She was only thirty-five years old when she died; but she was able to

leave to her children and to her people a name that will be remembered

and honoured as long as the German Empire lasts. Her tomb at

Charlottenburg is one of the most beautiful monuments to the memory of

the dead, which the world contains. The pure white marble statue of the

Queen is by the sculptor Rauch, who knew her well, and honoured her as

she deserved. Everything about the building is designed with loving

care. The words chosen by the King, and placed over the entrance of the

temple where the monument lies, are: “I am he that liveth, and was dead;

and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen: and have the keys of hell

and of death.”

XVIII

DOROTHY WORDSWORTH

“And were another childhood world my share,

I would be born a little sister there.”—GEORGE ELIOT.

A HUNDRED years ago England was particularly rich in great brothers and

sisters. There were William and Caroline Herschel, Charles and Mary

Lamb, and, perhaps, chief of all, William and Dorothy Wordsworth. These

last were certainly the greatest as tested by the position of the

brother in the world of literature. He won and maintained a place among

the greatest of English poets; but the very greatness of the brother was

the cause why the sister is known only as a tributary to his genius. It

is not that his achievements dwarf hers by comparison; she made no

conscious contribution to literature; she felt from the outset of their

life together that he was capable of giving to his countrymen thoughts

which the world would not willingly let die, and she deliberately

suppressed in herself all cultivation of her own powers, save such as

should contribute to support, sustain, and promote his. As Charles Lamb

said of his own sister, “If the balance has been against her, it was a

noble trade.” There is, however, much evidence that the balance was not

against Dorothy Wordsworth. She did not sacrifice herself in vain. She

chose to give up all independent cultivation of her own considerable

poetic gifts, and also to renounce all hopes of love and marriage, for

the sake of devoting her whole life to her brother, and of helping to a

freer and nobler utterance the poet who has given us “The Ode on the

Intimations of Immortality,” “The Ode to Duty,” “The Happy Warrior,” and

a host of songs and sonnets among the most beautiful in our language.

The sister freely and generously gave, the brother freely and generously

received, and freely and generously acknowledged the value of the gift.

Over and over again, in prose and verse, Wordsworth acknowledges all

that he owes to his sister; never more warmly than when, on the approach

of old age, disease had laid its hand upon her, and the long accustomed

support seemed likely to be withdrawn. When Coleridge and Dorothy lay

prostrate under the stroke of sickness, Wordsworth wrote at the age of

sixty-two: “He and my beloved sister are the two beings to whom my

intellect is most indebted, and they are now proceeding, as it were,

with equal steps, along the path of sickness, I will not say towards the

grave; but I trust towards a blessed immortality.” If Wordsworth,

reviewing the past, could speak thus of his sister, it must be of

interest to us to endeavour to discern what her influence over him was,

and how their life together was passed.

William Wordsworth was born in 1770, at Cockermouth, in Cumberland, the

second son of John Wordsworth, a lawyer and land-agent to the Earls of

Lonsdale. Dorothy, her parents’ only girl, was twenty months younger

than William, and the two children very early showed that close sympathy

and tender affection for one another which is often the precious

possession of happy family life. Only a few years were spent together by

the brother and sister in this joyous playtime of life; but the

happiness of this early time is recorded in several of Wordsworth’s

poems, especially in the one where he speaks of his sister and their

visit together to see the sparrow’s nest—

She looked at it and seemed to fear it;

Dreading, tho’ wishing, to be near it:

Such heart was in her, being then

A little Prattler among men.

The Blessing of my later years

Was with me when a boy:

She gave me eyes, she gave me ears;

And humble cares, and delicate fears;

A heart, the fountain of sweet tears;

And love, and thought, and joy.

William and Dorothy were less than nine and seven respectively when

these happy days of childish companionship were closed by the death of

their mother in 1778. William was then sent to school, and Dorothy went

to live with her maternal grandparents at Penrith. The children were

doubly orphaned five years later by the death of their father, in 1783.

William and his brothers then passed to the guardianship of their

uncles, Richard and Christopher Wordsworth, while Dorothy was made over

to the care of other relatives, and spent her time partly at Halifax and

partly with her mother’s cousin, Dr. Cookson, Canon of Windsor. She and

William, however, by no means forgot their childish affection or let it

grow cold. They rarely met at this time, but their meetings were looked

forward to by both with ardent and intense pleasure. Each continued to

be to the other the dearest and most beloved of friends.

Wordsworth, like most generous young people of his day, was deeply

stirred by sympathy with the French Revolution. At its outset he

believed it would bring immeasurable blessings to mankind; tyranny,

cruelty, and vice were, he believed, to be dismissed from the high

places of the earth, and in their stead would reign justice, mercy,

peace, and love. It is therefore not difficult to imagine with what

agony of disappointment he saw, as he thought, all these high hopes

falsified, and the light that had been lit by the Revolution quenched in

blood and in a series of massacres more cruel and remorseless than any

that had disgraced previous forms of government. For a time the belief

in goodness and righteousness seemed shaken in him. To disbelieve in the

power of goodness is infidelity; and from this gulf of infidelity

Wordsworth was saved by his sister’s influence. This was the first

memorable service she rendered to his moral nature. He was saved from

becoming permanently soured and narrowed by the sunny radiance of his

sister’s sympathy and by her unshaken faith that good is stronger than

evil. The brother and sister now resolved to live together; and from

that hour Dorothy’s whole life was given to enrich and solace that of

her brother, and to help him to give utterance to those great thoughts

and words which at last made the whole of England aware that the nation

was possessed of another poet.

Wordsworth was now twenty-five years of age; he had passed through his

college career at Cambridge and had travelled abroad, and the time had

come when it was not unnaturally expected of him that he should settle

down to some business or profession that would provide him with an

income. Very little had come to the family from inheritance, and parents

and guardians are not generally disposed to look with lenient indulgence

on a penniless young man of twenty-five who shows a disinclination to

any steady work, and is suspected of an ambition to become a poet.

Wordsworth’s uncles had been kind and generous guardians, but they could

not have been pleased at what must have seemed to them at this time the

dilatory, desultory life of their nephew. His sister, however, all the

while gave him her warmest sympathy and support. Before any one else had

dreamed of it, she recognised her brother’s genius; she not only

believed that he would be a poet, but _knew_ that he _was_ a poet. She

did not urge him, as a well-intentioned but less perceptive friend might

have done, to become a lawyer, or a doctor, or what not; she made it

possible, by joining her life to his, and nourishing his genius by the

tribute she poured into it from her own, that he should have the quiet

sympathetic surroundings without which his poetic imagination could not

work.

Their slender means were augmented about this time by a legacy which

rendered it possible for the brother and sister to have a little cottage

home together. Here, at Racedown, in Dorsetshire, Wordsworth first began

seriously to devote himself to poetry. Their means were so small that

the utmost economy was necessary; but Dorothy cheerfully undertook all

the household work of cleaning, cooking, making, and mending. She was

not one of those who think there is any degradation, either to man or

woman, in manual labour. While she was busied with household cares, her

brother often worked in their garden; when their digging and cooking

were accomplished, they read Italian authors together, or took long

walks through the beautiful country in which they had fixed their abode.

It must not be thought that Miss Wordsworth was nothing more to her

brother than an energetic, economical housekeeper; she was in feeling

almost as much a poet as he was. She had the same intense sympathy with

nature, the same observant eye and loving heart for all the various

moods of the beautiful outside world. She had also much of her brother’s

power of expression, and the same felicity in description. It has been

said of her, “Her journals are Wordsworth in prose, just as his poems

are Dorothy in verse.” Wordsworth said of his brother John that he was

“a silent poet,” and “a poet in everything but words,” meaning that he

was a poet in feeling and sympathy; but something more than this can be

said of Dorothy; she was a prose poet, who might have become a true

poet, if she had not felt that she had another vocation. She was her

brother’s inspirer and critic, and what she wrote herself proves that

she was worthy to be both. Some passages of her diary are almost

identical in thought and observation with subjects that Wordsworth has

crystallised in immortal verse. On 30th July 1802 we have, for example,

in the prose of Dorothy’s journal, part of what Wordsworth has given to

us in the sonnets on Westminster Bridge and Calais sands. “Left London

between five and six o’clock of the morning, outside the Dover coach. A

beautiful morning. The City, St. Paul’s, with the river, a multitude of

little boats, made a beautiful sight as we crossed Westminster Bridge;

the houses not overhung by their clouds of smoke, were spread out

endlessly; yet the sun shone so brightly, with such a pure light, that

there was something like the purity of one of Nature’s own grand

spectacles. Arrived at Calais at four in the morning of 31st July.

Delightful walks in the evenings, seeing far off in the west the coast

of England like a cloud, crested with Dover Castle, the evening star,

and the glory of the sky. The reflections in the water were more

beautiful than the sky itself; purple waves brighter than precious

stones for ever melting away on the sands.” Whoever will compare this

with the two sonnets beginning “Earth has not anything to show more

fair,” and “Fair star of evening, splendour of the West,” will see how

far it is just to say that Dorothy has given us in prose what Wordsworth

has given us in verse. There is a deeper human passion in Wordsworth’s

verse than Dorothy ever reached in her prose. He would not stand to-day

the third in the noble group where Shakespeare and Milton are first and

second, if he had not possessed, over and above his subtle sympathy with

Nature, sympathy also with the greatest of Nature’s works, “man, the

heart of man, and human life.” In the “Lines composed a few miles above

Tintern Abbey,” and again in the “Ode on the Intimations of

Immortality,” Wordsworth speaks of the change which had gradually come

in himself from the days when the worship of external nature, “meadow,

grove, and stream, the earth and every common sight,” was all in all to

him, to the time when—

I have learn’d

To look on nature, not as in the hour

Of thoughtless youth; but hearing oftentimes

The still, sad music of humanity,

Nor harsh nor grating, though of ample power

To chasten and subdue.

It was here, as it seems, that his sister could not follow him. Perhaps

her self-suppression, the very concentration of her devotion to her

brother, closed her powers of receptive sympathy for the wider issues of

human destiny which inspires the most precious of Wordsworth’s verse.

Whether this be so or not, he saw in her what he once had been and had

ceased to be.

I cannot paint

What then I was. The sounding cataract

Haunted me like a passion: the tall rock,

The mountain, and the deep and gloomy wood,

Their colours and their forms, were then to me

An appetite; a feeling and a love,

That had no need of a remoter charm.

... That time is past,

And all its aching joys are now no more,

And all its dizzy raptures.

· · · · · ·

For thou art with me here upon the banks

Of this fair river; thou my dearest Friend,

My dear, dear Friend, and in thy voice I catch

The language of my former heart, and read

My former pleasures in the shooting lights

Of thy wild eyes. Oh! yet a little while

May I behold in thee what I was once,

My dear, dear Sister!

After Racedown the next residence of Wordsworth and his sister was

(1797) at Alfoxden, in Somersetshire. Here they were visited by

Coleridge and Lamb, and here the “Ancient Mariner” was composed, chiefly

by Coleridge, but with the help and by the stimulus of Wordsworth and

Dorothy. It was during their residence here that the “Lines written

above Tintern Abbey” were composed and published. Racedown and Alfoxden

were temporary resting-places only; Wordsworth and his sister did not

make a real home for themselves till they settled in the beautiful lake

country of Westmoreland, in 1799. At first they lived in a small

cottage, where Dorothy, with the help of one feeble old woman, whom they

employed partly out of charity, did all the domestic work. A few years

later they removed to the house at Rydal Mount, Grasmere, which will

always be associated with their memory, and where the rest of their

lives was passed. It has been pointed out by Mr. Matthew Arnold that

almost all Wordsworth’s best work was produced in the ten years between

1798 and 1808. During this time he had achieved no fame; he had gained

no audience, as it were, save the very select group of whom the chief

members were his sister, Coleridge, and Charles and Mary Lamb. All

through this time of the production of Wordsworth’s best work, Dorothy

continued to devote herself to him by the cheerful performance of the

double duties of domestic drudge and literary companion and critic. She

was also his comrade in many long mountain excursions, in which they

both delighted. Miss Wordsworth had extraordinary physical strength,

which many persons believe she overtaxed by her long walks over moor and

mountain. It is certain, however, that her brother delighted in her

physical vigour no less than in her mental gifts. He speaks in lines

addressed to her of her being “healthy as a shepherd boy,” and in other

places he often shows that physical feebleness formed no part of his

conception of feminine grace. His ideal woman

is ruddy, fleet and strong,

And down the rocks can leap along

Like rivulets in May.

Or again—

She shall be sportive as the fawn,

That wild with glee across the lawn

Or up the mountain springs.

In 1802 the poet married his cousin, Mary Hutchinson, and nothing is

more characteristic of Dorothy’s sweet and generous nature than the

warm, loving welcome which she gave to her brother’s wife. She did not

know jealousy in love; her love was so perfect that she rejoiced in

every addition to her brother’s happiness, and did not, as a meaner

woman might have done, wish his heart to be vacant of all affection save

what he felt for herself. The poet’s wife was worthy of such a husband

and sister-in-law, and the family life went on in perfect love and

harmony, that were only strengthened by the new ties and interests that

marriage brought. Wordsworth’s children became as dear to Dorothy as if

they had been her own, and she devoted herself to them so that they

learnt to feel that they had in her almost a second mother.

In 1832, Wordsworth then being sixty-two years old and his sister over

sixty, Dorothy’s health seriously broke down. So much has been said in

some of the books about the poet and his sister of the harm resulting to

Miss Wordsworth’s health from her long walks, that it might have been

imagined that she had been the victim of a very premature decline of

physical powers. Considering, however, that she was descended from

parents both of whom had died young, it is at least doubtful whether her

failure of health at the age of sixty can be fairly attributed to her

pedestrian feats. Her illness in 1832 culminated in a dangerous attack

of brain fever, from which she recovered, but with mental and physical

powers permanently enfeebled. Her memory was darkened, and her spirits,

once so blithe and gay, became clouded and dull. Wordsworth and his wife

tended her with unceasing devotion. One who knew them well wrote of

Wordsworth at this time that “There is always something very touching in

his way of speaking of his sister. The tones of his voice become very

gentle and solemn, and he ceases to have that flow of expression which

is so remarkable in him on all other subjects.” The same friend wrote,

“Those who know what they (William and Dorothy Wordsworth) were to each

other can well understand what it must have been to him to see that soul

of life and light obscured.”

Notwithstanding the delicate health from which she suffered before the

close of her life, she outlived her brother for five years. He died on

23d April 1850, the anniversary of Shakespeare’s birth and death. His

sister at first could hardly comprehend her loss; but when at last she

understood that her heart’s best treasure was no more, she exclaimed

that there was nothing left worth living for. It was hardly life to live

without him to whom her own life had been devoted. The friends

surrounding her dreaded the shock which this great loss would be to her,

but she bore it with unexpected calmness. A friend wrote, “She is drawn

about as usual in her chair. She was heard to say as she passed the door

where the body lay, ‘O Death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy

victory?’” She died in January 1855, and was buried by her brother’s

side in Grasmere Churchyard.

XIX

SISTER DORA

ONE of the most remarkable women who, in recent times, have devoted

themselves to nursing and to the service of the sick poor, was Dorothy

Wyndlaw Pattison, more generally known by the name of Sister Dora. She

was a lady born and bred, well-educated, high-spirited, sweet-tempered,

and handsome; full of fun and sense of humour, fond of hunting and other

athletic exercises, and remarkably fond of her own way. As her own way

was generally a good way, she was probably right in preferring it to the

ways of other people. Strong determination, when it does not degenerate

into stupid obstinacy, is one of the most useful qualities any human

being can have. In Sister Dora’s case her strong will was a great secret

of her success, but it also, in a few instances, led her into errors,

which will easily be seen as the story of her life is told.

She was born, in 1832, at Hauxwell, in Yorkshire, a small village on the

slope of a hill, looking towards the moors and Wensleydale. Her father

was the clergyman of the village, and one of her brothers was the Rev.

Mark Pattison, the well-known scholar and the Rector of Lincoln College,

Oxford. Dorothy Pattison was first roused to wish for something more

than the ordinary occupations of a young lady’s life by the enthusiasm

felt throughout England in 1856 for Miss Florence Nightingale’s work in

the Crimea. Dorothy wished to join Miss Nightingale’s band of lady

nurses at the seat of war, but her parents’ opposition and her own want

of training prevented her from carrying out this wish. From this time,

however, she fretted against the life of comparative inactivity to which

she was restricted so long as she remained in her village home. Some

years were passed (wasted, we well may think) in unnecessary friction

between herself and her father, she desiring to leave home, and he

opposing her wishes in this respect. At last she did leave, in 1861,

more or less in face of her father’s opposition; he declined to make her

any allowance beyond what he had been accustomed to give her for

pocket-money and clothes, and she had therefore to live partly on what

she was able to earn. She obtained work as a village schoolmistress at

Little Woolston, near Bletchley, and lived for three years in a small

cottage, quite alone, without even a servant; her life at this time must

have been very much like that described in _Jane Eyre_, where the

heroine gains her livelihood for a time by similar work. She showed, as

a village schoolmistress, that keen sympathy with children and power

over them which always distinguished her. She could enter, through her

bright imagination, into the feelings and thoughts of children, and her

playfulness and love of fun made her a real friend and companion to

them. At Little Woolston, too, she did a good deal of amateur nursing

for the parents and friends of her little pupils. Her biographer, Miss

Lonsdale,[5] says that the people in the neighbourhood of the village

were very quick to discover that the new schoolmistress was a real lady,

but for some time they could not get over their astonishment if they

found Miss Pattison blacking her own grate when they came to see her.

She was, perhaps, the first instance they had come across of a

cultivated woman who thought that “being a lady” was not inconsistent

with working hard. Dirtiness, untidiness, and muddle vex the soul of the

“real lady” far more than doing the work which produces cleanliness and

order.

After three years at Little Woolston, Miss Pattison made what many must

think was the great mistake of her life. Her strong will has already

been spoken of; she had found by experience that she could not submit it

even to the control of her own father, to whom she was naturally bound

by strong feelings of affection. It was necessary to her to have freedom

and scope for her energies, and to learn by self-government what she had

failed to learn through the government of others. Notwithstanding the

incompatibility of her nature with the absolute submission required in

such institutions, Miss Pattison joined a High Church Sisterhood, at

Coatham, called the Sisterhood of the Good Samaritan. It was part of the

discipline of the sisterhood to require unquestioning obedience to all

commands. The reason, the feelings, the natural piety of the novices

were completely subordinated to obedience as their first and paramount

duty. By way of training in unquestioning obedience, Sister Dora, as she

was now called, was subjected to various tests of submissiveness; one

day, for instance, after she had made all the beds, they were pulled to

pieces again by the order of the Superior, and she was told to make them

again. In some institutions of this kind, after the floor has been

carefully and thoroughly scrubbed by a novice, some one enters, by order

of the Superior, with mud or ashes, and purposely makes it dirty again;

the novice is then ordered to return to her work and scrub the floor

once more, and she is expected to do so without showing the least sign

of disappointment or annoyance. It may be true that this system fosters

the habit of unquestioning obedience, but if so it must be at the

expense of other and more valuable qualities. This unnatural system is

perverting to the moral sense and judgment, as Sister Dora, a few years

later, found to her cost.

Some Eminent Women of Our Times: Short Biographical Sketches · 第 14 / 18 段