CHAPTER VII.

Scotland one of the most Superstitious Countries in

Europe--Scott's Relation of the Barbarities perpetrated in

the Witch-trials under the auspices of James VI.--The Fate

of Agnes Sampson, Euphane MacCalzean, &c.--Irrational

Conduct of the Courts of Justice--Causes of voluntary

Witch-confessions--Testimony of Sir G. Mackenzie, &c.--Trial

and Execution of Margaret Barclay--Computation of the number

of Witches who suffered death in England and Scotland in the

sixteenth and seventeenth centuries--Witches burned alive at

Edinburgh in 1608--The Lancashire Witches--Sir Thomas

Overbury and Dr. Forman--Margaret Flower and Lord Rosse.

Scotland, by the physical features of the country and by the

character and habits of the people, is eminently apt for the

reception of the magical and supernatural of any kind;[131] and

during the century from 1563 it was almost entirely subject to

the dominion of Satan. Sir Walter Scott has narrated some of the

most prominent cases and trials in the northern part of the

island. The series may be said to commence from the confederated

conspiracy of hell to prevent the union of James VI. with the

Princess Anne of Denmark. An overwhelming tempest at sea during

the voyage of these anti-papal, anti-diabolic royal personages

was the appointed means of their destruction.

[131] A late philosophic writer has ventured to institute a

comparison in point of superstition and religious

intolerance between Spain and Scotland. The latter country,

however, has denied to political what it conceded to

priestly government: hence its superior material progress

and prosperity.--Buckle's _History of Civilisation in

England_.

The human agents were Agnes Sampson, the wise wife of Keith (one

of the better sort, who cured diseases, &c.); Dame Euphane

MacCalzean, widow of a senator of the College of Justice, and a

Catholic; Dr. John Fian or Cunninghame, a man of some learning,

and of much skill in poison as well as in magic; Barbara Napier

or Douglas; Geillis Duncan; with about thirty other women of the

lowest condition. 'When the monarch of Scotland sprung this

strong covey of his favourite game, they afforded the Privy

Council and himself sport for the greatest part of the remaining

winter. He attended on the examinations himself.... Agnes

Sampson, after being an hour tortured by the twisting of a cord

around her head according to the custom of the buccaneers,

confessed that she had consulted with one Richard Grahame

concerning the probable length of the king's life and the means

of shortening it. But Satan, to whom at length they resorted for

advice, told them in French respecting King James, _Il est un

homme de Dieu_. The poor woman also acknowledged that she had

held a meeting with those of her sisterhood, who had charmed a

cat by certain spells, having four joints of men knit to its

feet, which they threw into the sea to excite a tempest: they

embarked in sieves with much mirth and jollity, the fiend rolling

himself before them upon the waves dimly seen, and resembling a

huge haystack in size and appearance. They went on board of a

foreign ship richly laden with wines, where, invisible to the

crew, they feasted till the sport grew tiresome; and then Satan

sunk the vessel and all on board. Fian or Cunninghame was also

visited by the sharpest tortures, ordinary and extraordinary. The

nails were torn from his fingers with smiths' pincers; pins were

driven into the places which the nails usually defended; his

knees were crushed in the _boots_; his finger-bones were

splintered in the _pilniewincks_. At length his constancy,

hitherto sustained, as the bystanders supposed, by the help of

the devil, was fairly overcome; and he gave an account of a great

witch-meeting at North Berwick, where they paced round the church

_withershins_--i. e. in reverse of the motion of the sun. Fian

then blew into the lock of the church door, whereupon the bolts

gave way: the unhallowed crew entered, and their master the devil

appeared to his servants in the shape of a black man occupying

the pulpit. He was saluted with a "Hail, Master!" but the company

were dissatisfied with his not having brought a picture of the

king, repeatedly promised, which was to place his Majesty at the

mercy of this infernal crew.... The devil, on this memorable

occasion, forgot himself, and called Fian by his own name instead

of the demoniacal sobriquet of Rob the Rowan, which had been

assigned to him as Master of the Rows or Rolls. This was

considered as bad taste; and the rule is still observed at every

rendezvous of forgers, smugglers, or the like, where it is

accounted very indifferent manners to name an individual by his

own name in case of affording ground of evidence which may upon

a day of trial be brought against him. Satan, something

disconcerted, concluded the evening with a divertissement and

a dance after his own manner. The former consisted in disinterring

a new-buried corpse, and dividing it in fragments among

the company; and the ball was maintained by well-nigh two

hundred persons, who danced a ring dance.... Dr. Fian, muffled,

led the ring, and was highly honoured, generally acting as

clerk or recorder. King James was deeply interested in those

mysterious meetings, and took great delight to be present at the

examinations of the accused. He sent for Geillis Duncan, and

caused her to play before him the same tune to which Satan and

his companions led the brawl in North Berwick churchyard. His

ears were gratified in another way: for at this meeting it was

said the witches demanded of the devil why he did bear such

enmity against the king, who returned the flattering answer,

that the king was the greatest enemy whom he had in the world.

Almost all these poor wretches were executed: nor did Euphane

MacCalzean's station in life save her from the common doom, which

was strangling to death and burning to ashes thereafter. The

majority of the jury which tried Barbara Napier, having acquitted

her of attendance at the North Berwick meeting, were themselves

threatened with a trial for wilful error upon an assize, and

could only escape from severe censure and punishment by pleading

guilty, and submitting themselves to the king's pleasure. The

alterations and trenching,' adds Scott, 'which lately took place

on the Castle-hill at Edinburgh for the purpose of forming the

new approach to the city from the west, displayed the ashes of

the numbers who had perished in this manner, of whom a large

proportion must have been executed between 1590--when the great

discovery was made concerning Euphane MacCalzean and the wise

wife of Keith and their accomplices--and the union of the

crowns.'[132]

[132] Sir W. Scott's _Letters on Demonology and Witchcraft_,

ix.

Euphane's exceptional doom was 'to be bound to the stake, and

burned in ashes _quick_ to the death.' 'Burning quick' was not an

uncommon sentence: if the less cruel one of hanging or strangling

first and afterwards burning was more usual. Thirty warlocks and

witches was the total number executed on June 25th, 1591. A few,

like Dr. Cunninghame, may have been really experienced in the use

of poison and poisonous drugs. The art of poisoning has been

practised perhaps almost as extensively as (often coextensively

with) that of sorcery; a tremendous and mostly inscrutable crime

which science, in all ages, has been able more surely to conceal

than to detect.

Two facts eminently illustrate the barbarous iniquity of the

Courts of Justice when dealing with their witch prisoners. An

expressed malediction, or frequently an almost inaudible mutter,

followed by the coincident fulfilment of the imprecation, was

accepted eagerly by the judges as sufficient proof (an antecedent

one, contrary to the boasted principle of English law at least,

which assumes the innocence until the guilt has been proved, of

the accused) of the crime of the person arraigned. And they

complacently attributed to conscious guilt the ravings produced

by an excruciating torture--that equally inhuman and irrational

invention of judicial cruelty; confidently boasting that they

were careful to sentence no person without previous confession

duly made.

But these confessions not seldom were partly extracted from a

natural wish to be freed from the persecution of neighbours as

well as from present bodily torture. Sir George Mackenzie, Lord

Advocate of Scotland during the period of the greatest fury, and

himself president at many of the trials, a believer, among other

cases in his _Criminal Law_, 1678, relates that of a condemned

witch who had confessed judicially to him and afterwards 'told me

under secrecy, that she had not confessed because she was guilty;

but being a poor creature who wrought for her meat, and being

defamed for a witch she knew she should starve, for no person

thereafter would either give her meat or lodging, and that all

men would beat her and set dogs at her, and that therefore she

desired to be out of the world. Whereupon she wept most bitterly,

and upon her knees called God to witness to what she said.

Another told me that she was afraid the devil would challenge a

right to her after she was said to be his servant, and would

haunt her, as the minister said when he was desiring her to

confess, and therefore she desired to die. And really,' admits

the learned judge, 'ministers are oft-times indiscreet in their

zeal to have poor creatures to confess in this; and I recommend

to judges that the wisest ministers should be sent to them; and

that those who are sent should be cautious in this particular.'

Another confession at the supreme moment of the same sort, as

recorded by the Rev. G. Sinclair in 'Satan's Invisible World

Discovered' is equally significant and genuine. What impression

it left upon the pious clergyman will be seen in his concluding

inference. The witch, 'being carried forth to the place of

execution, remained silent during the first, second, and third

prayer, and then, perceiving there remained no more but to rise

up and go to the stake, she lifted up her body and with a loud

voice cried out, "Now all you that see me this day know that I am

now to die as a witch by my own confession, and I free all men,

especially the ministers and magistrates, of the guilt of my

blood. I take it wholly upon myself--my blood be upon my own

head; and as I must make answer to the God of heaven presently, I

declare I am as free of witchcraft as any child. But being

delated by a malicious woman, and put in prison under the name of

a witch; disowned by my husband and friends, and seeing no ground

of hope of my coming out of prison or ever coming in credit

again, through the temptation of the devil I made up that

confession on purpose to destroy my own life, being weary of it,

and choosing rather to die than live"--and so died; which

lamentable story as it did then astonish all the spectators, none

of which could restrain themselves from tears, so it may be to

all a demonstration of Satan's subtlety, whose design is still to

destroy all, partly by tempting many to presumption, and some

others to despair.'

The trial of Margaret Barclay took place in 1613. Her crime

consisted in having caused by means of spells the loss of a ship

at sea. She was said to have had a quarrel with the owner of the

shipwrecked vessel, in the course of which she uttered a wish

that all on board might sink to the bottom of the sea. Her

imprecation was accomplished, and upon the testimony of an

itinerant juggler, John Stewart, she was arraigned before a Court

of Justice. With the help of the devil in the shape of a handsome

black dog, she had moulded some figures of clay representing the

doomed sailors, which with the prescribed rites were thrown into

the deep. We are informed by the reporters of the proceedings at

this examination, that 'after using this kind of gentle torture

[viz. placing the legs in a pair of stocks and laying on

gradually increasing weights of iron bars], the said Margaret

began, according to the increase of the pain, to cry and crave

for God's cause to take off her shin the foresaid irons, and she

should declare truly the whole matter. Which being removed, she

began at her formal denial; and being of new assayed in torture

as before, she then uttered these words: "Take off, take off! and

before God I shall show you the whole form." And the said irons

being of new, upon her faithful promise, removed, she then

desired my Lord of Eglinton, the said four justices, and the said

Mr. David Dickson, minister of the burgh; Mr. George Dunbar,

minister of Ayr; Mr. Mitchell Wallace, minister of Kilmarnock;

Mr. John Cunninghame, minister of Dalry; and Hugh Kennedy,

provost of Ayr, to come by themselves and to remove all others,

and she should declare truly, as she should answer to God, the

whole matter. Whose desire in that being fulfilled, she made her

confession in this manner without any kind of demand, freely

without interrogation: God's name by earnest prayer being called

upon for opening of her lips and easing of her heart, that she by

rendering of the truth might glorify and magnify His holy name

and disappoint the enemy of her salvation.'

One of those involved in the voluntary confession was Isabel

Crawford, who was frightened into admitting the offences alleged.

In court, when asked if she wished to be defended by counsel,

Margaret Barclay, whose hopes and fears were revived at seeing

her husband, answered, 'As you please; but all I have confessed

was in agony of torture; and, before God, all I have spoken is

false and untrue.' She was found guilty; sentenced to be

strangled at the stake; her body to be burned to ashes. Isabel

Crawford, after a short interval, was subjected to the same sort

of examination: a new commission having been granted for the

prosecution, and 'after the assistant-minister of Irvine, Mr.

David Dickson, had made earnest prayers to God for opening her

obdurate and closed heart, she was subjected to the torture of

iron bars laid upon her bare shins, her feet being in the stocks.

She endured this torture with incredible firmness, since she did

"admirably, without any kind of din or exclamation, suffer above

thirty stone of iron to be laid on her legs, never shrinking

thereat in any sort, but remaining, as it were, steady." But in

shifting the situation of the iron bars, and removing them to

another part of her shins, her constancy gave way; she broke out

into horrible cries of "Take off! take off!" On being relieved

from the torture she made the usual confession of all that she

was charged with, and of a connection with the devil which had

subsisted for several years. Sentence was given against her

accordingly. After this had been denounced she openly denied all

her former confessions, and died without any sign of repentance;

offering repeated interruptions to the minister in his prayers,

and absolutely refusing to pardon the executioner.'[133] It might

be possible to form an imperfect estimate of how many thousands

were sacrificed in the Jacobian persecution in Scotland alone

from existing historical records, which would express, however,

but a small proportion of the actual number: and parish registers

may still attest the quantity of fuel provided at a considerable

expense, and the number of the fires. By a moderate computation

an average number of two hundred annually, making a total of

eight thousand, are reckoned to have been burned in the last

forty years of the sixteenth century.[134]

[133] _Letters on Demonology and Witchcraft_, ix.

The Scotch trials and tortures, of which the above cases are

but one or two out of a hundred similar ones, are perhaps the

more extraordinary as being the result of _mere_

superstition: religious or political heresy being seldom an

excuse for the punishment and an aggravation of the offence.

[134] A larger proportion of victims than even those of the

Holy Office during an equal space of time. According to

Llorente (_Hist. de l'Inquisition_) from 1680 to 1781, the

latter period of its despotism (which flourished especially

under Charles II., himself, as he was convinced, a victim of

witch-malice), between 13,000 and 14,000 persons suffered by

various punishments: of which number, however, 1,578 were

burned alive.

In England, from 1603 to 1680, seventy thousand persons are said

to have been executed; and during the fifteen hundred years

elapsed since the triumph of the Christian religion, millions are

reckoned to have been sacrificed on the bloody altars of the

Christian Moloch. An entry in the minutes of the proceedings in

the Privy Council for 1608 reveals that even James's ministers

began to experience some horror of the consequences of their

instructions. And the following free testimony of one of them is

truly 'an appalling record:'--'1608.--December 1.--The Earl of

Mar declared to the council that some women were taken in

Broughton [suburban Edinburgh] as witches, and being put to an

assize and convicted, albeit they persevered constant in their

denial to the end, yet they were burned _quick_ after such a

cruel manner that some of them died in despair, renouncing and

blaspheming God; and others half-burned broke out of the fire,

and were cast _quick_ in it again till they were burned to the

death.'[135]

[135] The terrestrial and _real_ Fiends seem to have striven

to realise on earth and to emulate the 'Tartarus horrificos

eructans faucibus aestus' described by the Epicurean

philosophic poet (Lucretius, _De Rerum Natura_, iii.).

Equally monstrous and degrading were the disclosures in the

torture-chambers; and many admitted that they had had children by

the devil. The circumstances of the Sabbath, the various rites of

the compact, the forms and method of bewitching, the manner of

sexual intercourse with the demons--these were the principal

staple of the judicial examinations.

In the southern part of the island witch-hanging or burning

proceeded with only less vehemence than in Scotland. One of the

most celebrated cases in the earlier half of the seventeenth

century (upon which Thomas Shadwell the poet laureate, who, under

the name of MacFlecknoe, is immortalised by the satire of Dryden,

founded a play) is the story of the Lancashire Witches. This

persecution raged at two separate periods; first in 1613, when

nineteen prisoners were brought before Sir James Altham and Sir

Edward Bromley, Barons of Exchequer. Elizabeth Southern, known as

'Mother Demdike' in the poet laureate's drama, is the leader of

the criminals. In 1634 the proceedings were renewed wholly on the

evidence of a boy who, it was afterwards ascertained, had been

instructed in his part against an old woman named Mother

Dickenson. The evidence was of the feeblest sort; nor are its

monotonous details worth repetition. Out of some forty persons

implicated on both occasions, fortunately the greater number

escaped. 'Lancashire Witches,' a term so hateful in its origin,

has been long transferred to celebrate the superior _charms_ (of

another kind) of the ladies of Lancashire; and the witches'

spells are those of natural youth and beauty.

The social position of Sir Thomas Overbury has made his fate

notorious. An infamous plot had been invented by the Earl of

Rochester (Robert Kerr) and the Countess of Essex to destroy a

troublesome obstacle to their contemplated marriage. The practice

of 'hellish charms' is only incidental; an episode in the dark

mystery. Overbury was too well acquainted with royal secrets

(whose disgusting and unnatural kind has been probably correctly

conjectured), too important for the keeping of even a private

secretary. His ruin was determined by the revenge of the noble

lovers and sealed by the fear of the king. At the end of six

months he had been gradually destroyed by secret poison in his

prison in the Tower (to which for an alleged offence he had been

committed) by the agency of Dr. Forman, a famous 'pharmaceutic,'

under the auspices of the Earl of Rochester. This Dr. Forman

had been previously employed by Lady Essex, a notorious

_dame d'honneur_ at James's Court, to bewitch the Earl to an

irresistible love for her, an enchantment which required,

apparently, no superhuman inducement. A Mrs. Turner, the

countess's agent, was associated with this skilful conjuror. They

were instructed also to bewitch Lord Essex, lately returned from

abroad, in the opposite way--to divert his love from his

wife.[136]

[136] The husband was impracticable; he could not be

_disenchanted_. Conjurations and charms failing, 'the

countess was instructed to bring against the Earl of Essex a

charge of conjugal incapacity: A commission of reverend

prelates of the church was appointed to sit in judgment,

over whom the king presided in person; and a jury of matrons

was found to give their opinion that the Lady Essex was a

maiden.' Divorce was accordingly pronounced, and with all

possible haste the king married his favourite to the

appellant with great pomp at Court. After the conspirators

had been arraigned by the public indignation, a curious

incident of the trial, according to a cotemporary report,

was, that there being 'showed in court certain pictures of a

man and a woman made in lead, and also a mould of brass

wherein they were cast; a black scarf also full of white

crosses which Mrs. Turner had in her custody; enchanted paps

and other pictures [as well as a list of some of the devil's

particular names used in conjuration], suddenly was heard a

crack from the scaffold, which carried a great fear, tumult,

and commotion amongst the spectators and through the hall;

every one fearing hurt as if the devil had been present and

grown angry to have his workmanship known by such as were

not his own scholars' (_Narratives of Sorcery and Magic_, by

Thomas Wright). Whatever may have been the crime or crimes

for the knowledge of which Sir Thomas Overbury was doomed,

it is significant that for his own safety the king was

compelled to break an oath (sworn upon his knees before the

judges he had purposely summoned, with an imprecation that

God's curse might light upon him and his posterity for ever

if he failed to bring the guilty to deserved punishment),

and to not only pardon but remunerate his former favourite

after he had been solemnly convicted and condemned to a

felon's death. The crime, the knowledge of which prevented

the appearance of Somerset at the gibbet or the scaffold,

has been supposed by some, with scarcely sufficient cause or

at least proof, to be the murder by the king of his son

Prince Henry. Doubt has been strongly expressed of the

implication at all of the favourite in the death of

Overbury: the evidence produced at the trial about the

poisoning being, it seems, made up to conceal or to mystify

the real facts.

Two women were executed at Lincoln, in 1618, for bewitching Lord

Rosse, eldest son of the Earl of Rutland, and others of the

family--Lord Rosse being bewitched to death; also for preventing

by diabolic arts the parents from having any more children.

Before the Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas and one of the

Barons of the Exchequer, it was proved that the witches had

effected the death of the noble lord by burying his glove in the

ground, and 'as that glove did rot and waste, so did the liver of

the said lord rot and waste.' Margaret Flower confessed she had

'two familiar spirits sucking on her, the one white, the other

black spotted. The white sucked under her left breast,' &c.

The Superstitions of Witchcraft · 第 7 / 10 章