THE NETHERLANDERS ON THE WEST- AND SOUTH-WEST COAST OF AUSTRALIA

In the year 1616 the Dutch ship Eendracht, commanded by Dirk Hartogs on

her voyage from the Cape of Good Hope to Batavia unexpectedly touched at

"divers islands, but uninhabited" and thus for the first time surveyed

part of the west-coas of Australia[*]. As early as 1619 this coast, thus

accidentally discovered, was known by the name of Eendrachtsland or Land

van de Eendracht. The vaguenes of the knowledge respecting the coast-line

then discovered, and its extent, is not unaptly illustrated in a small

map of the world reproduced as below, and found in {Page x} GERARDI

MERCATORIS _Atlas sive Cosmographicae Meditationes de Fabrica mundi et

fabricati figura. De novo...auctus studio_ JUDOCI HONDIJ (Amsterodami;

Sumptibus Johannis Cloppenburgij. Anno 1632) [**]. If, however, we

compare this map of the world with KEPPLER'S map of 1630 [***], we become

aware that Hondius has not recorded all that was then known in Europe

respecting the light which since 1616 European explorers had thrown on

the question of the western coast-line of Australia. In Keppler's map,

namely, besides the English discovery of the Trial rocks (1622) [****],

and the name "'T Landt van Eendracht" in fat characters, passing from the

north to the south, we meet with the following names, which the smaller

letters show to have been intended to indicate subordinate parts of

Eendrachtsland: Jac. Rommer Revier [*****], Dirck Hartogs ree, F.

Houtmans aebrooleus and Dedells lant. What is more, Keppler's map also

exhibits the south-west coast of Australia.

[* See on this point the Documents sub No. VII (pp. 8f.).--It will hardly

be denied that these pieces of evidence may justly be called "documents

immediately describing" Hartogs's dicsovery.]

[** For my knowledge of this remarkable atlas I am indebted to Mr. ANTON

MENSING, member of the firm of Messrs. Frederik Muller and Co., of

Amsterdam. These gentlemen kindly enabled me to reproduce this chart for

the present work. I received it too late to allow of its being placed

among the charts accompanying the various documents.]

[*** See Chart No. 6 on p. 10 below.]

[**** See under No. XIII (p. 17) below.]

[***** See on this point p. 54 _infra_ (No. XXII A and note 3).]

[Map No. 18. Typus orbis terrarum uit GERARDI MERCATORIS Atlas...De

Novo...emendatus...studio JUDOCI HONDIJ, 1632.]

Whence all those names? The answer to this question, and at the same time

various other new features, are furnished by the chart of Hessel

Gerritsz. of 1627 [*] and by the one dated 1618 [**], in which

corrections have been introduced after date. The 1627 chart is specially

interesting. Gerritsz., at the time cartographer in ordinary to the

E.I.C., has "put together this chart of the Landt van d'Eendracht from

the journals and drawings of the Steersmen", which means that he availed

himself of authentic data [***]. He acquitted himself of the task to

admiration, and has given a very lucid survey of the (accidental)

discoveries made by the Dutch on the west-coast of Australia. In this

chart of 1627 the Land of d'Eendracht takes up a good deal of space. To

the north it is found bounded by the "Willemsrivier", discovered in July

1618 by the ship Mauritius, commanded by Willem Janszoon [****].

According to the chart this "river" is in about 21° 45' S. Lat., but

there are no reliable data concerning this point. If we compare Hessel

Gerritsz's chart with those on which about 1700 the results of Willem De

Vlamingh's expedition of 1696-7 were recorded [*****] we readily come to

the conclusion that the ship Mauritius must have been in the vicinity of

Vlaming Head (N.W. Cape) on the Exmouth Gulf. From Willem Janszoon's

statements it also appears that on this occasion in 22° an "island (was)

discovered, and a landing effected." The island extended N.N.E. and

S.S.W. on the west-side. The land-spit west of Exmouth Gulf may very

possibly have been mistaken for an island. From this point then the

Eendrachtsland of the old Dutch navigators begins to extend southward. To

the question, how far it was held to extend, I answer that in the widest

sense of the term ('t Land van Eendracht or the South-land, it reached as

far as the South-coast, at all events past the Perth of our day) [******].

In a more restricted sense it extended to about 25° S.' Lat. In

the latter sense it included the entrance to Shark Bay, afterwards

entered by Dampier, and Dirk Hartogs island, likewise discovered by Dirk

Hartogs.

[* No. 4 on p. 9 _infra_.]

[** No. 5 (folding map).]

[*** It is evident that he did not use all the data then available. Thus,

for instance, he left unused those furnished by the Zeewolf (No. VIII,

pp. 10 ff. below), and those of the ship Leiden (No. XV, p. 49).]

[**** See the Documents under No IX (pp. 12f.).]

[***** Nos. 13 and 14]

[****** Chart No. 14]

{Page xi}

More to southward we find in the chart of 1627 I. d'Edels landt, made in

July 1619 by the ships Dordrecht and Amsterdam, commanded by Frederik De

Houtman and Jacob Dedel [*]. To the north of Dedelsland the coast is

rendered difficult of access by reefs, the so-called (Frederik De)

Houtmans-Abrolhos (now known as the Houtman Rocks), also discovered on

this occasion [**]. To the south, in about 32° S. Lat. [***] Dedelsland

is bounded by the Landt van de Leeuwin, surveyed in 1622 [****]. Looking

at the coast more closely still, we find in about 29° 30, S. Lat. the

name Tortelduyff (Turtle Dove Island), to the south of Houtmans Abrolhos,

an addition to the chart dating from about 1624 [*****].

[* See the documents sub No. XI (pp. 14 ff.). If NORDENSKI÷LD had known

these documents, he would have withheld the second alinea on p. 199 of

his interesting _Periplus_.--The doubts, also, concerning Frederik De

Houtman's share in the discoveries on the west-coast of Australia,

expressed by COLLINGRIDGE (_Discovery_ p. 304), CALVERT (_Discovery_, p.

25), and others, are now likely to be set at rest.]

[** They were then held to lie in 28° 46'. On this point see also the

documents of PELSAERT'S shipwreck (No. XXIII, pp. 55 ff).]

[*** About this latitude, between 32° and 33° S. Lat., also De Houtman

and Dedel estimated themselves to be, when they first came upon land.

They afterwards ran on on a northerly course.]

[**** See the documents sub No. XII (p. 17).]

[***** See No. XVI (p. 50) below, and the highly curious charts Nos. Nos.

16 and 17.]

So much for the highly interesting chart of Hessel Gerritsz of the year

1627. If we compare with it the revised edition of the 1618 chart, we are

struck by the increase of our forefathers' knowledge of the south-west

coast. This revised edition gives the entire coast-line down to the

islands of St. François and St. Pieter (133° 30' E. Long. Greenwich),

still figuring in the maps of our day: the Land of Pieter Nuyts,

discovered by the ship het Gulden Zeepaard in 1627 [*].

[* See No. XVIII (p. 51) below.]

North of Willemsrivier, this so-called 1618 chart has still another

addition, _viz_. G. F. De Witsland, discovered in 1628 by the ship Vianen

commanded by G. F. De Witt [*]. In this case, too, it is difficult to

determine exactly the longitudes between which the coast-line thus

designated is situated. [**] But with great distinctness the chart

exhibits the chain of islands of which the Monte Bello and tha Barrow

islands are the principal, and besides, certain islands of the Dampier

Archipelago, afterwards so called after the celebrated English navigator.

I would have these observations looked upon as hints towards the more

accurate determination of the site of this De Wit's land, and they may be

of the more value since the small scale of the chart renders an exact

determination of it exceedingly difficult.

[* See No. XXI (p. 54) below.]

[** See, however, No. XXI., C. _infra_.]

In Gerritsz's chart of 1627, as well as in the so-called 1618 one, we are

struck by the fact, that on the west-coast the coast-line shows breaks in

various places: De Witt's land is not connected with the coast of

Willems-rivier; the coast-line of Eendrachtsland does not run on; there

is uncertainty as regards what is now called Shark-bay; the coast facing

Houtmans Abrolhos is a conjectural one only; the coast-line facing

Tortelduyf is even altogether wanting; Dedelsland and 't Land van de

Leeuwin are not marked by unbroken lines. This fragmentary knowledge

sufficiently accounts for the fact, that about the middle of the

seventeenth century navigators were constantly faced by the problem of

the real character of the South-land: was it one vast continent or a

complex of islands? And the question would not have been so repeatedly

asked, if the line of the west-coast had been more accurately known.

{Page xii}

Tasman and Visscher [*] did a great deal towards the solution of this

problem, since in their voyage of 1644 they also skirted and mapped out

the entire line of the West-coast of what since 1644 has borne the name

of Nieuw-Nederland, Nova Hollandia, or New Holland, from Bathurst Island

to a point south of the Tropic of Capricorn. In this case also certain

mistakes were committed: they failed, for instance, to recognise the real

character of Bathurst Island, which, like Melville Island, they looked

upon as forming part of the mainland; but if we make due allowance for

the imperfection of their means of observation, we are bound to say that

the coast-line has by them been mapped out with remarkable accuracy [**].

[* I pass by certain other exploratory voyages on the westcoast (see e.g.

No. XXIV. _infra_, etc.).]

[** Cf. Tasman's chart of 1644 in the Tasman Folio.]

About fifteen years after the west-coast was more accurately mapped out

also, to the south of the tropic of Capricorn. In the year 1658 Samuel

Volekersen with the ship de Wakende Boei [Floating Buoy], and Aucke

Pieters Jonck with the ship Emeloord surveyed a portion of the

west-coast, and the charts then made have been preserved [*]. The

coast-line from a point near the Tortelduyf down to past Rottenest (the

large island on which Volkertsen did not confer a name, preferring to

"leave the naming to the pleasure of the Hon. Lord Governor-General") and

the present Perth, were surveyed with special care. In the same year the

ship Elburg, commanded by Jacob Peereboom, brought in further reports

about the Land van de Leeuwin, where she had been at anchor "in Lat. 33°

14' South, under a projecting point" (in Geographe Bay?).

[* See _infra_ No. XXIX., pp. 75 ff., and the charts sub No. XXIX. E, F

and I.]

The surveying of the lines of the west-coast was finally brought to a

close by the exploratory voyage of Willem De Vlamingh in 1696-7 with the

ships Geelvink, Nijptang, and het Wezeltje. A remarkable chart referring

to this voyage, here reproduced [*], as well as the ISAAC DE GRAAFF chart

[**] of _circa_ 1700, give an excellent survey of the expedition. The

whole coast-line from the so-called Willemsrivier (N.W. Cape) to a point

south of Rottenest, Garden-island and Perth, was now mapped out. And

that, too, with great accuracy. Thus, for instance, the true situation of

the belt of islands enclosing Shark Bay was this time observed with

unerring exactitude, and Shark Bay itself actually discovered, though its

discovery is usually credited to Dampier (August, 1699).

[* No. 13.]

[* No. 14.]

The Part Borne by the Dutch in the Discovery of Australia 1606-1765 · 第 18 / 174 题