XXI.

The Ministers' Pay.

The salaries of New England clergymen were not large in early days, but the

£60 or £70 which they each were yearly voted was quite enough to suitably

support them in that new country of plain ways and plain living, if they

only received it, which was, alas! not always the case. The First Court of

Massachusetts, in 1630, set the amount of the minister's annual stipend

to be £20 or £30 according to the wealth of the community, and made it a

public charge. In 1659 the highest salary paid in Suffolk County was £100

to Mr. Thatcher, and the lowest was £40 to the clergyman at Hull. The

minister of the Andover church was voted a salary of £60, and "when he

shall have occacion to marry, £10 more." He was very glad, however, to take

£42 in hard cash instead of £60 in corn and labor, which were at that time

the most popular forms of ministerial remuneration; even though the "hard

cash" were in the form of wampum, beaver-skins, or leaden bullets.

Many congregations, though the members were so pious and godly, were pretty

sharp in bargaining with their preachers; for instance, the church in New

London made its new parson sign a contract that "in case he remove before

the year is out, he returneth the £80 paid him." Often clergymen would

"supply" (or "Sipploye," or "syploy" or "sipply," or "sciploy," as various

records have it) from month to mouth without "settling." As they got the

"keepe of a hors," and their own board for Saturday and Sunday, and on

Monday morning a cash payment for preaching (though often the amount was

only twelve shillings), they were richer than with a small yearly salary

that was irregularly and inconveniently paid. Often too they entered by

preference into a yearly contract with a church, without any wish for

regular settlement or ordination.

A large portion of the stipends in early parishes being paid in corn and

labor, the amounts were established by fixed rate upon the inhabitants;

and the amount of land owned and cultivated by each church-member was

considered in reckoning his assessment. These amounts were called voluntary

contributions. If, however, any citizen refused to "contribute," he

was taxed; and if he refused to pay his church-tax he could be fined,

imprisoned, or pilloried. For one hundred years the ministers' salaries

in Boston were paid by these so-called "voluntary contributions." In one

church it was voted that "the Deacons have liberty for a quarter of a yeare

to git in every mans sume either in a Church way or in a Christian way."

I would the process employed in the "Church way" were recorded, since it

differed so from the Christian way.

It is one of the Puritan paradoxes that abounded in New England, that the

community of New Haven, a "State whose Desire was Religion," and religion

alone, was particularly backward in paying the minister who had spiritual

charge there. After much trouble in deciding about the form and quality

of the currency which should be used in pay, since so much bad wampum was

thrust upon the deacons at the public contributions, it was in 1651 enacted

that "whereas it is taken notice of that Divers give not into the Treasury

at all on the Lords Day, it is decreed that all such if they give not

freely, of themselves be rated according to the Jurisdiction order for the

Ministers Maintaynance." The delinquents were ordered to bring their "rate"

to the Deacon's house at once. A presuming young man ventured to suggest

that the recreant members who would not pay in the face of the whole

congregation would hardly rush to the Deacon's door to give in their

"rate." He was severely ordered to keep silence in the company of wiser and

elder people; but time proved his simply wise supposition to be correct;

and many and various were the devices and forces which the deacons were

obliged to use to obtain the minister's rate in New Haven.

Some few bold Puritan souls dared to protest against being forced to pay

the church rate whether they wished to or not. Lieutenant Fuller, of

Barnstable, was fined fifty shillings for "prophanely" saying "that the law

enacted about the ministers maintenance was a wicked and devilish one, and

that the devil sat at the helm when the law was made." Such courageous

though profane expressions of revolt but little availed; for not only

were members and attendants of the Puritan churches taxed, but Quakers,

Baptists, and Church-of-England men were also "rated," and if they refused

to pay to help support the church that they abhorred, they were fined and

imprisoned. One man, of Watertown, named Briscoe, dared to write a book

against the violent enforcement of "voluntary" subscriptions. He was fined

£10 for his wickedness; and the printer of the book was also punished. A

virago in New London, more openly courageous, threw scalding water on the

head of the tithingman who came to collect the minister's rate. Old John

Cotton preached long and earnestly upon the necessity and propriety of

raising the money for the minister's salary, and for other expenses of the

church, wholly by voluntary and eagerly given contributions,--the "Lord

having directed him to make it clear by Scripture." He believed that tithes

and church-taxes were productive of "pride, contention and sloth," and

indicated a declining spiritual condition of the church. But it was a

strange voluntary gift he wished, that was forced by dread of the pillory

and cage!

Since, as Higginson said, "New England was a plantation of Religion, not a

plantation of Trade," the church and its support were of course the first

thought in laying out a new town-settlement, and some of the best town-lots

were always set aside for the "yuse of the minister." Sometimes these lots

were a gift outright to the first settled preacher, in other townships they

were set aside as glebes, or "ministry land" as it was called. It was a

universal custom to build at once a house for the minister, and some very

queer contracts and stipulations for the size, shape, and quality of the

parson's home-edifice may be read in church-records. To the construction

of this house all the town contributed, as also to the building of the

meeting-house; some gave work; some, the use of a horse or ox-team; some,

boards; some, stones or brick; some, logs; others, nails; and a few, a very

few, money. At the house-raising a good dinner was provided, and of course,

plenty of liquor. Some malcontents rebelled against being forced to work on

the minister's house. Entries of fines are common enough for "refusing

to dig on the Minister's Selor," for neglecting to send "the Minister's

Nayles," for refusing to "contribute clay-boards," etc. As with the

town-lot, the house sometimes was a gift outright to the clergyman, and

ofttimes the ownership was retained by the church, and the free use only

was given to each minister.

It was a universal custom to allow free pasturage for the minister's

horse, for which the village burial-ground was assigned as a favorite

feeding-ground. Sometimes this privilege of free pasturage was abused. In

Plymouth, in 1789, Rev. Chandler Robbins was requested "not to have more

horses than shall be necessary, for his many horses that had been pastured

on 'Burial Hill'" had sadly damaged and defaced the gravestones,--perhaps

the very headstones placed over the bones of our Pilgrim Fathers.

The "strangers' money," which was the money contributed by visitors who

chanced to attend the services, and which was sometimes specified as "all

the silver and black dogs given by strangers," was usually given to the

minister. A "black dog" was a "dog dollar."

Often a settlement or a sum of money was given outright to the clergyman

when he was first ordained or settled in the parish. At a town meeting in

Sharon, January 8, 1755, which was held with regard to procuring a new

minister, it was voted "that a committe confer with Mr. Smith, and know

which will be more acceptable to him, to have a larger settlement and a

smaller salary, or a larger salary and a smaller settlement, and make

report to this meeting." On Jan. 15th it was voted "that we give to said

Mr. Smith 420 ounces of silver or equivalent in old Tenor bills, for a

settlement, to be paid in three years after settlement. That we give to

said Mr. Smith 220 Spanish dollars or an equivalent in old Tenor bills for

his yearly salary." Mr. Smith was very generous to his new parish, for his

acceptance of its call contains this clause: "As it will come heavy upon

some perhaps to pay salary and settlement together I have thought of

releasing part of the payment of the salary for a time to be paid to me

again. The first year I shall allow you out of the salary you have voted me

40 dollars, the 2nd 30 dollars, the 3rd 15, the 4th year 20 to be repaid

to me again, the 5th year 20 more, the 6th year 20 more and the 25 dollars

that remain, I am willing that the town should keep 'em for its own use."

He was apparently "willing to live very low," as Parson Eliot humbly and

pathetically wrote in a petition to his church.

The Puritan ministers in New England in the eighteenth century were all

good Whigs; they hated the English kings, fully believing that those stupid

rulers, who really cared little for the Church of England, were burning

with pious zeal to make Episcopacy the established church of the colonies,

and knowing that were that deed accomplished they themselves would probably

lose their homes and means of livelihood. They were the most eager of

Republicans and patriots, and many of them were good and brave soldiers in

the Revolution.

When the minister acquired the independence he so longed and fought for,

it was not all his fancy painted it. He found himself poor

indeed,--practically penniless. He complained sadly that he was paid his

salary in the worthless continental paper money, and he refused to take it.

Often he cannily took merchandise of all kinds instead of the low-valued

paper money, and he became a good and sharp trader, exchanging his various

goods for whatever he needed--and could get. Merchandise was, indeed, far

preferable to money. The petition of Rev. Mr. Barnes to his Willsborough

people has been preserved, and he thus speaks of his salary: "In 1775 the

war comenced & Paper money was emitted which soon began to depreciate and

the depreciation was so rappid that in may 1777 your Pastor gave the whole

of his years Salary for one sucking Calf, the next year he gave the whole

for a small store pig. Your Pastor has not asked for any consideration

being willing to try to Scrabble along with the people while they are in

low circumstances." His neighbor, Rev. Mr. Sprague, of Dublin, formally

petitioned his church not to increase his salary, "as I am plagued to death

to get what is owing to me now," or to buy anything with it when he got it.

The minister in Scarborough had to be paid £5,400 in paper money to make

good his salary of £60 in gold which had been voted him.

"Living low" and "scrabbling along" seems to have been the normal and

universal condition of the New England minister for some time after the War

of Independence. He was obliged to go without his pay, or to take it in

whatever shape it might chance to be tendered. Indeed, from the earliest

colonial days it was true that of whatever they had, the church-members

gave; meal, maize, beans, cider, lumber, merchantable pork, apples,

"English grains," pumpkins,--all were paid to the parson. Part of the

stipend of a minister on Cape Cod was two hundred fish yearly from each

parishioner, with which to fertilize his sandy corn-land. In Plymouth,

in 1662, the following method of increasing the minister's income was

suggested: "The Court Proposeth it as a thing that they judge would be very

commendable and beneficiall to the townes where God's providence shall cast

any whales, if they should agree to set aparte some p'te of every such fish

or oyle for the Incouragement of an able and godly minister among them." In

Sandwich, also, the parson had a part of every whale that came ashore.

Various gifts, too, came to the preachers. In Newbury the first salmon

caught each year in the weir was left by will to the parson. Judge Sewall

records that he visited the minister and "carried him a Bushel of

Turnips, cost me five shillings, and a Cabbage cost half a Crown." Such a

high-priced cabbage!

That New England country institution--the "donation party" to the

minister--was evolved at a later date. At these donation parties the

unfortunate shepherd of the flock often received much that neither he

nor the wily donors could use, while more valuable and useful gifts were

lacking.

A very material plenishing of the minister's house was often furnished in

the latter part of the eighteenth century by the annual "Spinning Bee." On

a given day the women of the parish, each bearing her own spinning-wheel

and flax, assembled at the minister's house and spun for his wife great

"runs" of linen thread, which were afterward woven into linen for the use

of the parson and his family. In Newbury, April 20,1768, "Young ladies met

at the house of the Rev. Mr. Parsons, who preached to them a sermon from

Proverbs 31-19. They spun and presented to Mrs. Parsons two hundred and

seventy skeins of good yarn." They drank "liberty tea." This makeshift of

a beverage was made of the four-leaved loosestrife. The herb was pulled

up like flax, its stalks were stripped of the leaves and were boiled. The

leaves were put in a kettle and basted with the liquor distilled from the

stalks. After this the leaves were dried in an oven to use in the same

manner as tea-leaves. Liberty tea sold readily for sixpence a pound. In

1787 these same Newbury women spun two hundred and thirty-six skeins

of thread and yarn for the wife of the Rev. Mr. Murray. Some were busy

spinning, some reeling and carding, and some combing the flax, while the

minister preached to them on the text from Exodus xxxv. 25: "And all

the women that were wise-hearted did spin with their hands." These

spinning-bees were everywhere in vogue, and formed a source of much profit

to the parson, and of pleasure to the spinners, in spite of the sermons.

Pieced patchwork bed-quilts for the minister's family were also given by

the women of the congregation. Sometimes each woman furnished a neatly

pieced square, and all met at the parsonage and joined and quilted the

coverlet. At other times the minister's wife made the patchwork herself,

but the women assembled and transformed it into quilts for her. The parson

was helped also in his individual work. When the rye or wheat or grain on

the minister's land was full grown and ready for reaping and mowing, the

men in his parish gave him gladly a day's work in harvesting, and in turn

he furnished them plenty of good rum to drink, else there were "great

uneasyness." The New England men were not forced to drink liberty tea.

One universal contribution to the support of the minister all over New

England was cord-wood; and the "minister's wood" is an institution up to

the present day in the few thickly wooded districts that remain. A load of

wood was usually given by each male church-member, and he was expected to

deliver the gift at the door of the parsonage. Sixty loads a year were a

fair allowance, but the number sometimes ran up to one hundred, as was

furnished to Parson Chauncey, of Durham. Rev. Mr. Parsons, of East Hadley,

was the greatest wood-consumer among the old ministers of whom I have

chanced to read. Good, cheerful, roaring fires must the Parsons family have

kept; for in 1774 he had eighty loads of wood supplied to him; in 1751 he

was furnished with one hundred loads; in 1763 the amount had increased to

one hundred and twenty loads, when the parish was glad to make a compromise

with their extravagant shepherd and pay him instead £13 6s 8d annually

in addition to his regular salary, and let him buy or cut his own wood.

Firewood at that time in that town was worth only the expense of cutting

and hauling to the house. A "load" of wood contained about three quarters

of a cord, and until after the Revolutionary War was worth in the vicinity

of Hadley only three shillings a load. The minister's loads were expected

to be always of good "hard-wood." One thrifty parson, while watching a

farmer unload his yearly contribution, remarked, "Isn't that pretty soft

wood?" "And don't we sometimes have pretty soft preaching?" was the answer.

It was well that the witty retort was not made a century earlier; for the

speaker would have been punished by a fine, since they fined so sharply

anything that savored of "speaking against the minister." In some towns a

day was appointed which was called a "wood-spell," when it was ordered that

all the wood be delivered at the parson's door; and thus the farmers formed

a cheerful gathering, at which the minister furnished plentiful flip, or

grog, to the wood-givers. Rev. Stephen Williams, of Longmeadow, never

failed to make a note of the "wood-sleddings" in his diary. He wrote on

Jan. 25, 1757, "Neighbors sledded wood for me and shewed a Good Humour.

I rejoice at it. The Lord bless them that are out of humour and brot no

wood." In other towns the wood did not always come in when it was wanted or

needed, and winter found the parsonage woodshed empty. Rev. Mr. French, of

Andover, gave out this notice in his pulpit one Sunday in November: "I will

write two discourses and deliver them in this meeting-house on Thanksgiving

Day, _provided I can manage to write them without a fire_." We can be

sure that Monday morning saw several loads of good hard wood deposited at

the parson's door.

Other ministers did not hesitate to demand their cord-wood most openly,

while still others became adepts in hinting and begging, not only for wood,

but for other supplies. It is told of a Newbury parson that he rode from

house to house one winter afternoon, saying in each that he "wished he had

a slice of their good cheese, for his wife expected company." On his way

home his sleigh, unfortunately, upset, and the gathering darkness could not

conceal from the eyes of the astonished townspeople, who ran to "right the

minister," the nine great cheeses that rolled out into the snow.

Another source of income to New England preachers was the sale of the

gloves and rings which were given to them (and indeed to all persons of

any importance) at weddings, funerals, and christenings. In reading Judge

Sewall's diary one is amazed at the extraordinary number of gloves he thus

received, and can but wonder what became of them all, since, had he had

as many hands as Briareus, he could hardly have worn them. The manuscript

account-book of the Rev. Mr. Elliot, who was ordained pastor of the New

North Church of Boston in 1742, shows that he, having a frugal mind, sold

both gloves and rings. He kept a full list of the gloves he received, the

kid gloves, the lambswool gloves, and the long gloves,--which were for his

wife. It seems incredible, but in thirty-two years he received two thousand

and nine hundred and forty pairs of gloves. Of these, though dead men's

gloves did not have a very good market, he sold through various salesmen

and dealers about six hundred and forty dollars worth. One wonders that he

did not "combine" with the undertaker or sexton who furnished the gloves to

mourners, and thus do a very thrifty business.

The parson, especially in a low-salaried, rural district, had to practise a

thousand petty and great economies to eke out his income. He and his family

wore homespun and patched clothing, which his wife had spun and wove and

cut and made. She knitted woollen mittens and stockings by the score. She

unfortunately could not make shoes, and to keep the large family shod was a

serious drain on the clerical purse, one minister declaring vehemently

that he should have died a rich man if he and his family could have gone

barefoot. The pastors of seaboard and riverside parishes set nets, like the

Apostles of old, and caught fish with which they fed their families until

the over-phosphorized brains and stomachs rebelled. They set snares and

traps and caught birds and squirrels and hare, to replenish their tables,

and from the skins of the rabbits and woodchucks and squirrels, the

parsons' wives made fur caps for the husbands and for the children.

The whole family gathered in large quantities from roadsides and pastures

the oily bayberries, and from them the thrifty and capable wife made scores

of candles for winter use, patiently filling and refilling her few moulds,

or "dipping" the candles again and again until large enough to use. These

pale-green bayberry tallow candles, when lighted in the early winter

evening, sent forth a faint spicy fragrance--a true New England

incense--that fairly perfumed and Orientalized the atmosphere of the

parsonage kitchen. They were very saving, however, even of these home-made

candles, blowing them out during the long family prayers.

Some parsons could not afford always to use candles. In the home of one

well-known minister the wife always knitted, the children ciphered and

studied, and the husband wrote his sermon by the flickering fire-light (for

they always had wood in plenty), with his scraps of sermon paper placed on

the side of the great leathern bellows as it lay in his lap; a pretty home

scene that was more picturesque to behold than comfortable to take part in.

Country ministers could scarcely afford paper to write on, as it was taxed

and was high priced. They bought their sermon paper by the pound; but they

made the first drafts of their addresses, in a fine, closely written hand,

on wrapping-paper, on the backs of letters, on the margins of their few

newspapers, and copied them when finished in their sermon-books with a

keen regard for economy of space and paper. The manuscript sermons of New

England divines are models of careful penmanship, and may be examined with

interest by a student of chirography. The letters are cramped and crabbed,

like the lives of many of the writers, but the penmanship is methodical,

clear, and distinct, without wavering lines or uncertain touch.

As every parsonage had some glebe land, the parson could raise at least a

few vegetables to supply his table. One minister, prevented by illness from

planting his garden, complained with bitterness that, save for a few rare

gifts of vegetables from his parishioners, his family had no green thing

all summer save "messes of dandelion greens" which he had dug by the

roadside, and the summer's succession of wild berries and mushrooms. The

children had gathered the berries and had sold them when they could, but of

course no one would buy the mushrooms, hence they had been forced to eat

them at the parsonage; and he spoke despitefully and disdainfully of the

mean, unnourishing, and doubtfully healthful food.

In winter the parson's family fared worse; one minister declared that he

had had nothing but mush and milk with occasional "cracker johnny-cakes"

all winter, and that he had not once tasted meat in that space of time,

save at a funeral or ordination-supper, where I doubt not he gorged with

the composure and capacity of a Sioux brave at a war feast.

Often the low state of the parsonage larder was quite unknown to the

unthinking members of the congregation, who were not very luxuriously fed

themselves; and in the profession of preaching as in all other walks of

life much depended on the way the parson's money was spent,--economy and

good judgment in housekeeping worked wonders with the small salary. Dr.

Dwight, in eulogizing Abijah Weld, pastor at Attleborough, declared that

on a salary of two hundred and twenty dollars a year Mr. Weld brought up

eleven children, kept a hospitable house, and gave liberally in charity to

the poor. I fear if we were to ask some carnal-minded person, who knew not

the probity of Dr. Dwight, how Mr. Weld could possibly manage to accomplish

such wonderful results with so little money, that we should meet with

scepticism as to the correctness of the facts alleged. Such cases were,

however, too common to be doubted. My answer to the puzzling financial

question would be this: examine and study the story of the home life, the

work of _Mrs_. Weld, that unsalaried helper in clerical labor; therein

the secret lies.

In many cases, in spite of the never failing and never ceasing economy,

care, and assistance of the hard-working, thrifty wife, in spite of

tributes, tithes and windfalls--in country parishes especially--the

minister, unless he fortunately had some private wealth, felt it incumbent

upon him to follow some money-making vocation on week-days. Many were

farmers on week-days. Many took into their families young men who wished

to be taught, or fitted for college. Rev. Mr. Halleck in the course of his

useful and laborious life educated over three hundred young Puritans in his

own household. It is not recorded how Mrs. Halleck enjoyed the never ending

cooking for this regiment of hungry young men. Some parsons learned to draw

up wills and other legal documents, and thus became on a small scale the

lawyers of the town. Others studied the mystery of medicine, and bought a

small stock of the nauseous drugs of the times, which they retailed

with accompanying advice to their parishioners. Some were coopers, some

carpenters, rope-makers, millers, or cobblers. One cobbler clergyman in

Andover, Vermont, worked at his shoe-mending all the week with his Bible

open on his bench before him, and he marked the page containing any text

which bore on the subject of his coming sermon, with a marker of waxed

shoe-thread. Often the Bible, in his pulpit on Sunday, had thirty or forty

of these shoe-thread guides hanging down from it.

One minister, having been reproved for his worldliness in amassing a large

enough fortune to buy a good farm, answered his complaining congregation

thus: "I have obtained the money to buy this farm by neglecting to follow

the maxim to 'mind my own business.' My business was to study the word of

God and attend to my parish duties and preach good sermons. All this I

acknowledge I have not done, for I have been meddling with your business.

_That_ was to support me and my family; that _you_ have not done.

But remember this: while I have performed your duties, you have not done

mine, so I think you cannot complain."

Some of the early ministers, in addition to preaching in the meeting-house,

did not disdain to take care of the edifice. Parson Everitt of Sandwich was

paid three dollars a year for sweeping out the meeting-house in which he

preached; and after he resigned this position of profit, the duties were

performed by the town physician "as often as there shalbe ocation to keepe

it deesent." The thrifty Mr. Everitt had a pleasing variety of occupations;

he was also a successful farmer, a good fence-builder, and he ran a

fulling-mill.

So, altogether, as they were wholly exempt from taxation, the New England

parsons did not fare ill, though Mr. Cotton said that "ministers and milk

were the only cheap things in New England," and he deemed various ills,

such as attacks by fierce Indians, loss of cattle, earthquakes, and failure

of crops, to be divine judgments for the small ministerial pay; while

Cotton Mather, in one of his pompous and depressing jokes, called the

minister's stipend "Synecdotical Pay." A search in a treatise on rhetoric

or in a dictionary will discover the point of this witticism--if it be

worth searching for.

Sabbath in Puritan New England · 第 51 / 53 题