MURMAN AMENITIES.

This was to have been an essay from an igloo, describing the

awful privations of the writer and the primitive savagery of his

surroundings on the Murman coast. It was to have wrung the sympathetic

heart of the public and at the same time to have enthralled the

student of barbaric life with its wealth of exotic detail. While

embodying all the best-known newspaper _clichés_ appropriated to these

latitudes it was to have included others specially and laboriously

prepared after a fascinating study of Arctic literature.

But circumstances have blighted its early inspiration, and the article

it was to have been will never be written, the telling word-pictures

designed on board the transport never executed.

Figure the disgust of five adventurers who, landing at the Murman

base, sternly braced to encounter the last extremity of peril and of

hardship, to sleep in the snow and dig one another out o' mornings,

to give the weakest of their number the warmest icicle to suck, the

longest candle to chew--found themselves billeted in a room which the

landladies of home would delight to advertise! Its walls were hung

with such pictures as give cheap lodgings half their horror; it was

encumbered with countless frail chairs and "kiggly" tables, and upon

every flat surface had settled a swarm of albums, framed photographs,

china dogs, wax flowers, penholder-stands, and all the choicest

by-products of civilization struggling towards culture. As we were not

to be frozen by exposure or immediately attacked by Bolshies, we might

reasonably have expected to be asphyxiated by the Russian stove; but

even this consolation was denied us, since Madame, convinced that

the English are mad in their love of fresh air, consented to leave it

unlit.

When first we arrived, five large soldiers with five large kits, the

aspect of the room filled us with terror. The fiercest frost or foe we

could have faced, but the bravest man may quail before wax-flowers and

fragile tables top-heavy with ornaments and knick-knacks, and all felt

that to encounter such things within the Arctic Circle was an unfair

test of our fortitude. Why had not the War Office or some newspaper

correspondent warned us?

Madame, however, proved to have a sense of proportion or humour; or

perhaps the collection was not her own. In any case she showed no

reluctance to displace family photographs or china dogs, and rapidly

had the room cleared for action; so that now, when we roll about the

floor in friendly struggle, it is only someone's toilet tackle that

crashes with its spidery table, instead of cherished artificial fauna

and flora.

Thanks to our serviceable and becoming Arctic kit and the steady

approach of the Spring thaw, heralded by the preparation of spare

bridges to replace the existing ones, we can defy the eccentricities

of the climate. Even the language begins to reveal what might be

termed hand-holds; though possibly, when the natives echo our words

of greeting, painfully acquired from textbooks on Russian, they are

simply imitating the sounds we make under the impression that they are

learning a little English.

More difficult problems arise, however, regarding questions of

military etiquette. Not King's Regulations, nor Military Law, nor

any handbook devotes even a sub-paragraph to light and leading upon

certain points which we have here to consider every day. For example,

if a subaltern glissading on ski down the village street, maintaining

his precarious balance by the aid of a "stick" in each hand, meets

a General, also on ski and also a novice, what should happen? What

_does_ happen we know by demonstration: the subaltern brandishes both

sticks round his head, slides forward five yards, smartly crosses the

points of his ski and then, plunging forward, buries his head in the

wayside drift, while the General Officer sits down and says what he

thinks. But we do not know if these gestures of natural courtesy are

such as our mentors would approve. No authority has set up for us any

ideal in such matters. From official rules of deportment the British

soldier knows how to salute when on foot or mounted on bicycle, horse,

mule, camel, elephant, motor-lorry or yak, but no provision has been

made for the case of an army scooting on ski. So here we are at large

in the Arctic Circle, coping with new conditions by the light of

nature, and paying such perilous "compliments" to senior officers as

our innate courtesy and sense, of balance suggest and permit.

Further, consider the question of dress. Even the gunners, who in the

late war used to wear riding-breeches of their favourite colour, no

matter what it was, the kind of footgear they most fancied, and any

old variety of hat they thought becoming, are shocked by the fantastic

kit that is countenanced in this latitude. It must be borne in mind

that most of us are old campaigners and old nomads whose tailors have

grown accustomed to build us appropriate gear for various climes.

Fashions for fighting in France, in Egypt, in Mesopotamia, have gained

a hold upon our affections, to say nothing of those designs for civil

breadwinning or moss-dodging in Central Africa, Bond Street, Kirkcaldy

or Dawson City. The consequence is that here, pretty well out of

A.P.M. range, sartorial individualism flourishes unchecked. Thus

the eye is startled to behold a fur headdress as big as a busby, an

ordinary service tunic, gaberdine breeches, shooting stockings and

Shackleton boots, going about as component parts of one officer's

make-up; or snow-goggles worn with flannel trousers, or sharp-toothed

Boreas defied by a bare head and a chamois-leather jerkin; or the

choice flowers of Savile Row associated with Canadian moccasins.

What idea will the North Russians retain of the outward appearance of

the typical British officer? How will the little Lapps, befurred and

smiling, who come sliding to market behind the trotting reindeer,

report of us to the smaller Lapps at home? In any case I hope we shall

found a legend of a well-meaning if peculiar and patchwork people.

* * * * *

[Illustration: SOCIAL DIFFICULTIES IN EARLY TIMES.

_British Matron (whose husband has just had his weekly coat of woad,

to visitor)._

"I'M SORRY, SIR, BUT MY HUSBAND CAN'T SEE YOU TILL HE'S DRY."]

* * * * *

"Gas Stoker wanted for 11 million works, used to gas

engine and exhauster; 50_s_. per week of seven 12-hour

shifts."--_Advt. in Daily Paper_.

In the circumstances the reference to "exhauster" seems superfluous.

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 156, May 28, 1919 · 第 14 / 45 题