Chapter 798 of the Laws of 1911 constitute Sections 304 and 305 of the

Agricultural Law, under which this Department has been working for

several years for the control of such insects as are distributable by

nursery stock, and for the preventing of the establishment in the state

of dangerously injurious insect pests and fungous diseases. If the

Department were to attempt to control the hickory bark borer, it would

require a character of work quite different from anything that we have

undertaken for the reason that this insect would not likely be

distributed in nursery stock. It is an insect that is not only a native

of the country but is quite widely distributed over the state and is one

that is given to irregular periodic outbreaks. Of late its depredations

have shown seriously in the vicinity of New York along the Hudson Valley

and at numerous places in the state. The pest is not amenable to such

treatment as can be used against many other deleterious insects. I am

informed that the only way now known to control the insect is to first

locate it and then destroy all trees or parts of trees in which the

grubs are found before the middle of June. It appears to me that to

attempt the suppression of the hickory bark borer, it would require a

very large force of men and, of course, considerable money.

Relative to the chestnut bark disease, we had a conference at this

office in the month of October last and the question was discussed by

botanists and foresters from adjoining states and the whole matter was

thoroughly thrashed out by those who were present, including

representatives of the United States Department of Agriculture,

Washington. Invitations have been received from the Governor of

Pennsylvania to a conference to be held at Harrisburg on February 20th

and 21st and I have directed a representative of this Department to be

present.

Mr. C. H. Pettis, Superintendent of Forests of the State Conservation

Commission, joined in our conference here and I learn that someone will

be sent from that Commission to Harrisburg.

We have in the hickory bark borer and the chestnut bark disease, two

very serious propositions, the importance of which I fully appreciate.

It is not clear to me what methods should or can be adopted which will

be productive of the greatest good.

Any suggestions that your Association make will be highly appreciated.

As soon as I learn of the result of the conclusions at the Harrisburg

meeting, I shall be pleased to take the subject up again.

Very truly yours,

CALVIN J. HUSON,

Commissioner.

LETTER FROM THE SECRETARY TO COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE.

March 16th, 1912.

Hon. Calvin J. Huson,

Commissioner of Agriculture,

Albany, New York.

Dear Sir:--

Your letter of February 7th in reply to mine of an earlier date in

relation to the hickory bark beetle has been too long unanswered owing

to a rush of professional and other work. I regret this delay as I would

like to do all that I can to expedite the work which should be done as

soon as possible to prevent further damage from this insect.

If I am not mistaken Chapter 798 of the laws of 1911 is a new law under

which the Department has not previously worked and which states

specifically that "no person shall knowingly or willfully keep any

plants or vines affected or infected with--or other insect pest or

fungous disease dangerously injurious to or destructive of the trees,

shrubs or other plants; every such tree, shrub, plant or vine shall be a

public nuisance, etc." It also states that if the Commissioner of

Agriculture is notified of the presence of any such pests he shall take

such action as the law provides, and the law provides for the

destruction or treatment of diseased trees.

This law appears to be not confined in its application to nursery stock,

and in this view I am supported by such men as Dr. E. P. Felt, State

Entomologist, and Forester Merkel of the New York Zoological Park. It

appears that the Commissioner of Agriculture not only has the right but

it is his duty to take action under this law when his attention is

called to a matter such as the one in question.

The methods of procedure under this law seem to be sufficiently clear.

Wherever infected trees are known to exist the Commissioner is directed

to order the owners thereof to destroy them. Failure to obey these

orders constitutes a misdemeanor and the Commissioner may have his

orders carried out by his own agents.

I am glad that you fully appreciate the serious nature of this pest

which threatens great destruction of one of our most valuable timber and

nut trees and I hope that no obstacle will be allowed to stand in the

way of the enforcement of the full intent of the law.

This Association will aid such work in any way in its power.

I would like to call to your attention a report in the Yearbook of the

U. S. Department of Agriculture for 1903, page 317, of the successful

treatment of an outbreak of this pest at Detroit, Michigan. Also to an

address to be published in the transactions of this Association, a copy

of which I will send you, by Prof. Herrick in which he recounts the

successful treatment of another outbreak.

April 3, 1912.

W. C. Deming, M. D.,

Sec., Northern Nut Growers' Association,

Westchester, New York City.

Dear Sir:--

I am in receipt of your communication of the 16th of March, and have

considered carefully the question of what can be done towards the

control of the hickory bark beetle. As this is a species which at

irregular intervals becomes abundant and capable of doing considerable

local damage, yet I am inclined to think that so far as the Department

of Agriculture can exercise any control, the hickory bark beetle should

be classed among such pests as in a way have like habits of injury, such

for instance as the apple tent caterpillar, forest tent caterpillar,

green maple worm, fruit tree bark beetle, pine bark beetle, and other

thoroughly established native and introduced species, all of which exert

injuries at irregular intervals and then disappear. The hickory bark

beetle suggests one of the problems which is difficult to handle, and it

does not seem that much can be accomplished in a practical way by

starting an agitation on the subject. The entomologist of the New York

Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, says that the insect is common

around Geneva, and nearly every season an occasional tree succumbs to

its work. He further says that he believes that hickory trees have some

time in the past suffered from either a severe winter or drought, and

that the shot-hole borer is attacking the weakened trees.

Owing to wide distribution, I do not see how I can direct a campaign

against this particular insect at this time for the lack of funds. The

appropriations at my disposal under Sections 304-305 of the Agricultural

Law, are scarcely adequate for the large amount of work which has

already been started, and which, owing to its nature, must be kept up

and finished each season.

It is my opinion that general publicity would result in accomplishing

much, if individual owners were informed how necessary it is to seek out

and destroy the dead trees before the 1st of June, in order to prevent

the insects attacking healthy trees adjoining. The habits of these

insects are thoroughly known and their life histories have been worked

out by our entomologists, and very definite information can be given for

the control of the hickory bark borer.

Very truly yours,

CALVIN J. HUSON,

Commissioner.

RESOLUTIONS PASSED AT THE CONFERENCE CALLED BY THE GOVERNOR OF

PENNSYLVANIA AT HARRISBURG FEB. 20 AND 21 FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF THE

MEASURES TO BE TAKEN TO CONTROL THE CHESTNUT-TREE BARK DISEASE:

WHEREAS this Conference recognizes the great importance of the chestnut

tree as one of our most valuable timber assets, having an estimated

value of not less than $400,000,000, and

WHEREAS a most virulent fungous disease has made its appearance in wide

sections of the chestnut timber region, and already many millions of

dollars of damage has been sustained, and the total extinction of the

chestnut tree is threatened by the rapid spread of this disease, and

WHEREAS we recognize the importance of prompt action.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:

That the thanks of this Conference are tendered to Governor Tener for

calling it, and for the courtesies he has shown

That we appreciate the interest of the President of the United States as

evidenced by his communication to Governor Tener, showing as it does,

that the head of the National Government is not unmindful of the great

danger presented by the Chestnut Blight problem.

That the Commission appointed by the Governor of Pennsylvania be

commended for the earnestness and diligence they have shown in the

conduct of their work.

That we urge the National Government, the States and the Dominion of

Canada to follow the example of Pennsylvania, which is analogous to that

of Massachusetts in starting the fight against the gypsey moth, and

appropriate an amount sufficient to enable their proper authorities to

cope with the disease where practicable.

That we favor the bill now before Congress appropriating $80,000 for the

use of the U. S. Department of Agriculture in Chestnut Bark Disease

work, and urge all States to use every means possible to aid in having

this bill become a law at the earliest moment.

That we believe trained and experienced men should be employed in field

and laboratory to study the diseases in all its phases.

That we believe definite boundaries should be established where

advisable in each State beyond which limits an endeavor should be made

to stamp out the disease.

That we believe an efficient and strong quarantine should be maintained

and that it should be the earnest effort of every state, the Federal

Government and the Dominion of Canada to prevent the spread of the

disease within and beyond their borders. In accord with this thought we

strongly commend the efforts being made to pass the Simmons bill now

before Congress.

That we believe strong efforts should be made in all States to stimulate

the utilization of chestnut products, and in order to do so, we

recommend that the Interstate Commerce Commission permit railroads and

other transportation companies to name low freight rates so that

chestnut products not liable to spread the disease may be properly

distributed.

That we recommend the National Government, each State and the Dominion

of Canada to publish practical, concise and well illustrated bulletins

for educating owners of chestnut trees.

That we believe further meetings on the line of this Conference

advisable and we hope the Pennsylvania Commission will arrange for

similar meetings.

That we thank the State of Pennsylvania for its intention to publish

immediately the proceedings of this Conference.

That copies of these resolutions be forwarded to the President of the

United States, to the Governor of every State, to the Governor General

of the Dominion of Canada, and the members of the Federal and State

legislatures, with the request that they do all in their power to aid in

checking the ravages of this dread disease.

* * * * *

WHITE'S

BUDDING TOOL

(PATENTED APRIL 1905)

PECANS, HICKORIES, CHESTNUTS

WALNUTS, PERSIMMONS

And all other trees

$2.75 DELIVERED

_A Scientific Instrument for the Propagation of the Pecan and other

Trees by the Annular, Semi-annular, Patch and Veneer Methods._

FOR SALE BY

HERBERT C. WHITE

DE WITT, GA.

* * * * *

Grafted and Budded Pecans and Catalpa Speciosa

The Ohio Valley Forest Nurseries of Lake, Indiana, is engaged in growing

forest tree seedlings of all kinds, but make a specialty of Catalpa

Speciosa seeds and seedlings that are true to name.

We are also engaged in the propagation of trees from the best varieties

of Northern Pecans found in the states of Indiana, Illinois and

Kentucky. Our supply of budded and grafted Pecan trees is limited at

this time, but we hope to be able to fill all orders by fall of 1912.

If interested in Pecan trees that will grow and bear nuts in the North,

write us for further information and prices.

R. L. McCoy, Proprietor;

Lake, Spencer Co., Indiana

* * * * *

Hardy Pecan and Walnut Trees

We grow hardy varieties of Pecans and Persian (English) Walnuts under

northern conditions for northern planting. Varieties of Pecans

introduced by us won all the premiums offered on Pecans in the Morris

Competition, at the December convention of Northern Nut Growers, Cornell

University, 1911. We are the pioneers in the growing of hardy pecan

trees. You get the benefit of our wide experience extending over several

years when you plant "Arrowfield" trees.

Our Persian (English) Walnut trees are of hardy northern types, budded

on black walnut stocks.

We shall have some unusually fine specimens for next season Let us book

your order, select some fine trees for you and bring them to prime

condition for delivery at such date as you may designate.

Write for our booklet "Nut Trees". It contains information that will

interest you.

ARROWFIELD NURSERIES

Box N, Petersburg, Va.

* * * * *

Get a Copy

The American Fruit and Nut Journal, of Petersburg, Va., is a bi-monthly

publication covering every phase of the Nut Industry from the Festek of

Greece and Assyria to the Chestnut, Almond, Walnut and Pecan of America.

It is ably edited, fully illustrated and handsomely printed.

If you want full, accurate, reliable information pertaining to every

phase of Nut Growing--varieties, cultures, insects, harvesting,

selling--If you want a practical paper that interests, inspires and

informs, read this Journal.

_Subscription price, one year, one dollar; three years, two dollars.

Write now for a sample copy._

American Fruit and Nut Journal

PETERSBURG VIRGINIA

* * * * *

NUT TREES

Why not plant NUT TREES about the home and combine profit with ornament

and shade. You may not need the revenue, but you will certainly enjoy

the nuts, if you plant Jones' budded and grafted trees. Nurseries at

Jeanerette, La., and Willow Street, Pa.

J. F. JONES

The Nut Tree Specialist Willow Street, Pa.

Northern Nut Growers Association Report of the Proceedings at the Second Annual Meeting Ithaca, New York, December 14 and 15, 1911 · 第 13 / 13 段