CHAPTER II.

Three Sorts of Witches--Various Modes of Witchcraft--Manner

of Witch-Travelling--The Sabbaths--Anathemas of the Popes

against the Crime--Bull of Adrian VI.--Cotemporary Testimony

to the Severity of the Persecutions--Necessary Triumph of

the Orthodox Party--Germany most subject to the

Superstition--Acts of Parliament of Henry against

Witchcraft--Elizabeth Barton--The Act of 1562--Executions

under Queen Elizabeth's Government--Case of Witchcraft

narrated by Reginald Scot.

The ceremonies of the compact by which a woman became a witch

have been already referred to. It was almost an essential

condition in the vulgar creed that she should be, as Gaule

('Select Cases of Conscience touching Witches,' &c., 1646)

represents, an old woman with a wrinkled face, a furred brow, a

hairy lip, a gobber tooth, a squint eye, a squeaking voice, a

scolding tongue, having a ragged coat on her back, a skull-cap on

her head, a spindle in her hand, a dog or cat by her side. There

are three sorts of the devil's agents on earth--the black, the

gray, and the white witches. The first are omnipotent for evil,

but powerless for good. The white have the power to help, but not

to hurt.[91] As for the third species (a mixture of white and

black), they are equally effective for good or evil.

[91] A writer at the beginning of the seventeenth century

(Cotta, _Tryall of Witchcraft_) says, 'This kind is not

obscure at this day, swarming in this kingdom, whereof no

man can be ignorant who lusteth to observe the uncontrouled

liberty and licence of open and ordinary resort in all

places unto _wise_ men and _wise_ women, so vulgarly termed

for their reputed knowledge concerning such diseased persons

as are supposed to be bewitched.' And (_Short Discoverie of

Unobserved Dangers, 1612_) 'the mention of witchecraft doth

now occasion the remembrance in the next place of a sort of

practitioners whom our custom and country doth call wise men

and wise women, reputed a kind of good and honest harmless

witches or wizards, who, by good words, by hallowed herbs

and salves, and other superstitious ceremonies, promise to

allay and calm devils, practices of other witches, and the

forces of many diseases.' Another writer of the same date

considers 'it were a thousand times better for the land if

all witches, but specially the _blessing witch_, might

suffer death. Men do commonly hate and spit at the

_damnifying_ sorcerer as unworthy to live among them,

whereas they fly unto the other in necessity; they depend

upon him as their God, and by this means thousands are

carried away, to their final confusion. Death, therefore, is

the just and deserved portion of the _good_

witch.'--_Observations on the Popular Antiquities of Great

Britain_, by Brand, ed. by Sir H. Ellis.

Equally various and contradictory are the motives and acts

assigned to witches. Nothing is too great or too mean for their

practice: they engage with equal pleasure in the overthrow of a

kingdom or a religion, and in inflicting the most ordinary evils

and mischiefs in life. Their mode of bewitching is various: by

fascination or casting an evil eye ('Nescio,' says the Virgilian

shepherd, 'quis teneros oculus mihi fascinat agnos'); by making

representations of the person to be acted upon in wax or clay,

roasting them before a fire; by mixing magical ointments or

other compositions and ingredients revealed to us in the

witch-songs of Shakspeare, Jonson, Middleton, Shadwell, and

others; sometimes merely by muttering an imprecation.

They ride in sieves on the sea, on brooms, spits magically

prepared; and by these modes of conveyance are borne, without

trouble or loss of time, to their destination. By these means

they attend the periodical sabbaths, the great meetings of the

witch-tribe, where they assemble at stated times to do homage, to

recount their services, and to receive the commands of their

lord. They are held on the night between Friday and Saturday; and

every year a grand sabbath is ordered for celebration on the

Blocksberg mountains, for the night before the first day of May.

In those famous mountains the obedient vassals congregate from

all parts of Christendom--from Italy, Spain, Germany, France,

England, and Scotland. A place where four roads meet, a rugged

mountain range, or perhaps the neighbourhood of a secluded lake

or some dark forest, is usually the spot selected for the

meeting.[92]

[92] 'When orders had once been issued for the meeting of

the sabbath, all the wizards and witches who failed to

attend it were lashed by demons with a rod made of serpents

or scorpions. In France and England the witches were

supposed to ride uniformly upon broom-sticks; but in Italy

and Spain, the devil himself, in the shape of a goat, used

to transport them on his back, which lengthened or shortened

according to the number of witches he was desirous of

accommodating. No witch, when proceeding to the sabbath,

could get out by a door or window were she to try ever so

much. Their general mode of ingress was by the key-hole, and

of egress by the chimney, up which they flew, broom and all,

with the greatest ease. To prevent the absence of the

witches being noticed by their neighbours, some inferior

demon was commanded to assume their shapes, and lie in their

beds, feigning illness, until the sabbath was over. When all

the wizards and witches had arrived at the place of

rendezvous, the infernal ceremonies began. Satan having

assumed his favourite shape of a large he-goat, with a face

in front and another in his haunches, took his seat upon a

throne; and all present in succession paid their respects to

him and kissed him in his face behind. This done, he

appointed a master of the ceremonies, in company with whom

he made a personal examination of all the witches, to see

whether they had the secret mark about them by which they

were stamped as the devil's own. This mark was always

insensible to pain. Those who had not yet been marked

received the mark from the master of the ceremonies, the

devil at the same time bestowing nick-names upon them. This

done, they all began to sing and dance in the most furious

manner until some one arrived who was anxious to be admitted

into their society. They were then silent for a while until

the new comer had denied his salvation, kissed the devil,

spat upon the Bible, and sworn obedience to him in all

things. They then began dancing again with all their might

and singing.... In the course of an hour or two they

generally became wearied of this violent exercise, and then

they all sat down and recounted their evil deeds since last

meeting. Those who had not been malicious and mischievous

enough towards their fellow-creatures received personal

chastisement from Satan himself, who flogged them with

thorns or scorpions until they were covered with blood and

unable to sit or stand. When this ceremony was concluded,

they were all amused by a dance of toads. Thousands of these

creatures sprang out of the earth, and standing on their

hind-legs, danced while the devil played the bagpipes or the

trumpet. These toads were all endowed with the faculty of

speech, and entreated the witches there to reward them with

the flesh of unbaptized infants for their exertions to give

them pleasure. The witches promised compliance. The devil

bade them remember to keep their word; and then stamping his

foot, caused all the toads to sink into the earth in an

instant. The place being thus cleared, preparations were

made for the banquet, where all manner of disgusting things

were served up and greedily devoured by the demons and

witches, although the latter were sometimes regaled with

choice meats and expensive wines, from golden plates and

crystal goblets; but they were never thus favoured unless

they had done an extraordinary number of evil deeds since

the last period of meeting. After the feast, they began

dancing again; but such as had no relish for any more

exercise in that way, amused themselves by mocking the holy

sacrament of baptism. For this purpose the toads were again

called up, and sprinkled with filthy water, the devil making

the sign of the cross, and all the witches calling

out--[some gibberish]. When the devil wished to be

particularly amused, he made the witches strip off their

clothes and dance before him, each with a cat tied round her

neck, and another dangling from her body in form of a tail.

When the cock crew they all disappeared, and the sabbath was

ended. This is a summary of the belief that prevailed for

many centuries nearly all over Europe, and which is far from

eradicated even at this day.'--_Memoirs of Extraordinary

Popular Delusions_, by C. Mackay.

A mock sermon often concludes the night's proceedings, the

ordinary salutation of the _osculum in tergo_ being first given.

But these circumstances are innocent compared with the obscene

practices when the lights are put out; indiscriminate debauchery

being then the order of the night. A new rite of baptism

initiated the neophyte into his new service: the candidate being

signed with the sign of the devil on that part of the body least

observable, and submitting at the same time to the first act of

criminal compliance, to be often repeated. On these occasions the

demon presents himself in the form of either sex, according to

that of his slaves. It was elicited from a witch examined at a

trial that, from the period of her servitude, the devil had had

intercourse with her _ut viri cum f[oe]minis solent_, excepting

only in one remarkable particular.

During the pontificate of Julius II.--the first decade of the

sixteenth century--a set of sorceresses was discovered in large

numbers: a dispute between the civil and ecclesiastical

authorities averted their otherwise certain destruction. The

successors of Innocent VIII. repeated his anathemas. Alexander

VI., Leo X., and Adrian VI. appointed special commissioners for

hunting up sorcerers and heretics. In 1523, Adrian issued a bull

against _Haeresis Strigiatus_ with power to excommunicate all who

opposed those engaged in the inquisition. He characterises the

obnoxious class as a sect deviating from the Catholic faith,

denying their baptism, showing contempt for the sacraments, in

particular for that of the Eucharist, treading crosses under

foot, and taking the devil as their lord.[93] How many suffered

for the crime during the thirty or forty years following upon the

bull of 1484, it is difficult exactly to ascertain: that some

thousands perished is certain, on the testimony of the judges

themselves. The often-quoted words of Florimond, author of a work

'On Antichrist,' as given by Del Rio the Jesuit ('De Magia'), are

not hyperbolical. 'All those,' says he, 'who have afforded us

some signs of the approach of antichrist agree that the increase

of sorcery and witchcraft is to distinguish the melancholy period

of his advent; and was ever age so afflicted with them as ours?

The seats destined for criminals before our judicatories are

blackened with persons accused of this guilt. There are not

judges enough to try enough. Our dungeons are gorged with them.

No day passes that we do not render our tribunals bloody by the

dooms we pronounce, or in which we do not return to our homes

discountenanced and terrified at the horrible contents of the

confessions which it has been our duty to hear. And the devil is

accounted so good a master that we cannot commit so great a

number of his slaves to the flames but what there shall arise

from their ashes a number sufficient to supply their place.'

[93] Francis Hutchison's _Historical Essay concerning

Witchcraft_, chap. xiv.; the author quotes Barthol. de

Spina, _de Strigibus_.

It is within neither the design nor the limits of these pages to

repeat all the witch-cases, which might fill several volumes; it

is sufficient for the purpose to sketch a few of the most

notorious and prominent, and to notice the most remarkable

characteristics of the creed.

Maximilian I., Emperor of Germany, protected the inquisitorial

executioners from the indignant vengeance of the inhabitants of

the districts of Southern Germany, which would have been soon

almost depopulated by an unsparing massacre and a ferocious zeal:

while Sigismund, Prince of the Tyrol, is said to have been

inclined to soften the severity of a persecution he was totally

unable, if he had been disposed, to prevent. Ulric Molitor,

under the auspices of this prince, however, published a treatise

in Switzerland ('De Pythonicis Mulieribus') in the form of a

dialogue, in which Sigismund, Molitor, and a citizen of Constance

are the interlocutors. They argue as to the practice of

witchcraft; and the argument is to establish that, although the

practicers of the crime are worthy of death, much of the vulgar

opinion on the subject is false. Even in the middle of the

fifteenth century, and in Spain, could be found an assertor, in

some degree, of common sense, whose sentiments might scandalise

some Protestant divines. Alphonse de Spina was a native of

Castile, of the order of St. Francis: his book was written

against heretics and unbelievers, but there is a chapter in which

some acts attributed to sorcerers, as transportation through the

air, transformations, &c., are rejected as unreal.

From that time two parties were in existence, one of which

advocated the entire reality of all the acts commonly imputed to

witches; while the other maintained that many of their supposed

crimes were mere delusions suggested by the Great Enemy. The

former, as the orthodox party, were, from the nature of the case,

most successful in the argument--a seeming paradox explained by

the nature and course of the controversy. Only the _received_

method of demoniacal possession was questioned by the adverse

side, accepting without doubt the possibility--and, indeed, the

actual existence--of the phenomenon. Thus the liberals, or

pseudo-liberals, in that important controversy were placed in an

illogical position. For (as their opponents might triumphantly

argue) if the devil's power and possession could be manifested in

one way, why not by any other method. Nor was it for them to

determine the appointed methods of his schemes, as permitted by

Providence, for the injury and ruin of mankind. The diabolic

economy, as evidently set forth in the work of man's destruction,

might require certain modes of acting quite above our reason and

understanding. To the sceptics (or to the _atheists_, as they

were termed) the orthodox could allege, 'Will you not believe

in witches? The Scriptures aver their existence: to the

jurisconsults will you dispute the existence of a crime against

which our statute-book and the code of almost all civilised

countries have attested by laws upon which hundreds and thousands

have been convicted; many, or even most, of whom have, by their

judicial confessions, acknowledged their guilt and the justice of

their punishment? It is a strange scepticism, they might add,

that rejects the evidence of Scripture, of human legislature, and

of the accused persons themselves.'[94] Reason was hopelessly

oppressed by faith. In the presence of universal superstition, in

the absence of the modern philosophy, escape seemed all but

impossible.

[94] Sir W. Scott's _Letters on Demonology and Witchcraft_,

chap. vi.

If preeminence in this particular prejudice can be assigned to

any single region or people, perhaps Germany more than any other

land was subject to the demonological fever. A fact to be

explained as well by its being the great theatre for more than a

hundred years of the grand religious struggle between the

opposing Catholics and Protestants, as by its natural fitness.

The gloomy mountain ranges--the Hartz mountains are especially

famous in the national legend--and forests with which it abounds

rendered the imaginative minds of its peoples peculiarly

susceptible to impressions of supernaturalism.[95] France

takes the next place in the fury of the persecution. Danaeus

('Dialogue') speaks of an innumerable number of witches. England,

Scotland, Spain, Italy perhaps come next in order.

[95] How greatly the imagination of the Germans was

attracted by the supernatural and the marvellous is plainly

seen both in the old national poems and in the great work of

the national mythologist, Jacob Grimm (_Deutsche

Mythologie_).

Spain, the dominion of the Arabs for seven centuries, was

naturally the land of magic. During the government of Ferdinand

I., or of Isabella, the inquisition was firmly established. That

numbers were sent from the dungeons and torture-chambers to the

stake, with the added stigma of dealing in the 'black art,' is

certain; but in that priest-dominated, servilely orthodox

southern land, the Church was not perhaps so much interested in

confounding the crimes of heresy and sorcery. The first was

simply sufficient for provoking horror and hatred of the

condemned. The South of France is famous for being the very nest

of sorcery: the witch-sabbaths were frequently held there. It was

the country of the Albigenses, which had been devastated by De

Montfort, the executioner of Catholic vengeance, in the twelfth

century, and was, with something of the same sort of savageness,

ravaged by De Lanere in the seventeenth century. Scotland, before

the religious revolution, exhibits a few remarkable cases of

witch-persecution, as that of the Earl of Mar, brother of James

III. He had been suspected of calling in the aid of sorcery to

ascertain the term of the king's life: the earl was bled to death

without trial, and his death was followed by the burning of

twelve witches, and four wizards, at Edinburgh. Lady Glammis,

sister of the Earl of Angus, of the family of Douglas, accused of

conspiring the king's death in a similar way, was put to death in

1537. As in England, in the cases of the Duchess of Gloucester

and others, the crime appears to be rather an adjunct than the

principal charge itself; more political than popular. Protestant

Scotland it is that has earned the reputation of being one of the

most superstitious countries in Europe.

In 1541 two Acts of Parliament were passed in England--the first

interference of Parliament in this kingdom--against false

prophecies, conjurations, witchcraft, sorcery, pulling down

crosses; crimes made felony without benefit of clergy. Both the

last article in the list and the period (a few years after the

separation from the Catholic world) appear to indicate the causes

in operation. Lord Hungerford had recently been beheaded by the

suspicious tyranny of Henry VIII., for consulting his death by

conjuration. The preamble to the statute has these words: 'The

persons that had done these things, had dug up and pulled down an

infinite number of crosses.'[96] The new head of the English

Church, if he found his interest in assuming himself the

spiritual supremacy, was, like a true despot, averse to any

further revolution than was necessary to his purposes. Some

superstitious regrets too for the old establishment which, by a

fortunate caprice, he abandoned and afterwards plundered, may

have urged the tyrant, who persecuted the Catholics for

questioning his supremacy, to burn the enemies of

transubstantiation. Shortly before this enactment, eight persons

had been hanged at Tyburn, not so much for sorcery as for a

disagreeable prophecy. Elizabeth Barton, the principal, had been

instigated to pronounce as revelation, that if the king went on

in the divorce and married another wife, he should not be king a

month longer, and in the estimation of Almighty God not one hour

longer, but should die a villain's death. The Maid of Kent, with

her accomplices--Richard Martin, parson of the parish of

Aldington; Dr. Bocking, canon of Christ Church, Canterbury;

Deering; Henry Gold, a parson in London; Hugh Rich, a friar, and

others--was brought before the Star Chamber, and adjudged to

stand in St. Paul's during sermon-time; the majority being

afterwards executed. In Cranmer's 'Articles of Visitation,' 1549,

an injunction is addressed to his clergy, that 'you shall inquire

whether you know of any that use charms, sorcery, enchantments,

witchcrafts, soothsaying, or any like craft, invented by the

devil.'

[96] Hutchison's _Historical Essay concerning Witchcraft_.

The author, chaplain in ordinary to George I., published his

book in 1718. It is worth while to note the colder

scepticism of the Hanoverian chaplain as compared with the

undoubting faith of his predecessor, Dr. Glanvil.

During the brief reigns of Edward VI. and Mary I. in England, no

conspicuous trials occur. As for the latter monarch, the queen

and her bishops were too absorbed in the pressing business of

burning for the real offence of heresy to be much concerned in

discovering the concomitant crimes of devil-worship.[97] An

impartial judgment may decide that superstition, whether engaged

in vindicating the dogmas of Catholicism or those of witchcraft,

is alike contemptible and pernicious.

[97] Agreeably to that common prejudice which selects

certain historical personages for popular and peculiar

esteem or execration, and attributes to them, as if they

were eccentricities rather than examples of the age, every

exceptional virtue or vice, the 'Bloody Queen' has been

stigmatised, and is still regarded, as an _extraordinary_

monster, capable of every inhuman crime--a prejudice more

popular than philosophical, since experience has taught that

despots, unchecked by fear, by reason, or conscience, are

but examples, in an eminent degree, of the character, and

personifications of the worst vices (if not of the best

virtues) of their time. Considered in this view, Mary I.

will but appear the example and personification of the

religious intolerance of Catholicism and of the age, just as

Cromwell was of the patriotic and Puritanic sentiment of the

first half, or Charles II. of the unblushing licentiousness

of the last half, of the seventeenth century.

In the year of Elizabeth's accession, 1558, Strype ('Annals of

the Reformation,' i. 8, and ii. 545) tells that Bishop Jewell,

preaching before the queen, animadverted upon the dangerous and

direful results of witchcraft. 'It may please your Grace,'

proclaims publicly the courtly Anglican prelate, 'to understand

that witches and sorcerers, within these last few years, are

marvellously increased within your Grace's realm. Your Grace's

subjects pine away even to the death, their colour fadeth, their

flesh rotteth, their speech is benumbed, their senses are bereft.

I pray God they never practise further than upon the subject.'

For himself, the bishop declares, 'these eyes have seen most

evident and manifest marks of their wickedness.' The annalist

adds that this, no doubt, was the occasion of bringing in a bill

the next Parliament, for making enchantments and witchcraft

felony; and, under year 1578, we are informed that, whether it

were the effect of magic, or proceeded from some natural cause,

the queen was in some part of this year under excessive anguish

_by pains of her teeth_, insomuch that she took no rest for

divers nights, and endured very great torment night and day. The

statute of 1562 includes 'fond and fantastic prophecies' (a very

common sort of political offences in that age) in the category of

forbidden arts. With unaccustomed lenity it punished a first

conviction with the pillory only.

Witch-persecutions (which needed not any legal enactment) sprung

up in different parts of the country; but they were not carried

out with either the frequency or the ferocity of the next age, or

as in Scotland, under the superintendence of James VI. A number

of pamphlets unnecessarily enforced the obligatory duty of

unwearied zeal in the work of discovery and extermination.[98]

Among the executions under Elizabeth's Government are specially

noticed that of a woman hanged at Barking in 1575; of four at

Abingdon; three at Chelmsford; two at Cambridge, 1579; of a

number condemned at St. Osythes; of several in Derbyshire and

Staffordshire. One of the best known is the case at Warboys, in

Huntingdonshire, 1593.

[98] One of these productions, printed in London, bore the

sensational title, 'A very Wonderful and Strange Miracle of

God, shewed upon a Dutchman, of the age of 23 years, who was

possessed of ten devils, and was, by God's Mighty

Providence, dispossessed of them again the 27 January last

past, 1572.' Another, dedicated to Lord Darcy, by W. W.,

1582, sets forth that all those tortures in common use 'are

far too light, and their rigour too mild; and in this

respect he (the pamphleteer) impudently exclaimeth against

our magistrates who suffer them to be but hanged, when

_murtherers and such malefactors be so used, which deserve

not the hundredth part of their punishment_.'

The author of the 'Discoverie' relates a fact that came under his

personal observation: it is a fair example of the trivial origin

and of the facility of this sort of charges. 'At the assizes

holden at Rochester, anno 1581, one Margaret Simons, wife of John

Simons, of Brenchly in Kent, was arraigned for witchcraft, at the

instigation and complaint of divers fond and malicious persons,

and especially by the means of one John Farral, vicar of that

parish, with whom I talked about the matter, and found him both

fondly assotted in the cause and enviously bent towards her: and,

which is worse, as unable to make a good account of his faith as

she whom he accused. That which he laid to the poor woman's

charge was this. His son, being an ungracious boy, and 'prentice

to one Robert Scotchford, clothier, dwelling in that parish of

Brenchly, passed on a day by her house; at whom, by chance, her

little dog barked, which thing the boy taking in evil part, drew

his knife and pursued him therewith even to her door, whom

she rebuked with such words as the boy disdained, and yet

nevertheless would not be persuaded to depart in a long time. At

the last he returned to his master's house, and within five or

six days fell sick. Then was called to mind the fray betwixt the

dog and the boy: insomuch as the vicar (who thought himself so

privileged as he little mistrusted that God would visit his

children with sickness) did so calculate as he found, partly

through his own judgment and partly (as he himself told me) by

the relation of other witches, that his said son was by her

bewitched. Yea, he told me that his son being, as it were, past

all cure, received perfect health at the hands of another witch.'

Not satisfied with this accusation, the vicar 'proceeded yet

further against her, affirming that always in his parish church,

when he desired to read most plainly his voice so failed him that

he could scant be heard at all: which he could impute, he said,

to nothing else but to her enchantment. When I advertised the

poor woman thereof, as being desirous to hear what she could say

for herself, she told me that in very deed his voice did fail

him, specially when he strained himself to speak loudest.

Howbeit, she said, that at all times his voice was hoarse and

low; which thing I perceived to be true. But sir, said she, you

shall understand that this our vicar is diseased with such a kind

of hoarseness as divers of our neighbours in this parish not

long ago doubted ... and in that respect utterly refused to

communicate with him until such time as (being thereunto enjoined

by the ordinary) he had brought from London a certificate under

the hands of two physicians that his hoarseness proceeded from a

disease of the lungs; which certificate he published in the

church, in the presence of the whole congregation: and by this

means he was cured, or rather excused of the shame of the

disease. And this,' certifies the narrator, 'I know to be true,

by the relation of divers honest men of that parish. And truly if

one of the jury had not been wiser than the others, she had been

condemned thereupon, and upon other as ridiculous matters as

this. For the name of witch is so odious, and her power so feared

among the common people, that if the honestest body living

chanced to be arraigned thereupon, she shall hardly escape

condemnation.'

The Superstitions of Witchcraft · 第 2 / 10 章