CHAPTER XXI.

PROF. JOHN HUBBARD.--PROF. ROSWELL SHURTLEFF.

Prof. John Hubbard succeeded Professor Woodward. We quote from a

published eulogy by Rev. Elijah Parish, D.D., his college classmate.

"The Hon. John Hubbard, the son of John and Hannah (Johnson) Hubbard,

late Professor of Mathematics and Natural Philosophy in this

university, was born in Townsend, Mass., August 8, 1759. Dark and

dismal was the dawn of that life, which has been so fair and luminous.

Five months before his birth his father died, and this, in his last

moments, when his children stood weeping round his dying bed, he made

use of as an argument of consolation to them, entreating them not to

weep, for God had taken care of him when a fatherless infant. During

his minority most of his time was employed in the labors of

agriculture. At the age of twenty-one he commenced his studies, and

the next year became a member of this institution. In the second year

of his residence at college, when many were awakened to a religious

sense of divine things, our friend was one of the happy number. His

subsequent life and death have proved that his conversion was not

imaginary. While this increases our loss, it is the best reason for

consolation.

"In his college life Mr. Hubbard was a youthful cedar of Lebanon. He

gave visible tokens of his approaching eminence. So tenacious was his

memory, that his progress in the languages was remarkably rapid. While

he lived, the Greek and Roman writers were his amusement; and with a

taste refined, he was charmed with their classic beauties; his memory

was stored with numerous favorite passages.

"On leaving college, his love of study, his delight in religious

inquiries, his devout regard for the best interests of man, led him to

the study of theology. Becoming a preacher of the gospel, his voice,

naturally small and feeble, was found to be ill adapted to such an

employment. After a fair experiment his good sense forbade him to

persevere. The transition was easy to his 'delightful task to teach

the young idea how to shoot,' and form the minds of youth to science

and virtue. Of the academy in New Ipswich he was elected preceptor.

Under his able instruction that seminary rose to distinction, and

became a favorite of the public. Some who were his pupils are already

eminent in the walks of literature.

"After several years, quitting this situation, he was appointed Judge

of Probate for the County of Cheshire. This office was peculiarly

adapted to that gentle and tender philanthropy for which he was

remarkable. It was luxury to him to comfort the widow and the

fatherless. The blended resolution and exquisite sensibilities of his

heart qualified him, in a singular manner, impartially to weigh the

claims of justice and compassion. But this situation was not congenial

with his love of study, and his delight in the instruction of youth,

which was so pleasant, that he declared he would make it the business

of his life. Accordingly he accepted the invitation of Deerfield

Academy, Massachusetts, where for several years he continued with

great reputation. After the death of Professor Woodward, who had, from

its origin, been an able instructor in this university, he was elected

his successor in the Professorship of Mathematics and Philosophy. So

high was his reputation, that a successor of common attainments could

not have satisfied the raised expectations of the public. To supply

the place of such a man was the arduous task assigned to Mr. Hubbard.

His success equaled the fond hopes of his friends. Here you rejoiced

in his light; here he spent his last and his best days; here he had

full scope for the various, the versatile powers of his vigorous mind.

His amiable virtues, his profound learning, you cheerfully

acknowledged.

"He had a happy facility in illustrating the practical advantages of

every science. He not only explained its principles, but traced its

relation to other branches of knowledge. Not satisfied by merely

ascertaining facts, he explored the cause, the means, the ultimate

design of their existence.

"Though he has been my intimate friend from cheerful youth, yet

neither inspired by his genius, nor enriched with his attainments, it

is not possible I should do justice to his merits. His person,

muscular and vigorous, indicated the energy of his mind. Every feature

of his face expressed the mildness of his spirit; never did I witness

in him the appearance of anger. Without that undescribable

configuration which constitutes beauty, his countenance was pleasing

and commanded respect. Without formality or art, his manners were

refined and delicate; his address was conciliatory and winning. By his

social and compliant temper he was calculated for general society.

Though instructed 'in the learning of Egypt,' and the civilized world,

he was too discreet and benevolent to humble others by his superior

lustre. His light was mild and clear, like that of the setting sun. He

had no ambition to shine, or to court applause. More disposed to make

others pleased with themselves than to excite their admiration, it is

not strange that he was universally beloved. His heart was impressed

with an exquisite sense of moral obligations. In every passing event,

in every work of nature, the formation of a lake, a river, a cataract,

a mountain, he saw God. When as a philosopher, surrounded with the

apparatus of science, extending his researches to the phenomena of the

universe, amazed at the minuteness of some objects, astonished at the

magnitude and magnificence of others, his mind was transported; when

he explored the heavens, and saw worlds balancing worlds, and other

suns enlightening other systems, his senses were ravished with the

wisdom, the power, the goodness of the Almighty Architect. On these

subjects he often declaimed, with the learning of an astronomer, the

simplicity of an apostle, the eloquence of a prophet. He illustrated

the moral and religious improvement of the sciences; the views of his

students were enlarged; the sciences became brilliant stars to

irradiate the hemisphere of Christianity. The perfect agreement

between sound learning and true religion was a favorite theme of his

heart. This remark is confirmed by his conversation, his letters, his

lectures.

"In theology his researches were not those of a polemic divine, but of

a Christian, concerned for his own salvation and the salvation of

others."

Professor Hubbard published several works, one of them being entitled

"Rudiments of Geography." He died at Hanover, August 14, 1810.

His wife was Rebecca, daughter of Dr. John Preston, of New Ipswich.

* * * * *

Mr. Roswell Shurtleff was elected the second professor of Divinity in

the college. We give some of the more important points in a published

"Discourse," by Professor Long:

"Roswell Shurtleff, the son of William and Hannah (Cady) Shurtleff,

was born at Ellington, then East Windsor, Ct., August 29, 1773. He was

the youngest of nine children, two of whom died before he was born.

From his earliest years he was fond of reading, and at school he was

called a good scholar. His religious training was carefully attended

to, and to this, and the Christian example which accompanied it, he

ascribed his conversion, and the views he subsequently embraced of the

Christian doctrines.

"When he was seven or eight years old he had many serious thoughts of

God and duty. The requirement that he should give up all for God, as

he understood it, filled him with gloom.

"During several of the subsequent years, the subject of religion dwelt

on his mind, and he was occasionally deeply impressed. One of the

difficult things was to comprehend the notion of faith. The promise

was: 'He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved.' He believed,

as he supposed, and he had been baptized, but he could not feel that

he was safe. Must he believe that he, personally, should be saved? But

what if he mistook his own character, and believed what was false;

would his opinion of his safety _make_ him safe. He was ashamed to be

known as a religious inquirer, and, therefore, remained longer in

darkness. Finding that he had been observed by his father to have

become a more diligent student of the Scriptures, he left the practice

of reading them before the family. Sometimes, assuming a false

appearance of indifference, he carried his difficulties to his mother,

who was able to furnish a satisfactory solution. She seems to have

been a person of unusual intelligence as well as goodness. Her memory

was ever cherished by him with the most grateful affection, as it

regarded his own spiritual progress. He believed that he suffered

unspeakable loss from the concealment of his early feelings on the

subject of religion, and did not doubt that many failed of conversion

from this foolish reserve. It was not till a number of years after

this that his religious life commenced.

"The only school which young Shurtleff had the opportunity of

attending, before his eighteenth or nineteenth year, was the common

school of the district. He made good proficiency, but nothing worthy

of note occurred in relation to his studies till he was about fifteen

years of age. He then began to think, as he says. Before that time, he

had repeated by rote whatever he had been taught. The first impulse to

reflection was a new discovery. He had been taught from childhood that

accent is a stress of voice laid on some syllable or letter of a word.

But this definition had not been illustrated by an example, and the

classification of words by their accent, in the spelling-book, he had

never understood. The definition had been to him an unmeaning

collection of words. He now discovered what it meant. This was in

itself a trifling event, but it led to the further discovery that

other things, which he had been accustomed, parrot-like, to repeat

_memoriter_, had a meaning; that the meaning of things was that which

the student should be set to learn, and that his own education had, in

this view, been greatly neglected. He says that a new world seemed to

be opened to his view; that nothing now appeared so important as an

opportunity to reflect on what he had learned, and that he was greatly

displeased with the instructors by whom he had been so badly cheated.

He resolved that, if ever he should be a teacher, he would propose it

to himself, as his leading object, to make his pupils understand

whatever they should study. This resolution he afterward had the

opportunity of carrying into effect in five or six winter schools; and

his attempt was attended with gratifying success.

"It was the opinion of Dr. Shurtleff, grounded on his own experience

as learner and teacher, that too much importance is attached to the

books used in schools; that the end to be reached is too generally

regarded as the learning of the book rather than the mastery of the

subject, and that books are too often prepared mainly with a view to

abridge the labor of the teacher. He believed that, while the pupil

might, through the text-book, possess himself of the knowledge of

others, he was in danger of acquiring little which could be called his

own.

"In consequence of using his eyes too soon, after his recovery from

the measles, when he was about seventeen years old, Shurtleff was

almost wholly cut off from the reading of books for two years, and he

never afterward perfectly recovered from the injury resulting from

this imprudence. He made some proficiency, however, by listening to

the reading of others. About two years after this affliction he

entered the academy at Chesterfield, N. H., whither his father's

family had removed a few years before. He attended first to English

studies. The weakness of his eyes continued, and he was considerably

embarrassed for a time from the necessity of using the eyes of his

friends. At length he commenced the study of Latin, going through

Ross' Grammar, the only one then in use, in just two weeks, and then

beginning to construe and parse in Corderius.

"He met, at the academy, one who had been his school-fellow and

playmate, and with whom he was intimately associated from that time

till the end of his college course,--the late Hon. Levi Jackson, who

died at Chesterfield in 1821. They got out their lessons together,

taking turns in looking out new words; and afterward, at college,

where they were classmates and room-mates, continued the practice. Dr.

Shurtleff felt under great obligations to this friend and helper, and

said that 'few friendships among men had been more ardent, confiding

and permanent.'

"Shurtleff had supposed, at first, that the Greek language was beyond

his reach, on account of his infirmity of sight. But some improvement

having taken place, he ventured to commence the study. He went through

the Westminster Greek Grammar, the book then in use, in one week, and

began to read the Gospel of John. Having completed the New Testament,

and read several books of Homer's Iliad, he was reputed in the school

as tolerably versed in Greek. He and Jackson studied from the love of

study, and did not think of college till a year before they applied

for admission, at Commencement, in 1797, and entered the Junior class

in this institution.

"The round of college duties presents few marked events. Time has left

no record of most of the occurrences which diversified and enlivened

the period from 1797 to 1799. How the two friends studied, and read,

and discussed, and recreated together, has been lost, just as the

facts of our daily life will be lost sixty years hence. They made

constant and good progress. They were about equally good scholars,

neither of them being a dead weight upon the other. Each was happy in

the other's proficiency. The amount of learning requisite for a degree

was less then than now. Sciences have been introduced into the course

which were then in their infancy. But it may be doubted whether the

students of our day have the advantage over those of an earlier

period, in respect to thoroughness as well as extent of attainment.

They read fewer books, in the first years of the college, but they

thought the more. They were as well disciplined and able, and as

competent to handle a difficult subject, I imagine, as our students,

if they were not as well informed. We know from the esteem in which

Shurtleff was held by the Trustees and Faculty, as it appeared not

long after his graduation, that he was one of the best scholars of his

time.

"Peculiar interest attaches to the religious experience of Shurtleff

during his college course.

"He had performed some of the duties of a Christian before he supposed

himself to possess the Christian character. The first school he taught

he opened daily with prayer, persevering in the practice as a

conscientious duty, in spite of many misgivings and much timidity. And

this he did in every school he afterward taught. He kept up the habit

of secret prayer, at the same time, asking more earnestly than for

anything else, that his weak eyes might be cured, and that he might

have the means of intellectual improvement.

"He seems to have supposed that during his senior winter vacation he

became a true Christian.

"Soon after his return to college, he intimated a desire to a

classmate, who, as he supposed, was the only professor of religion in

the class, to join with others in a private meeting for religious

conference and prayer. He had never attended, or even heard of such a

meeting. After a little delay he was surprised to learn from his

friend that such a meeting as he had proposed had been held for years,

and that he was desired to attend. On the Saturday evening following,

he and five or six other persons assembled, and by the free

interchange of thought and feeling, and the apparently humble prayers

that were offered, he felt himself greatly refreshed and quickened. On

leaving college he regretted the loss of nothing more than of these

Saturday evening conference meetings.

"The time had now come for choosing a profession. His success in

teaching led him to seek for a situation in an academy; but no opening

of this kind presented itself, and he believed himself thus

providentially called to preach the gospel. There were at the time no

theological seminaries; the students of the distinguished clergymen

who gave instruction in theology were supposed to represent the views

of their teacher; and that he might not be thought to go forth as the

advocate of some exceptionable _ism_, Mr. Shurtleff chose to study

theology by himself. Having pursued this course one year, he was

appointed a tutor in the college, and at the same time was licensed to

preach. The pressure of a considerable debt hastened the period of

obtaining license, but we may be certain, from the opportunities

subsequently enjoyed, and from the character of the man, that any

deficiency he may have felt at first, from hasty preparation, was

abundantly supplied.

"Mr. Shurtleff continued in the tutorship from 1800 to 1804, and was

also engaged, for the greater part of the time, in preaching in vacant

parishes.

"After the close of the four years' tutorship, Mr. Shurtleff was

appointed a professor of Divinity in the college. It was a part of his

duty to preach to the students and the people of the village. The

church was at that time Presbyterian. The predecessor of Professor

Shurtleff--Professor Sylvanus Ripley--had been the pastor of this

church. Since his death, in 1787, Dr. John Smith, professor of

Languages, previously associate pastor with Professor Ripley, had been

the sole pastor of the church. Dr. Backus, of Conn., Dr. Worcester, of

Salem, and Dr. Alexander, of Princeton, had been appointed at

different times to the vacant professorship, but all had declined, in

consequence, as it was supposed, of the influence of Dr. John

Wheelock, the second president of the college. Professor Shurtleff

accepted the office, expecting that the same causes which had kept it

so long vacant would render it an uncomfortable post. The difficulties

which he feared, he was called to encounter. The president wished him

to become the colleague of Professor Smith in the pastoral office, but

he refused,--agreeing in his decision with the views of the largest

part of the church and of the village. In consequence of this

disagreement, a controversy ensued which lasted several years, and

ended in the law-suit between the college and the State, in 1816-17.

In July, 1805, twenty-two persons, professors of religion, were

constituted 'The Congregational Church at Dartmouth College.' To this

church, and the religious society of which it was a part, Professor

Shurtleff was invited to preach, performing pastoral labors so far as

his other duties would permit. Professor Smith was, meanwhile, the

pastor of the Presbyterian church till the time of his death, in

April, 1809. Professor Shurtleff was ordained as an evangelist, at

Lyme, N. H., in 1810. He continued in this relation until the year

1827.

"The literary labors of his office would have been quite sufficient to

occupy all his time. In addition to these, an amount of work nearly

equal to that of any pastor of a church was imposed on him--fully

equal, perhaps, we shall say, if we consider the character of the

congregation to whom he ministered. He was faithful and assiduous,

both as a preacher and a pastor. But he performed the many duties of

his station with acceptance and success. And he had the satisfaction

of seeing that his efforts were crowned with the special blessing of

God. In 1805 God displayed his saving power among the students and

people of the village. As many as forty persons became Christians

during the revival. But the most extensive and powerful work of grace,

probably, which the church ever enjoyed was that of 1815. The revival

began in the hearts of God's people. Some of the pious students

resolved that they would every day talk with some unconverted person

respecting the interests of his soul. The effect of this soon appeared

in a general religious awakening. In one week forty persons expressed

hope in Christ, and in four weeks as many as one hundred and twenty

persons were supposed to be converted. There were also revivals in

1819, 1821, and 1826,--that of 1821 being the most extensive, and

embracing among the converts a greater number of citizens than of

students. Public religious meetings were less numerous during the

revivals than in most of those of a later period. It was before the

day of protracted meetings. Perhaps there was less reliance then on

means, and more on the Spirit of God. It was not thought necessary

that business should be suspended, and every day converted into a

Sabbath. But such means as the state of feeling seemed to require were

faithfully used. Professor Shurtleff was never happier than when

engaged in conversation with inquirers, or in conducting meetings for

conference and prayer. The informality and freedom of these meetings

made them attractive. They were probably quite as useful as the more

regular ministrations of the pulpit. The speaker can say that he never

visited a more solemn place than the old district school-house--which

stood where the brick school-house now stands--often was, on a Sunday

evening during the progress of a conference meeting. A distinguished

professor of a neighboring college, who was here in 1815, says that

'The evidence of an increasing seriousness among the students at

large, in that revival, was first shown, so far as I can recollect, by

the more crowded attendance at these meetings.' Not that the more

formal services of the Sabbath were not also impressive and

profitable. The same gentleman says of the preaching of Professor

Shurtleff at this time: 'The general impression made on me by several

of his sermons I remember to the present day. I liked to hear him

preach, even before I took any especial interest in religion as a

personal concern. His sermon on the text, "The harvest is past, the

summer is ended," etc., produced a deep effect at the time of its

delivery which was not soon forgotten. I remember the stillness and

solemnity of the audience. This sermon must have been delivered some

little time before the revival.' The same gentleman further states,

that 'During the whole of this revival, and the gathering in of the

fruits of it into the church, Professor Shurtleff was the leading

instrument of the work, so far as human agency was concerned. He went

into it with his whole heart. I have seen him and his excellent wife

almost overpowered with joy when told of a new case of conversion

among the students. He did a great deal--all that one man could do, as

it seemed to me--to promote the good work by his own personal

efforts.' It is in the power of the speaker to give similar testimony

respecting the revival of 1821.

"When Professor Shurtleff entered upon the duties of his

professorship, and for many years afterward, he met with much

opposition. But his position was constantly growing stronger, both as

it respects the sympathy of his Christian brethren and the clergy, and

his popularity as an instructor. I have not been able to learn that

there was a whisper of discontent with his instructions during the

whole of the period from 1804 to 1827. The testimony of one of the

best students of the Class of 1816 is, that 'As an instructor,

particularly in Moral Philosophy, he was much thought of; and we were

careful never to miss one of his recitations on this subject. His way

of putting questions, and answering such as were proposed to himself,

showed great judgment and shrewdness.' Quite a number of persons in

the classes for seven or eight years following the time here referred

to, were pre-eminent as scholars and as men. May not the fact be partly

accounted for by the impulse and guidance of the mind of this

instructor? He constituted a large portion of the faculty from 1815 to

1819, there being at that time only two professors,--Professor Adams

and Professor Shurtleff. The graduates of the college who had been his

pupils were never backward in acknowledging their obligations to him.

"In 1810, Professor Shurtleff was united in marriage with Miss Anna

Pope, only daughter of Rev. Joseph Pope of Spencer, Mass. Of her he

said, 'She was truly an helpmeet--one who did me good and not evil all

the days of her life.' By her vivacity and cheerfulness she was

eminently fitted to comfort him in his hours of suffering and

depression. But it pleased God to take her from him in March, 1826,

after having enjoyed with her, during sixteen years, a degree of

domestic happiness which rarely falls to the lot of man. He also lost

two children, sons, in 1820, after a brief illness. Respecting the

oldest, he had already begun to indulge very pleasing anticipations,

although he was less than five years old at the time of his decease.

Little did the speaker then know, when helping to carry to the grave

the remains of these children, who, if they had survived, would now

have been men of mature age, what hopes he was assisting to bury! But

who knows the future? It was better they should die, than that they

should live to dishonor him and themselves. The husband and father

mourned incessantly, though not without resignation, for these

bereavements, till the time of his own death.

"In 1825, Professor Shurtleff was in very feeble health, from the

spring till Commencement. The Trustees adjourned at that time to

reassemble in November, supposing it might be necessary then to

appoint another professor of Divinity. But by the blessing of God on

medical advice and careful nursing, he was able to resume instruction

before the meeting of the Trustees.

"In January, 1827, Professor Shurtleff was transferred from the

professorship of Divinity to one newly established, of Moral

Philosophy and Political Economy, which he filled till the year 1838,

when, by his own resignation, his active labors in the college ceased.

It was understood, when this appointment was made, that Professor

Shurtleff should instruct in all the Senior classes, and should also

hear the recitations of other classes in particular branches. During

the last half of this period, he preached in vacant neighboring

parishes. No particular account of the literary labors of these years

can be required. Any one of them may be regarded as a fair sample of

the rest. A member of the class of 1828 can testify that that class

greatly enjoyed his instructions. We never heard the summons to the

recitation-room without pleasure. We were always interested and

excited, always profited. The questions were put by the professor in

the plainest Saxon. They were well adapted to develop the knowledge or

the ignorance of the student, as the case might be, but not to give

him undue assistance. If there was anything in the text-book which was

obscure, the questions made it plain. A clearly wrong opinion advanced

by an author was briefly, yet thoroughly, exposed. His own opinions

were lucidly stated and sustained, and for the time being, at least,

we seldom saw reason to differ from him. The recitation was enlivened

with anecdote, illustration, and wit, and never dragged heavily. If

our objections were sometimes curtly silenced, it was so effectually

and handsomely done that we bore it with perfect good-nature. He ever

lent a willing ear to our real difficulties, and assisted in their

removal. Together with unusual freedom in the mode of conducting the

recitations, there was good order and earnest attention to the subject

in hand. He knew how to control us, while he had with us all the

sympathy of a young man and an equal. I think it was the opinion of

the class that Professor Shurtleff, in his ripe manhood, had few

equals as an instructor.

"At the time of his retirement, in 1838, Dr. Shurtleff had been in the

service of the college thirty-eight years. After what manner he has

lived among us since that time, most of this audience know. He has not

been noticeably active in the affairs of the village, but when you

have met him in private intercourse, you have known that he retained

the fine social qualities--the love of story-telling, and the keen,

yet harmless wit--for which he was always remarkable. Those whose

memory goes back thirty years, must have noticed, I think, that he

became more uniformly serene and cheerful in the latter part of his

life. The old graduates of the college who revisited the place know

how cordially he received them, and with what hearty zest he recalled

with them the scenes of their college days. He continued to be deeply

interested in the prosperity of the college, and he was the means of

eliciting in its behalf the interest and the benevolence of his

friends. He continued the habit, commenced at an early period, of

assisting students who were in needy circumstances. These were

objects of benevolence toward which he was naturally drawn. In his

feelings he never grew old, but carried forward the vivacity of youth

into old age; and always enjoyed the society of the young. He loved to

have young men about him; and he has thus, by his unobtrusive

charities and counsels, and his interesting and instructive

conversation, been a benefactor to a large number of students. The

spiritual welfare of the college was near his heart. He had passed

through many revivals of religion, and he longed for the return of

such seasons. He devoutly observed the days set apart for prayer for

colleges, and, as you remember, often urged the students, assembled on

those occasions, to give their hearts to God.

"When he left his post as an instructor he was sixty-five years old.

After this he had more than twenty-two years of leisure, during which

he retained, in a remarkable degree, the vigor of his intellectual

powers. But he had good and sufficient reasons, as he judged, for his

resignation; and no new and suitable field of labor presenting itself

to a man who wanted but a few years of threescore and ten, he could

enjoy the offered leisure with a good conscience, occupying it with

such pursuits as his taste suggested. Even at the time when his labors

were the most multiplied, and the church and the college were

successively engaged in bitter controversy, he had but little to do

with administrative and practical matters. Even then a life of

reflection appeared to be more attractive than a life of action. And

when his public duties were ended, he naturally chose such a life. He

was still intellectually active. He could not let his faculties sink

into sluggish repose if he would. His temperament would not suffer it.

If he was not a hard student, he was, what he had always been, a

thinking man to the last."

In a published notice of Professor Shurtleff, by Professor (now

President) Brown, we find the following language:

"The life of Dr. Shurtleff extended over the largest and most

important part of that of the institution itself. For nearly twenty

years he was college preacher, and at the same time pastor of the

church on Hanover Plain,--during which period more than two hundred

persons connected themselves with the church, a large proportion of

them by original profession. In the contest of the college with the

State, he and the late venerable Professor Adams, with the president,

constituted the permanent Faculty for instruction and government. Upon

the issues then presented he exerted a full measure of influence,

though it was comparatively quiet and private.

"As a professor, Dr. Shurtleff had some remarkable qualities. He

possessed a mind of extraordinary subtleness and acuteness, ever

alert, active and ingenious. Whatever he saw, he saw distinctly, and

was able, with equal clearness, to express to another. If a student

were really perplexed, he knew how to relieve him by a pertinent

example or illustration, but it was generally done by a question or a

suggestion which demanded the activity of the student's own mind, and

disciplined while it, helped him. If a pupil, on the other hand, were

captious, or conceited, he was apt to find himself, before he

suspected it, inextricably entangled in a web of contradictions, where

he was sometimes left till he came to a sense of his weakness, or till

he was dismissed with the benign declaration that 'he might sit.'

"Dr. Shurtleff's wit was sharp and pungent, and on any occasion which

involved the exercise of it he was quite equal to his part. He

sometimes engaged in controversy, and versed as he was in all logical

art, those who encountered him once were seldom anxious to provoke a

second contest. His opinions, both religious and philosophical, were

early settled and firmly held. He was in nothing given to change; his

friends were generally the friends of his life, and those who were

familiar with his habits of thought could easily tell where, upon any

given question, he would probably be found.

"His interest in young men was a noticeable trait in Dr. Shurtleff's

character, while preacher to the college; the effect of his private

conversations and friendly advice was almost equal to that of his

public ministrations. His quiet study was often the scene of meetings

for prayer or religious conversation from which were carried away

influences for good, never to be forgotten, and for which many were

grateful to their dying day.

"The efforts of deserving young men to obtain a liberal education

always excited his sympathy, and there has seldom been a time for many

years when some such one has not been a member of his own family,

aided and encouraged by his kindness. The number thus assisted no one

can now tell, nor probably could he himself. It was greater than most

persons would think possible.

"The last twenty years of his life Dr. Shurtleff spent in dignified

retirement, in the enjoyment of a competency, and in full exercise of

his faculties. He especially enjoyed the visits of former pupils, no

one of whom seemed to be lost from his retentive memory, and the

annual commencements were always exhilarating reunions to him. His

conversation, at such times especially, abounded in anecdote and

reminiscences of earlier days, and his cheerfulness survived to the

end. He has seldom, of late years, taken part in any public service,

the last time he did so being at the meeting of the alumni of

Dartmouth in 1859, to initiate measures for properly noticing the

death of Mr. Choate."

A volume would be required to set forth adequately the value of the

public services of this distinguished educator, who acted a most

important part in strengthening the foundations and adorning the

superstructure of a leading literary institution. Professor Shurtleff

died at Hanover, February 4, 1861.

The History of Dartmouth College · 第 21 / 31 章