CHAPTER V.

LOCAL COLOUR.

SCHEI UIT! SCHIET OP! TOE DAN!--GUNST! HEUS! MIS!--ZANIK NOU NIET.--THE

WORD FOR LIGHTNING.--IS TO BE ESCHEWED.

After these efforts I judged it wise to take a day or two's rest from

the actual practice of Dutch conversation till my nerves had recovered

their tone, and until I had mastered more of the grammar and the idiom.

I was the more concerned to do so as Enderby, to whom I had related my

purchase of the pens, told me that my language on that occasion had

been much too stiff and formal. For the purpose then of acquiring an

everyday vocabulary I listened attentively to the talk in the streets

and tram-cars. Most of it was unintelligible to me, but I caught up

some vigorous and happy phrases here and there. These I soon learned to

pronounce in a kind of way, but it was difficult to get at their exact

meaning, for many popular idioms did not appear in my dictionary at all.

There was a vocable that occasioned me some perplexity--indeed a haze

envelopes it still. It sounded like _Eris_, but had nothing to do

with the Goddess of Strife. It doesn't seem to have any particular

signification, and you can introduce it anywhere to give a finish to

your style. Some people were fond of _evetjes_, a word of the same

class, on which none of my books shed the least light. Though my

authorities were likewise silent about _Toe! toe dan_, I perceived that

this was the proper expression for courteous appeal, and as such I have

always used it, with confidence and success.

Two curious imperative moods, which were popular at the street corners,

I did find in my grammar. They belong to that provoking category of

words that, as you touch them carelessly, break up into smaller verbs

and prepositions. I used to compare them mentally to those lizards

that drop their tails when you handle them roughly. Only instead of

tails these _werkwoorden_ drop their _voorzetsels_, which turn up again

unexpectedly in distant parts of the sentence. One of these "lizards"

was _schei uit_, which means indifferently, 'stop talking now',

'analyse it' and 'go away'. It was pleasant to hear so scientific a

term as schei er uit or schiet nouw op (shoot up now, aim high) used so

often. I soon became quite dexterous in employing them myself. On the

whole I got little help from my dictionary in tracing out the idioms of

everyday live. Two interrogative particles, for example, without which

the lower classes, when excited, could hardly ask a question, were

quite ignored both by Boyton and the Woordenboek. The were _Zaliku_ and

_Woujeme_. I was left to conjecture the force of these particles--that

they were forcible I could see--might remotely resemble that of the

familiar num or nonne of Latin.

Occasionally animated interlocutors became suddenly oracular: their

flow of language stopped and they uttered some one solitary syllable

such as _Gunst!_ or _heus!_ or _mis!_ or _raak!_ These single shots

were often most effective, but I never could imitate them successfully.

_Ach!_ was safe mostly for "I'm sorry"; _Och!_ for "I don't care"; and

I discovered a treasure in _Hé!_ That is a contraction for "Do you

really mean it?" On the other hand _Hè!_ I found was "Shocking!" "How

very dreadful!" When I used these little words I seemed never quite to

hit the bull's eye, however. Invariably I said either more or less

than I intended. But I made very good play with pretty triplets like

_'t zal wel_, and _schei er uit_, and with expressions of approval:

_da's leuk_, _aardig hoor_, _och kom_. It gives a vivid local colour

to your conversation if you drop in now and again a homely fresh idiom

caught from the lips of the people. That prevents one's vocabulary

becoming too bookish. You can give quite a realistic flavour to your

remarks by interjecting occasionally _waarempeltjes_ or _Wel van

mijn leven!_ Among the encouraging ejaculations of every day I soon

concluded that none was more likely to prove useful than "_Zanik nou

niet_", a popular favourite which one may render roughly by "Pray,

don't mention it", "Don't trouble about it". This idiom has been simply

invaluable.

Anomalies of pronunciation were not numerous, but they existed. _Nouw_,

a common word, must be spelt _nu_; and the advice _duwen_, which

was printed up on the inner door of the Post-Office, was pronounced

_douwe_. Most enigmatical perhaps was the contrast between the barber's

notice on the window of his establishment, and what he said to you when

you entered. Outside it was _haarsnijden_ and never anything else.

That is the printed form; inside, however, you must pronounce it

_haarknippen_.

Still these are trifles compared with the real puzzles. I witnessed

a street dispute one evening. It was about herring, I think, but I

really couldn't follow the one thousandth part of the vigorous debate.

Picturesque idioms were bandied to and fro; happily no harm was done.

One could not help noticing that the Grammar-book was right. Jij and

jou were freely employed, and the disputants did not once address each

other as U or UEdele. On that occasion there was another epithet or

pronoun or interjection, which none of my previous studies had at all

prepared me for. Turning it up in the dictionary as well as I could, I

learnt that it might be translated by 'lightning', and that it was an

ordinary noun. Next day I enquired of Enderby if the word for lightning

could ever be employed as an interrogative particle or a pronoun. He

was horrified and said "Please don't be vulgar".

"All right," I replied, "I don't intend to be, but what about that

personal pronoun?"

"Hush!" he said. "Stop; it's not a pronoun."

"Well whatever it is," I told him, "noun or pronoun, if you had heard

it used as I did, you would admit that it was very _personal_."

"Don't be frivolous," he retorted solemnly, "and let me give you a

piece of advice. As long as you are in Holland never let anyone hear

you utter that word. Say _onweer_ or _weerlicht_. The other word is not

decent, it is almost wicked."

"There now; don't be surly", I reasoned, "the thing is in the

dictionary."

"Never mind. That's for science or for poetry. Then it's all right. But

_you_ had better have nothing to do with it. Try and forget it."

I did try. But I didn't succeed.

For the more trouble you take to forget a thing, the better you

remember it. At least that's my experience, and if I strain every nerve

to get a word out of my head, it simply never goes! So if there be a

Dutch noun that I recall accurately and without effort, it is just the

scientific and poetical term for 'lightning'.

An Irishman's Difficulties with the Dutch Language · 第 5 / 12 章