XI. Conclusion.

The resemblances, homologies, and metamorphoses existing everywhere

among animal forms are, therefore, evidence of the most logical

consanguinities. It is all so perfectly plain. The structures of

organic beings have come about as a result of the action and

reaction of environment upon these structures. Every being—and not

only every being, but every species, the whole organic world—has

come to be what it is as a result of the incessant hammerings of its

surroundings, the hammerings not only of the present, but of the

long-stretching past. By surroundings is meant, of course, the rest

of the universe. Those animals belonging to the same stock resemble

each other because they have been subjected to the same experiences,

the same series of selections. They have lain on the same great

anvil, and felt the down-comings of the same sledge. The

similarities among animal forms in general indicate relationships,

just as the similarities among the races of men indicate racial

consanguinities. All men belong to the human species because they

are all fundamentally alike. But there are differences in the

character of the hair, in the colour of the skin, in the

conformation of the skull, and in the structure of the language,

among the different varieties of the species, indicating striking

variety in relationship and origin. An eminent biologist has said

that if Negroes and Caucasians were snails they would be classed as

entirely distinct species of animals. Whether, as is thought by

some, the woolly-haired races are the descendants of the African

anthropoids, and the straight-haired varieties are the posterity of

the orangs and gibbons, we may never know positively. But we do know

that these two great branches of mankind must have different

genealogies, extending to a remote antiquity, and that the varieties

belonging to each great group sustain to each other the relations of

a common kinship. Englishmen look like each other, act like each

other, and speak the same language. So do Frenchmen and Swedes and

Chinese. Every people is peculiar. This is not the result of

accident or agreement, but the result of law. Mongolians do not all

have short heads, yellow faces, slanting eyes, and prominent malars

because they have agreed to have them, but as a result of a common

pedigree. Similarity of structure implies commonalty of origin, and

commonalty of origin means consanguinity.

And this is true whether you contemplate the featural resemblances

of brothers and sisters of the same human parent, or those more

fundamental characteristics which distinguish species, orders, and

sub-kingdoms. All animals are composed of protoplasm, which is a

compound of clay, because all animals are descended from the same

first parents, protoplasmic organisms evolved out of the elemental

ooze. All vertebrates have nerve-filled backbones with two pairs of

ventrally branching limbs, because the original ancestors of the

vertebrates had nerve-filled backbones with two pairs of ventrally

branching limbs. Insects individually evolve from worms because

worms are their phylogenetic fathers and mothers. Man has hands and

a vertical spine, and walks on his hind-limbs, not because he was

fashioned in the image of a god, but because his ancestors lived

among the trees. The habit of using the posterior limbs for

locomotion, and the anterior for prehension, and the resulting

perpendicular, are peculiarities developed by our simian ancestors

wholly on account of the incentives to such structure and posture

afforded by aboreal life. These peculiarities would not likely have

been acquired by quadrupeds living upon and taking their food from a

perfectly level and treeless plain. If there had been no forests on

the earth, therefore, there would have been no incentive to the

perpendicular, and the ‘human form divine’ would have been

inconceivably different from what it is to-day. And if fishes had

had three serial pairs of limbs instead of two, and their posterity

had inherited them, as they certainly would have had the foresight

to do if they had had the opportunity, the highest animals on the

earth to-day, the ‘paragons of creation,’ would probably be

two-handed quadrupeds (centaurs) instead of two-handed bipeds. And

much more efficient and ideal individuals they would have been in

every way than the rickety, peculiar, unsubstantial plantigrades

who, by their talent to talk, have become the masters of the

universe, and, by their imaginations, ‘divine.’

Kinship is universal. The orders, families, species, and races of

the animal kingdom are the branches of a gigantic arbour. Every

individual is a cell, every species is a tissue, and every order is

an organ in the great surging, suffering, palpitating process. Man

is simply one portion of the immense enterprise. He is as veritably

an animal as the insect that drinks its little fill from his veins,

the ox he goads, or the wild-fox that flees before his bellowings.

Man is not a god, nor in any imminent danger of becoming one. He is

not a celestial star-babe dropped down among mundane matters for a

time and endowed with wing possibilities and the anatomy of a deity.

He is a mammal of the order of primates, not so lamentable when we

think of the hyena and the serpent, but an exceedingly discouraging

vertebrate compared with what he ought to be. He has come up from

the worm and the quadruped. His relatives dwell on the prairies and

in the fields, forests, and waves. He shares the honours and

partakes of the infirmities of all his kindred. He walks on his

hind-limbs like the ape; he eats herbage and suckles his young like

the ox; he slays his fellows and fills himself with their blood like

the crocodile and the tiger; he grows old and dies, and turns to

banqueting worms, like all that come from the elemental loins. He

cannot exceed the winds like the hound, nor dissolve his image in

the mid-day blue like the eagle. He has not the courage of the

gorilla, the magnificence of the steed, nor the plaintive innocence

of the ring-dove. Poor, pitiful, glory-hunting hideful! Born into a

universe which he creates when he comes into it, and clinging, like

all his kindred, to a clod that knows him not, he drives on in the

preposterous storm of the atoms, as helpless to fashion his fate as

the sleet that pelts him, and lost absolutely in the somnambulism of

his own being.

The Universal Kinship · 第 31 / 53 题