Hoeing among the flower-beds on my lawn this morning--for I am a bit of

a gardener in my way--I have had the ill-luck to maim a poor yellow

slug, who had hidden himself among the encroaching grass on the edge of

my little parterre of sky-blue lobelias. This unavoidable wounding and

hacking of worms and insects, despite all one's care, is no small

drawback to the pleasures of gardening _in propriâ personâ_.

Vivisection for genuine scientific purposes in responsible hands, one

can understand and tolerate, even though lacking the heart for it

oneself; but the useless and causeless vivisection which cannot be

prevented in every ordinary piece of farm-work seems a gratuitous blot

upon the face of beneficent nature. My only consolation lies in the

half-formed belief that feeling among these lower creatures is

indefinite, and that pain appears to affect them far less acutely than

it affects warm-blooded animals. Their nerves are so rudely distributed

in loose knots all over the body, instead of being closely bound

together into a single central system as with ourselves, that they can

scarcely possess a consciousness of pain at all analogous to our own. A

wasp whose head has been severed from its body and stuck upon a pin,

will still greedily suck up honey with its throatless mouth; while an

Italian mantis, similarly treated, will calmly continue to hunt and

dart at midges with its decapitated trunk and limbs, quite forgetful of

the fact that it has got no mandibles left to eat them with. These

peculiarities lead one to hope that insects may feel pain less than we

fear. Yet I dare scarcely utter the hope, lest it should lead any

thoughtless hearer to act upon the very questionable belief, as they

say even the amiable enthusiasts of Port Royal acted upon the doctrine

that animals were mere unconscious automata, by pushing their theory to

the too practical length of active cruelty. Let us at least give the

slugs and beetles the benefit of the doubt. People often say that

science makes men unfeeling: for my own part, I fancy it makes them

only the more humane, since they are the better able dimly to figure to

themselves the pleasures and pains of humbler beings as they really

are. The man of science perhaps realises more vividly than all other

men the inner life and vague rights even of crawling worms and ugly

earwigs.

I will take up this poor slug whose mishap has set me preaching, and

put him out of his misery at once, if misery it be. My hoe has cut

through the soft flesh of the mantle and hit against the little

embedded shell. Very few people know that a slug has a shell, but it

has, though quite hidden from view; at least, in this yellow kind--for

there are other sorts which have got rid of it altogether. I am not

sure that I have wounded the poor thing very seriously; for the shell

protects the heart and vital organs, and the hoe has glanced off on

striking it, so that the mantle alone is injured, and that by no means

irrecoverably. Snail flesh heals fast, and on the whole I shall be

justified, I think, in letting him go. But it is a very curious thing

that this slug should have a shell at all! Of course it is by descent a

snail, and, indeed, there are very few differences between the two

races except in the presence or absence of a house. You may trace a

curiously complete set of gradations between the perfect snail and the

perfect slug in this respect; for all the intermediate forms still

survive with only an almost imperceptible gap between each species and

the next. Some kinds, like the common brown garden snail, have

comparatively small bodies and big shells, so that they can retire

comfortably within them when attacked; and if they only had a lid or

door to their houses they could shut themselves up hermetically, as

periwinkles and similar mollusks actually do. Other kinds, like the

pretty golden amber-snails which frequent marshy places, have a body

much too big for its house, so that they cannot possibly retire within

their shells completely. Then come a number of intermediate species,

each with progressively smaller and thinner shells, till at length we

reach the testacella, which has only a sort of limpet-shaped shield on

his tail, so that he is generally recognised as being the first of the

slugs rather than the last of the snails. You will not find a

testacella unless you particularly look for him, for he seldom comes

above ground, being a most bloodthirsty subterraneous carnivore who

follows the burrows of earthworms as savagely as a ferret tracks those

of rabbits; but in all the southern and western counties you may light

upon stray specimens if you search carefully in damp places under

fallen leaves. Even in testacella, however, the small shell is still

external. In this yellow slug here, on the contrary, it does not show

itself at all, but is buried under the closely wrinkled skin of the

glossy mantle. It has become a mere saucer, with no more symmetry or

regularity than an oyster-shell. Among the various kinds of slugs, you

may watch this relic or rudiment gradually dwindling further and

further towards annihilation; till finally, in the great fat black

slugs which appear so plentifully on the roads after summer showers, it

is represented only by a few rough calcareous grains, scattered up and

down through the mantle; and sometimes even these are wanting. The

organs which used to secrete the shell in their remote ancestors have

either ceased to work altogether or are reduced to performing a useless

office by mere organic routine.

The reason why some mollusks have thus lost their shells is clear

enough. Shells are of two kinds, calcareous and horny. Both of them

require more or less lime or other mineral matters, though in varying

proportions. Now, the snails which thrive best on the bare chalk downs

behind my little combe belong to that pretty banded black-and-white

sort which everybody must have noticed feeding in abundance on all

chalk soils. Indeed, Sussex farmers will tell you that South Down

mutton owes its excellence to these fat little mollusks, not to the

scanty herbage of their thin pasture-lands. The pretty banded shells in

question are almost wholly composed of lime, which the snails can, of

course, obtain in any required quantity from the chalk. In most

limestone districts you will similarly find that snails with calcareous

shells predominate. But if you go into a granite or sandstone tract you

will see that horny shells have it all their own way. Now, some snails

with such houses took to living in very damp and marshy places, which

they were naturally apt to do--as indeed the land-snails in a body are

merely pond-snails which have taken to crawling up the leaves of

marsh-plants, and have thus gradually acclimatised themselves to a

terrestrial existence. We can trace a perfectly regular series from the

most aquatic to the most land-loving species, just as I have tried to

trace a regular series from the shell-bearing snails to the shell-less

slugs. Well, when the earliest common ancestor of both these last-named

races first took to living above water, he possessed a horny shell

(like that of the amber-snail), which his progenitors used to

manufacture from the mineral matters dissolved in their native streams.

Some of the younger branches descended from this primæval land-snail

took to living on very dry land, and when they reached chalky districts

manufactured their shells, on an easy and improved principle, almost

entirely out of lime. But others took to living in moist and boggy

places, where mineral matter was rare, and where the soil consisted for

the most part of decaying vegetable mould. Here they could get little

or no lime, and so their shells grew smaller and smaller, in proportion

as their habits became more decidedly terrestrial. But to the last, as

long as any shell at all remained, it generally covered their hearts

and other important organs; because it would there act as a special

protection, even after it had ceased to be of any use for the defence

of the animal's body as a whole. Exactly in the same way men specially

protected their heads and breasts with helmets and cuirasses, before

armour was used for the whole body, because these were the places where

a wound would be most dangerous; and they continued to cover these

vulnerable spots in the same manner even when the use of armour had

been generally abandoned. My poor mutilated slug, who is just now

crawling off contentedly enough towards the hedge, would have been cut

in two outright by my hoe had it not been for that solid calcareous

plate of his, which saved his life as surely as any coat of mail.

How does it come, though, that slugs and snails now live together in

the self-same districts? Why, because they each live in their own way.

Slugs belong by origin to very damp and marshy spots; but in the fierce

competition of modern life they spread themselves over comparatively

dry places, provided there is long grass to hide in, or stones under

which to creep, or juicy herbs like lettuce, among whose leaves are

nice moist nooks wherein to lurk during the heat of the day. Moreover,

some kinds of slugs are quite as well protected from birds (such as

ducks) by their nauseous taste as snails are by their shells. Thus it

happens that at present both races may be discovered in many hedges and

thickets side by side. But the real home of each is quite different.

The truest and most snail-like snails are found in greatest abundance

upon high chalk-downs, heathy limestone hills, and other comparatively

dry places; while the truest and most slug-like slugs are found in

greatest abundance among low water-logged meadows, or under the damp

fallen leaves of moist copses. The intermediate kinds inhabit the

intermediate places. Yet to the last even the most thorough-going

snails retain a final trace of their original water-haunting life, in

their universal habit of seeking out the coolest and moistest spots of

their respective habitats. The soft-fleshed mollusks are all by nature

aquatic animals, and nothing can induce them wholly to forget the old

tradition of their marine or fresh-water existence.

VI.

_A STUDY OF BONES._

On the top of this bleak chalk down, where I am wandering on a dull

afternoon, I light upon the blanched skeleton of a crow, which I need

not fear to handle, as its bones have been first picked clean by

carrion birds, and then finally purified by hungry ants, time, and

stormy weather. I pick a piece of it up in my hands, and find that I

have got hold of its clumped tail-bone. A strange fragment truly, with

a strange history, which I may well spell out as I sit to rest a minute

upon the neighbouring stile. For this dry tail-bone consists, as I can

see at a glance, of several separate vertebræ, all firmly welded

together into a single piece. They must once upon a time have been real

disconnected jointed vertebræ, like those of the dog's or lizard's

tail; and the way in which they have become fixed fast into a solid

mass sheds a world of light upon the true nature and origin of birds,

as well as upon many analogous cases elsewhere.

When I say that these bones were once separate, I am indulging in no

mere hypothetical Darwinian speculation. I refer, not to the race, but

to the particular crow in person. These very pieces themselves, in

their embryonic condition, were as distinct as the individual bones of

the bird's neck or of our own spines. If you were to examine the chick

in the egg you would find them quite divided. But as the young crow

grows more and more into the typical bird-pattern, this lizard-like

peculiarity fades away, and the separate pieces unite by 'anastomosis'

into a single 'coccygean bone,' as the osteologists call it. In all our

modern birds, as in this crow, the vertebræ composing the tail-bone are

few in number, and are soldered together immovably in the adult form.

It was not always so, however, with ancestral birds. The earliest known

member of the class--the famous fossil bird of the Solenhofen

lithographic stone--retained throughout its whole life a long flexible

tail, composed of twenty unwelded vertebræ, each of which bore a single

pair of quill-feathers, the predecessors of our modern pigeon's train.

There are many other marked reptilian peculiarities in this primitive

oolitic bird; and it apparently possessed true teeth in its jaws, as

its later cretaceous kinsmen discovered by Professor Marsh undoubtedly

did. When we compare side by side those real flying dragons, the

Pterodactyls, together with the very birdlike Deinosaurians, on the one

hand, and these early toothed and lizard-tailed birds on the other, we

can have no reasonable doubt in deciding that our own sparrows and

swallows are the remote feathered descendants of an original reptilian

or half-reptilian ancestor.

Why modern birds have lost their long flexible tails it is not

difficult to see. The tail descends to all higher vertebrates as an

heirloom from the fishes, the amphibia, and their other aquatic

predecessors. With these it is a necessary organ of locomotion in

swimming, and it remains almost equally useful to the lithe and gliding

lizard on land. Indeed, the snake is but a lizard who has substituted

this wriggling motion for the use of legs altogether; and we can trace

a gradual succession from the four-legged true lizards, through

snake-like forms with two legs and wholly rudimentary legs, to the

absolutely limbless serpents themselves. But to flying birds, on the

contrary, a long bony tail is only an inconvenience. All that they need

is a little muscular knob for the support of the tail-feathers, which

they employ as a rudder in guiding their flight upward or downward, to

right or left. The elongated waving tail of the Solenhofen bird, with

its single pair of quills, must have been a comparatively ineffectual

and clumsy piece of mechanism for steering an aërial creature through

its novel domain. Accordingly, the bones soon grew fewer in number and

shorter in length, while the feathers simultaneously arranged

themselves side by side upon the terminal hump. As early as the time

when our chalk was deposited, the bird's tail had become what it is at

the present day--a single united bone, consisting of a few scarcely

distinguishable crowded rings. This is the form it assumes in the

toothed fossil birds of Western America. But, as if to preserve the

memory of their reptilian origin, birds in their embryo stage still go

on producing separate caudal vertebræ, only to unite them together at a

later point of their development into the typical coccygean bone.

Much the same sort of process has taken place in the higher apes, and,

as Mr. Darwin would assure us, in man himself. There the long

prehensile tail of the monkeys has grown gradually shorter, and, being

at last coiled up under the haunches, has finally degenerated into an

insignificant and wholly embedded terminal joint. But, indeed, we can

find traces of a similar adaptation to circumstances everywhere. Take,

for instance, the common English amphibians. The newt passes all its

life in the water, and therefore always retains its serviceable tail as

a swimming organ. The frog in its tadpole state is also aquatic, and it

swims wholly by means of its broad and flat rudder-like appendage. But

as its legs bud out and it begins to fit itself for a terrestrial

existence, the tail undergoes a rapid atrophy, and finally fades away

altogether. To a hopping frog on land, such a long train would be a

useless drag, while in the water its webbed feet and muscular legs make

a satisfactory substitute for the lost organ. Last of all, the

tree-frog, leading a specially terrestrial life, has no tadpole at all,

but emerges from the egg in the full frog-like shape. As he never lives

in the water, he never feels the need of a tail.

The edible crab and lobster show us an exactly parallel case amongst

crustaceans. Everybody has noticed that a crab's body is practically

identical with a lobster's, only that in the crab the body-segments are

broad and compact, while the tail, so conspicuous in its kinsman, is

here relatively small and tucked away unobtrusively behind the legs.

This difference in construction depends entirely upon the habits and

manners of the two races. The lobster lives among rocks and ledges; he

uses his small legs but little for locomotion, but he springs

surprisingly fast and far through the water by a single effort of his

powerful muscular tail. As to his big fore-claws, those, we all know,

are organs of prehension and weapons of offence, not pieces of

locomotive mechanism. Hence the edible and muscular part of a lobster

is chiefly to be found in the claws and tail, the latter having

naturally the firmest and strongest flesh. The crab, on the other hand,

lives on the sandy bottom, and walks about on its lesser legs, instead

of swimming or darting through the water by blows of its tail, like the

lobster or the still more active prawn and shrimp. Hence the crab's

tail has dwindled away to a mere useless historical relic, while the

most important muscles in its body are those seated in the network of

shell just above its locomotive legs. In this case, again, it is clear

that the appendage has disappeared because the owner had no further use

for it. Indeed, if one looks through all nature, one will find the

philosophy of tails eminently simple and utilitarian. Those animals

that need them evolve them; those animals that do not need them never

develop them; and those animals that have once had them, but no longer

use them for practical purposes, retain a mere shrivelled rudiment as a

lingering reminiscence of their original habits.

VII.

_BLUE MUD._

After last night's rain, the cliffs that bound the bay have come out in

all their most brilliant colours; so this morning I am turning my steps

seaward, and wandering along the great ridge of pebbles which here

breaks the force of the Channel waves as they beat against the long

line of the Dorset downs. Our cliffs just at this point are composed of

blue lias beneath, with a capping of yellow sandstone on their summits,

above which in a few places the layer of chalk that once topped the

whole country-side has still resisted the slow wear and tear of

unnumbered centuries. These three elements give a variety to the bold

and broken bluffs which is rare along the monotonous southern

escarpment of the English coast. After rain, especially, the changes of

colour on their sides are often quite startling in their vividness and

intensity. To-day, for example, the yellow sandstone is tinged in parts

with a deep russet red, contrasting admirably with the bright green of

the fields above and the sombre steel-blue of the lias belt below.

Besides, we have had so many landslips along this bit of shore, that

the various layers of rock have in more than one place got mixed up

with one another into inextricable confusion. The little town nestling

in the hollow behind me has long been famous as the head-quarters of

early geologists; and not a small proportion of the people earn their

livelihood to the present day by 'goin' a fossiling.' Every child about

the place recognises ammonites as 'snake-stones;' while even the rarer

vertebrae of extinct saurians have acquired a local designation as

'verterberries.' So, whether in search of science or the picturesque, I

often clamber down in this direction for my daily stroll, particularly

when, as is the case to-day, the rain has had time to trickle through

the yellow rock, and the sun then shines full against its face, to

light it up with a rich flood of golden splendour.

The base of the cliffs consists entirely of a very soft and plastic

blue lias mud. This mud contains large numbers of fossils, chiefly

chambered shells, but mixed with not a few relics of the great swimming

and flying lizards that swarmed among the shallow flats or low islands

of the lias sea. When the blue mud was slowly accumulating in the

hollows of the ancient bottom, these huge saurians formed practically

the highest race of animals then existing upon earth. There were, it is

true, a few primæval kangaroo-mice and wombats among the rank brushwood

of the mainland; and there may even have been a species or two of

reptilian birds, with murderous-looking teeth and long lizard-like

tails--descendants of those problematical creatures which printed their

footmarks on the American trias, and ancestors of the later toothed

bird whose tail-feathers have been naturally lithographed for us on the

Solenhofen slate. But in spite of such rare precursors of higher modern

types, the saurian was in fact the real lord of earth in the lias ocean.

For him did his high sun flame, and his river billowing ran,

And he felt himself in his pride to be nature's crowning race.

The Evolutionist at Large · 第 2 / 11 段