LADY GAY’S DETECTION.

_Berkeley Square, W._

MR. PUNCH, Sir,

I am surprised to find a Journal of your standing lowering itself to

follow the example of the so-called “Society Journals” by inserting

contributions from women!—I have discovered, no matter how, that My

Wife, who always declares she hates letter-writing, has for months

past contributed a long weekly letter to _Punch_, dealing with racing

from a humorous (save the mark!) point of view! Now I never make jokes

myself—at least intentionally—nor do I think it becomes a man of

position to do so—and I quite agree with SWIFT or SHERIDAN (I know

it was _one_ of these infernal clever literary chaps) who said, “A

humorous woman is a delusion and a snare!”—so you may imagine my

disgust at finding My Wife writing for a Journal!—why couldn’t she

have asked Me to help her?—and signing her articles anonymously

too!—for I need hardly tell you she is no more “GAY” than I am!—at

all events when in _my_ society!

Like most busy idlers (that is _not_ intended for a joke)—I go racing

a bit, and of course “have a bit on” like other people, and having

tried all the turf-prophets in turn, with unsatisfactory results, I

was delighted to hear from a friend that “a new DANIEL had come to

judgment” in the person of a tipster on _Punch_, who was “wonderful

good”—(it was just the time when she _did_ blunder on to a

winner)—and I made up my mind to follow the new Prophet DANIEL; but,

by Jove! it resulted in a loss, and DANIEL landed me among the lions

in no time! These are _not_ jokes, but sober facts—I plunged heavily

on all the “Selections,” and am now in the pleasant position of owing

the Ring a substantial sum in addition to “the old,” through following

My Wife’s advice—whilst _her_ banking-account is considerably

augmented through having _laid against_ her own tips! This _may_ be

humorous, but as i said, I don’t approve of humour when exercised on

myself!

I laughed most consumedly at some of her articles, but on looking them

over again—(she has kept the lot, pasted in a book—a monument to my

fatuity!)—I don’t think so much of them now I know she wrote them,

and see that I could have made numberless valuable suggestions had

she only seen fit to consult me! Of course I could stop any further

contribution on her part, but consideration for your readers (?)

prevents that—to say nothing of _her_ determination to continue—so

I have therefore consented to her odd whim, on the condition that in

future I “edit” her contributions;—I need hardly assure you that I

shall confine my “editing” strictly to these limits, and that your

own Editor need be under no apprehension as to my usurping his

place,—ably as I should, no doubt, fill it!

My Wife begs me to follow her example, and conclude with a verse—(I

don’t know where she picked up such a bad habit)—but—while bowing

to her wishes—(I am always polite)—to a certain extent, I absolutely

decline to make the verse other than _blank_!

Believe me, Yours obediently,

CHARLES POMPERSON (Bart.).

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 103, November 12, 1892 · 第 23 / 26 题