CH.

Whatever the present practice of the House of Commons with respect to

strangers may be, it does not seem probable that it will soon undergo

alteration. In the session of 1849 a Select Committee, composed of

fifteen members, and including the leading men of all parties, was

appointed "to consider the present practice of this House in respect of

the exclusion of strangers." The following is the Report of the

Committee _in extenso_ (_Parl. Pap._, No. 498. Sess. 1849):

"That the existing usage of excluding strangers during a

division, and upon the notice by an individual Member that

strangers are present, has prevailed from a very early period of

parliamentary history; that the instances in which the power of

an individual Member to exclude has been exercised have been

very rare: and that it is the unanimous opinion of your

committee, that there is no sufficient ground for making any

alteration in the existing practice with regard to the admission

or exclusion of strangers."

This Report confirms the statement of Mr. Ross (p. 83., _antè_), that

within his experience of thirty-one years no change has been made in the

present rule of the House upon this matter, which, it would seem, dates

very far back. The Speaker was the only witness examined before the

Committee, and his evidence is not printed.

Arun.

* * * * *

Notes and Queries, Number 38, July 20, 1850 · 第 53 / 71 题