I hear he kept very late hours?

No, sir, very early; he was always up at sunrise, but then he had never

been in bed.

Did you ever correspond with him?

Very seldom. We were so much together there was little opportunity or

occasion for it.

You do not happen to have any reliques of his hand-writing?

I don’t think I have; but when I get my breath a little better I will

look among my papers to try if I can find any.

The kind old gentleman was warmed with the subject, and even set forward

to his escritoire in the pursuit, but returned only with a letter from

the late Dr. Armstrong, which he flattered himself contained something

relative to Thomson. In this he was mistaken. It was a rhapsody of

thanks in return for being presented with a large bottle of spirits; but

it was well worth an airing. This, said Mr. R., will show you the

intimate terms I was upon with Johnny Armstrong, who wrote that

beautiful poem, the “Art of Preserving the Health.” He was a very

ingenious and excellent man.

Did you know Dr. Patrick Murdoch, who wrote Thomson’s Life?

Ay, very well, and esteemed him. Pattie, as I always called him, had a

good heart.

Pope, as I have heard, used often to visit Thomson?

Yes, frequently. Pope has sometimes said, Thomson, I’ll walk to the end

of your garden, and then set off to the bottom of Kew-foot-lane and

back. Pope, sir, courted Thomson, and Thomson was always admitted to

Pope whether he had company or not; but Pope had a jealousy of every

eminent writer; he was a viper that gnawed the file.

Was Pope a great talker?

Pope, when he liked his company, was a very agreeable man. He was fond

of adulation, and when he had any dislike was a most bitter satirist.

Thomson, I think, was very intimate with David Mallet, the editor of

Bolingbroke?

Sir, that person’s name was properly “Malloch;” but I used to call him

“Moloch” in our festive moments, and Thomson enjoyed the jest. Sir, he

had not Thomson’s heart; he was not sound at the core; he made a

cat’s-paw of Thomson, and I did not like the man on that account.

Thomson had two cousins or nephews, who were gardeners, did they live

with him?

No, they did not live with him, they lived upon him. He was so generous

a man, that if he had but two eggs he would have given them both away.

Were you acquainted with Mr. Gray, who lived at Richmond Hill?

Yes, I knew a John Gray, who was a victualler. He purchased Thomson’s

collection of prints and drawings after his decease, but I believe

purely out of ostentation.

You must have had great influence over him, sir, from several

circumstances you have mentioned, but wish to be suppressed?

Without ostentation or vanity, sir, I really very often have wondered

how I came to have so much, and the rest of his friends wondered too;

for I do say it most sincerely, that I never could find out what made

Thomson and many of these geniuses so partial to me as they appeared.

Then, sir, I suspect you are the only one who could not make the

discovery?

Sir, I was not fishing for a compliment, I do assure you.

If you had, sir, I should not have snatched so eagerly at your bait.

I suppose you attended Thomson in a medical as well as in a social

capacity?

Yes, Armstrong and myself were with him till his last moments. I was in

the room with him when he died. A putrid fever carried him off in less

than a week. He seemed to me to be desirous not to live, and I had

reason to think that my sister-in-law was the occasion of this. He could

not bear the thoughts of her being married to another.

Pray did you attend his funeral?

Indeed I did, and a real funeral it was to me, as Quin said when he

spoke the prologue to “Coriolanus”--“I was in truth no actor there.”

Did you hear Quin speak that prologue, sir?

Yes, I could not have been absent.

Were you the only intimate friend who paid the last tribute of respect

to Thomson’s remains?

No, sir, Quin attended, and Mallet, and another friend, whose name I do

not recollect. He was interred in the north-west corner of Richmond

church, just where the christening pew now stands. I pointed out the

place to the sexton’s widow, that she might show it to strangers.

Did you know Andrew Millar, the bookseller?

I knew him well. He took a box near Thomson’s, in Kew-lane, to keep in

with him as an author who might be profitable to him. Andrew was a

good-natured man, and not an unpleasant companion, but he was a little

contracted in mind by his business, and had the dross of a bookseller

about him.

Did you know Paterson?

Yes. Paterson had been clerk to a counting-house in the city, went for

some time abroad, and on his return was amanuensis to Thomson, was his

deputy as surveyor-general to the Leeward Islands, and succeeded him in

that office, but he did not live long to enjoy it, I believe not more

than two years.

Collins, the poet, and Hammond, author of the “Love Elegies,” visited

Thomson?

Yes. Ah! poor Collins, he had much genius, but half mad. Hammond was a

gentleman, and a very pleasant man. Yet Thomson, I remember, one day

called him a burnished butterfly. Quin, the comedian, was a sincere

friend of Thomson; he was naturally a most humane and friendly man, and

only put on the brute when he thought it was expected from him by those

who gave him credit for the character.

Was the anecdote of Quin and Thomson true?

Yes, I believe it was.

Boswell surmised that Thomson was a much coarser man than is commonly

allowed?

Sir, Thomson was neither a _petit-maître_ nor a boor; he had simplicity

without rudeness, and a cultivated manner without being courtly. He had

a great aversion to letter-writing, and did not attempt much of prose

composition of any kind. His time for composition was generally at the

dead of night, and was much in his summer-house, which, together with

every memorial of his residence, is carefully preserved by the

honourable Mrs. Boscawen.

Did you know, sir, of any other attachments of Thomson’s, except that to

his Amanda?

No, I believe he was more truly attached to my little wife and her

sister than to any one else, next to Amanda. Mr. H., of Bangor, said he

was once asked to dinner by Thomson, but could not attend. One of his

friends, who was there, told him that there was a general stipulation

agreed on by the whole company, that there should be no hard drinking.

Thomson acquiesced, only requiring that each man should drink his

bottle. The terms were accepted unconditionally, and when the cloth was

removed, a three-quart bottle was set before each of his guests. Thomson

had much of this kind of agreeable humour. Mr. Aikman, the painter, and

Dr. De la Cour, a physician and ingenious writer, were intimate and

beloved friends of Thomson. Mr. Aikman was a gentleman of competent

estate, and was always friendly to Thomson.

Sir, I cordially thank you for this kindness, in suffering yourself to

be teased with interrogations; and when lord Buchan’s tablet on the

grave of the poet shall be imposed in Richmond church, I shall hope to

see you tripping across the green to take a peep at it.

Sir, if I can crawl across for such a gratification, I shall certainly

do it.

We then twice shook hands and parted. Intelligent old gentleman! Little

was I aware that his lengthened eve of life was so very near its close!

He was taken seriously ill a few hours after I left him, Monday, October

24, and on the Friday following he died, and was buried on Saturday, the

4th of November, by the south side of Richmond church.

Mors ultima linea rerum est.

(Signed) T. P.

* * * * *

The Every-day Book and Table Book. v. 3 (of 3) Everlasting Calerdar of Popular Amusements, Sports, Pastimes, Ceremonies, Manners, Customs and Events, Incident to Each of the Three Hundred and Sixty-five Days, in past and Present Times; Forming a Complete History of the Year, Month, and Seasons, and a Perpetual Key to the Almanac · 第 911 / 1847 题