VI. The Meaning of Homology.

The similarities and homologies of structure existing between man

and other animals, and between other animals and still others, are

not accidental and causeless. They are not resemblances scattered

arbitrarily among the multitudinous forms of life by the capricious

levities of chance. That all animals commence existence as an egg

and are all made up of cells composed of the same protoplasmic

substance, and all inhale oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide, and are

all seeking pleasure and seeking to avoid pain, are more than

ordinary facts. They are filled with inferences. That vertebrate

animals, differing in externals as widely as herring and Englishmen,

are all built according to the same fundamental plan, with

marrow-filled backbones and exactly two pairs of limbs branching in

the same way, is an astonishing coincidence. That the wing of the

bird, the foreleg of the dog, the flipper of the whale, and the

fore-limb of the toad and crocodile, have essentially the same bones

as the human arm has is a fact which may be without significance to

blind men, but to no one else. The metamorphosis of the frog from a

fish, of the insect from a worm, and of a poet from a senseless

cell, are transformations simply marvellous in meaning. And it is

not easy, since Darwin, to understand how such lessons could remain

long unintelligible, even to stones and simpletons. Not many

generations have passed, however, since these revelations, now so

distinct and wonderful, fell on the listless minds of men as

ineffectually as the glories of the flower fall on the sightless

sockets of the blind.

It is hardly two generations since the highest intelligences on the

earth conceived that not only the different varieties of men—the

black, the white, and the orange—but all the orders and genera of

the animal world, and not only animals, but plants, had all been

somehow simultaneously and arbitrarily brought into existence in

some indistinct antiquity, and that they had from the beginning all

existed with practically the same features and in approximately the

same conditions as those with which and in which they are found

to-day. The universe was conceived to be a fixed and stupid

something, born as we see it, incapable of growth, and indulging in

nothing but repetitions. There were no necessary coherencies and

consanguinities, no cosmical tendencies operating eternally and

universally. All was whimsical and arbitrary. It was not known that

anything had grown or evolved. All things were believed to have been

given beginning and assigned to their respective places in the

universe by a potential and all-clever creator. The serpent was

limbless because it had officiously allowed Eve to include in her

dietary that which had been expressly forbidden. The quadruped

walked with its face towards the earth as a structural reminder of

its subjection to the biped, who was supposed to be especially

skilled in keeping his eyes rolled heavenward. The flowers flung out

their colours, not for the benefit of the bugs and bees, and the

stars paraded, not because they were moved to do so by their own

eternal urgings, but because man had eyes capable of being affected

by them. Man was an erect and featherless vertebrate because his

hypothetical maker was erect and featherless. (I wonder whether, if

a clam should conceive a creator, it would have the magnanimity to

make him an insect or a vertebrate, or anything other than a great

big clam.)

The Universal Kinship · 第 25 / 53 题