NO. 1.--ENGLAND.

Of the early history of England nothing is known. It was, however, invaded

by the _Normans_; but whether they were any relations of the once

celebrated _Norman_ the pantaloon, we have no authentic record. The

kingdom had at one time seven kings--two of whom were probably the two

well-known kings of Brentford. Perhaps, also, the king of Little Britain

made a third; while old king Cole may have constituted a fourth; thus

leaving only a trifling balance of three to be accounted for.

Alfred the Great is supposed to have been originally a baker, from his

having undertaken the task of watching the cakes in the neat-herd's oven;

and Edward the Black Prince was probably a West Indian, who found his way

to our hospitable shores at an early period.

We now come to King John, who ascended the throne after putting out his

nephew's eyes with a pair of curling-irons, and who is the first English

Sovereign who attempted to write his own name; for the scrawl is evidently

something more than his mark, which is attached to Magna Charta.

We need say nothing of Richard the Third, with whom all our play-going

friends are familiar, and who made the disgraceful offer, if Shakspeare is

to be believed, of parting with the whole kingdom for a horse, though it

does not appear that the disreputable bargain was ever completed.

The wars of York and Lancaster, which, though not exactly _couleur de

rose_, were on the subject of white and red roses (that is to say, China

and cabbage), united the crown in the person of Henry the Seventh, known

to the play-going public as the Duke of Richmond, and remarkable for

having entered the country by the Lincolnshire fens; for he talks of

having got into "the bowels of the land" immediately on his arrival.

Henry the Eighth, as everybody knows, was the husband of seven wives, and

gave to Mr. Almar (the Sadler's Wells Stephens) the idea of his beautiful

dramatic poem of the Wife of Seven Husbands.

Elizabeth's reign is remarkable for having produced a mantle which is worn

at the present day, it having been originally made for one Shakspeare; but

it is now worn by Mr. George Stephens, for whom, however, it is a palpable

misfit, and it sits upon him most awkwardly.

Charles the First had his head cut off, and Mr. Cathcart acted him so

naturally in Miss Mitford's play that one would have thought the monarch

was entirely without a head all through the tragedy.

Cromwell next obtained the chief authority. This man was a brewer, who did

not think "small beer" of himself, and inundated his country with "heavy

wet," in the shape of tears, for a long period.

Charles the Second, well known as the merry monarch, is remarkable only

for his profligacy, and for the number of very bad farces in which he has

been the principal character. His brother James had a short reign, but not

a merry one. He is the only English sovereign who may be said to have

_amputated his bludgeon_; which, if we were speaking of an ordinary man

and not a monarch, we should have rendered by the familiar phrase of "cut

his stick," a process which was soon performed by his majesty.

The crown now devolved upon William and Mary, upon whom half-a crown

a-piece was thus settled by the liberality of Parliament. William was

_Prince of Orange_, a descendant probably of the great King _Pippin_.

Anne of Denmark comes next on our list, but of her we shall say nothing;

and as the Georges who followed her are so near own time, we shall

observe, with regard to them, an equally impenetrable mystery.

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 1, October 2, 1841 · 第 25 / 65 题