MIND

[Sidenote: Law of nature]

Now, dear reader, if you have comprehended the foregoing, in which I

have tried to demonstrate to you that man is simply a machine, forced

into action by his environment—this I have learned through hypnosis,

which I consider merely a side issue to the Law of Suggestion, a crude

and tyrannical use of suggestion—we will go a step further and try to

understand the body of man, which is his closest environment. To do so

it will first be necessary to explain what you call the “law of nature”

or “hand of God.” After I have made you comprehend that, I shall then

be able to discuss mankind in general.

[Sidenote: Law of Suggestion]

If we drop a plum seed, peach seed, apple seed and a grape seed in six

square inches of earth what will grow from them? Each of its kind.

Why? One says the “law of nature,” another says the “hand of God.” I

ask what is meant by these terms, as neither has affected me through

my senses, and a sickly smile comes on your lips, and you say, “Don’t

you know?” I plead ignorance and reply, “No,” then you won’t talk with

me because I fail to know something that you do not know. Then you

ask _me_ why, and I tell you the “Law of Suggestion.” You say,

“Why, there must be an intelligence to respond to that law.” As it is

impossible to conceive of anything happening without an intelligence

(associated action) to guide it, every action of all matter is guided.

[Sidenote: All matter contains mind]

NOTE.—I will state that all matter contains mind (which

word will be used from now on without the quotation marks), and

all mind gives expression in matter. Matter is the expression of

mind—transformed mind—the utterance of mind; it is the material

reproduction of mind; there can be no matter without mind, no mind

without matter. _Other than matter is incomprehensible._

[Sidenote: All changes are advancement]

This intelligence is acted upon by suggestion. There is mind in the

rock, otherwise the rock would not disintegrate (respond to the

suggestion of the elements). There is mind within wood. You say, “No,

water rots wood.” Water does not rot wood. It forces (suggests) a

latent (memory) action in wood to produce or transform into rot. As

long as the suggestion is kept from the wood, that action will not take

place; the moment the suggestion is applied, the intelligence within

the wood responds. All changes are an advancement and good (natural

response).

[Sidenote: Maturity]

[Sidenote: Mind defined]

All suggestions are transformed. You of the “law of nature” and the

“hand of God” claim that intelligence is external and everywhere; I

claim it to be internal and everywhere, that all matter contains within

itself intelligence (mind). Then you ask me what is mind and in turn

I ask you this question: What is maturity? When does a boy become a

man, a girl become a woman, and when is fruit ripe? When the seed is

accomplished. As the seed is the last thing accomplished to complete

the entirety of all attributes required, all of the preceding actions,

_i. e._, responses to suggestion of the development of the tree

that has taken place are registered within the seed. Therefore, the

complete memory must be in the last thing accomplished—the seed; and I

will define mind to be _the consensus of all actions acquired during

gestation_, not a so-called reasoning intelligence, but a memory of

response to suggestion, as to heat, cold, different elements of the

earth, to guide the commingling into the reproduction of its kind.

If the natural suggestions do not occur, a _reproduction_ is an

impossibility.

[Sidenote: Suggestion in lower life]

To illustrate, if plenty of sunshine is required and the suggestion of

sunshine is lacking, the entire fulfillment of the suggestion required

cannot or will not be accomplished. If iron or some certain element

in the soil is necessary to force a certain action, and is lacking,

the response necessary will not take place. In the spring time, when

warmth, et cetera, surrounds the trees, the buds are forced out. If

frosts occur, contraction takes place and the buds are pinched off,

the entire action of the tree being in accordance with the environment

(suggestion). To the degree of the suggestion is the degree of

response, identical with the action of man.

Genesis, Chapter XXX, 37-40, reads as follows:

[Sidenote: Jacob knew of the law]

37. And Jacob took him rods of green poplar, and of the hazel and

chestnut tree; and pilled white strakes in them, and made the white

appear which was in the rods.

38. And he set the rods which he had pilled before the flocks in the

gutters in the watering troughs when the flocks came to drink, that

they should conceive when they came to drink.

39. And the flocks conceived before the rods, and brought forth cattle

ringstraked, speckled and spotted.

[Sidenote: Darwin]

[Sidenote: As of their environment]

This simple law, the law of environment (suggestion), was in some

degree known to Jacob. Therefore, what is, was, and always will be.

There is nothing new in the world, only new to our comprehension.

Darwin showed us that animals most like their environment, or

those which responded closest to (were part of) their environment

survived, while the others were destroyed. Man, being a creature of

his environment, survives to the degree he responds to or is part of

that environment. In the Arctic region animals are white as of their

environment; in the reeds they are striped, therefore look like the

reeds and are not easily distinguishable from them; up in the tree tops

they are spotted. The negro from exposure to the sun was made black. If

the white man goes into the sun he becomes what we call “tanned”; that

tan can, in time, become very dark. The negro, therefore, is black only

as a result of his environment.

[Sidenote: Energy]

[Sidenote: Energetic waves]

[Sidenote: Life]

[Sidenote: Death]

Man, not being a perpetual motion machine, must obtain energy elsewhere

than through or from his food as our scientists (?) tell us. The energy

required to digest the food must be greater than all the energy in the

food, otherwise it could not overcome the resistance; therefore, it is

self-evident that our energy does not come from the food. Any condition

that overcomes resistance sends out an energetic wave; every time we

breathe, blink our eye, talk or move, we send out an energetic wave,

which can be transmitted only through matter. _Life is energy_,

always moving and being reinforced as it passes through new matter; and

I believe those energetic waves are received in the spleen, passed to

the solar plexus and from the solar plexus passed to the extremities

through the Sympathetic System. It is through the absorption of

this energy—which is life—that keeps man going. When a man dies the

machinery of his body—the Sympathetic System—fails to respond, to

receive, to exert, or transform the energy.

[Sidenote: Ovum of the female]

[Sidenote: Element of the male]

The first part of a child formed is the Sympathetic System. A girl has

reached maturity when she can reproduce; _i. e._, when she monthly

gives forth an egg. In that egg is a memory action of building the

Sympathetic System, when fertilized by an element of the male. Bear in

mind that the element of the male is only a _fertilizer_.

The Sympathetic System centers are developed at the end of eight weeks.

(See Gray.)

[Sidenote: Building of mind in man]

Now each ganglion acquires a specific memory from the same ganglion of

the mother, and out of the blood of the mother builds over itself the

form of the child. Therefore, when the child is born it contains within

itself the intelligence that built it; _i. e._, mind. Every six

months this intelligence rebuilds the entire tissues of the body.

[Sidenote: No cerebral knowledge]

The child when born has no cerebral knowledge. It must learn to

see, hear, smell, feel and taste. It has no reflexes other than of

contraction. All other actions are acquired after birth. The heart

action was learned from the mother; also the respiration, which action

can very easily be changed. It must learn to take the breast. It has

no control over its bowels or bladder. The pupil of the eye does not

dilate, contract, nor blink at light. The child’s limbs will not draw

away from heat or irritation. If the rectal sphincter be severely

dilated a response in the throat will occur. This same action can

always be repeated with a chloroformed patient, showing that the noise

is simply a response at the other end of the nerve.

[Sidenote: All things are learned]

From the taking of the breast the child must learn to digest food, to

respond to its environment. The moment a child readily does so, it is

said to have displayed intelligence.

Physicians differ as to the length of the period after children

are born into the world before they can see, hear, smell, feel and

taste. There is much discussion, and many volumes have been written

as to the length of time after a child is born before its senses are

established. After much reading, I finally ask what is meant by seeing,

hearing, feeling, smelling and tasting; and none of the writers have

comprehensively answered. Therefore, why this discussion? What are they

talking about?

[Sidenote: Definition of the senses]

I will define the senses to be the correlation of the different

nerve-end stimuli. Give a new-born child soft, sweet, soothing

sound-stimulus, then harsh, discordant sound-stimulus, and the moment

a memory of these two extreme nerve-end contacts with sound waves is

established, the child will be able to give expression to the degrees

of all subsequent stimuli of the auditory nerve-ends. The same with

smelling, tasting, et cetera. Sight, unless associated with feeling,

conveys no form expression. A child, to be taught the meaning of round,

must not only see it but feel it. The same with other forms. The child

is now learning to respond to its environment.

[Sidenote: Mind a tenant]

Mind is the tenant of the house it lives in—the body. That house is

always wasting; mind rebuilding it. When mind rebuilds correctly, we

have a healthy body; when incorrectly, we have what is called sickness.

Mind can only build as of itself, as it responds to its environment,

and consequently must be a reproduction of that environment, modified

by the acquired memory learned from the mother. Therefore, the house in

which it dwells is the exact representation of its tenant—matter being

the expression of mind.

[Sidenote: Food]

Food is taken into the body to rebuild the house. If a man takes

possession of a new brick house and starts in to replace with bad

bricks as it wastes away, at the end of six or seven months he will

live in a bad brick house. If he replaces with rotten lumber he will

live in a rotten lumber house at the end of a period. Hence, man

partakes of the nature of the food he eats.

Now, if mind be worried so that he builds awry, his house will be awry;

and if his house be awry and he finds his error and corrects it, he

will re-establish the symmetry of his dwelling. (Rational treatment—the

orificial surgeon and personal suggestion.)

[Sidenote: Error]

Thus mind rules and builds the body, but a time may come when the body

becomes so awry that it rules the tenant. In health, mind rules; after

severe illness the body may. Mind cannot choose to correct its error,

it can only respond; the suggestion must change. Error can only be

distinguished, when _known_, in comparison with good. Unhealthy

surroundings must be changed. The closest environment—the body, may

require the knife.

[Sidenote: Mind rules]

It is inconceivable for anything to happen without an intelligence

to guide it. I have shown the intelligence that built the body—that

keeps rebuilding the body—but our learned (?) physicians seem to think

that the body of man is a dunghill in which seed may be sown and foul

vegetation grow, forgetting that nothing in the body can happen without

an intelligence to guide it—that the body is a result, and there is

_no cause within the tissue itself_.

[Sidenote: Nerve-ends]

_Every nerve has two ends._ When there is an irritation at one

end, there is a response, or so-called reflex, at the other. Oh! why

has this thought never occurred to our “learned authorities?” Our

worthy doctors are forever trying to remove the effect, never reaching

the cause. If a man’s blood is out of order, does the bad blood cause

illness, or is the illness and bad blood the result of the imperfect

transforming of food by the intelligence whose duty it is to perform

such functions?

[Sidenote: Three pulsations]

When I first showed my ability to produce in a hypnotized subject three

pulsations at one time, the doctors declared it to be a trick; that

it was an impossibility; that the heart _only_ controlled the

circulation. If our most learned (?) men would only think (and such

a thing were possible), they would readily see the futility of such

claims. If I am rightly informed, there are several miles of vascular

piping in the body, and the heart of itself is not strong enough to

pump the blood that distance; if it were, the frame of the body is not

strong enough to maintain the resistance to such an action. The truth

of the matter is, that the heart is simply the governor, _i. e._,

regulator, that starts the rhythm of the pumping, and different nerve

centers (mind) take up and carry on the action. Our doctors tell us

that a man dies because the heart stops beating. No, he dies because

the intelligence that forces the heart to beat stops working.

[Sidenote: Man a tube]

Man is a tube lined with a series of insulated electric wires. These

wires run from orifice through ganglia of Abdominal Brain to orifice.

Every nerve has two ends; irritate one end and through the action of

its ganglia a response will occur at the other. Our doctors treat the

response, paying no attention to the cause, although they talk nothing

but cause.

[Sidenote: Body rebuilt every six months]

From a series of experiments that I have made, I am satisfied that the

body is rebuilt every six or seven months. The Abdominal Brain in the

embryonic child is complete at the end of _two_ months; and, as

the child is born at the end of _nine_ months, the first attempt

of the Sympathetic System, the Abdominal Brain (mind) built a complete

child in _seven_ months; although a child born at eight months

is seemingly complete. If mind in its first attempt can build a child

in seven months, why should it take longer to build a second time,

particularly when it has a freer hand and environment to work in?

[Sidenote: “Bugs”]

[Sidenote: Rebuilding]

Our doctors start on the premise that man’s eyes, lungs, heart and

all vital organs live forever, unless bugs get in and destroy them. I

cannot accept any such statement. For the sake of argument we will say

that all organs and tissue are rebuilt every six months. I care not if

every six years, but we will assume that they are rebuilt every six

months, constantly wasting and constantly being replaced. The doctors

will tell us that a cataract _grows_ on our eye. I deny that,

maintaining that the eyes are replaced every six months, and when

there is a cataract, the ganglion of the Abdominal Brain (mind) is so

irritated that it builds an imperfect eye, an eye with a cataract.

The doctor with his knife removes the cataract, and ninety-nine times

out of a hundred _it grows (?) back_. The Mental Scientists, the

Christian Scientists, the Faith Curists and the Hypnotists remove the

cataract. How? By causing the mind to stop building the cataract and

resume its previous building of a healthy eye. I have cured dozens of

cases of astigmatism and myopia, and several cases of cataract simply

through personal suggestion and orificial surgery.

Many people come to me saying “Mr. Santanelli, I have been wearing

eye-glasses for a year. Can you cure me?”

“Yes.”

“How many hypnoses will it take?”

“None.”

“Why, what will you do?”

“I will take you to my surgeon, and have the proper orificial work

performed.”

“And will that cure me?”

“Certainly.”

Another comes to me and says, “Mr. Santanelli, can you cure me?”

“How long have you been wearing glasses?”

“Ten years.”

“How old were you when you began wearing glasses?”

“Twenty years.”

“Yes, I can cure you.”

“How long will it take?”

“I do not know.”

“What will you do with me?”

[Sidenote: Nerve habit]

“I will send you first to an orificial surgeon and have the cause

removed. Then I will break up the nerve habit.”

“What is that,—the nerve habit?”

[Sidenote: Greatest use for hypnotic suggestion]

“Why, I mean this, that until you were eighteen, your ganglia (mind)

built good eyes, when, through an irritation, it developed into

building a pair of bad eyes, called astigmatism, myopia, et cetera.

You get two pairs of eyes a year, in eighteen years you get thirty-six

pairs of eyes; and up to that time the ganglia (mind) has the memory

of building good eyes, in twelve years it builds twenty-four pairs of

eyes; after the cause of building bad eyes is removed, I must force the

memory of thirty-six to overcome the memory of twenty-four, which is

not a very difficult task; but if you came to me ten years later, it

would be nearly impossible for me to cause a memory of thirty-six to

overcome a memory of forty-four. Where the nerve habit or new memory is

not too pronounced, through personal suggestion I can readily revive

the first memory. It is through the lack of knowing how to overcome

this that our orificialists fail in many cases. This is the greatest

use of so-called hypnotic suggestion—the breaking up of nerve habits.”

The same argument holds good as to the lungs, and in all early stages

of heart trouble, et cetera.

[Sidenote: Consumption]

The doctors tell us that when we have consumption, bugs are nesting

in and eating our lungs; but why, most wise (?) gentlemen? Life is

indestructible, and if you will use microscopes powerful enough you

will always find life (bugs). When man is most dead (?) and burned to a

handful of ashes, drop a little acetic acid on them and you will find

there is life, movement; and life is simply energy.

I maintain that man gets a new pair of lungs every six months, and when

the ganglion that controls the building of the lungs transforms the

food into healthy lungs, we lack consumption; that when it makes an

imperfect transformation we have the so-called diseased lung, the germ,

which is the mal-transformation of food containing life or energy.

[Sidenote: Circumcision]

But few male Jews have consumption, _although they are improperly

circumcised_. _Circumcise all consumptives, both male and

female_, and see how quickly you will achieve a result.

[Sidenote: Undeveloped bust]

I will show a genital lesion in every woman with an undeveloped bust.

Amputate the labia minora of a young woman and see how quickly her

bust will develop and her respiration be facilitated—a marked result in

less than two weeks.

I treat all eye trouble by removing the irritation from the other

end of the nerve. It is a rare case where the cause and effect are

at the same place. The fool ideas offered as to light, printing, et

cetera, in our schools, being the cause of so much bad eyesight among

the students, is all rot. Circumcise them, our mothers are breeding a

sexually irritated generation of both sexes. If the Jews had properly

circumcised their women there now would be no necessity of doing so

with the men.

[Sidenote: Law of Moses]

Moses insisted on two laws. The Jews to-day cannot tell you why those

laws are enforced. As to the pork I will explain later, as to the

circumcision they have not been able to offer a rational explanation.

[Sidenote: Jews]

Why is it there are so few Jews in the penitentiaries, insane asylums,

who are cancerous or consumptive among the males? Why are the Jews a

money-making race? Oh, they inherit it. _No._ A Jew is but a human

being, he is the same as you and I; he is ruled by the same Law of

Suggestion. It is first, because he is circumcised, secondly, because

he is clean, and third, his Abdominal Brain (mind) is not worried or

irritated. Consequently, he is full of life and energy, and his brain

works in a “normal” manner. He eats clean food, producing the same

result and, therefore, is equipped to do business with a “normal”

mind, he is free from the “abnormal,” therefore, not a criminal, not

a candidate for the insane asylum; his thoughts are healthful and

therefore he looks forward to a long life, to a large family, to the

care of them, and to the necessity of acquiring the means whereby they

can live: he is nearly “normal.” The law of Moses, although unexplained

by his followers, was a law of health; a healthy mind is always the

result of a healthy body, or a healthy body is the result of the

healthy mind, impossible to find one each way.

[Sidenote: Bad blood]

When food is impure, the ganglia whose duty it is to transform and make

pure blood, is working awry, and nothing done to the blood will purify

it as to the health of man. Inasmuch as the ganglia will continue to

make bad blood, why treat the blood?

[Sidenote: Drugs are suggestions]

A man’s bowels are constipated and the doctor gives him a drug. Does

the drug empty the bowel? No, the drug does not. Why is the bowel

not working properly? Because the ganglia that control secretion and

peristalsis are not doing their duty, and nothing but those ganglia

can empty the bowel. Therefore, _the drug is simply a suggestion_

that stimulates these ganglia and causes them to renew their action of

secretion and peristalsis. Catarrh, asthma, heart trouble, rheumatism

and functional diseases are all a result of irritation at the other end

of the nerve. The idea of trying to drug or treat the heart for its

imperfect action is ridiculous.

My intelligent reader now asks where the other end of these nerves are?

How is it the doctor has not discovered them? I will tell you why, my

good reader.

[Sidenote: Too scientific]

[Sidenote: Reasoning]

[Sidenote: Clean (?) people]

[Sidenote: Modesty]

Our doctors have failed to discover the end of the nerve, inasmuch

as they are “scientific” and do not know how to “think.” They reason

_deductively_, which is not reasoning. From a true premise no

deduction should be necessary, inasmuch as the cause and effect are

perceptible. Reasoning, so-called, is required when only an effect

is perceptible, and one has to go back to the cause. The moment the

cause is found no more reasoning is required. The cause and effect

are so closely associated that when we comprehend the cause, we must

comprehend the effect. Inductive reasoning is the only _true_

reasoning, and our scientists (?) know nothing of this, they much

prefer to _assume_ a cause and force a deduction to fit the

effect known. How many inductive reasoners has the world produced? Not

fifty, and I include all great thinkers in the fifty. Our doctor is a

good, clean (?) man; his patients are good, clean (?) people, and they

greatly dislike to think of anything that is “naughty,” forgetting

that all “naughty” things are a perversion of good things; and that

the being who appears the most “nice,” at heart is the worst. Little

children are taught that it is awful to hear anything mentioned about

their privates. In many states physiology is barred from the public

schools, as it is something awful for man to understand himself. As

everything suggests positive for or positive against, the _real

modest_ person is simply the positive opposite to the real vulgar

person, both having the same thought, only one gives action in

blushing, et cetera—alleged modesty—while the other gives action in

vulgar expressions. The truly pure being would be neutral—no ideas

associated as to bad.

Dear reader, one can have no thought without its expression (for that

is all a thought is), and alleged modesty deceives no one, least of all

one versed in human nature.

In all my years of experience (and I can read a face like a book—I know

my nerve-ends), I have met but three really healthy women, and they

were Southerners; and no healthy men.

[Sidenote: Not] [Sidenote: “Bad” defined]

Some one speaks in public of a woman’s leg, many cast their eyes down

and others blush; some laugh. The sexual look appears in the eyes of

others. Let us analyze the thoughts of these four classes of people.

When “leg” is mentioned, the first party would not cast his eyes down

unless he had “bad” ideas associated; the second would not have blushed

if he had good ideas associated; the third would not have laughed,

nor the sexual look have appeared in the eyes of the fourth, had they

not all proportionately associated the same ideas. Now, the ideas are

mostly acquired,—particularly in the first three—by the parents telling

them _not_ to think of this, _not_ to do that, and the

entirely false thought of modesty, or something “bad” was associated

and placed in their minds through their “bad” mother telling them they

must _not_ do or think of these things. Remember, all things in

the world are good, and man has created the bad. Life keeps moving

onward, which is good, and no matter which way it moves it is always

onward and always good, and the “bad” is produced by the “not’s,”

the “don’t’s,” and the “mustn’t’s.” Therefore, I define “bad” to be

perverted good.

The nerve-ends of all the upper orifices and the heart and lungs,

terminate in the genitals and the rectum. You will rarely find only one

orifice of the head responding to nerve-end irritations. I always find

two—the eyes and ears, eyes and nose, et cetera.

I have cured stutterers, all classes of eye trouble, all kinds of

nervousness in both sexes by removing the sexual irritation; but as

this book is written simply to give the reader a general idea of

suggestion, I will keep this subject for a book to be written later,

intended for doctors and mothers only.

In 1895, while claiming in my lectures that we must have an

Abdominal Brain—otherwise there was no logical explanation as to

many of the conditions I was producing through hypnosis, in Lansing,

Michigan—Doctor William D. Cooper drew my attention to the wonderful

results Dr. E. H. Pratt, of Chicago (the father of orificial surgery),

was attaining by operating on the lower orifices, and intimated that

perhaps he was reaching the Abdominal Brain. This intimation prompted

me to visit Dr. Pratt and learn of his work, which in time resulted in

my believing that the Sympathetic System was my much sought Abdominal

Brain, and much study and experiment has resulted in the foregoing

synopsis.

[Sidenote: Environment]

[Sidenote: Sin (?) a disease]

If man is ruled by his environment, it naturally follows that his body

must be his closest environment; as the body is, so is the “mind;”

as is the “mind,” so the body. Therefore, blackguarding, sensuality

and prostitution are physical diseases. If man’s thoughts are forced

on him through his five senses, it follows that, if he has a sexual

irritation, sexual thoughts will always dominate. Therefore, instead of

passing laws against those “sins,” hospitals should be established and

convicted _invalids_ sent there to be properly treated.

_Prostitution is a curable disease._ The orificial surgeon can

remove the physical suggestion, and the hypnotist can break up the

_nerve habit_.

If we put a clean woman in a dirty house, and keep the house dirty for

a certain length of time, that woman will become disgusted and have no

desire to clean up. Put a dirty woman in a clean house, keep the house

clean for a period, and that woman will become ashamed and acquire

habits of neatness. So it is with the mind and the body. When the body

becomes foul, the mind degenerates and _vice versa_. The food is

the material out of which the body is made, and foul food builds a foul

body and “mind,” notwithstanding the false theories of our alleged

scientists.

[Sidenote: Food]

Man’s stomach is the hopper of a mill, made to grind and digest certain

foods. If man partakes of food to re-establish his body, his present

eating must be radically wrong, because at least three-fourths of the

food taken into the stomach is passed off through the bowels; if he ate

proper food, ninety-five per cent of it should be turned into tissue

and the waste should be correspondingly small. What fool man does

to-day is to put all kinds of indigestible food (?) into his hopper,

and when the mill tries to grind, it breaks down; he then sends for his

doctor and expects him—if he could—to repair the mill so that he can go

on trying to grind flint with machinery intended to grind wheat only.

[Sidenote: Flesh-eating]

Remember this, a child’s stomach is gradually taught to digest coarse

food. In other words, it must learn to transform the different foreign

elements passed into the stomach. No argument offered can substantiate

the necessity of flesh-eating. The strongest animals in the world,

proportionately, are the ox, the ass and the elephant, strict

vegetarians; and each and every pound of their flesh represents an

equal proportion of vegetable strength, a concentration of many times

its bulk of vegetable matter, and vegetable life was before animal

life. The vicious animals in the world are the lion, the tiger, and

all flesh-eating animals. In certain parts of the Orient are horses

that eat flesh, and are so vicious that only the most expert can handle

them. If you desire to make your dog vicious, chain him up and feed him

on flesh.

The life of modern man is one of confinement, and in every pound

of flesh he eats he takes into his system _a hundred times more

energy_ than it is possible for him to give voice to. Being

possessed of this concentrated energy, he can get rid of it only by

giving it a counter-irritant or energy absorber in the form of liquor,

sensuality and brutality.

During the Greco-Turkish war, the non-meat-eaters and abstainers from

alcohol paid but little attention to wounds similar to those that sent

the meat-eaters to the hospital. Similar wounds that sent them to the

hospital, caused the death of the others.

[Sidenote: The hog]

[Sidenote: All fat is filth]

The hog is a scavenger, living on filth and transforming filth into

its body, which is simply a concentrated form of filth. Lazy man takes

this filth into his stomach, transforms it into his flesh, and wonders

why he is syphilitic, cancerous, diseased, lazy and sluggish. I have

given health to many families by causing them to cut pork and lard

from off their bills of fare. _All fat is filth._ All four-legged

scavengers easily go to fat. Feed kine on “slops” and they go to fat.

The lady with the blotched face goes to her physician, and he advises

her to avoid eating pastry. For Heaven’s sake! What can be healthier

than flour and fruits? What, then, must be the only thing that is

detrimental? Why, the lard, the shortening in the pastry.

[Sidenote: Lazy]

My experience and investigations have shown me that the majority of the

poor people, who can barely get money enough together to buy a little

“sow-belly” and meal, are always the lazy, indolent, worthless class of

people, whose entire tissue is made up of hog meat, and consequently

have very sluggish brains. I have yet to meet a confirmed pork-eater

with an active mentality.

For three years I abstained from eating flesh, two years of which was

the most delightful existence I ever experienced. Having a clean tenant

in a clean house, my thoughts were pure, my actions pure; but found

I lacked the energy to keep up the race with the over-wrought, pell

mell, flesh-eating environment. I firmly believe that there is no case

of syphilis so severe but proper dieting will re-establish a healthy

condition.

[Sidenote: Fasting]

Since my experiments of putting subjects to sleep for seven days, many

dyspeptics have taken up the fast cure and have demonstrated beyond all

question that much good is consummated by total abstinence from food.

Our doctors are daily killing their patients by feeding them. When mind

requires food, food will be demanded. _There is never danger of a

patient starving to death._

[Sidenote: Small-pox]

Mind responds to the suggestion of matter. Our doctors tell us that

we are vast sewers, filled with bugs that are devouring one another;

that the more chemicals, the more putrid matter they can put into us

the better we are. First, they warn us to beware of the pus of a sore,

yet take the pus of cow-syphilis—cow-pox—and put it into the pure

body of a helpless babe to prevent its getting a harmless disease, a

disease that any first-class homeopath laughs at, small-pox—a disease

that is non-contagious, non-infectious, as is proven by vaccination,

which fails to produce small-pox—Oh! the scientists (?). This was

demonstrated beyond all question last summer by a physician in

Wisconsin eating the virus and spreading it all over his face; he fed

it to at least thirty of his patients and none contracted the disease.

_Small-pox decreases with the advancement of sanitation._

[Sidenote: Pointer for the doctors]

Strange to say, our doctors marvel at the increase of syphilitic

affections, of tubercular conditions of the body and of the bones,

of the prevalence of hip disease, yet fail to see that it comes from

the inoculation of these innocent children with cow-syphilis. I would

unhesitatingly kill any member of a board of health or any officer

who would enforce the inoculation of any of my family with this

syphilis, and the jury does not live that would convict me. The body

being rebuilt every six months, the so-called immunizing could only be

effective for that period. Now, my scientific (?) friends, as I have

taught you something that is irrefutable, have the boards of health

force a law that all shall be poxed every six months. What a lot of

idle doctors would be kept busy.

These philosophers (?), these scientists (?), fill horses with disease

and take the serum, fill it full of drugs to keep it from spoiling (?),

“shoot” it into the arms of helpless babes to cure them of diphtheria,

and when they die of lockjaw and other diseases produced by the poison

so injected into their blood, the doctors suddenly discover that

they got hold of the wrong toxin, otherwise the children would have

recovered. Never! A lie given to protect a fool theory.

[Sidenote: Germs]

[Sidenote: Remove the cause]

Now, as the body is rebuilt every six months, and there is an

intelligence building the body, an intelligence that is making the

blood, an intelligence than is transforming this blood so made into

tissue, what in the mischief have bugs to do with disease? The germ

is life; impossible to find life without germs or germs without

life, and the germ is simply a transformation of form of life; if

the intelligence within the body is surrounded with suggestions

of health, forcing it to perform its functions in a natural and

proper way, it will make the correct transformation which is known

as health; but if the rhythm of its work is interfered with, it will

make mal-transformations which are recognized as germs of this, that,

and the other disease. The removing of the germ is of no consequence,

inasmuch as the intelligence (mind) still builds more germs. Remove the

cause, allow the intelligence that built to rebuild correctly, and the

“specific” germs will disappear. Killing the germs is like to a man

who is annoyed by a hen laying an egg on his porch every morning, and

he sends the servant out to destroy the egg. If you want to stop the

laying of the egg on the porch, remove the hen.

[Sidenote: Body a result]

Good blood and bad blood are results of the building of the

intelligence (mind) that makes the blood, and any bugs or anything of

that kind you find in your blood are simply the badly or goodly made

blood. Our doctors seem to think that man is built and rebuilt without

an intelligence to guide that building; that he is a compost heap in

which seeds lie that in time develop and grow, overlooking that the

body is a result, that anything on or in the body is a result, and

that the entire result is guided by the all-wise intelligence of mind,

this mind being subservient to and part of the Law of Suggestion—its

environment.

=Mineral, vegetable, animal, human mind is the same (either singly

or collectively); i. e., a conditional reproduction of its environment

(suggestion). (1), The primitive element (environment), forces

(suggests) a reproduction in (2), vegetable result; 1 and 2 forces

(suggests) a result (3),—animal life; and 1 plus 2 plus 3 forces

(suggests) a result (4),—man. Thus the Law of Suggestion keeps up an

individual and combined transformation, always progressing yet ever in

variable form, resulting from the individual changes in the several

attributes (suggestion) back of or lower than itself.=

=“Man is made in the image of his Creator.” Yes; but, dear reader,

not as you interpret it. Man is the interpretation, the consensus, the

result of the transforming of his environment, the exemplification of

the Law of Suggestion; he is good, God. Mind, the intelligence within,

learned from the mother, responds to the external forces, suggestion,

the all, God, that forces material life ever onward into something

else. We are but one of the MANY forms of God, good, the Law of

Suggestion that embraces ALL. Remove from or add one atom to this world

and it will end, a thing incomprehensible. What is, was, and always

will be.=

[Sidenote: Blister test]

[Sidenote: Only memory actions can be revived]

I place a cantharides plaster on the left arm of a man and blister him.

In time the blister heals. I afterward hypnotize him, put a postage

stamp on his left arm and tell him that it is a cantharides plaster,

and in twenty-four hours or less I have the blister. What made the

first blister? What made the second? Well, the first blister was made

by the cantharides plaster. No, sir; it was not. The first blister was

suggested by the plaster, which caused the ganglion that built the

tissue of that area of the arm to accomplish a condition called a

“blister,” that action, being associated with the cerebral memory of

the name “cantharides plaster,” was aroused in the hypnosis through

the word “plaster” and the ganglion built the second blister as it did

the first. Can I reproduce this blister on the right arm? No. Why not?

Because the ganglion of the right arm has no such memory. I can only

produce it on the place where the memory was established through its

proper channels, through feeling. Here is where the mistake has been so

often made by operators trying to perform the blister test; trying to

revive a memory where none exists.

[Sidenote: Reaching mind]

A man has a wart on his finger; the doctor says the wart grew there.

No, it did not grow there. It is a result. It is burned off with an

acid or caustic, and grows (?) back; then the doctor says he did not

get to the roots (?), that if he had taken the roots out, it would stop

growing. (Just as if a man was a well-manured heap, and you could grow

things in him.) An old woman comes along, cuts a few white hairs out of

a black cat’s tail, mutters some cabalistic words over it, and behold,

in time the wart disappears! Why? Because she reaches the mind. The

mind stopped building the wart and began building healthy tissue. The

doctor cuts it off, but seldom reaches the mind.

No result can be produced in the body until the mind is reached. Drugs

are nothing but suggestions. We will assume that a man’s bowels are

constipated and the doctor gives him a dose of calomel. Does the

calomel move the bowels? Yes. Good. If I put into a glass jar some

food with some calomel, will it “move”? What is constipation? Why,

it is lack of secretions, lack of peristalsis. Does the peristalsis

work of itself? Does the secretion work of itself, or is there an

intelligence that guides and makes the secretions, that guides and

forces the peristalsis? This being a fact, the intelligence that guides

or rules the secretions and peristalsis has ceased to do its work,

and the calomel simply irritates these ganglia or brain centers and

stimulates them to renew their _former action_. If they accept

this suggestion the patient is cured; if they fail to do so, more

suggestion must be given, and in many cases the ganglia refuse to

accept the suggestion at all and the doctor looks wise and gives you a

handful more of “stuff.”

[Sidenote: Mental science]

The Mental or Christian Scientist, or hypnotist can cure constipation.

How does he do it? Let us first analyze and find the attributes of

constipation. First, there is the cerebral attribute, its name,

constipation; associated with that are the two mind actions of

peristalsis and secretion. Those three are now associated in the

“mind” of man, and the law is that if I lock a thought in the “mind”

and start it in action, every one of its attributes in its proper

place is bound to act. Therefore, if I will lock into the mind of a

hypnotized subject the thought that his bowels are loose, or will move,

or arouse any thought there that has associated with it the action of

peristalsis and secretions, and hold that thought there long enough,

the result is certain. It is for this reason that a personal suggestion

or an inspiration in hypnosis has but little effect on a young child.

The moment it has cerebral attributes associated with sympathetic

attributes, and the operator knows how to emphasize them, he can get

the desired result.

[Sidenote: Christian scientists]

[Sidenote: Certainty of action]

The Christian Scientists tell the patient that he is not sick; then

if his mind could reason it would say, “If I am not sick, in what

condition am I?” But you should say to your patient, “You are sick, and

so and so will happen,” and if the memory is there to be aroused the

action will take place. Remember, in hypnosis or any mental treatment,

you can only revive memories, words of themselves mean nothing, hence

skill is required to force the proper thought; but just as certain as

the proper thought, _no matter how aroused_, is put in force just

that certain will the action take place.

[Sidenote: Cure for cancer]

I believe that the only cure for cancer is personal suggestion,

inasmuch as the cancer does not grow in the body of man, but the mind

that is building that area of the body is building cancerous, instead

of healthy, tissue; that a suggestion or an inspiration will be found

that will re-establish the original healthy building. Our doctor cuts

the cancer out and says it grows back. It does not _grow_ back.

[Sidenote: Attributes of a “mental healer”]

Personal suggestion, when attempted, must affect the _proper_

senses; in hypnosis the operator _names_ the sense-pictures. When

we _talk_ health to a patient, we must _look_ and _act_

health, as well as show it in our _tone_. If we doubt, we are

wasting our time, inasmuch as we can only _do_ as we think. Faith,

confidence and sincerity are the principal attributes of a “mental

healer.”

Is man a free agent? · 第 19 / 24 题