OUR BOOKING-OFFICE.

(_BY MR. PUNCH'S STAFF OF LEARNED CLERICS._)

In _Forty Days in 1914_ (CONSTABLE), Major-General Sir F. MAURICE does

more than revive our fading recollections of the retreat from Mons and

the marvellous recovery on the Marne. A careful study of the German

documents relating to VON KLUCK'S dash for Paris has led the author to

form a new theory to account for the German defeat. Hitherto we have

been asked to believe that VON KLUCK'S fatal change of direction, just

when he seemed to have Paris at his mercy, was due to an urgent call

for assistance from the CROWN PRINCE. General MAURICE holds, on the

contrary, that it was deliberately adopted, at a moment when the CROWN

PRINCE'S army was undefeated, in the belief that the French Fifth Army

could be enveloped and destroyed, in which event "the whole French

line would be rolled up and Paris entered after a victory such as

history had never yet recorded." Thus, not for the first time, a too

rigid adherence to MOLTKE'S theory of envelopment proved disastrous to

the Germans' chances of success. It had first caused them to invade

Belgium, and so brought Britain into the War at the very outset; it

had next caused VON KLUCK to continue his westward sweep after Mons at

a juncture when a vigorous pursuit by his cavalry might have turned

the British retreat into a rout; and finally it caused him to execute

the notoriously dangerous manoeuvre of changing front before an

unbeaten foe, and to give JOFFRE the opportunity for which he had

been patiently waiting. The fact was that VON KLUCK did not think the

British were unbeaten. He could not conceive that men who had just

endured such a harassing experience as the seven days' continuous

retreat could possibly be in a condition to turn and fight. Not for

the first or last time in the War German psychology was woefully at

fault. Whether General MAURICE'S theory is correct or not, it is

most attractively set forth, and, thanks to the excellent; maps with

which the volume is provided, can be easily followed even by the

non-military reader.

* * * * *

There was at first a little danger of my being put off _Fruit of

Earth_ (METHUEN) by the uneasy manner of its opening chapters and a

style that it is permissible to call distinctly "fruity." Thus on page

5 J. MILLS WHITHAM is found writing about "an astonishment that nearly

smudged the last spark of vitality from a hunger-bitten author," and

a good deal more in the same style. But I am glad to say that the

tale subsequently pulls itself together, and, despite some occasional

high-falutin, becomes an interesting and human affair. It is a story

of country life, the main theme of which is a twofold jealousy, that

of the chronic invalid, _Mrs. Linsell_, towards the girl _Mary_, whom

she rightly suspects of displacing her in the thoughts of _Inglebury_;

and that of _Amos_, who marries _Mary_, towards _Inglebury_, whom he

rightly suspects of occupying too much room in the reflections of his

wife. In other words, the simple life at its most suspicious, with

the rude forefathers of the hamlet supplying a scandalous chorus. The

strongest part of the story is the tragedy, suggested with a poignancy

almost too vivid, of the wretched elder woman, tortured in mind and

body, morbidly aware of the contrast between her own decay and the

vitality of her rival. As to _Inglebury_ and _Mary_, the causes of all

the pother, they struck me as conspicuously unworth so much fussing

over; and, when their final flight together landed them--well,

where it did, I could only feel that the neighbourhood was to be

congratulated. But, as you see, I had by this time become unwillingly

interested. So there you have it; an unequal book, about people

unattractive but alive.

* * * * *

When the literary Roll of Honour of all the belligerents comes to be

considered quietly, in the steady light of Peace, not many names will

stand higher in any country than that of our English writer, HECTOR

HUGH MUNRO, whose subtle and witty satires, stories and fantasies

were put forth under the pseudonym "SAKI." I have but to name _The

Chronicles of Clovis_ for discriminating readers to know what their

loss was when MUNRO (who, although over age, had enlisted as a private

and refused a commission) fell fighting in the Beaumont-Hamel action

in November 1916. Mr. JOHN LANE has brought out, under the title _The

Toys of Peace_, a last collection of "SAKI'S" fugitive works, with a

sympathetic but all too brief memoir by Mr. ROTHAY REYNOLDS. Although

"SAKI" is only occasionally at his very best in this volume--on

the grim side, in "The Interlopers," and in his more familiar

irresponsible and high-spirited way in "A Bread-and-Butter Miss" and

"The Seven Cream Jugs;" although there may be no masterpiece of fun or

raillery to put beside, say, "Esmé;" there is in every story a phrase

or fancy marked by his own inimitable felicity, audacity or humour.

It is good news that a complete uniform edition of his books is in

preparation.

* * * * *

I can't help feeling that ISABEL ECCLESTONE MACKAY'S chief aim in

_Up the Hill and Over_ (HURST AND BLAOKETT) was to write a convincing

tract for the times on a subject which is achieving unhappy prominence

in America as in our own police-courts. A worthy aim, I doubt not.

One of the chief characters is a drug-taker; and as if that were not

enough another is "out of her head," while a third, _Dr. Callandar_,

the Montreal specialist, is in the throes of a nervous breakdown.

This seems to me to be distinctly overdoing it. It is the doctor's

love-story (a story so complicated that I cannot attempt a _précis_)

which is the designedly central but actually subordinate theme. I

have the absurd idea that this might really have begun life as a

pathological thesis and suffered conversion into a novel. The author

has no conscience in the matter of the employment of the much-abused

device of coincidence. And I don't think the story would cure anyone

of drug-taking. On the contrary.

* * * * *

_The Three Black Pennys_ (HEINEMANN) is a story that began by

perplexing and ended by making a complete conquest of me. Its

author, Mr. JOSEPH HERGESHEIMER, is, I think, new to this side of

the Atlantic; the publishers tell me (and, to prevent any natural

misapprehension, I pass on the information at once) that he belongs

to "a Pennsylvania Dutch family, settled for many generations in

Philadelphia." Which being so, one can enjoy his work with a free

conscience. It certainly seems to me very unusual in quality. The

theme of the tale is the history of the _Penny_ family, or rather

of the periodical outcrop in it of a certain strain that produces

_Pennys_ dark of countenance and incalculable of conduct. This

recurrence is shown in three examples: the first, _Howart Penny_,

in the days when men wore powder and the _Penny_ forge had just

been started in what was then a British colony; the next, _Jasper_,

involved in a murder trial in the sixties; and; last of the black

_Pennys_, another _Howart_, in whom the family energy has thinned

to a dilettante appreciation of the arts, dying alone amongst

his collections. You can see from this outline that the book is

incidentally liable to confound the skipper, who may find himself

confronted with (apparently) the same character tying a periwig on one

page and hiring a taxi on another. I am mistaken though if you will

feel inclined to skip a single page of a novel at once so original

and well-told. As a detail of criticism I had the feeling that the

"blackness" of the _Penny_ exceptions would have shown up better had

we seen more of the family in its ordinary rule; but of the power

behind Mr. HERGESHEIMER'S work there can be no question. He is, I am

sure, an artist upon a quite unusual scale, from whom great things may

be anticipated.

* * * * *

If neither book of short stories before me is what Americans call "the

goods," I can, at any rate, say that _Ancient Mariners_ (MILLS AND

BOON) does infinite credit to Mr. MORLEY ROBERTS'S imagination. These

yarns of seafaring men are salt with the savour of the sea and with

the language thereof. Of the seven my favourite is "Potter's Plan,"

which not only contains the qualities to be found in the other

half-dozen, but also has an ingenuity all its own. But perhaps you

will prefer "A Bay Dog-Watch," as coming home to the general bosom,

for it deals with a ferocious hunt after matches which recalls the

deadly days of the shortage. Of the five stories in Mr. WARWICK

DEEPING'S _Countess Glika_ (CASSELL) the best is "Bitter Silence."

Here the author deals with essentials, and gives us a tale entirely

free from artificiality. The remaining stories are marred by their

lack of naturalness; but Mr. DEEPING is never at a loss for incident,

and he can write dialogue which is often gay and sometimes witty.

* * * * *

[Illustration: THE PASSING OF THE COUPON. _Our Grocer_ (_gone dotty with

joy_). "SHE LOVES ME--SHE LOVES ME NOT--SHE LOVES ME!"]

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 156, February 26, 1919 · 第 36 / 36 题