THE ROMANS.

The whole early part of the Roman history is very problematical. It is

hardly possible to suppose the Romans could have made so conspicuous a

figure in Italy, and not be noticed by Herodotus, who finished his

history in Magna Græcia. Neither is Rome mentioned by Aristotle, though

he particularly describes the government of Carthage. Livy, a writer by

no means void of national prejudice, expressly says, they had never

heard of Alexander; and here we surely may say in the words of the poet,

“Not to know him, argues themselves unknown.”

Pliny, it is true, quotes a passage of Theophrastus, to show that a

certain Greek writer, named Clitarchus, mentions an embassy from the

Romans to Alexander; but this can never be set against the authority of

Livy, especially as Quintilian gives no very favourable opinion of the

veracity of the Greek historian in these words,--“Clitarchi, probatur

ingenium, fides infamatur.”[364]

[364] H. J. Pye.

* * * * *

The Every-day Book and Table Book. v. 3 (of 3) Everlasting Calerdar of Popular Amusements, Sports, Pastimes, Ceremonies, Manners, Customs and Events, Incident to Each of the Three Hundred and Sixty-five Days, in past and Present Times; Forming a Complete History of the Year, Month, and Seasons, and a Perpetual Key to the Almanac · 第 1278 / 1847 题