is correct. Every zone would be so organized as to

absolutely protect the confidences of the business world and the

banking fraternity.

I think in the organization of the commercial zone, that we have

taken such steps to emphasize and secure publicity of action, and so

much pains to guarantee representation from every section of every

zone, that the people as well as the bankers will be kept advised all

the while of all that is being done. I think that the matter of the

subsequent selection of members, both to the Board of Control and to

the Board of the Bankers' Council, will always be a subject of general

discussion and newspaper comment. This is true more particularly,

because every bank has one vote, and because only one member will be

elected to the Board of Control each year, and only two members will be

elected to the Board of the Bankers' Council each year.

Publicity and direct representation are the two distinct ends sought,

as we believe that in this way alone can a true and proper sense of

responsibility be imposed upon the members of the two boards.

MR. MERCHANT: I agree with you absolutely. It is precisely as

President-elect Wilson said: "Publicity, pitiless publicity, is the

only sure protection to the people."

MR. MANUFACTURER: Just another word upon that point. Samuel J.

Tilden I think it was who said: "Publicity is the only safeguard of

republican institutions." How well we have guaranteed publicity in the

organization of our commercial zone the public will have to judge.

However, if our method for securing publicity can be improved upon, we

will all welcome it.

MR. FARMER: Since we have been discussing this feature of publicity

and independence, I have become so deeply impressed with the fact that

every bank will be set free, will be able to act so independently, and

that every commercial zone will be such a complete, such a perfect

democratic republic in itself, that I have been wondering whether each

zone could not create and carry its own reserve.

Listen! This is my idea. Some one has mentioned St. Louis as a

financial centre. Now, why could not St. Louis carry the central

reserve for that commercial zone, and so each of the forty-two

financial centers of the zones carry their own central reserves,

precisely as we have learned the Clearing Houses are carrying the

reserves of their banks today. You have extended the approved Clearing

House practices to the entire zone--you have complete, absolute, local

self-government; you have your supervision and control of all the banks

in the zone; you have your Central Reserve--you have a free check

zone. Now, what more do you want? Why should not every zone stand upon

its own bottom, just as the banks of Virginia, Louisiana, Kentucky,

Missouri, and Ohio did; and as the Bank of the State of Indiana and the

State Bank of Iowa did? That's what I want to know.

MR. BANKER: I must say that is a very pertinent, a very interesting,

and very important question. There is one point upon which everybody

now agrees, however much they may differ upon other points. That one

point of common agreement is this--that the real source of weakness,

from the standpoint of organization today, is the fact that whenever

there is fear or apprehension in the country, every bank begins to

fight for reserves, fight for some kind of cash; because there is no

actual or real protection as matters now stand, unless a bank has

practically as much cash as its deposits amount to. In other words,

it is really a run of the banks upon the banks. It is "Everyone for

himself, and the devil take the hind-most."

Now, it must be apparent to you that each of your forty-two zones would

be fighting each other for reserves, just as all the individual banks

fight each other today when the danger comes, and the whole situation

proves no stronger than the weakest link; hence, our exchanges break

down.

St. Louis, for instance, might have a Central Reserve of $50,000,000;

but would St. Louis be satisfied that that was enough to protect her

against any accident? She is confident that she has some strength, but

is not sure of unlimited strength and absolute protection. Therefore,

the struggle for reserves would begin between the zones, with the first

appearance of danger, just as it does today between the banks.

On the other hand, if the banks in the St. Louis zone should send

their $50,000,000 to Washington, and send along with it their

representative of that zone, and in like manner every zone should send

its Central Reserve and representative to Washington, it would make

a total reserve of $1,250,000,000 of gold in one mass, and a board

of forty-two members to manage it. The result would be precisely the

same as that now attained by having a Federal army, a Federal navy, a

National Government, for a "Common Defense." If each zone should be

left to stand upon its own bottom, as you say, we would be repeating,

economically, identically the same mistake that we made politically

when we formed the Confederation of States in 1781. The confederation

was too weak to be an efficient government, and so we formed a

"Stronger Union," the present Federal Government in 1789.

It is no more important that the banks in a Clearing House should get

together than that all the banks in any given commercial zone should

get together; and it is no more important that the banks in any given

commercial zone should get together, than that all the zones should

get together for a _common defense_ of all the business interests of

the country, and for the common defense of all the reserves of the

country against all the demands of the rest of the commercial world.

Unless this final union of reserves is made, no discount rate for gold

can be fixed and enforced, and we would find ourselves in the same

helpless, hopeless situation or position that we are in today. But if

all the central reserves of all the zones are united in The American

Reserve Bank, and every commercial zone has its representative upon

the board of directors, you will have in the banking world of the

United States identically the same form of Government we now have in

our National Government. Then when we have converted our United States

notes into gold certificates, and when all our silver certificates

have been reduced to the form of token money, by cutting them up into

pieces of two dollars and less, The American Reserve Bank will be in

identically the same position that the Bank of England is in today,

the most positive and powerful force in the world in controlling and

directing the movement of gold. And yet, like the Bank of England,

The American Reserve Bank would not be a bank of issue. It is not a

question of note issue at all; but it is a question of centralizing

our gold reserves to meet any emergency in the business world, coupled

with the power of fixing and enforcing a price for the use of gold, a

discount rate for gold throughout the United States.

The Financial and Banking system that we have proposed combines the

Bank of England and the Canadian Bank note system--the two highest

and best exemplifications of a central gold reserve and bank credit

currency.

MR. FARMER: Well, Mr. Banker, you are undoubtedly right. I see now that

we would be very little, if any, better off with the individual zone

system than we are today, when you recall the fact that the whole world

now uses one common reserve, gold, and have ways of obtaining it. I

think your argument illustrated by the Army and Navy and the National

Government is absolutely unanswerable. What do you think, Mr. Merchant?

MR. MERCHANT: I have never had any doubt about that question at all.

MR. LABORINGMAN: Abe Lincoln said, you know, "A house divided against

itself cannot stand." I think this thing is just as plain as the nose

on your face. It is Uncle Sam against the world just as much in banking

as in anything else; and a good deal more so in these days of lightning

intelligence and cheap transportation.

With a representative of every commercial zone, say forty-two in all,

sitting at Washington and holding in trust for the protection of

all the people of the United States such a Central Gold Reserve as

you propose to make the banks create, you have a perfect duplicate

of our present National Government, in political matters. These

representatives of the zones are the servants of the zones, just as the

senators are the servants of the states. Another thing, twenty-one of

them will be business men, and twenty-one will be bankers; both sides

of the bank counter, the inside and the outside, will be represented;

and, since you have arranged to have one-seventh of them, or three

business men and three bankers go out every year, your board of

forty-two will always be old, and yet always will be becoming new. The

more I think of it, the more I am for it, because I am for Uncle Sam

against the world.

UNCLE SAM: If you ever want a "B" line on anything, go to Mr.

Laboringman every time.

MR. BANKER: Well, we have considered the economic side of the Aldrich

scheme pretty thoroughly. I think it is about time that we heard

something from Mr. Lawyer about the administrative features of the

scheme.

MR. LAWYER: From a professional point of view, I have been a student

of motives all my life, and as you know, I have been a part of a

powerful, political machine in this state for more than twenty years.

The Aldrich scheme furnished me a rich mine of motives, and a detail

of organization that staggered even an old political stager as I am.

You will remember that when Aldrich made his first announcement

about his plan, he said that we must have a _Central Bank_ and that

immediately President Taft declared at Boston, "Senator Aldrich desires

to round out his career with a financial system for the United States,

and says that we should have a _Central Bank_." I never will forget

what an eminent citizen of this state said when he read that statement.

It was this: "Well, God help the American people if Nelson W. Aldrich

ever rounds out _his career_ with a financial system for the United

States."

You will all of you remember, I am sure, what a cold reception the idea

of a "Central Bank" at the hands of Aldrich received. Does anyone of

common intelligence believe that Aldrich ever changed his scheme below

its throat? It is true he put a mask on its head; but that is all. He

hunted around for an all-concealing name to hide the thing under--"The

National Reserve Association." _I assert that his proposal would mean

the greatest and most centralized Central Bank in the world._

Note these figures and draw your own conclusion:

Nat. Reserve Bank of Bank of Bank of

Assn. France England Germany

Capital

$400,000,000 $36,500,000 $72,000,000 $45,000,000

Deposit

1,500,000,000 100,000,000 250,000,000 200,000,000

Note Issue

2,400,000,000 1,000,000,000 (See Note.) 400,000,000

Possible Note Issue

4,500,000,000 Possible issue

large with tax.

NOTE.--_The Bank of England is not in any sense a bank of issue,

because the amount of notes it issues is limited to the amount of gold

coin in the issue department. The notes are gold certificates. There is

an exception to the law, to the extent of the arbitrary amount of notes

issued against the Government debt and securities, held in the issue

department, amounting to $90,000,000._

Now, gentlemen, here you have a proposal to organize in this country

an institution with a capital greater than the combined capital of the

Central Banks of England, France and Germany, because the capital of

all of our banks now exceeds $2,000,000,000, and the subscription to

the National Reserve Association must be 20 per cent of this amount,

to entitle them to participate. Certainly the idea must have been that

they all would participate in so beneficent an institution. "It was to

be a bank of banks for all the banks."

It was the declared purpose of the author of the scheme that the banks

should surrender all their real money, now carried as reserves, to this

central institution in exchange for its notes; or that the banks would

deposit more than $1,500,000,000 with the National Reserve Association.

This would be a deposit nearly three times as great as all the deposits

of the Central Banks of England, France and Germany combined.

The bill provides, Section 51, that the National Reserve Association

can issue $900,000,000 of its notes, _and as many more_ as are covered

"by an equal amount of lawful money" (United States notes, silver, or

silver certificates, and gold in some form), without paying any tax.

But if the banks turned over their present reserves, amounting to

$1,500,000,000, as contemplated by the author of the National Reserve

Association, it could issue $2,400,000,000 before beginning to pay any

tax on circulation. By paying a tax of 1-1/2 per cent per annum, it

could put out $300,000,000 more notes, not covered by lawful money,

or $2,700,000,000; then, by paying a tax of 5 per cent, it could go

any limit until its lawful money reserve was reduced to 33 per cent.

This makes a possible issue of $4,500,000,000, or a possible note

issue today two or three times as great as all the note issues at any

time outstanding of the Central Banks of England, France and Germany

combined. _Every dollar of this vast amount is only the credit of the

so-called National Reserve Association, and yet is a lawful reserve for

over twenty-five thousand banks to hold._

MR. MERCHANT: By the way, Mr. Banker, I would like to ask you what you

think of a tax upon bank notes to be paid by the Central Bank of Issue

as it is practiced in Germany where they got this idea.

MR. BANKER: Economically speaking, a tax paid under such circumstances

is of no more use than your appendix.

MR. MERCHANT: My appendix! I have had my appendix removed.

MR. BANKER: Well, that makes no difference. I still insist that a

tax paid upon bank notes under such circumstances is of no more use,

economically speaking, than your appendix, whether it has been removed

or not.

MR. LAWYER: Section 23 provides, "The National Reserve Association

shall be the principal fiscal agent of the United States. The

Government of the United States shall, upon the organization of the

National Reserve Association, deposit its general funds with said

association and its _branches_, and thereafter all receipts of the

Government, exclusive of trust funds, shall be deposited with said

association and its _branches_, and all disbursements by the Government

shall be made through said association and its _branches_."

The Central Bank of any country may be defined to be the bank at which

the other banks carry their reserves, and at which the Government

carries its balance.

But will some advocate say "it is only the bank of all the other

banks"? This is the very quintessence of a Central Bank.

Upon this evidence will any candid man say that the so-called

National Reserve Association is not a Central Bank? It was to have

fifteen branches. The Bank of England has none. The Bank of Germany

has nineteen main branches. The Bank of France has one hundred and

twenty-seven main branches.

"SECTION 34.--The National Reserve Association shall have power both at

home and _abroad_ to deal in certain things."

SECTION 36.--"The National Reserve Association shall have power to open

and maintain banking accounts in foreign countries, and to _establish

agencies in foreign countries_ for certain purposes."

Have the Central Banks of England, France or Germany any power to

maintain accounts and establish agencies in foreign countries? With

"A baby stare," and under cover of "Sunday-school pretences," we are

told that this all-comprehending scheme is just a simple coöperative

enterprise for the exclusive benefit of the individual American banks.

Indeed, that it is the only truly altruistic banking institution that

was ever conceived.

Now, as the chief argument for the adoption of this scheme, its main

promoters and sponsors have persistently declared that the country

was now being dominated and controlled by certain great banking

interests, and, therefore, that the people should liberate themselves

from these sinister and dangerous banking powers by running into the

warm and enticing embrace of the National Reserve Association. Upon

investigation, we find this anomaly, this surprising, this astounding

fact: that the promoters and advocates of this gigantic machine are

these self-same sinister banking influences who have the country by the

throat today.

Hon. Leslie M. Shaw has pertinently inquired, "Is it not strange that

Nelson W. Aldrich and his affiliations are tired of their great power

and vast opportunities, and are now trying to divest themselves of

them," through the innocent-looking National Reserve Association?

It will be well remembered by all of you, that at the time that the

Aldrich scheme made its first bow to the dear people, the public

discovered that the National City Bank owned bank stock to the amount

of $10,000,000 in other National Banks located throughout the United

States. Possibly the same interests owned several times that amount. I

was informed about that time that they controlled at least one hundred

banks in the leading cities of the United States. Now, let us assume

that to be true, and let us meditate upon what such an organization

could accomplish if they wanted to elect every officer in every local

association, and every officer in charge of every branch, and the board

of directors of the National Reserve Association, and so name the

"_Governor_" and the rest of the executive committee of nine which is

to control this great Central Bank.

To appreciate the power of such an organization, you must keep in

mind the fact that practically every bank in the United States would

be carrying a balance with some one of these banks immediately under

their control. There is your machine. It is a perfect duplicate of the

political machine in this state. The state "Boss," whom you know stands

in precisely the same position as the National City Bank would stand.

As you are fully aware, I am the "Boss" of this county; and I am in

identically the same position that one of these hundred banks would be

that are controlled by the National City Bank. When I get my orders,

I immediately communicate with every so-called local leader in every

township. This political machine works three hundred and sixty-five

days and three hundred and sixty-five nights in the year. In the

sense of an organization, we are working all the time, and it is the

organization work that does the business. All the rest of the people

are unorganized. So it would be with the banks. The men who belong to

the organization or machine "_like it and fear it_"; because as things

have stood, no one could get anywhere without being a part of the

machine. This fact forces acquiescence. It has been, as you know, a

perfect feudalism from top to bottom. We have had a machine government

in this state as perfect as the Manchu Government in China.

Can you imagine anything easier than for the National City Bank with

this complete banking organization all over the United States to name

every man practically that went into this organization from top to

bottom? This would not be done by holding a majority of the stock in

all the twenty-five thousand banks; they don't care about that; because

it is a matter of no consequence to them, and if they attempted to do

anything so crude, it would spoil their whole game. They attain their

ends in more subtle but no less certain and powerful ways. They get

influences to work. They put forces into operation. Their interests are

not limited to the banking business. They have affiliations with great

transportation companies and manufacturing interests, and therefore

control large bank deposits everywhere that the banks want and are

always working to get. Then there are favors to be granted; commissions

to be paid; "melons to be cut." Opportunities are suggested. In one

respect at least they are like the Lord, they "work in a mysterious way

their wonders to perform."

They had established their ramifications throughout the United States

by making the National City Bank a holding company of bank stocks,

and the culmination of their power was to be realized through the

devious methods of organizing the National Reserve Association. The

same money and the same power that filled the columns of the newspapers

of the country with the unqualified praise of the Aldrich scheme for

two years--the same power that rushed resolutions of one uniform

stereotyped kind through twenty or thirty state bank associations, and

steam rollered the same unconsidered declarations through two annual

conventions of the American Bankers' Association, would have made this

so-called _altruistic, benevolent, coöperative association_ the most

powerful machine ever organized; because, it would have absolutely

dominated all the bank credit in the United States, or 45 per cent of

the banking power of the world. You must remember that these interests

are by far the greatest speculators in the United States. Yes, the

greatest in the world.

MR. BANKER: But don't you remember that the bill provided in Section

26 that the paper rediscounted by it must "be issued or drawn for

agricultural, industrial, or commercial purposes," and not "for the

purpose of carrying stocks, bonds, or other investment securities"?

MR. LAWYER: Yes, but that is all folderol. It is the purest kind

of poppycock. If a bank wanted to take on a speculative deal, it

could sell its commercial paper, could it not, and use the money for

speculation just the same? That is on precisely the same level with its

declaration that the institution was not a Central Bank. It is such

subterfuges that disgust every candid man.

Listen to Mr. Aldrich in his report upon the bill upon the selection of

the "Governor" of the National Reserve Association by the President of

the United States. He says, "Further restraint upon the administration

of the association upon narrow or selfish lines, is imposed by the

provision that four of the highest officials of the Government are made

ex officio members of the controlling board, _and by the requirement

that the governor shall be selected by the President of the United

States_. The fear has been expressed that the _selection of the

governor by the President_, and the provisions making the Secretary of

the Treasury, the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Commerce

and Labor, and the Comptroller of the currency, ex officio members of

the board of directors of the reserve association, _might lead to an

attempt to control the organization for political purposes_."

Please note the sham, fraud and false pretense covered by this comment.

The bill provides that the "Governor" of the association, as they

call him, shall be selected by the President of the United States

_from a list of at least three names, furnished by the directors_.

Will any honest man say that the President of the United States would

have had any more to do with the selection of the "Governor" of the

so-called National Reserve Association than the King of Siam? Again

note this cheap, false pretense, "Fear has been expressed that the

selection of the governor by the President," and the four ex officio

members of the board of directors, "might lead to an attempt to control

the organization for political purposes." These four ex officio

members have just four votes upon a board of forty-six which proceeds

immediately to eliminate all of the ex officio members forever, by

selecting an executive committee consisting of nine members to manage

its affairs, from which all of them are excluded except the Comptroller

of the currency. Can any intelligent man doubt the purpose of all these

sham declarations and false pretenses? If so, let him spend a day or

two trying to find out how the members of the boards of the local

associations are to be chosen; try to unravel the process by which the

members of the boards of the branches are to be evolved; and, having

grown tired and dizzy with his task, let him undertake to prove how

the board of directors of the National Reserve Association are to be

manufactured through the machinations born of ulterior purposes.

I have studied puzzles before, but for complications, wheels within

wheels, evident designs upon evident designs, occult purposes under

occult purposes, and a combination of powerful forces, born of sinister

influences, this project will forever stand alone as an illustration of

what the human mind can do to conceal its real object.

There is not one man in a hundred, indeed I do not believe that there

is one man in a thousand, taking the business men, farmers, working

men, and bankers all together, who can solve the riddle, and tell

how it is done. Such a mystery could not have just happened. It must

necessarily have been the product of a purpose.

_Simplicity, publicity and direct methods are the guaranties of common

honesty. Intricacy, secrecy and indirect methods are invariably used

to hide uncommon dishonesty. I do not mean petty larceny, taking a

few pennies, or a loaf of bread; but the absorption of hundreds of

millions, without returning anything to the world in exchange for them._

Should the United States have been so unfortunate as to have been

bound hand and foot for fifty years, the life of the proposed charter,

by the trammels and intricacies of the National Reserve Association

under control of an executive committee, consisting of only nine men

who had been the evolutionary product of a preconceived purpose and

well-defined plan, can anyone doubt what the result would have been?

Can anyone doubt that all of their banks and all of their business

interests would have gotten all the money they wanted all the time?

The advanced information from week to week and, at times, possibly, a

month ahead, of what the discount rate would be--a very natural way for

some member of that executive committee to show his or their proper

appreciation of his or their promotion to their positions--would have

been worth more every year, during the fifty-year grant, than all the

wealth that the American people could produce during any twelve months;

for this advanced information about the discount rate would have made

profits a mathematical certainty upon the billions and billions of

stocks and bonds that are quoted upon the Stock Exchange, the fertile

field of the man who knows that he has a sure thing.

MR. MANUFACTURER: Mr. Lawyer, that smells pretty bad.

MR. LAWYER: Yes, I admit it; but does it smell any worse than oil has

been smelling for more than twenty years? Than certain United States

senators have been made to smell? Than robbing rebates smell? Is it not

the natural sequel to this train of abuses to which the country has

been treated?

This whole situation was so graphically depicted, precisely as it has

developed, two years before Mr. Aldrich gave birth to this conception,

that I want to read it to you:

"A central bank could easily be so organized as to sap the commercial

blood of this country at every turn and direct the silent and unseen

currents of advantage into the channels of favored institutions, and

all these favored institutions might turn out, upon investigation, to

be, in the end, one institution.

"And if, unfortunately, the subterranean connection could not be

detected, and even if detected, could not be broken, what a power for

evil and injustice such an organization would prove in the life of this

Nation.

"This is not only regarded as possible, but as probable; indeed, it is

charged that it is the preconceived, cunning design of the advocates of

a central bank to accomplish this purpose.

"Under these circumstances, with what suspicion and jealousy will every

act of the central bank be watched! Localities will become envious

of localities. Cities will bitterly attack their neighboring cities.

Nine-tenths, if, indeed, not ninety-nine out of every hundred, of the

banks will imagine spears in needlecases, and, right or wrong, fling

their accusations upon the wings of the wind; and we will be living in

a commercial world of unrest and constant controversy surpassing in

suspicion, envy, jealousy and bitterness anything this Republic has

ever witnessed. The consequences no man can prophesy; no imagination

can paint."

These words were spoken by Hon. Charles N. Fowler, March 29, 1908,

just two years before Mr. Aldrich made his report to Congress upon his

National Reserve Association.

MR. LABORINGMAN: You know I said that I had heard that the Aldrich Bill

was dead; for one, I hope so. If the people ever get a lick at it they

will finish it for certain.

MR. FARMER: You are right, and you bet that if they ever get a chance

to discuss this banking bill question, they will come mighty near

settling upon the right proposition in the end.

MR. BANKER: I agree with you, and furthermore I am thoroughly convinced

that we shall never reach a satisfactory conclusion until we have had

just the same kind of a hand-to-hand fight over this question that we

had over the gold standard.

MR. MANUFACTURER: It looks so to me. That gold-standard fight taught

me that you could trust the American people to make a wise decision,

if you would only have a country store, schoolhouse, cornfield debate,

in which every man in the country got into the game--preacher, lawyer,

teacher, farmer, merchant, manufacturer, laboringman, townfolks and

country folks, all alike.

MR. MERCHANT: Nothing more true has been said since we have been

talking about this question than that remark about the importance of a

public discussion of this whole matter. I know any number of men who

when this Aldrich scheme came out were ready to swallow it, but who now

realize what a fatal blunder it would have been. The reason was, that

they knew absolutely nothing about the question and they were living in

such a state of terror on account of the panic, that they were ready to

take anything that would shield them from experiences such as they had

just passed through. The Aldrich scheme was the only thing in sight,

because hundreds of thousands of dollars had been spent in promoting

it. They are just beginning to study and think about the subject. Our

hope of wise action by Congress rests upon a red-hot debate among the

people, exactly as you said.

MR. BANKER: Well, it will be easy enough to show them what the real

reforms demanded are.

_The reforms we demand are these_:

_First: Holding companies in the banking business must be completely

wiped out._

_Second: Every National Bank should be authorized to do_

_(1) A commercial banking business._

_(2) A Savings bank business._

_(3) A Trust company business._

_(4) A note issue business, precisely as the Canadian banks do._

_Third: All the various accounts--commercial, savings, trust and note

issues--should be segregated._

_Fourth: Every bank in the United States should be compelled to carry

the same amount of bank reserves._

_Fifth: All bank reserves should consist of gold or gold certificates,

as soon as the United States notes can be converted into gold

certificates._

_Sixth: Every bank in the United States should be brought under

national control, because banking is essentially Interstate Commerce._

_Seventh: Every natural financial centre in the United States should

become the clearing centre for all the checks, drafts and bank notes

that are payable in the territory that is economically and naturally

tributary to that Financial centre; such territory should constitute a

commercial zone._

_Eighth: There should be organized at each of these financial centres a

Clearing House at which all the checks, drafts and bank notes payable

within the commercial zone shall be at par._

_Ninth: The banks of each commercial zone should elect a board of

control to examine, supervise and control all the banks within such

commercial zone, precisely as the Clearing Home bank examiners are

examining and supervising all banks clearing through them today._

_Tenth: The banks of each commercial zone should also elect a court of

appeals, or a banker's council, composed of an equal number of business

men and bankers, to settle all banking and business questions that

would properly come before them._

_Eleventh: The Board of Control in each commercial zone should be

presided over by a deputy United States Comptroller, for the purpose

of securing immediate and efficient action._

_Twelfth: The banks of the United States should all contribute a

percentage of their deposits to a Central Reserve, which should be

composed of gold, and gold alone. The percentage of deposit should be

7 per cent at the outset, and be gradually increased to 10 per cent,

which would amount, at the present time, to a central gold reserve of

upwards of $1,250,000,000. This reserve would correspond to the reserve

held today by the Clearing Houses for their banks._

_Thirteenth: This central gold reserve should be held in trust by a

body of men composed of one man from each commercial zone, for the

benefit of all the commercial zones._

_Fourteenth: Each Board of Control should have access to this central

gold reserve, and should have power to sell gold to any bank within its

zone and under its supervision, in case it desired it for the purpose

of moving crops or for any other legitimate reason. The practical

result would be, that the gold would be held, to a large extent, at

the financial centres, and under the command of the Board of Control,

precisely as the Clearing House committees today hold the reserves of

the banks constituting their respective Clearing Houses._

_Fifteenth: The use, distribution and control of the central gold

reserve should be under the management of the representatives of all

the commercial zones, who should be composed equally of business men

and bankers._

_Sixteenth: For the purpose of establishing responsibility and securing

efficiency, the representatives of the zones should act through

corporate powers granted by the National Government._

_Seventeenth: The purpose of a national centralization of gold to so

large an extent is two-fold:_

_(1) It brings all the banking power of the United States to the

defense of the commercial interests in every part of the United States

instantaneously._

_(2) It will give to the representatives of the zones the power to

control and direct the movement of gold to and from the United States,

by fixing and enforcing a price for the use of gold, or a discount

rate for gold transactions throughout the United States._

_These reforms are based upon three distinct propositions:_

_First: They incorporate the principles of a central gold reserve, as

illustrated by the Bank of England, where all the transactions are in

gold, and gold alone, without the use or intervention of bank credit in

the form of bank credit notes, which could be used for reserves by the

banks throughout Great Britain._

_Second: They incorporate the principle of bank credit currency, as

illustrated by the bank note system of Canada, which involves daily

redemption in gold coin through the clearing houses._

_Third: They extend to every economic or natural commercial zone the

established and approved practices of the American Clearing Houses,

that is:_

_(1) Bank supervision and control over all members._

_(2) A reserve created by all the members of the Clearing House and

held by the Clearing House Committee for the benefit of all the

members._

_(3) Such a free check system over every commercial zone, precisely as

New England has had since 1899, and as has just been established over

a large territory around New York by the New York Clearing House._

_The result of these reforms would be:_

_(1) To make each individual bank absolutely independent, because it

has an unlimited resource in the coöperative gold reserve._

_(2) To make every commercial zone as free and independent of every

other commercial zone, as England is of France, or France is of

Germany._

_(3) To completely decentralize all bank credit in the United States,

while it centralizes the gold to a degree that would enable us by

raising the discount rate to close the door of our markets against

the demands for gold from abroad._

_(4) To insure all depositors in National banks against loss._

_(5) To liquefy and therefore develop a general market for commercial

paper._

_(6) To save the business interests of this country more than

$200,000,000 every year, to say nothing of the incalculable losses

growing out of our ever-recurring panics._ #/

MR. LAWYER: Mr. Banker, you have stated with great clearness and

precision just what our investigation has demonstrated should be done

to give us a sound and economical financial and banking system.

After a careful consideration of the question, I am prepared to say

that the Aldrich scheme would not accomplish or effect a single one of

these reforms.

On the other hand, I am convinced that, while it would give us

temporary relief, immediately there would follow undue expansion. In

quick succession there would come wild inflation, a vast amount of gold

would be expelled from the country and we would find ourselves in the

end in far greater and more serious difficulties than those from which

we are now suffering.

MR. BANKER: Your conclusion is in perfect keeping with my own. It seems

to me very remarkable how many people were temporarily misled by its

claims, but have since turned from it and are now opposed to it.

MR. LAWYER: I do not think that is either remarkable or strange, when

you recall the mental condition of the whole country, due to the panic;

the vast amount of money poured into its propaganda; the claims made

for it and the fact that it incorporated some things that the public

realized ought to be done.

For example, it proposed to divide the country into districts, an idea

that Congressman Fowler had advocated ever since 1897 or for more than

fifteen years, and had incorporated in his bill of 1908.

The Aldrich scheme provided for a Central Reserve, but composed almost

entirely of United States bonds, United States notes and silver in some

form, a fact that did not attract the attention of the public at the

outset.

It proposed to make an unlimited market for the rediscount of paper,

a most pleasing thought to contemplate until it was discovered that

this was to be done by "replenishing" the reserves of our 25,000 banks

"indefinitely," as Aldrich said, with bank debts in the form of bank

notes issued by the so-called "Reserve Association." It incorporated

the plan proposed by Congressman Fowler in his bill of 1908 for

converting the "_Two per cent United States bonds_" into "_Three per

cent United States bonds_," a fact that impressed the National banks

favorably.

The so-called Association was given an attractive name--"National

Reserve Association," also borrowed from the first draft of Congressman

Fowler's Bill of 1908, with only a slight change. He called his central

reserve, "United States Reserve Association." Finally, owing to the

clever presentation of the scheme, the country took to it at the start,

because they wanted something done and they hoped that the scheme was

what Mr. Aldrich declared it to be, when he said, "The plan we propose

is, essentially, an American system, scientific in its methods and

democratic in its control."

Every intelligent man now knows that the system he proposed was the

German system from top to bottom, which broke down completely under the

first real test, which came in 1911.

Every man who calls himself an economist must admit, instead of its

being scientific in character, it was constructed in absolute defiance

of all economic law, and now the public is convinced that instead of

being democratic in control, it was intended to be a gigantic "_Central

Bank_" with fifteen branches over which a "_Governor_," a name wholly

foreign to American banking institutions, and his seven associates were

to rule, the "_Governor_" appointing his assistant managers over the

fifteen branches as if it were a Manchu dynasty and not a democracy at

all.

Thus one by one the economic blunders have been pointed out; one by one

the sinister motives have been exposed; one by one the false pretenses

have been unmasked, until there is left only a recollection of the

impression made by the expenditure of hundreds of thousands of dollars

in this futile attempt to enslave all American bank credit and the

lesson of extreme caution and a most urgent need on the part of every

citizen in every walk of life, of study, diligent study, if he desires

to perform a truly patriotic duty and be of some real service to his

country in this hour of peril, inspired only by unselfish motives and a

sincere devotion to the welfare of the whole people.

MR. MERCHANT: Mr. Lawyer has certainly succeeded in pointing out very

clearly the things that _must be excluded_ from our bill.

MR. MANUFACTURER: And Mr. Banker has certainly succeeded in pointing

out very clearly the things that _must be included_ in our bill.

MR. LABORINGMAN: Well, then, if we are all sure that we are right, let

us go ahead.

MR. FARMER: We will; and as our forefathers fought for the birth of

this nation we will fight for its life.

UNCLE SAM: Boys, I shall live only through your intelligence, your

courage, your justice, your honor, your patriotism, your service, your

sacrifice; and I shall be immortal only if all those who come after you

shall possess these same virtues.

FAREWELL.

APPENDIX A

UNITED STATES CIRCULATION STATEMENT--January 2, 1913.

=======================+================+=================+=============

|General Stock |Held in Treasury,| Money in

|of Money in the |as Assets of the |Circulation.

|United States. | Government. |

+----------------+-----------------+---------------

|January 2, 1913.|January 2, 1913. |January 2,1913.

-----------------------+----------------+-----------------+---------------

Gold coin (including | | |

bullion in Treasury) | $1,878,57,122| $170,983,732 | $623,159,221

Gold Certificates[2] | | 128,747,19 | 955,686,972

Standard Silver Dollars| 565,481,020| 165,022 | 74,528,998

Silver Certificates[2] | | 12,814,458 | 477,972,542

Subsidiary Silver | 174,538,163| 17,814,855 | 156,723,308

Treasury Notes of 1890 | 2,797,000| 10,115 | 2,786,885

United States Notes | 346,681,016| 6,995,837 | 339,685,179

National Bank Notes | 750,972,246| 30,787,771 | 720,184,475

+----------------+-----------------+--------------

Total | $3,719,046,567| $368,318,987 |$3,350,727,580

-----------------------+----------------+-----------------+--------------

Population of continental United States January 2, 1913, estimated at

96,496,000; circulation per capita, $34.72.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 2: For redemption of outstanding certificates an exact

equivalent in amount of the appropriate kinds of money is held in the

Treasury, and is not included in the account of money held as assets of

the Government.]

APPENDIX B

CLASSIFICATION OF CASH IN BANKS--June 14, 1912.

===========================+=================+============+=============

Classification. |National Banks. |All Other |All Reporting

| | Banks. | Banks.

---------------------------+-----------------+------------+--------------

Gold Coin | $149,294,417 | 88,210,552 | 237,504,970

Gold Certificates | 437,081,380 |204,494,410 | 641,575,790

Silver Dollars | 12,637,221 | 10,230,733 | 22,867,954

Silver Certificates | 138,569,628 | 55,248,220 | 193,817,848

Subsidiary and Minor Coins| 22,555,692 | 15,026,738 | 37,582,430

Legal-tender Notes | 188,440,207 | 63,576,675 | 252,016,882

National Bank Notes | { 47,564,277 }| 58,037,130 | 105,601,407

Cash not Classified | {of other banks}| 82,302,986 | 82,302,986

---------------------------+-----------------+------------+--------------

Total | $996,142,823 |$577,127,445|$1,573,270,268

---------------------------+-----------------+------------+--------------

Amount of money held by United States Treasury, $368,318,987.

Amount of money held by all banks, $1,573,270,268.

Amount of money held by the people, $1,777,457,312.

Total amount of money in the United States, $3,719,046,567.

APPENDIX C

Assuming that the plan should be adopted within the year 1913, and

taking round but approximate figures, the amount of reserves required

to put the plan into operation would be as follows:

Individual deposits, commercial $11,000,000,000

Due to banks 1,000,000,000

Band credit currency, notes 1,250,000,000

---------------

_Total demand liabilities_ $13,250,000,000

Central reserves against this amount at 10% $1,325,000,000

Cash reserves on this amount at an average

of 8% 1,060,000,000

Cash reserves against savings held amounting

to $3,000,000,000 at 5% 150,000,000

--------------

_Total reserves required under our plan_ $2,535,000,000

_Amount of circulation in the United States

that may be used as reserves_:

Gold coin in the United States $1,900,000,000

Standard silver dollars 565,000,000

Subsidiary coin 175,000,000

Treasury notes, 1890 2,797,000

United States notes 346,681,000

--------------

$2,989,478,000

Less gold held in the U.S. Treasury as a

Reserve Fund 150,000,000

--------------

_Total possible reserves_ $2,839,478,000

Amount of reserves required by our plan $2,535,000,000

--------------

Leaving a net amount of lawful reserves

for circulation among the people of $304,478,000

Amount of subsidiary coin $175,000,000

Amount of silver dollars out 75,000,000

Amount of $1 and $2 bills out 225,000,000

------------

$475,000,000

This amount is probably about equally divided between the banks and the

people.

Amount of circulation now outside of the

U.S. Treasury and the banks and, therefore,

in the hands of the people $1,780,000,000

If we deduct the amount of lawful reserves

left for circulation among the people $304,478,000

--------------

_We have the total amount of bank note

circulation_ $1,475,522,000

Amount of circulation provided for 1,250,000,000

--------------

Additional amount of bank credit currency

to be provided $225,522,000

_But this increased amount of bank notes, amounting to $225,522,000,

will not take any additional reserves because the deposits which will

be converted into these notes are now covered by reserves. It is plain

that, thereafter, book credits and note credits will be currently

interchangeable._

_Thus every demand for currency will be met automatically and

perfectly, every day, everywhere, throughout the United States, day in

and day out; month in and month out; year in and year out._

INDEX

Appendix A, United States circulation, 501

Appendix B, amount of money held by banks, 502

Appendix C, reserves required under proposed plan, 503

Acceptance, what is an, 87

desirability of, 90

liability of, same as deposit, 93, 390

reserves against, should be same as against deposits, 96

Acceptance should be allowed only on goods in transit, 96

would develop a general market for commercial paper, 91

Acceptances, 428

Agriculture produced its money, 9

Aldrich, Nelson W, 60, 369

Aldrich, Wilbur, 30

American Reserve Bank, formation of, 389

duties of board of, 415

fund of, 433

how reserve is created, 422

government balance carried with, 434, 435

shall maintain parity of silver and gold, 439

Aldrich Plan and Plot, exposed, 459, 484

cost of currency of, 476

branches and foreign agencies, 487

economic objections to, 462

expansion and inflation of, 469

inconvenience and uselessness of, 475

loss of gold by, 469

800 associations possible, 478

was central bank, 484

possible capital and issue, 485

why public favored at first, 494, 499

would not effect reforms demanded, 498

reasons for its rejection, 500

Aristotle, 29

Bagehot, 202, 226

Bank, what is a, 225

credits of equivalent to gold, 234

failures of, 198

deposit, system of, 228

holding companies in, 237

at Hamburg, 226

number of, in United States, 235, 236

number and resources of, 374

independence of individual, 474

penalty for not carrying reserves, 431

repression in development of, 238

Bank, description of, by MacLeod, 226

by Bagehot, 226

United States, 71

at Venice, 226

Banks, no change in National, 239

increase in business of, 239

various kinds and business of, 375

Banker, is what, 224

Banking is Interstate Commerce, 216

is kind of insurance, 230

bank deposits and bank notes identical in, 231

necessary reforms in, 245

resources of, in 1860, 370

amount of, in 1890, 372

amount of, in 1912, 372

amount of, in world in 1890, 373

Bancroft, George, 165, 166

Bank credit currency, definition of, 67

first lien on assets, 69

additional amount permitted, 424

cost of transmission, how paid, 425

facility of supplying currency, 360

identical with check, 376

increase of, 400

how described and issued, 421

less profitable than deposits, 376

not understood, 378

tax on, how used, 427

strength of, 473

Bankers' Council, formation of, 412

Bank notes, bond-secured, 36

are a first lien, 69

are Government credit, in circulation, 58

bear no relation to business, 58

cost of, as currency, 50

not money, 36

origin of, 57

objections to, as currency, 59

penalty for carrying, as reserves, 428

promise of, to pay money, 36

Bayard, James A., 179

Bill, draft of, 407

Board of Control, compensation of, 413

Boston, country clearing at, 300, 310

Bullion report, 441

California, first use of gold, 14

Canada, bank system of, 79

chart showing movement of currency in, 80

Canada, circulation in 1912, 81

free from panics, 444

Cannon, James G., 291

Capital, what is, 108, 109

active, passive and fixed, 109, 110

active, essential to commerce, 110

conversion of commercial, into fixed, 131, 132

real estate mortgages tie up, 134

Central bank, tax on notes of, 486

Chase, Salmon P., 57, 176

Check, what is a, 86

City bank, National, bank stock holdings of, 488

Boss system established by, 493

Chicago Clearing House examinations, 316, 318

Clearing House, 289

approved practices of, 379, 383

clearings prior to establishment of, 295, 296

country Clearing, established in England, 299

centralizing reserves of, 308

definition of, 290, 291

established in London, 291

first clearing in New York, 298

free zones, 309

functions adopted, 339

for each commercial zone, 419

Clearing House Certificates, issues of, 329, 330

Coins, amount of subsidiary, 43

description of subsidiary, 38

parity of value of, 37

total amount of silver, 43

token, 37

value of, 37

Colonial credit money, 144

depreciation of issues of, 156

effect of issues of, 155

issues by Continental Congress, 157

issue of, in Connecticut, 149

in Massachusetts, 146

in New Hampshire, 151

in New Jersey, 151

in North Carolina, 153

in New York, 153

in Pennsylvania, 152

in Rhode Island, 151

in South Carolina, 153

in Virginia, 152

price of issues fixed, 158

succession of events following issue of, 173

Colwell, Stephen, 290

Congress, will legislate only after discussion, 369

Connecticut, bank commissioners report 1841, 357

Conklin, Roscoe, 180

Coöperative societies, conditions in Germany, 281

conditions in Belgium, 283

extent of business, 279

in United States, not a subject of banking legislation, 285

profits of, 279

main offices described, 281

started in Rochdale, 279

success assured in United States, 286

wholesale houses of, 280

Conant, Charles A. (Scotch currency), 68

Credit, definition of, 114, 124, 125

ample reserves essential to sound, 123

comparative value of, 124

contraction of, by an instrument of, 125

dangers of, 115

expansion as a result of, 121

Germany's abuse of, 124

importance of, 113

our banks should be ready to prove their, 124

per cent, of business done by, 112

production by use of, 119

proper functions of different forms of, 141, 142

use of, in Lancashire, 126

various forms of, 117

Webster on, 111

Crédit Foncier, amortization of mortgages, 266

capital of, 263

can take deposits, 265

formed when, 261

how governed, 262

Currency, definition of, 46, 441

cost of bank credit, 49

definition of bank credit, 67

deposits identical with bank credit, 64, 65

economy of bank credit, 51, 66

consists of, 47

proper system of, 48

right kind of, 55

what it is not, 47

redemption of, 67

Deposits, guarantee of, 393

no difference between currency and, 66

interchangeability of currency into, 64, 65

Depositors, insurance of, 395, 435, 437

cost of insurance of, 395

Depositors, insurance fund, how created, 435

losses of, how paid, 436

Deutsche Bank, 465

Diagrams, zone, subdivisions, 387

Canadian currency chart, 80

Clearing House, 295, 297

course of check, 311-313

Egypt, absorption of gold by, 20

Electricity, importance of, 113

Ellsworth, Oliver, 168

England, Bank of, 206

dissimilarity of, with banks of France and Germany, 443

failure of bank act, 441

resources, when established, 407

not bank of issue, 485

Exchange, what is, 84

Bill of, 87

broad definition of, 96

difference between draft and bill of, 87

is equal to gold in all transactions, 98

Origin, ancient, 94

Farmers, number of, 249

Fessenden, William Pitt, 181

Forgan, James B., 318, 319

Fowler, Charles N., 336, 340, 460

Fowler, W.J., Deputy Comptroller, 395

France, Bank of, founded by Napoleon, 71

land used as basis of money in, 137

Government credit of France used as basis of money, 138

resources of bank, when established, 407

note issue of, 484

Gallatin, Albert, 292

Garfield, James A., 58

Germany, resources of bank, when established, 407

financial situation of bank, weak, 467

failure of bank act, 443

Gold, adopted as standard by United States, 18

by England, 18

amount of, 19

amount in United States in 1860 and 1912, 370

certificate, 28

changing value of, 31

monetary use of, 22

outlook for supply of, 24

production of, 23

United States share of, 22

universal standard of value, 19

Gold, total amount used as reserves, 32

what influences the movement of, 440

Gold reserves, how created, 222

Government, demand liability of, 42

Government issues preceding greenbacks, 174

Hamilton, Alexander, 161, 171

Herrick, Myron T., 249

Hallock, James C., 293, 300

India, absorption of gold by, 20

Indiana, Bank of the State of, 346

State Bank of, 73, 345

statement of bank of, 361

Interest, rate in United States, 249

France, 254

Germany, 249

Iowa, State Bank of, 73, 348

statement of Bank of, 361

Japan, Tried Bond-secured Currency, 59

Jefferson, Thomas, 170

Jevons, Stanley, 203, 291

Kentucky, Bank of, 73, 347

Land Credit Bank, Directors of, 450

dividends of, 454

losses, how borne, 455

put into operation, how, 456

outline of provisions, 268, 269, 270

Landschaften, business of modern, 261

modern, 260

origin of, 252

old, 255

spread of, 258

Law, John, 137

Lee, Richard Henry, 162

Legal tender, what is, 41

Liverpool, Lord, coins of the realm, 39

Loan Certificates, clearing house, 328

amount of, issued, 336

are bank credit currency, 336

denominations of, 329-333

lessons of, 333

London, clearing started in, 291, 302

Los Angeles, Clearing House, 316

Louisiana, bank act of, 343

statement of banks of, 361

Lubbock, Sir John, 299

MacVeagh, Franklin, 240, 405

Madison, James, 164, 165

Maine, Report of Bank Commissioner 1857, 357

and 1865, 358

Marshall, John, 58, 164

Mason, George, 163

Massachusetts, Report of Bank Commissioner, 358

Missouri, Bank of the State of, 73, 351

statement of Bank of, 361

Money, amount held by banks in United States, Appendix B

amount of, in United States, Appendix A

coin and commodity must be of equal value, 44

credit must not be called money, 33

description of, 29

functions of, 30

gold is our, 26

how made, 26

what are the pieces of, 27

"wild cat," "red dog," etc., 348

Morrill, Justin S., 17

Mortgages, amount of, 249

rate of interest on, 249

Mutual Credit Societies, number of, 274

in Massachusetts, 275

resources for short loans, 277

Ohio, Bank of the state of, 73

bank act of, 344

statement of bank of, 361

Paper, accommodation, 128, 131

commercial, 120

difference between commercial and accommodation, 129

Paine, Thomas, 162

Panic of 1907, 471

Pinckney, Charles, 163

Population, shifting of, 32

Price, what is, 104

Prices, causes of higher, 31

Printing, importance of, 112

Promissory note, what is a, 86

note and draft identical, 87

Property, what is, 104

difference between property and wealth, 104

Postal Savings Banks, 384

Raiffeisen, Friedrich Wilhelm, 272

Real estate, unfit as basis for currency, 136

Redemption, in coin essential, 50

Reforms demanded, 494, 495, 496, 497

Reserves, amount of, 200

amount held by national and other banks, Appendix B, 381

amount of central, 222, 381

additional, where obtained, 409

Bagehot, 202

bank notes as, 204

circumstances should control amount of, 200

character of, 201

average, in United States, 208

elasticity of, 208, 219

from what points considered, 199

how increased, 220, 221

Jevons on, 202

legal tender quality unnecessary to, 188

national banks, 207

promises to pay as, 204

present, inefficient, 218

penalty for not maintaining, 423, 431, 432

present method of, useless, 218

are measure of value, therefore must be coin, 205

state or city debts as, 204

silver, not used in Bank of England, 206

should be national, 211

superimposed, 218

State bank, 207

taxation to compel equal, 212

unfair to permit unequal, 209

United States notes not actual, 206

what constitutes proper, 203

Ricardo, 441

Root, L. Carroll, 334

Ruggles, Charles A., 301, 310

Scotland, description of, currency by Conant, 68

currency by White, 68

effect of bank credit in, 67

Schulze, Francis Frederick, 272

Shaw, Leslie M., 487

Shaw, William A., 17

Sherman, John, 183

Sherman, Roger, 150, 166

Silver certificate, a warehouse receipt, 40

Silver dollars, amount of, Appendix A, 36, 43

a government debt, 40

a subsidiary coin, 39

a demand for gold, 38

not money, 38, 40

weight of, 36

Spaulding, E.G., 183

Stevens, Thaddeus, 183

Steam, importance of, 113

Standard of value, 9

changes in ratio of gold and silver as, 17

gold, the natural selection of, as the, 24

qualities of gold as, 17

Sub-Treasury, deposits in, 243

Suffolk Bank system, 73, 353, 354, 355, 361

achievements of, 334, 335

Bank was first clearing house in United States, 337, 338

commissioner's reports on, 357, 358

description of, 75

destroyed by 10 per cent tax, 74

Sumner, Charles, 179

Talbot, Joseph T., 205, 231

Uap, money of, 15

United States, bank clearings of, 373

financial center of world, 404

foreign trade of, 373

important interests of, 409

production of 1912, 373

size of, compared with Europe, 409

total business transactions of, 373

United States Government, nature of, 410

taxing power, only resource, 189, 191

time obligations only should be incurred, 192, 410

unfit to meet demand debts, 189

United States notes or greenbacks, additional cost of war due to, 185

agreement to pay gold, 34

amount of, Appendix A and 35

bonds issued for, 52

constitutionality of, 185-187

cost of, as currency, 50, 56

cost of, since 1879, 53

depreciation of, 184

drive gold out, 206

how converted into gold certificates, 427, 438

issues of, 183

lowest value of, 35

not money, 35

price of, a quotation of government credit, 41

resumption of payment of, 53

suspended payment of, 34

unfit for currency, 55

Walsh, John R., failure of, 314

War, Civil, first loan for, 177

Washington, George, 162, 165

Wealth, what is, 104

difference between property and, 107

Webster, Daniel, 111, 170

White, Horace, 30, 155

Wilson, John W., clearing house examiner, Los Angeles, 316

Zone, credit bureau of, 323

organization of, 338, 411

organization, repetition of National Government, 483

places of, discount limited to, 479

publicity of organization, 476

should not stand alone, 480

state lines do not conform to economic, 419

Seventeen Talks on the Banking Question Between Uncle Sam and Mr. Farmer, Mr. Banker, Mr. Lawyer, Mr. Laboringman, Mr. Merchant, Mr. Manufacturer · 第 148 / 148 章