GENTLEMEN,—The authorities of the Dental Hospital of London have
entrusted to me the heavy responsibility of lecturing on Dental
Mechanics for this present Session of 1880 and 1881. I have undertaken
this post with many misgivings; the subject is so wide and
comprehensive, the study so important to you now, and the effect of good
or bad teaching will so deeply affect your whole life, that I might well
have hesitated before finally accepting the duties that will now devolve
upon me.
I have taken a great interest in this Hospital and School from its early
foundation, when the pupils were few, and the School and Hospital had,
so to speak, to win its spurs; but in passing, I may here remark that
that small class of students, then a new feature in London life, by
their diligence, learning and conduct, have established throughout the
country a name and reputation that you will have to perpetuate. It was
by the combined efforts of the whole profession, and by the fact that
its senior members were able to point back to so many successful
students of this School and Hospital, now earnest practitioners in
nearly every large town of the British Isles, that the leaders of our
department of Surgery were enabled to bring this special branch before
the notice of Parliament, and obtain a Bill which now governs the method
and extent of the classes and hospital practice of all our schools.
As your lecturer, I may perhaps without egotism mention that I was one
of the six gentlemen appointed as the first Assistant Dental Surgeons to
this Hospital, while it was struggling through its first year of active
life. I remained at my post nearly ten years, until driven by increasing
practice to relinquish the work, then, as now, carried on in your
Hospital. It is the knowledge and experience I then gained, and the
lessons I have since learnt as the result of treatment in private
practice, that I have now to offer you—many failures and some successes,
many abortive schemes, and some inventions that have stood the test of
time.
My best thanks are due to the Managing Committee of this Hospital, for
electing me to be the colleague of such men as Alfred Coleman, C. S.
Tomes, and D. Lewis.
Gentlemen, I am fully conscious of the honour, and will do my best, if
health and strength are given me, to redeem in part the loss you have
sustained in the resignation of your late teacher, Mr. James Smith
Turner. I know that you and your companions in hospital practice held
him in high esteem. He has been a true friend to the London Dental
School. He had become a ripe and experienced teacher, one fully alive to
the best manner of treating his subject, passing by what the student
might gain for himself from books, to dwell upon those details that a
man of his experience could so fully grasp. But much as we miss him, we
may yet congratulate ourselves that we have not to mourn over the death
of so good and faithful a friend. He is now as actively at work in
another sphere of Dental life; he is even working harder than ever in
perfecting the work that has so prospered in the hands of Messrs. Tomes
and Turner. He is consolidating the Dental Act of 1878, making every
effort to render the Register of 1881 as perfect as may be, and to raise
the standard of Dental Education throughout Great Britain. That the
number of Dental Schools may be equal to what is now demanded by
students, the schools be sound in teaching power, the men elected as
teachers be conscientious in their newly appointed work, that full and
complete courses on each Dental subject be delivered—these are a few
items of his daily work. The end and object of his endeavours is that
the students in the various schools may gather wider stores of knowledge
during their curriculum, so that the various examining bodies may see
their way to enforce a higher standard of examination than is now
enforced to obtain the L.D.S. Diploma, and the coveted power of
registration.
Those gentlemen who were members of Mr. Turner’s class last year will
join with me in wishing him long life and energy to complete his
self-imposed task.
To come to the special subject of my lecture. At the risk of provoking
the well-known retort of “nothing like leather,” I venture to assert
that no man can ever prove himself a good Dental Surgeon unless he is a
skilled artist in Dental Mechanics. To kindle a spark of my own
enthusiasm for the subject, to fan that spark into a flame that shall
burn brighter and brighter in your life until you lay down the file and
the engraver, with a sense that you have done some good work in the
world, is at once my endeavour and my duty. A painter or sculptor of
eminence in his profession is frequently the leader in the fashionable
world, he is feasted by the city guilds, his company is sought by the
rich and noble, he has the _entrée_ to the literary circles of every
capital, yet the work of the artist is, at best, but to reproduce a
faint imitation of nature in cold marble or on inanimate canvass. The
subjects of your handiwork will be full of life and animation.
What is the necessary training for such accomplishments? A full and
perfect realization of all the forms of human beauty, and of woman’s
beauty in particular. Why do I dwell so much on the complete form of
beauty? Because no face can be perfect in beauty, unless its features
each and all are in harmony. The teeth have a peculiarly marked position
in relation to the features: one missing link in the circle will attract
attention and mar the harmony of an otherwise lovely face, like a false
chord in music.
Projecting, discoloured, irregular, misshapen, crowded teeth, all tend
to destroy symmetry. If so in the natural course of dentition, how much
more in the artificial!
I would urge you all to undertake at starting a thorough study of the
normal bones of the skull.
Normal bones of the face.—In the anatomical class at your general
hospital you will study the bones of the face in considerable detail,
but there your attention will be directed to the common or general
characters of the bones. You will there have to learn the usual shape of
the bones, their processes, ridges, grooves and depressions; you will be
shewn the characters, not only by which you may at once recognise them,
but which you may always recognise in them. I cannot too strongly urge
you to master all these details.
But, Gentlemen, here we have to study these bones in a practical manner;
we have to look upon them as parts of the living countenances of our
patients, and as no two faces are exactly alike, a study of individual
faces is necessary, as a groundwork for your success in practical
mechanical dentistry, and you must study individual specimens of each of
the facial bones. A careless observer of a crowd of negroes might think
they were all alike, because each had a black skin, woolly hair,
retreating foreheads, thick lips and white teeth. But yet a close
observation would quickly tell him in truth there came behind all these
coarse resemblances, minute, but noteworthy differences, differences
which he would be compelled to take note of before intercourse with them
would be possible. In the same way a general anatomist merely points out
to you how all palates are alike, and I want to go farther and shew you
with equal truth how no two are alike, but all differ. Depend upon it,
gentlemen, your usefulness and success will vary with your skill in
perceiving these lesser differences which characterise individuals. The
best name I can give to this study is comparative human anatomy.
Let us take some examples of what I mean. The upper jaw bone is the most
complex of all the bones of the face. Looking at its central part or
body we are first of all struck with the cavity in it—the antrum of
Highmore. Now, if you take a hundred bones, you will not be able to find
two antra exactly alike, but they will differ in size, in shape, in
depth, in width, and in size of their angles and inclination of each of
their walls. And all these peculiarities influence the countenance, and
must, therefore, be studied before you can hope to be successful in
replacing the lost dental organs. The high cheek bone of the Scotchman
is a very familiar example of the effect of a variation in the antrum.
The alveolar process.—The natural setting of the teeth varies also in
its depth, thickness, smoothness, irregularity, and most importantly in
its curve, which may be a broad, open semi-circle, or a narrow
semi-ellipse. The nasal process, too, varies as much in different
specimens; you will find differences in length, breadth, in the angle it
forms with the body of the bone, and with the frontal bones; all these
particulars modify the shape of the nose, and as I shall have to point
out to you, no feature is more worthy of your careful study than the
human nose in its numberless varieties. The malar process of this bone
has similar varieties. Notice again the palate plate how it differs in
breadth and arch, and so modifies importantly the roof of the mouth, to
which a denture has been adapted. The malar bones are unlike in
thickness, the size of their angles, length of their offspringing
processes, and in the exact mode of articulation with neighbouring
bones. See too, how frontal bones vary, in one case a broad, bold line
forehead, in another overhanging, in a third narrow and pointed, and you
meet with infinite varieties between these extremes.
In passing to the nasal bones, not only must we notice how they differ
in length and breadth, and the level of their edges, but that the shape
of their arch is constantly varying; it may be broad and rounded, or
narrow and high, even to sharpness. This depends upon the prominence
forward of the bony nasal septum, the interval between the nasal
processes of the upper maxilla, that is to be bridged over the breadth
of the nasal bones, and the exact mode of their articulation with the
upper jaw bone. Not alone does the usual arch differ thus, but most
obviously on the angle it forms with the frontal lines.
From your own observation you will at once grant me that noses vary as
much as families; in fact I am inclined to think that there is a good
deal to be said for Mr. Shandy’s philosophy of noses. The cartilages of
the nose play a most important part in the shape of the organ, and
demand your study as much as the bones. Each variation in the shape of
the nose has a corresponding variety of upper lip, and the correlations
between these two must be most carefully attended to. Granted that these
differences are so numerous, you must admit that the nose must have
primary importance in the estimate of the Dental Surgeon, when called
upon to restore the lost Dental organs. I may remark that although I am
examining noses every day of my life, I have never yet found one
assuming a direct line with the other central lines of the head and
face.
To arrive at a just appreciation of the effect of these bones on the
lines of the face you must examine them in the articulated skeleton, not
in one instance but in many—fifty or even a hundred—make weekly visits
to the Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons, and there examine all
the specimens of articulated skulls and skeletons, until you fully grasp
the meaning of comparative human anatomy—the size, the shape, the
relative acuteness of angles, the proportions of the different parts. It
is this relationship, the articulation of each bone with the other bones
of the skull that is of primary importance to the Dental Surgeon.
The last bone that I shall mention to you this evening is the lower jaw,
perhaps the most important of all. You will all soon be taught that it
has a body, a symphysis, a ramus with its condyle, coronoid process and
sigmoid notch, an alveolar process, and various tubercles, ridges,
spines, grooves, and depressions. But beyond all such facts, be at pains
to notice, gentlemen, how all these various parts differ in different
specimens. The changes in the angle of the bone that are met with at
different ages are notorious, but you will have to learn that the angle
of every adult differs, that each form of countenance has its special
maxillary angle, nor are the depth, thickness, curve, obliquity and
relative prominence of different parts of the bone one whit more
constant, and if you would succeed in fitting artificial dentures to a
lower jaw, these individual peculiarities of the bone must be carefully
studied.
The Dental organs will be presented in full detail by my colleague, Mr.
C. S. Tomes, but I should fail in the one point of my brief sketch, if I
did not refer you to the fact that no circle is found exactly
corresponding with a second in the articulation of the thirty-two teeth
implanted in the maxillary bones. My remarks culminate in this
apparently strange contradiction, no two sets of teeth ever describe the
same circle at any age. The differences in children are only slight, yet
a difference exists; the older the subject, the greater the contrast
visible. Yet harmony exists in the lines of the face; once acknowledge
this and you will perceive the labour and investigation necessary to
make you grasp the subject in its broadest sense.
Take, for instance, a patient at the age of sixty, with edentulous jaws,
requesting artificial dentures to be prepared at your hands. For such
mechanism to be successful in the restoration of the contour of the
face, it will be necessary that it shall harmonise with the features;
you must carry your perception backwards to the appearance that this
face presented when he had only attained the age of thirty: this will be
the art and science expected at your hands.
Not to lengthen this my introductory lecture, by labouring to define the
various types of English faces, when the bones are covered with the soft
parts, I have selected a few outlines of faces such as a sculptor and
painter would study. Cast your eye upward, you will see that each
possesses its own characteristic and alterable features. So in life; and
if you gentlemen are to be true Dental Surgeons, you must rise to the
ideal of artistic mechanics. If I am to benefit you to the full bent of
my wishes, you must study nature in all its variety—nature when
presented to you as destroyed by premature disease and death, to be
restored by your hand to its original conformation. Remember that use
must follow beauty, one cannot be dissevered from the other if you would
obtain results, complete in power of mastication, speech, durability,
and appearance.
To win success in appearance, you must study the irregularities of the
natural projection of circle, and the character of circle. If any
irregularities are observed, take a model cast of the mouth, so that you
can compare the natural organs whilst the artificial are in progress of
arrangement; modify these irregularities, but do not efface their
existence altogether. The general conformation of the Dental organs and
the face must be your special study. The colour of the teeth to be
selected must receive at your hands great care: compare the various
tints at your disposal, ascertain if a perfect self colour, or a tinted,
shaded, or stained tooth is the most pleasing; which will harmonise best
with the complexion, producing a natural effect. It will be your object
to disguise that the new introductions are foreign bodies, endeavour to
make them appear as if they possessed life. Many colours absorb so much
light that at night the appearance they present is black and death-like.
Avoid such shades, select those that reflect light; in many cases the
teeth should be almost transparent. The colour of the hair, the nature
of the complexion will guide you in this endeavour; hair and complexion
must harmonise. A heavy, wavy head of hair, dark and massive, with
bronzed face would indicate a strong shaded tooth, solid in character
and non-transparent, yet a colour that will reflect rather than absorb
the rays of light. A Saxon face with fair hair will strongly puzzle you
at times; the pearl hued, thin and transparent teeth, as a rule, are
appropriate for such a face.
When articulating the dentures, every care must be taken and much
thought and study bestowed to adjust the depth and height of the
superior and inferior dentures to the length and depth, to the thickness
or thinness of the lips. Note and estimate the loss of structure by
absorption, and supply in proportion to the loss.
The circle and projection as above alluded to will be your special
study. Give hours to produce a natural expression. Propose to the
patient a short walk in your operating room; if a good corridor is at
your disposal, so much the better, use it. By so doing you will
ascertain what, if any, old habit of contortion of features is indulged
in by the patient; the character of the laugh, if the lips are raised,
and how much; at times only the tips of the teeth are manifest, at
others the full lip is raised exposing to view the crown of the tooth
and the alveolus, even to the lower margin of the meatus of the nose.
Arrangements equal to all these expressions must be adopted. The how,
will be told you in future lectures.
Then, again, the smile; the smile of a Desdemona and the smile of an
Iago! yet how much in a smile! Harmonise your mechanism so that the
smile of the patient shall be rendered as natural and full of meaning as
art can make it. The movements of the lips and tongue in speech must be
as carefully studied; the eloquence of the orator and the no less
eloquent prattle of a pretty woman. During the visit of your patient
strike out a conversation that shall put him at his ease, and show him
at his best; this will aid you in observing what is required to render
conversation easy to himself and acceptable to his hearers. Notice that
the head is never carried in a perpendicular line with the body; at
times it leans to the right or the left, the effect of this inclination
is to lengthen in appearance the teeth of the incline. Notice also, many
patients have the ungainly habit of twisting the lips out of the natural
line of the head and face.
It is by attention to all these details that the results of your work
will be noble, your claims to reward great, your satisfaction not less
in its kind than that of the sculptor or the painter; whilst they can
only charm the happy, it is yours to relieve the suffering, to alleviate
pain, and even to prolong life and restore lost beauty.
Special General Meeting of the Midland Counties Branch of the British
Dental Association.
A Special General Meeting of the Midland Counties Branch of the British
Dental Association, was held on Wednesday, 6th October, in the Memorial
Hall, Albert Square, Manchester. The President of the branch, H.
Campion, Esq. (Manchester), presided, and there were also present,
Messrs. S. Wormald (Treasurer), Stockport; Dr. W. H. Waite (Secretary),
Liverpool; W. H. Nicol (Leeds); R. E. Stewart (Liverpool); Dr. D. A.
Wormald (Bury); T. Murphy (Bolton); Q. Renshaw (Rochdale); W. H. Ridge
(Stafford); T. Mahonie (Sheffield); B. Harding (Manchester); T. C.
Parson (Clifton); H. Marsh (Manchester); T. Dilcock (Liverpool); D.
Dopson (Liverpool); L. Matheson (Manchester); W. Dykes (Manchester); W.
Headridge (Manchester); J. G. Roberts (Liverpool); W. Taylor (Batley);
W. Shillinglaw (Birkenhead); J. S. Crapper (Hanley); and R. Rogers
(Cheltenham).