CHAPTER LIX.

NOTES ON EUROPE.

In the articles written on the different European nations visited

I confined myself to certain subjects, but there are a number of

things worthy of comment which were not germane to the matters

discussed. I shall present some of these under the above head.

An American who travels in England in the winter time is sure to

notice the coldness of the cars. The English people do not seem to

notice this, for if they did the matter would certainly be remedied;

but the stranger who has to wrap up in blankets and keep his feet

upon a tank of hot water makes comparisons between the comfort

of the American railway cars and those of England, much to the

disadvantage of the latter. On the continent the temperature of the

cars is higher and travel more pleasant.

Sheep graze in the very suburbs of London. This was a surprise to

me. I saw more sheep in the little traveling that I did in England

than I have seen in the United States east of the Mississippi River

in years of travel. But after one has enjoyed for a few days the

English mutton chop, the best in the world, he understands why

English sheep are privileged to graze upon high priced lands.

The House of Lords is much more elegantly furnished than Parliament,

but it excites curiosity rather than interest. It, too, is small

compared with the number of Lords; but as the Lords seldom attend,

the accommodations are ample. Only three members are required to

constitute a quorum, and it is easy therefore to get together

enough to acquiesce in measures that pass Parliament. So far as any

real influence is concerned, the House of Lords might as well be

abolished; and as only three are necessary to constitute a quorum,

it would only be necessary to reduce the necessary number by three

and make none a quorum to entirely remove this legislative body from

consideration.

The Courts of England are a matter of interest to American lawyers,

and a matter of curiosity to other Americans. As our Supreme Judges

wear gowns, the gown is not so unfamiliar to us; but the wig, which

is still worn by the English judges, barristers and solicitors,

is not seen in this country. The wig is made of white curly hair

and does not reach much below the ears. "When the wearer has black

hair, or red hair, or in fact hair of any color except, white, the

contrast between the wig and the natural hair sometimes excites

a smile from those who are not impressed with the necessity for

this relic of ancient times. In one of the court rooms which I

visited, a son of Charles Dickens was arguing a case, and while I

did not recognize any of the brilliancy and humor that have led me

to place Dickens at the head of the novelists whom I have read, the

son is said to be a reasonably successful lawyer. In one of the

Admiralty Courts a very bushy headed wharfman was testifying to a

salvage contract which he had made and he was quite emphatic in his

assertions that the terms were "'alf and 'alf."

In one of the court rooms Lord Alverstone was presiding, and I had

the pleasure of meeting him afterwards at dinner in Lincoln Inn

Court. He is one of the finest looking men whom I met in England. He

rendered a decision in favor of the United States in the matter of

the recent arbitration with Canada.

Ambassador Joseph Choate placed me under obligations to him, as did

also Secretary of the Legation Henry White, by their many courtesies

extended.

At Mr. Choate's table I had the pleasure of meeting Right Hon. A.

J. Balfour, the present Premier. He strikes one as a scholarly man

rather than as a parliamentary fighter. He has had a remarkable

official career. As he was and is still a bimetallist, I found him a

congenial man to have at my right. Mr. Richie, who left the Cabinet

because of a disagreement with Mr. Balfour on the fiscal question,

sat at my left, and as he was an ardent opponent of protection, I

had no trouble conversing with him. I learned afterwards that Mr.

Balfour and Mr. Richie had not met since the Cabinet rupture. Among

those present at the table was Hon. Leonard Courtney, for many years

a member of Parliament. He was a member of the Royal Commission

that presented the now world renowned report on falling prices. He

also took an active part in opposing the war against the Boers.

In appearance he reminds one of Senator Allen G. Thurman, having

something of the same strength and ruggedness of feature. I am

indebted to him for an opportunity to visit Lincoln Inn Court, where

I met a number of other eminent judges besides Lord Alverstone.

Mr. Moreton Frewen was also a guest of Ambassador Choate on that

occasion. He has frequently visited the United States and has

written much on the subject of silver. When he came to the United

States soon after the election in 1896, and was told that there

had been some repeating in some of the cities, he inquired, "Is

it not twice as honest to vote twice for honest money as to vote

once?" I found, however, that he was working with the Chamberlain

protectionists, who, by the way, call themselves "tariff reformers."

He had found a Bible passage which he was using on the stump. It

was taken from Genesis. Pharaoh said to someone who inquired of him,

"Go unto Joseph; what he saith to you, do." It seems, however, from

the more recent elections, that the people have refused to identify

the modern Joseph with the ancient one.

At Mr. Choate's table the subject of story telling was discussed,

and some comment made about the proverbial slowness of the

Englishman in catching the point of American stories. I determined

to test this with a story and told of the experience of the minister

who was arguing against the possibility of perfection in this life.

He asked his congregation: "Is there anyone here who is perfect?" No

one arose. "Is there anyone in the congregation who has ever seen a

perfect person?" No one arose. Continuing his inquiry, he asked, "Is

there anyone here who has ever heard of a perfect person?" A very

meek little woman arose in the rear of the room. He repeated his

question to be sure that she understood, and as she again declared

that she had heard of such a person, he asked her to give the name

of the perfect person of whom she had heard. She replied, "My

husband's first wife." All the Englishmen at the table saw the point

of the story at once, and one of them remarked that he thought the

story would be appreciated wherever domestic life is known.

It was my good fortune to meet in London Mr. Sidney Webb and his

talented wife, both of whom have written extensively on municipal

ownership and industrial co-operation.

One of the most interesting figures in European journalism is Sir

Alfred Harmsworth, proprietor of the London Daily Mail. He has

achieved a remarkable success and is still a young man. His country

home, some thirty miles out from London, is an old English castle

which he recently secured for a long term of years. The house was

built more than three hundred years ago by one of the kings for a

favorite courtier. The estate is large enough to include farm and

pasture lands and a well stocked hunting preserve. Lady Harmsworth

is one of the most beautiful women in the kingdom and entertains

lavishly.

The average foreigner does not have any higher opinion than the

American does of those "international marriages" by means of

which some of the decaying estates of titled foreigners are being

restored, but there are many marriages between our people and

Europeans which rest upon affection and congeniality. The union

of Rt. Hon. Joseph Chamberlain and the daughter of Ex-Secretary

Endicott, who was at the head of the Navy Department during Mr.

Cleveland's first administration, is a notable illustration. Mrs.

Chamberlain is a charming and accomplished woman and justly popular

with the Britons as well as with the Americans who visit England.

The American tourist is sure to find some of his countrymen

stranded in London. I met several of them. Most of them represented

themselves as related to prominent political friends, and these

I could assist without inquiring too closely into the alleged

relationship, but one case of a different kind failed to appeal to

me. A lady who attached a high sounding title to her name sent her

secretary to solicit aid. He represented her as an American who had

against her parents' wishes married a titled Englishman; her husband

had deserted her and her physician had told her that her health

required that she spend the winter in Southern France. Her American

relatives were rich, I was assured, but she was too proud to let

them know of her misfortune. It was a sad story even when told by a

secretary (how she could afford one I do not know), but I did not

feel justified in encouraging a pride that led her to make her wants

known to strangers rather than to her own kin.

In my article on the growth of municipal ownership (it will be found

on another page), I referred to the work of John Burns, the noted

labor leader of London. I may add here that his seven or eight years

old son is the handsomest child that I saw in England. I was on the

stage at Lord Rosebery's meeting and my attention was attracted to

a child of unusual beauty sitting just in front of me. I asked the

gentleman at my side whether he was a fair sample of the English

boy; he replied that he was an excellent representative. Soon

afterward the mother introduced herself to me as the wife of John

Burns. I thought it an interesting coincidence that I should admire

the child unconscious of his relationship to the man who had the day

before impressed me so favorably.

And, speaking of Mr. Burns, I reproduce below an item which appeared

in one of the London papers the day after I returned Mr. Burns'

call. He sent it to me with the remark that it probably differed

from the personal items to which I was accustomed. It reads:--

"Mr. Burns' Mysterious Visitor.

"Just before ten o'clock this (Friday) morning a hansom cab

(plentifully bespattered with gilt coronets) stopped outside the

residence of Mr. Burns, Lavender Hill. A person alighted and

was received with every appearance of cordiality by Mr. Burns,

who escorted him into the house. We believe the visitor was

Lord Rosebery; he certainly bore a striking resemblance to that

childlike peer. Possibly, however, it was only the King of Italy.

In diplomatic circles it has been known for a long time that his

Italian Majesty intended to visit the Municipal Mecca for much

the same reasons that induced Peter the Great of Russia to come

to England. It was known, also, that he would come in some sort

of disguise. That Mr. Burns' visitor this morning was a person of

importance is evidenced by the fact that a constable in uniform

and two or three other men (probably secret service officers) were

in waiting when the cab drew up. They stood round the visitor and

the constable saluted respectfully. A uniformed policeman had been

in the neighborhood of Mr. Burns' house and the 'Crown' all the

morning."[14]

[14] NOTE--It was an ordinary cab and no policemen or secret service

men were in sight.--Editor.

Westminster Abbey is one of the places which the visitor cannot

well neglect. It was originally the burial place of royalty, and as

the guide shows you the tablets and statues which perpetuate the

memory of warrior kings and tells you how this king killed that one,

and that king killed another, you recall the story of the American

minister who concluded a very short discourse at the funeral of a

man of questionable character by saying, "Some believe that he was

a tolerable good man, while others believe that he was a very bad

man, but whether he was good or bad we have this consolation, that

he is dead." It is a relief to pass from the bloody annals of the

earlier days and from the bloody deeds of ancient royalty to that

part of the building which is honored by memorials of the great men

in modern English life. To the American the most noted of those

recently buried in Westminster Abbey was Gladstone. His life spanned

the present and the past generation, and his character and talents

are regarded as a part of the heritage of English speaking people.

A description of the Art Gallery, the public buildings, the Tower,

and of the many interesting and historic places would occupy more

space than I can spare at this time.

I shall pass from England with one observation. Upon the streets of

London, and in fact throughout the British Isles, the rule is to

"turn to the left." The American notices this at once, and until he

becomes accustomed to it he is in danger of collision. If England

and the United States ever come together in an unfriendly way, it

will probably be accounted for by the difference in our rules. We

will be turning to the right while she will be turning to the left.

Queenstown, Ireland, the first town to greet the tourist when he

reaches Northern Europe and the last to bid him farewell when he

departs, is a quaint and interesting old place. It is near the City

of Cork, and the names upon the signs--the Murphys, the McDonalds,

the O'Briens, etc., are so familiar that one might suppose it to

be an American colony. Here the returning traveler has a chance

to spend any change which he has left, for black thorn canes and

shillalahs, "Robert Emmett" and "Harp of Erin" handkerchiefs and

lace collars are offered in abundance. The price of these wares

has been known to fall considerably as the moment of departure

approaches. At Queenstown one can hear the Irish brogue in all its

richness and if he takes a little jaunt about the town he can enjoy

the humor for which the Irish are famed.

Scotland has a hardy population, due probably to the climate. Even

near the southern boundary, the weather was quite wintry before

Thanksgiving Day of last year. Scotch plaids are in evidence at the

stores and the visitor has an opportunity to buy traveling blankets

bearing the figures and the colors of the various Scottish clans.

As I visited Scotland to study municipal ownership I reserved for a

future trip a visit to the places of natural and historic interest.

Strange that a narrow channel should make such a difference as there

is between the Englishman and the Frenchman. Some one has said,

"not only is England an island, but each Englishman is an island."

This puts the case a little too strongly, but one notices that the

French are much more gregarious than the English and more inclined

to sociability. Their attention to strangers while not more sincere

is more marked.

Paris seems to be the favorite place for residence for Americans who

desire to live in Europe. The climate is milder, the attractions are

more numerous and the cooking, it is said, is the best in the world.

The automobile seems to have captured Paris, possibly because of its

many wide streets and boulevards.

While the tipping system may not be worse in France than in other

countries, it is certainly nowhere more fully developed. It is said

that in some of the fashionable restaurants of Paris the tips are so

valuable that the waiters, instead of receiving wages, pay a bonus

for a chance to serve. But all over Europe service of every kind is

rewarded with tips, and a failure to comply with the custom makes

the delinquent a persona non grata. At the hotels all the attendants

seem to get notice of the intended departure of a guest and they

line up to receive a remembrance--porter, chambermaid, valet,

bell-boy, elevator man, and some whose faces are entirely new to the

guest. The cab-drivers collect the fare fixed by city ordinance and

expect a tip besides. Ten per cent is the amount usually given and

anything less fails to elicit thanks. An Irish jaunting car driver

at Queenstown took out his tip in making change. While the traveler

is often tempted to rebel against the tip system as it is found in

Europe, he finally concludes that he can not reform a continent in

one brief visit and submits with as good grace as possible.

Guides can be found at all the leading hotels and they are well

worth what they charge. They are acquainted with all places of

interest, and can act as interpreters if one wants to make inquiries

or do shopping.

The rivers of Europe which have been immortalized in poetry and

song--the rivers whose names we learn when as children we study

geography--are a little disappointing. The Thames at London, the

Seine at Paris, the Tiber at Rome, the Danube at Vienna, the Spree

at Berlin, the Po in northern Italy, and the Rhine are not as

large as fancy has pictured; but the lakes of Switzerland surpass

description.

I regretted that I could not visit the Bay of Naples for I never

think of it without recalling the lines:

I care not if

My little skiff

Floats swift or slow

From cliff to cliff.

With dreamful eyes

My spirit lies

Under the walls

Of Paradise.

Surely it must be a delightfully restful place if it justifies the

description given by the poet.

I was disappointed that I did not have time to see more of Germany.

Berlin was the only city in which I stopped, and the fact that

the holiday festivities were at their height made it difficult to

prosecute any investigation. In another article I have discussed

the German socialistic propaganda, and I shall here content myself

with calling attention to their railroad system. The total railroad

mileage at the end of the year 1900, as reported by the American

consul, was 28,601. Of this mileage private companies owned 2,573,

and the federal government 798, the remainder was owned by the

various German states, some of the states owning but a few miles of

line. The ownership of the railroads by the various states does not

in the least interfere with the operation of the lines. The plan in

operation in Germany suggests the possibility of state ownership in

this country as distinguished from federal ownership.

In Austria I saw for the first time the systematic cultivation of

forests. In some places the various plantings were near enough

together to show trees of all sizes. At one side the trees were but

a few feet in height while those at the other side of the forest

were being converted into fuel.

Vienna, the capital of Austria, is not the "Old Vienna" which

was reproduced at the Chicago World's Fair and at the Buffalo

Exposition, but is a substantial, new, and up-to-date city. The

stores exhibit an endless variety of leather goods, and I found

there, as also in Belgium, many novelties in iron, steel and brass.

Russia deserves more attention than I could give it in the articles

on Tolstoy and the czar. It is a land of wonderful resources and

possibilities, and is making great progress considering the fact

that a large proportion of the population has so recently emerged

from serfdom. The peasants live in villages as in France and their

life is primitive compared with life in the larger cities. There

has been rapid growth in manufacturing, commerce and art. Besides

furnishing one of the greatest of novelists, Tolstoy, who is also

the greatest of living philosophers, Russia has given to the world

many others who are prominent in literature and in art. There is an

art gallery at Moscow devoted almost entirely to the work of Russian

artists. Here one finds a most interesting collection, a large

number of the pictures being devoted to home scenes and historic

events. In this gallery the nude in art is noticeable by its

absence. In the art gallery at St. Petersburg most of the paintings

are by foreign artists. There is in this gallery a wonderful

collection of cameos, jewelry and precious stones.

I found in Russia a very friendly feeling toward the United States.

Prince Hilkoff, who is at the head of the Siberian railroad, speaks

English fluently, as do nearly all the other prominent officials. He

informed me that he visited the United States about 1858 and crossed

the plains by wagon. He inquired about the Platte river and its

branches and remembered the names of the forts along the route.

I have spoken in another article of the deep hold which the Greek

Church has upon the people of Russia. A story which I heard in St.

Petersburg illustrates this. An American residing there asked her

cook to go to market after some pigeons, or doves as they are more

often called. The latter was horrified at the thought and refused,

saying, "The Holy Ghost descended upon our Saviour in the form of a

dove and it might be in one of these." Another American was rebuked

by her servant, who when told to throw something out of the window

replied, "This is Easter and Christ is risen. He might be passing by

at this moment."

In Russia we find the extremes. The government is the most arbitrary

known among civilized nations and yet in Russia are to be found some

of the most advanced and devoted advocates of civil liberty. Nowhere

is the doctrine of force more fully illustrated and yet from Russia

come the strongest arguments in favor of non-resistance. The poison

and the antidote seem to be found near together in the world of

thought as well as in the physical world.

[Illustration: GODDESS OF LIBERTY IN NEW YORK HARBOR--A WELCOME

SIGHT TO THE RETURNING TRAVELER.]

* * * * *

Transcriber's note:

Minor typographical errors have been corrected without note.

Irregularities and inconsistencies in the text have been retained

as printed including unpaired quotation marks.

The illustrations have been moved so that they do not break up

paragraphs, thus the page number of the illustration might not match

the page number in the List of Illustrations.

Page 163: "which Señor Gregoria Agilpay is the head. Obispo Maximo

Aglipay" ... this stands as printed in the book.

The old world and its ways · 第 59 / 59 章