PREFACE

Anthropology and the Humanities--on verbal grounds one might suppose

them coextensive; yet in practice they divide the domain of human

culture between them. The types of human culture are, in fact,

reducible to two, a simpler and a more complex, or, as we are wont to

say (valuing our own achievements, I doubt not, rightly), a lower and a

higher. By established convention Anthropology occupies itself solely

with culture of the simpler or lower kind. The Humanities, on the other

hand--those humanizing studies that, for us at all events, have their

parent source in the literatures of Greece and Rome--concentrate on

whatever is most constitutive and characteristic of the higher life of

society.

What, then, of phenomena of transition? Are they to be suffered to

form a no-man’s-land, a buffer-tract left purposely undeveloped,

lest, forsooth, the associates of barbarism should fall foul of the

friends of civilization? Plainly, in the cause of science, a pacific

penetration must be tolerated, nay, encouraged, from both sides at

once. Anthropology must cast forwards, the Humanities cast back. And

there is not the slightest reason (unless prejudice be accounted

reason) why conflict should arise between the interests thus led to

intermingle.

Indeed, how can there be conflict, when, as in the case of each

contributor to the present volume, the two interests in question,

Anthropology on this side and Classical Archaeology and Scholarship

on that, are the joint concern of one and the same man? Dr. Evans

both is a leading authority on prehistoric Europe, and likewise, by

restoring the Minoan age to the light of day, has set Greek history

in a new and juster perspective. Dr. Lang is an anthropologist of

renown, and no one, even amongst his peers, has enriched the science

with so many original and fertile hypotheses; nevertheless he has found

time (and for how much else has he found time as well!) not only to

translate Homer, but also to vindicate his very existence. Professor

Murray can turn his rare faculty of sympathetic insight now to the

reinterpretation of the music of Euripides, and now to the analysis of

the elemental forces that combine and crystallize in the Greek epic.

Principal Jevons is famous for his brilliant suggestions in regard

to the early history of religion; but he has also laboured in the

cause of European archaeology, and his edition of Plutarch’s _Romane

Questions_ is very precious to the student of classical antiquities.

Professor Myres, whilst he teaches Greek language and literature as the

modern man would have them taught, and is a learned archaeologist to

boot, yet can have no greater title to our respect than that, of many

devoted helpers, he did the most to organize an effective school of

Anthropology in the University of Oxford. Finally, Mr. Warde Fowler,

living embodiment as he is in the eyes of all his friends of the

Humaner Letters, both is the historian of the Graeco-Roman city-state,

and can wield the comparative method so as to extort human meaning from

ancient Rome’s stately, but somewhat soulless, rites. Unless, then,

dual personality of some dissociated and morbid type is to be

attributed to these distinguished men, they can scarcely fail, being

anthropologists and humanists at once, to carry on nicely concerted

operations from both sides of their subject, just as the clever

engineer can set to work on his tunnel from both sides of the mountain.

It is but fair to add, however, that in the present case the first move

has been made from the anthropological side. The six lectures composing

this volume were delivered during the Michaelmas Term of 1908, at the

instance of the Committee for Anthropology, which from the outset of

its career has kept steadily in view the need of inducing classical

scholars to study the lower culture as it bears upon the higher.

Anthropology, to be sure, must often divert its attention to lines of

development branching off in many a direction from the track of advance

that leads past Athens and Rome. For us, however, and consequently

for our science, the latter remains the central and decisive path of

social evolution. In short, the general orientation of Anthropology, it

would seem, must always be towards the dawn of what Lecky so happily

describes as ‘the European epoch of the human mind’.

Lastly, a word may be said in explanation of the title chosen.

‘Anthropology and the Classics’ is exactly suited to express that

conjunction of interests of which mention has already been made--the

conjunction so perfectly exemplified by the life-work of each

contributor to the volume. But some myopic critic might contend that,

however well fitted to indicate the scope of the work as a whole, the

title hardly applies to this or that essay taken by itself. It surely

matters little if this be so; yet is it so? Dr. Evans’s lecture is

introductory. To gather impetus for our imaginative leap into the

classical period we start, it is true, from the cave-man, but have

already crossed the threshold in arriving at the Cretan. Homer, Hesiod,

Herodotus--the claims of these to rank as classics are not likely to

be assailed. There remain the Roman subjects, magic and lustration. In

what sense are they classical? Now, to use the language of biology,

whereas Greek literature is congenital, Roman literature is in large

part acquired. Therefore it includes no ‘songs before sunrise’; for

it the ‘father of history’ cannot be born again. Spirit no less than

form is an importation. In particular, the magico-religious beliefs

of Latium have lost their hold on the imitator of Greece and the

Orient. Yet primal nature will out; and the Romans, moreover, were a

pious people who loved to dwell on their _origines_. To appreciate the

greatest of Latin classics, Virgil--to glance no further afield--one

must at least have gained the right to greet him as fellow-antiquary.

For the rest, these essays profess to be no more than _vindemiatio

prima_, a first gleaning. When the harvest has been fully gathered in,

it will then be time to say, in regard to the classics both of Greece

and of Rome, how far the old lives on in the new, how far what the

student in his haste is apt to label ‘survival’ stands for a force

still tugging at the heart-strings of even the most sophisticated and

lordly heir of the ages.

Anthropology and the Classics Six Lectures Delivered Before the University of Oxford · 第 5 / 26 题