Now, let us find, if we can, a cause for this. The negro is fond of

saying that his present condition is due to the fact that the State

and Federal courts have not sustained the laws passed for the

protection of the rights of his people, but I think we shall have to

go deeper than this, because I believe that all agree that court

decisions, as a rule, represent the public opinion of the community or

nation creating and sustaining the court.

At the beginning of his freedom, it was unfortunate that those of the

white race who won the political confidence of the negro were not,

with few exceptions, men of such high character as would lead them to

assist him in laying a firm foundation for his development. Their main

purpose appears to have been, for selfish ends in too many instances,

merely to control his vote. The history of the reconstruction era will

show that this was unfortunate for all the parties in interest.

It would have been better, from any point of view, if the native

Southern white man had taken the negro, at the beginning of his

freedom, into his political confidence, and exercised an influence and

control over him before his political affections were alienated. In

the light of present experience, I think all will now agree that the

ballot would have meant more to the negro and would have been more

lasting in its results, would have caused less opposition, if it had

been given to him gradually, as he came into possession of education.

The average Southern white man has the idea to-day that if the negro

were permitted to get any political power all the mistakes of the

reconstruction period would be repeated. He forgets or ignores the

fact that thirty years of acquiring education and property and

character have produced a higher type of black man than existed thirty

years ago.

But to be more specific for all practical purposes, there are two

political parties in the South--a black man's party and a white man's

party. In saying this, I do not mean that all white men are Democrats,

for there are some white men in the South of the highest character who

are Republicans, and there are a few negroes in the South of the

highest character who are Democrats. It is the general understanding

that all white men are Democrats, or the equivalent, and that all

black men are Republicans. So long as the color line is the dividing

line in politics, so long will there be trouble.

The white man feels that he owns most of the property, furnishes the

negro most of his employment, that he pays most of the taxes, and,

besides, has had years of experience in government. There is no

mistaking the fact that the feeling which, in some way, has heretofore

taken possession of the negro--that to be manly and stand by his race

he must oppose the Southern white man with his vote--has had much to

do with intensifying the opposition to him.

The Southern white man says that it is unreasonable for the negro to

come to him, in a large measure, for his clothes, board, shelter, and

education, and for his politics to go to men a thousand miles away.

The Southern white man argues that when the negro votes he should in a

larger measure try to consult the interests of his employer, just as

the Pennsylvania employee tries to vote for the interests of his

employer.

The Southern white man argues, further, that much of the education

which has been given the negro has been defective in not preparing him

to love labor and to earn his living at some special industry, and

has, in too many cases, resulted in tempting him to live by his wits

as a political creature, or by trusting to his "influence" as a

political timeserver.

Then there is no mistaking the fact that much opposition to the negro

in politics is due to the circumstance that the Southern white man has

not got accustomed to seeing the negro exercise political power,

either as a voter or as an officeholder. Again, we want to bear it in

mind that the South has not yet reached the point where there is that

strict regard for the enforcement of the law against either black or

white men that there is in many of our Northern and Western States.

This laxity in the enforcement of the laws in general, and especially

of criminal laws, makes such outbreaks as those in North Carolina and

South Carolina of easy occurrence.

Then there is one other consideration which must not be overlooked: it

is the common opinion of almost every black man and almost every white

man that nearly everybody who has had anything to do with the making

of laws bearing upon the protection of the negro's vote has proceeded

on the theory that all the black men for all time are going to vote

the Republican ticket, and that all the white men in the South are

going to vote the Democratic ticket; in a word, all seemed to have

taken it for granted that the two races are always going to oppose

each other in their voting.

In all the foregoing statements I have not attempted to define my own

views or position, but simply to describe conditions as I have

observed them, that might throw light upon the cause of our political

troubles.

As to my own position in all these matters I do not favor the negro's

giving up anything which is fundamental and which has been guaranteed

to him by the Constitution of the United States. It is not best for

him to relinquish any of his rights; nor would his doing so be best

for the Southern white man. Every law placed in the Constitution of

the United States was placed there to encourage and stimulate the

highest citizenship. If the negro is not stimulated and encouraged by

just State and national laws to become the highest type of citizen,

the result will be worse for the Southern white man than for the

negro. Take the State of South Carolina, for example, where nearly two

thirds of the population are negroes. Unless these negroes are

encouraged by just election laws to become taxpayers and intelligent

producers, the white people of South Carolina will have an eternal

millstone about their necks.

In addressing the Southern white people at the opening of the Atlanta

Exposition, in 1895, I said:

"There is no escape through law of man or God from the inevitable:

"'The laws of changeless justice bind

Oppressor with oppressed;

And close as sin and suffering joined

We march to fate abreast.'

"Nearly sixteen millions of hands will aid you in pulling the load

upward, or they will pull against you the load downward. We shall

constitute one third and more of the ignorance and crime of the South,

or one third of its intelligence and progress; we shall contribute one

third to the business and industrial property of the South, or we

shall prove a veritable body of death, stagnating, depressing,

retarding every effort to advance the body politic."

Subsequently, in an open letter to the State Constitutional Convention

of Louisiana, I wrote:

"I am no politician; on the other hand, I have always advised my race

to give attention to acquiring property, intelligence, and character,

as the necessary basis of good citizenship, rather than to mere

political agitation. But the question upon which I write is out of

the region of ordinary politics: it affects the civilization of two

races, not for to-day alone, but for a very long time to come; it is

up in the region of duty of man to man, of Christian to Christian.

"Since the war no State has had such an opportunity to settle for all

time the race question, so far as it concerns politics, as is now

given to Louisiana. Will your convention set an example to the world

in this respect? Will Louisiana take such high and just grounds in

respect to the negro that no one can doubt that the South is as good a

friend to the negro as he possesses elsewhere? In all this, gentlemen

of the convention, I am not pleading for the negro alone, but for the

morals, the higher life of the white man as well; for the more I study

this question, the more I am convinced that it is not so much a

question as to what the white man will do with the negro as to what

the negro will do with the white man's civilization.

"The negro agrees with you that it is necessary to the salvation of

the South that restriction be put upon the ballot. I know that you

have two serious problems before you: ignorant and corrupt government

on the one hand, and on the other a way to restrict the ballot, so

that control will be in the hands of the intelligent, without regard

to race. With the sincerest sympathy with you in your efforts to find

a good way out of the difficulty, I want to suggest that no State in

the South can make a law that will provide an opportunity or

temptation for an ignorant white man to vote and withhold the

opportunity or temptation for an ignorant colored man without injuring

both men. No State can make a law that can thus be executed without

dwarfing for all time the morals of the white man in the South. Any

law controlling the ballot that is not absolutely just and fair to

both races will work more permanent injury to the whites than to the

blacks.

"The negro does not object to an educational and property test, but

let the law be so clear that no one clothed with State authority will

be tempted to perjure and degrade himself by putting one

interpretation upon it for the white man and another for the black

man. Study the history of the South, and you will find that where

there has been the most dishonesty in the matter of voting, there you

will find to-day the lowest moral condition of both races. First,

there was the temptation to act wrongly with the negro's ballot. From

this it was an easy step to act dishonestly with the white man's

ballot, to the carrying of concealed weapons, to the murder of a

negro, and then to the murder of a white man, and then to lynching. I

entreat you not to pass a law that will prove an eternal millstone

about the necks of your children.

"No man can have respect for the Government and officers of the law

when he knows, deep down in his heart, that the exercise of the

franchise is tainted with fraud.

"The road that the South has been compelled to travel during the last

thirty years has been strewn with thorns and thistles. It has been as

one groping through the long darkness into the light. The time is not

far distant when the world will begin to appreciate the real character

of the burden that was imposed upon the South when four million

ex-slaves, ignorant and impoverished, were given the franchise. No

people has ever been given such a problem to solve. History has blazed

no path through the wilderness that could be followed. For thirty

years we have wandered in the wilderness. We are now beginning to get

out. But there is only one road out, and all makeshifts, expedients,

profit-and-loss calculations, but lead into swamps, quicksands,

quagmires, and jungles. There is a highway that will lead both races

out into the pure, beautiful sunshine, where there will be nothing to

hide and nothing to explain, where both races can grow strong and true

and useful in every fiber of their being. I believe that your

convention will find this highway; that it will enact a fundamental

law that will be absolutely just and fair to white and black alike.

"I beg of you, further, that in the degree that you close the ballot

box against the ignorant you open the schoolhouse. More than one half

of the population of your State are negroes. No State can long prosper

when a large part of its citizenship is in ignorance and poverty, and

has no interest in government. I beg of you that you do not treat us

as an alien people. We are not aliens. You know us; you know that we

have cleared your forests, tilled your fields, nursed your children,

and protected your families. There is an attachment between us that

few understand. While I do not presume to be able to advise you, yet

it is in my heart to say that if your convention would do something

that would prevent for all time strained relations between the two

races, and would permanently settle the matter of political relations

in one Southern State, at least, let the very best educational

opportunities be provided for both races; and add to this an election

law that shall be incapable of unjust discrimination, at the same time

providing that in proportion as the ignorant secure education,

property, and character, they will be given the right of citizenship.

Any other course will take from one half your citizens interest in the

State, and hope and ambition to become intelligent producers and

taxpayers, to become useful and virtuous citizens. Any other course

will tie the white citizens of Louisiana to a body of death.

"The negroes are not unmindful of the fact that the white people of

your State pay the greater portion of the school taxes, and that the

poverty of the State prevents it from doing all that it desires for

public education; yet I believe that you will agree with me that

ignorance is more costly to the State than education; that it will

cost Louisiana more not to educate the negroes than it will to educate

them. In connection with a generous provision for public schools, I

believe that nothing will so help my own people in your State as

provision at some institution for the highest academic and normal

training in connection with thorough training in agriculture,

mechanics, and domestic economy. The fact is that ninety per cent of

our people depend upon the common occupations for their living, and

outside of the cities eighty-five per cent rely upon agriculture for

support. Notwithstanding this, our people have been educated for the

most part since the war in everything else but the very thing most of

them live by. First-class training in agriculture, horticulture,

dairying, stock raising, the mechanical arts, and domestic economy

would make us intelligent producers, and not only help us to

contribute our proportion as taxpayers, but would result in retaining

much money in the State that now goes outside for that which can be as

well produced at home. An institution which will give this training of

the hand, along with the highest mental culture, would soon convince

our people that their salvation is largely in the ownership of

property and in industrial and business development, rather than in

mere political agitation.

"The highest test of the civilization of any race is in its

willingness to extend a helping hand to the less fortunate. A race,

like an individual, lifts itself up by lifting others up. Surely no

people ever had a greater chance to exhibit the highest Christian

fortitude and magnanimity than is now presented to the people of

Louisiana. It requires little wisdom or statesmanship to repress, to

crush out, to retard the hopes and aspirations of a people, but the

highest and most profound statesmanship is shown in guiding and

stimulating a people, so that every fiber in the body and soul shall

be made to contribute in the highest degree to the usefulness and

ability of the State. It is along this line that I pray God the

thoughts and activities of your convention be guided."

As to the cure for such outbreaks as have recently hurt North Carolina

and South Carolina, I would say that the remedy will not come by the

Southern white man's being merely cursed by the Northern white man or

by the negro. Again, it will not come by the Southern white man merely

depriving the negro of his rights and privileges. Both of these

methods are but superficial, irritating, and must in the nature of

things be short-lived. The statesman, to cure an evil, resorts to

enlightenment, to stimulation; the politician to repression. I have

just remarked that I favor the giving up of nothing that is guaranteed

to us by the Constitution of the United States, or that is fundamental

to our citizenship. While I hold to these views as strongly as any

one, I differ with some as to the method of securing the permanent and

peaceful enjoyment of all the privileges guaranteed to us by our

fundamental law.

In finding a remedy, we must recognize the world-wide fact that the

negro must be led to see and feel that he must make every effort

possible in every way possible to secure the friendship, the

confidence, the co-operation of his white neighbor in the South. To do

this, it is not necessary for the negro to become a truckler or a

trimmer. The Southern white man has no respect for a negro who does

not act from principle. In some way the Southern white man must be led

to see that it is to his interest to turn his attention more and more

to the making of laws that will in the truest sense elevate the negro.

At the present moment, in many cases, when one attempts to get the

negro to co-operate with the Southern white man, he asks the question,

"Can the people who force me to ride in a Jim Crow car, and pay

first-class fare, be my best friends?" In answering such questions,

the Southern white man as well as the negro has a duty to perform.

In the exercise of his political rights I should advise the negro to

be temperate and modest, and more and more to do his own thinking,

rather than to be led or driven by a political "boss" or by political

demagogues.

I believe the permanent cure for our present evils will come though a

property and educational test for voting that shall apply honestly and

fairly to both races. This will cut off the large mass of ignorant

voters of both races that is now proving so demoralizing a factor in

the politics of the Southern States.

But most of all it will come through industrial development of the

negro! It is for this reason that I have believed in General

Armstrong's theory of industrial education. In the first place,

industrial education makes an intelligent producer of the negro, who

becomes of immediate value to the community rather than one who yields

to the temptation to live merely by politics or other parasitical

employments. In the next place, industrial development will make the

negro soon become a property-holder, and when a citizen becomes a

holder of property he becomes a conservative and thoughtful voter. He

is going to think about the measures and individuals to be voted for.

In proportion as the negro increases his property interests he becomes

important as a taxpayer. When the negro becomes a large taxpayer, he

will see that it is to his interest to consult with his white neighbor

about the measures to be voted for. There is little trouble between

the negro and the white man as to matters of education, and when it

comes to the negro's business development the black man has implicit

faith in the advice of the Southern white man. When the negro gets

into trouble in the courts, which require a bond to be given, in nine

cases out of ten he goes to a Southern white man for advice and

assistance. Every one who has lived in the South knows that in many of

the church troubles among the colored people the ministers and other

church officers apply to the nearest white minister for assistance and

instruction. As soon as we have grown to the point where we shall

consult the Southern white man about our politics as we now consult

him about our business, legal, and religious matters, there will be a

change for the better in the situation.

The object lesson of a thousand negroes in every county in the South

owning neat and comfortable homes, possessing skill, industry, and

thrift, with money in the bank, who are large taxpayers and co-operate

with the white men in the South in every manly way for the development

of their own communities and counties, will go a long way in a few

years toward changing the present status of the negro as a citizen as

well as the attitude of the whites toward the blacks.

In proportion as the negro grows along industrial and business lines

he will divide in his politics on economic issues, just as the white

man in other parts of the country now divides his vote.

In proportion as the South grows in business prosperity the whole

South will divide its vote on economic issues, just as other portions

of the country divide their vote. When we can enact laws that result

in honestly cutting off the large ignorant and nontaxpaying vote, and

when we can bring both races to the point where they will co-operate

with each other in politics in matters of business, religion, and

education, the problem will be in a large measure solved, and

political outbreaks will cease.

* * * * *

COLONEL GEORGE EARL CHURCH, speaking of the Indians of the

country of the Amazons, relates of the chief of a horde of Yocaré

savages whom he met among the falls of the Madeira, a young

fellow twenty-five years old, that "he appeared to know

everything that was going on around him. He seemed to have eyes

in the back of his head, so acute were his senses. His hearing

appeared to indicate, and his mind to define, the thousand things

which were occurring in the tropical forest around us.

Instinctively, he classified and estimated them at their true

value as if they were under close and accurate analysis. As he

sat dining with me at my camp table, in the simplicity of his

nature and modesty of his nakedness, I could not help thinking

that, in the evolution of man, many magnificent qualities have

been sacrificed upon the altar of civilization."

THE ANTIQUITY OF MAN IN NORTH AMERICA.

BY DR. CHARLES C. ABBOTT.

The claim of satisfactory evidence of the extreme antiquity of man in

the valley of the Delaware River has been soberly discussed and

intemperately ridiculed until the public, both scientific and general,

have become tired of hearing the subject mentioned; but this is no

valid reason why the truth should not be ascertained. If man in a

paleolithic stage of culture did exist on the Atlantic seaboard of

North America, then we have a basis upon which to build--a tangible

starting point from which to date a history of human activities on

this continent. As it is, we have but an immense array of facts,

largely unrelated, and the greater portion sadly distorted and

misleading because of the reckless theories set forth with them by

their discoverers, and undoubtedly there never has been, in the whole

range of scientific agitation of a simple question, as great a volume

of reckless assertion, illogical deduction, and disregard of exact

statement. The main question was often wholly lost sight of, and the

author's sole purpose that of demonstrating some one else in error.

Predetermination on the part of many has been fatal to the value of

their field work. Convinced on theoretical grounds, such are

necessarily blinded when on the spot where positive evidence occurs.

He who does not desire the object searched for seldom finds it; and,

later in the day, pride declines to accede to the just demands of

candor--the admission of having reached a wrong conclusion.

There probably would not have been as much attention paid to the

subject of man's growth in culture on this continent had not the

proposition of a sequence from paleolithic to Indian, with an

intervening period, seemed to necessitate a dating back to the Glacial

epoch, which naturally brought geological erudition to bear upon the

question, and since then, most surprisingly, there has been confusion

worse confounded, rather than a flood of light. Much has been written,

but we can not yet be confident which author is most nearly correct;

and the latest report, showing sad evidences of haste, is vitiated by

evident determination to modernize every trace of man, whether the

facts warranted such procedure or not.

Appletons' Popular Science Monthly, July 1899 Volume LV, No. 3, July 1899 · 第 3 / 16 段