MANDEVILLE; OUR FIRST TRAVELLER.

Mandeville was the Bruce of the fourteenth century, as often calumniated

and even ridiculed. The most ingenuous of voyagers has been condemned as

an idle fabulist; the most cautious, as credulous to fatuity; and the

volume of a genuine writer, which has been translated into every

European language, has been formally ejected from the collection of

authentic travels. His truest vindication will be found by comprehending

him; and to be acquainted with his character, we must seek for him in

his own age.

At a period when Europe could hardly boast of three leisurely wayfarers

stealing over the face of the universe; when the Orient still remained

but a Land of Faery, and "the map of the world" was yet unfinished; at a

time when it required a whole life to traverse a space which three years

might now terminate, Sir JOHN MANDEVILLE set forth to enter unheard-of

regions. Returning home, after an absence of more than thirty years, he

discovered a "mervayle" strange as those which he loved to record--that

he was utterly forgotten by his friends!

He had returned "maugre himself," for four-and-thirty years had not

satiated his curiosity; his noble career had submitted to ordinary

infirmities--to gout and the aching of his limbs; these, he lamentably

tells, had "defined the end of my labour against my will, God knoweth!"

The knight in this pilgrimage of life seems to have contracted a duty

with God, that while he had breath he should peregrinate, and, having

nothing to do at home, be honourable in his generation by his enterprise

over the whole earth. And earnestly he prays "to all the _readers_ and

_hearers_ of my book," (for "hearers" were then more numerous than

"readers,") "to say for him a _Pater-Noster_ with an _Ave-Maria_." He

wrote for "solace in his wretched rest;" but the old passion, the

devotion of his soul, finally triumphed over all arthritic pangs. The

globe evidently was his true home; and thus Liege, and not London,

received the bones of an unwearied traveller, whose thoughts were ever

passing beyond the equator.

With us, to whom an excursion to "the Londe of Promyssioun or of Behest"

has sometimes arisen out of a morning engagement--we who impelled by

steam go "whither we list," with those billets which might serve as

letters of recommendation in the steppes of Tartary,--we may wonder how

our knight, who would not win his way by the arts of commerce, like his

predecessor Marco Polo, bore up his chivalry; for in his traversing he

had nothing to offer but his honourable sword, and probably his medical

science, which might be sometimes as perilous. But difficulties

insuperable to us could not enter into the emotions, nor were they the

accidents which impeded the traveller, "who, on the day of St. Michael,

in the year of our Lord 1322, passed the sea, and went the way to

Hierusalem, and to behold the mervayles of Inde." A deep religious

emotion, an obscure indefinite curiosity, and a courageous decision to

wander wherever the step of man could press on the globe, to tell the

world "the mervayles" it unconsciously holds within its orb, were the

inspiration of a journey which stood next in solemnity to a departure to

the world of spirits. Sir John had prepared himself, for he was learned

not only in languages, but in authentic romance, and in romantic

history; and he honestly resolved to tell all "the mervayles" which he

had seen, and those which he had not; and these last were not the least.

Sir John Mandeville's probity remains unimpeached; for the accuracy of

whatever he relates from his own personal observation has been confirmed

by subsequent travellers. On his return to Europe he hastened to Rome to

submit his book to the Pope, and to "his wise council," and "those

learned men of all nations who dwell at that court." The volume was

critically reviewed; and his holiness "ratified and confirmed my book in

all points," by referring to an account in Latin: this account was

probably written by some missionary; Rubriquis had been dispatched on an

unsuccessful mission to Christianize the great Khan of Tartary in 1230;

or it was the writings of Marco Polo, which could not be unknown at

Rome. In that day all real information was consigned to the fugitive

manuscript, partially known, and often subject to the interpolations and

capricious alterations of its possessor, and what sometimes occurred, to

the silent plagiarisms of other writers--of which even Mandeville

himself has been suspected.

The Pope decreed that not only all that Mandeville related was

veracious, but that the Latin book which his holiness possessed

contained _much more_, and from whence the Mappa Mundi had been made.

Indeed Mandeville has himself told us that he wrote only from his

recollections as they "would come into his mind;" these necessarily were

often broken and obscure. Some "mervayles" remained unrecorded, and

hereafter were to be "more plainly told;" but I fear these are lost for

us.

In this "true" book we find many things very untrue, but we may doubt

whether any in that day were as positive in this opinion. The author

himself designed no imposition on his readers; he tells us what he

believed; part of which he had seen and the rest he had heard, and

sometimes had transcribed from sources deemed by him authentic. Who can

suspect the knight of spotless honour, and whose piety would not

relinquish his _Ave-Marias_ for a dominion? Having fought during two

years under the ensign of the Sultan of Egypt, and being offered in

marriage the Sultan's daughter and a province, he refused both, when his

Christianity was to be exchanged for Mahometanism.

This was a period when the marvellous never weakened the authenticity of

a tale. The mighty tome of Pliny, that awful repository of all the

errors of antiquity, and other writers of equal name, detail prodigies

and legends, and so do the Fathers. Who would not have rejoiced to

transcribe Pliny or St. Austen? Who imagined that all the delectable

adventures of the romances, over which they passed many a dreamy day,

with the very names of the personages and the very places where they

occurred, were solely chimeras of the brain? The learned Mandeville was

evidently not one of these sceptics: for he observes, that "the trees of

the sun and of the moon are well known to have spoken to King

Alisaundre, and warned him of his death." The unquestioned fact is in

that famed romance; and others might be referred to if we required

additional authority. I have read of these talking trees of the sun and

moon in _Guarino detto il Meschino_, who lived a year among them to

learn his own genealogy, and then was graceless enough to laugh at

these timber-oracles. Mandeville forgot not in the island of Lango, not

distant from Crete, the legend of the unfortunate "Lady of the Land,"

who remained a dragoness, because no one had the hardihood to kiss her

lips to disenchant her. He tells likewise of the Faery Lady who guarded

the sparrow-hawk; whoever ventured to assist that lady during three days

and nights, was rewarded by the boon of having whatever he wished. A

king who, not wanting anything, had the audacity to wish to have the

lady herself, was fairly warned that he did not know what he asked, as

happens to the reckless; but, persisting in his absolute will, he

incurred the curse of perpetual war to the last of his race!

We trace such tales among the romances, with all their circumstances;

and some may have reached the listener from the Arabian tale-teller. The

monsters he describes Mandeville never invented; these, human and

animal, he gave as some of his predecessors had done, from Pliny, or

Aelian, or Ctesias,[1] who have sent them down to be engraven in the

Great Nuremberg Chronicle, and adorned in the immortal page of

Shakspeare. Marco Polo had noticed that portentous bird which could lift

an elephant by its claws; he does not tell us that he had seen any bird

of this wing, but we all know where it is to be found--in the Arabian

Tales! Sir Thomas Browne accuses Mandeville of _confirming_ the fabulous

accounts of India by Ctesias; but, in truth, our knight does not

"confirm these refuted notions of antiquity;" he only repeats them, with

the prelude of "men seyn." No one was more honest than Mandeville, for

when he had to describe the locality of paradise, he fairly acknowledges

that "he cannot speak of it properly, for I was not there; it is far

beyond, but as I have _heard say_ of wise men, it is on the highest

part of the earth, nigh to the circle of the moon." However, he has

contrived to describe the wall, which is not of stone, but of moss, with

but a single entrance, "closed with brennynge fyre;" and though no

mortal could enter, yet it was known that there was a well in paradise,

whence flowed the four floods that run through the earth. "Wise men," he

tells us, said this; some of these "wise men" were the Rabbins; and

three centuries afterwards, the accounts of paradise, by a finer genius

than Mandeville, the illustrious Rawleigh, remained much the same.

To explain some of those incredible incidents which occurred to the

author himself might exercise some critical ingenuity. Mandeville's

adventure in "the Valley Perilous," when he saw the Devil's head with

eyes of flame, great plenty of gold and silver, which he was too

frightened to touch, and, moreover, a multitude of dead bodies, as if a

battle had been fought there, might probably be resolved into some

volcanic eruption, the rest supplied by his own horrifying imagination;

for he tells, with great simplicity, "I was more devout then than ever I

was before or after, and all for the dread of fiends that _I saw in

divers figures_;" that is, at the _shapes_ of the disparted rocks. The

travellers were beaten down by tempests, winds, and thunder, which raged

in this pent-up vale. As he marks the locality, the spot may yet be

ascertained.

There was no imposition practised in all such legends; it is we who are

startled by the supernatural in a personal narrative; but in the

fourteenth century the more wonderful the tale, the more authentic it

appeared, as it sunk into the softest and richest moulds of the most

germinating imagination. The readers, or the hearers, were as well

prepared to believe, as the writers prompt to gather up, their fictions.

Collections of "Mirabilia Mundi," "Wonders," were a fashionable title

applied to any single country, as well as to the world--to England or

Ireland, to the Holy Land or the Indies. The "Mirabilia" might be the

running title for a whole system of geography. The age of imagination

has long been unfurnished of all its ingenious garniture, and yet we

still catch at some evanescent hour of fancy susceptible of those

ancient delights. We have lost something for which we have no

substitute. Would not the modern novelist rejoice in the privilege of

intermingling supernatural inventions to break the level of his

every-day incidents and his trivial passions so soon forgotten? But that

glowing day has set, leaving none of its ethereal hues in our cold

twilight. Mandeville may still be read for those wild arabesques which

so long unjustly proved fatal to his authentic narrative. His simplicity

often warrants its truth; he assures us that Jerusalem is placed in the

middle of the earth, because when he stuck his staff in the ground,

exactly at noon, it cast no shadow; and having ascertained the spherical

form of the globe, he marvels how the antipodes, whose feet are right

upwards towards us, yet do not fall into the firmament! When he

describes the elegant ornaments of "a vine made of gold that goeth all

about the hall, with many bunches of grapes, some white, and the red

made of rubies," he tells what he had seen in some divan; but when he

records that "the Emperor hath in his chamber a pillar of gold, in which

is a ruby and carbuncle a foot long, which lighteth all his chamber by

night," it may be questioned whether this carbuncle be anything more

than an Arabian fancy, a tale to which he had listened. Some of his

ocular marvels have been confirmed by no questionable authority.

Mandeville's description of a magical exhibition before the Khan of

Tartary is a remarkable instance of the strange optical illusions of the

scenical art, and the adroitness of the Indian jugglers--a similar scene

appears in a recent version of the autobiography of the Emperor Akber.

What seemed the spells of magic to the Europeans of that age, and of

which some marvellous descriptions were brought to Europe by the

crusaders or the pilgrims, and embellished the romances, our exquisite

masques and our grand pantomimes have realized. Three centuries were to

elapse ere the court of England could rival the necromancy of the court

of Tartary.

Mandeville first composed his travels in the Latin language, which he

afterwards translated into French, and lastly out of French into

English, that "every man of my nation may understand it." We see the

progressive estimation of the languages by this curious statement which

Mandeville has himself given. The author first secured the existence of

his work in a language familiar to the whole European world; the French

was addressed to the politer circles of society; and the last language

the author cared about was the vernacular idiom, which, at that time the

least regarded, required all the patriotism of the writer in this

devotion of his pen.

Copies of these travels were multiplied till they almost equalled in

number those of the Scriptures; now we may smile at the "mervayles" of

the fourteenth century, and of Mandeville, but it was the spirit of

these intrepid and credulous minds which has marched us through the

universe. To the children of imagination perhaps we owe the

circumnavigation of the globe and the universal intercourse of

nations.[2]

Amenities of Literature Consisting of Sketches and Characters of English Literature · 第 106 / 272 题