REVELATION, XIV., 5.

_They are without fault before the throne of_ GOD.

JOB declares that GOD puts no trust in His saints; that He charges His

angels with folly; that in His sight the very heavens are not clean.

This language is, of course, figurative, and not to be taken literally;

but it well describes to us the transcendent holiness of GOD, and His

utter abhorrence of all evil. In comparison of Him, heaven itself is not

pure, and angels, endued with wisdom, swift and constant to obey,

delighting in His will, even these are not perfect—fall far short of

perfection before Him. Job would show us the distance between GOD and

man. St. John, however, in the chapter of my text, would exhibit another

truth, not contradictory, but rather supplementary to Job’s, namely, the

nearness, through grace, of man to GOD. The Apostle is describing, for

the comfort and encouragement of the tried and persecuted, a vision which

he had seen of some of those who have passed away from this world, and,

as a kind of first-fruits, are already with GOD and the Lamb; and he

says, that “in their mouth is found no guile; for they are without fault

before the throne of GOD.”

“Without fault,” means here, without spot or blemish; not only free from

actual transgression, but wholly untainted by corruption of sin—not

wanting in anything that belongs to the perfect character of the approved

of GOD.

That man in his natural state is altogether faulty, that even in his

redeemed, and spiritualised, and sanctified state, while here on earth,

he has still many faults, are truths so plainly taught, so proved to our

reason and experience, that it would be idle to enforce them. How, then,

can he ever stand faultless before the throne of GOD? Now some would

answer, that for CHRIST’S sake GOD overlooks, that CHRIST, by His merits,

hides man’s faults; and so that the redeemed in heaven are not really

faultless, but that for CHRIST’S sake faultlessness is reckoned, imputed

to them. This is what may be called the popular answer to our question.

But, brethren, how utterly wrong it is seen to be, when we consider that,

in order to exalt GOD’S mercy and His wisdom in contriving justification,

it sacrifices His truth and His holiness. GOD cannot call the faulty

faultless. He Who is Truth cannot enter with His Holy Son (Who is also

Truth) into a plan of deceit, by which, to Himself, to them, to angels,

to the whole universe, sin shall be presented as holiness. GOD may agree

not to reckon with men for their sins, to forget the past, on certain

conditions to deal with the faulty as if they were actually faultless;

but He cannot—I say it advisedly, it is beyond the limits of His power,

as regulated by His truth—He cannot call evil good. And, brethren,

besides, even if it were possible that by some strange agreement with the

Son, sinful man should be passed off as holy, still his sin, while it

remained, hide it, disguise it, call it by what name you will, must

separate from GOD. Charity might forbear to punish it, or to make

mention of it. Charity might even gild it over; but Holiness deals not

with the name, but with the reality; and holiness must shrink from sin

and thrust it away. This ought to be the most readily perceived and

admitted of all Scripture truths, that GOD cannot tolerate near iniquity;

that—if I may venture reverently to use such words—even if GOD were

willing to receive to Himself an unchanged sinner, the actual reception

would be morally impossible; the same heaven could not contain holiness

and sin! No, brethren, if the sinner is to enter heaven, it must be, not

because his name is changed, but his nature; he must be actually without

fault before GOD. We see this to have been the case with those described

in the text: for it is expressly said, “In their mouth was found no

guile.” Observe, it is not, GOD mercifully overlooked their guile for

the sake of His dear Son, the Guileless One; He charitably called them

guileless; but “in their mouth was found (the testimony of truth to the

searching of holiness) no guile: yea, for they are altogether blameless,

without spot or blemish.” It is an actual, not an imputed faultlessness

that is thus described. Now, how is it to be attained by sinful men?

And here comes in a second answer of popular theology. At or after

death, CHRIST meets the departed, and by His resurrection-power quickens

that which was dead, purifies that which was corrupt, spiritualises,

sanctifies, and, as by a miracle, converts the sinner into a perfect

saint. This is an answer only second in popularity to the one we have

been considering. Those who urge it, believe that man is naturally

depraved, that, under grace, he retains much, almost all, his old nature,

that he is very faulty in deed, in will and affections. They know that

he must be faultless to gain accession to heaven and dwell with GOD and

the Lamb, and this faultlessness they hope for and pray for; but there is

no effort to acquire it; there is no concern for the absence, the

continued absence of it; it is regarded as altogether a thing of the

future; the free and perfect gift—perfect at once—to the released soul

and the raised body. Men who hold this view, are often better than their

creed requires them to be. In love of GOD and devotion to Him, they

strive to abandon sin and cultivate holiness; but they have no definite

object in view of becoming faultless here, in order to be faultless in

heaven. They seem to believe that they cannot get any nearer to

faultlessness whatever they do, and that those who have made no efforts,

ay, have even led ungodly lives, and, but for a few last sighs and

ejaculations, would have died ungodly deaths, are just as qualified, just

as fit in many cases, just as sure recipients of instantly converting and

perfecting grace in the next world!

But if this is so, why have we such solemn warnings, to the effect that

as the tree falls, so shall it lie? “He that is righteous, then, shall

be righteous still. He that is filthy then, shall be filthy still.” Why

is it that in the representations which we have of the Judgment, men are

always dealt with according to what they were in life, “Inasmuch as ye

did it,” “Inasmuch as ye did it not”? Why is the pound taken away from

him that did not seek to increase it, and given to him who had gained ten

pounds, and the commentary subjoined, “Unto every one which hath shall be

given, and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away

from him”? Why is the boaster of his privileges—“In Thy name have I cast

out devils”—instantly dismissed with the words, “Depart from me, I never

knew you”? Why are they reproved who called CHRIST LORD, LORD, but did

not the things which He said? What did St. Peter mean when he exhorted

“Save yourselves;” and Paul, “Work out your own salvation with fear and

trembling;” “Let him that thinketh he standeth, take heed lest he fall;”

and CHRIST Himself, “Behold, I come quickly, and My reward is with Me, to

give to every man according as his work shall be;” “Blessed are they that

do His commandments that they may have right to the tree of life, and may

enter in through the gates into the city”? Surely all this, as with a

voice from heaven, calls on us to put away the delusion, that mortal life

is not a probation, that man has not a fitness to acquire in this life,

in order that he may be faultless in heaven. The answer of truth,

brethren, to the question, “How can man be faultless in heaven?” is,

briefly, By praying, and striving, through the blessing of GOD, the grace

of the Spirit of CHRIST, and his own self-denial, and diligence, and

cultivated holiness, to become less and less faulty here. After all, he

will never, on this side of the grave, be without spot or blemish, and

perfect in holiness. Whatever CHRIST may do for him here, he will still

have much to be purged away, much to be quickened, much to be glorified.

But, be sure, there must be a seed-time here and a growing here, if there

is to be a harvest hereafter. There must be a service, if there is to be

a reward; we must be faithful in a little, before we are made rulers over

much; there must be a fitness, a partial, a main fitness acquired here,

or no admission there to the inheritance of the Saints in light.

CHRIST’S work in us hereafter is not a transforming, but a completing, a

finishing, a perfecting work. “To him that hath”—that is, that has made

use of and improved what he hath—“to him more shall be given,” and he

shall abound. He who has traced in his soul and life the outline of the

features of the blessed JESUS, shall have the likeness filled up and

finished by the Divine artist, and be wholly conformed to His image. He

who has kept down the flesh, shall have the power of the flesh destroyed

in him. He who has sought after holiness, shall be made perfect. A

great change; much taken away, much added, but not a transformation. A

great work, which can only be done then, and only by CHRIST; but which

will fail to be done then if materials are not provided for it now; if

the foundation has not been laid, and the walls have not been raised, and

all made ready for the roof of GOD’S adding, and the capping of the tower

of glory. Yes; this is the qualification, without which you cannot be

received, but, having it, cannot be refused. Labour and pray to be

faultless here, and CHRIST shall at the end perfect your faultlessness,

and shall present you faultless before the presence of His glory with

exceeding joy. But the text seems to speak not of those who had washed

away defilements, had secured pardon of offences, had repaired faults and

made up deficiencies, in short, had been sinners, but, under the

operation of the spirit of CHRIST, were become saints; but of those who

never had been faulty, spotted, or blemished “These are they which were

not defiled with women, for they are virgins. These are they which

follow the Lamb whithersoever He goeth.” Of course, there must have been

the spot and blemish of original sin; but, apart from this—which CHRIST’S

applied purifying power and all-sufficient merits would entirely

remove—there seems to have been in the lives of these persons no actual

sin, no omission of righteousness. Now, as there is no man that liveth

and sinneth not, it has been conjectured that the vision here exhibits

those who were taken away to GOD in their infancy, before they had the

power or the will to do good or evil, and who, therefore, as far as

actual deeds and feelings are concerned, not by work, or grace, or

conviction, but absolutely and from the first were faultless: and

probably the selection of the description as the Gospel for this day, the

festival of the Holy Innocents, has gone far to confirm this conjecture.

But, brethren, this surely is not the meaning, at least the full meaning,

of the words. They describe freedom from defilement and following of the

Lamb as things that might have been otherwise. They hold up for the

example and encouragement of those who were tempted to lust, and to

depart from following the living LORD, the praise and happiness of those

who are without fault in these respects; and therefore they suggest to

us, I think, as the most profitable and foremost thought, the

blessedness, the superior blessedness of those who never have contracted

sin, nor failed in holiness.

Men sometimes seem to fancy that the most glorious character in heaven,

the object of GOD’S fondest love, will be the once deep-stained and

wholly defiled, that have been washed in CHRIST’S blood till they are

become whiter than snow, the reckless, and rebellious, and blaspheming,

who have been subdued and converted; and that in comparison of these, the

mainly regular righteous life will almost pass unnoticed. It is easy to

account for the supposition. We read, without due consideration, of her

that sinned much, and was forgiven much, and therefore loved much; of the

returned prodigal rejoiced over more than the son who had remained at

home; of the joy in heaven over one sinner that repenteth, more than over

ninety-nine just persons who need no repentance; of publicans and harlots

going into the kingdom of heaven before priests and scribes. We forget

that these things were said to men who were not really righteous, but

self-sufficient; that they were an accommodation to their own kind of

reasoning; that they were the justification of special works and

feelings, and peculiar demonstrations. Surely we are not to understand

by them anything more than that sinners were _at times_ more in CHRIST’S

thoughts than saints; that on the recovery of one lost sheep, the joy

over that one caused the rest for the moment to be put out of

remembrance. Surely we are not to understand that GOD has less love for,

and shows less favour to those who have uniformly served and honoured

Him, than to those whose life has been one of contempt and rebellion, who

have refused to accept Him till they had made trial of all else; that

GOD’S power and glory are more magnified in the ultimate conversion of

such a sinner, than in the steady control and improvement of a life-long

saint; that in themselves the reformed drunkards and defiled are better

than those who were always sober and pure; that their memories are more

blissful, and their themes of praise more satisfactory; that they are

even equal in favour, in bliss, in manifested honour to those who were

undefiled and consistently obedient, whom Holy Scripture distinguishes on

this very account, of whom it relates, that they sing a song which no

other can learn, signifying that they have a peculiar privilege and a

peculiar joy! Brethren, be sure it is not so. GOD is abundantly

gracious to all who call upon Him, late as well as early. No one,

whatever his past life, shall be refused who comes to Him through CHRIST.

In his late righteousness all his former sins shall be forgiven and

forgotten; they shall not once be mentioned unto him. He shall have too,

the joy of the righteous, and shall dwell with GOD in heaven; but still

He Who makes one star to differ from another in glory, Who bestows

different measures of reward upon different capacities, and different

attainments, has a special interest and a superior blessedness for those

who have never been stained, who have always stayed in their father’s

house, and have obeyed His will and loved His voice. In themselves they

are dearer to Him, as more like JESUS; and for them, He has seats closer

to the throne of CHRIST, and offices of honour near His person.

If this is so, if “faultlessness,” in the sense of never blotted, never

imperfect, is the state that is most blessed, then, brethren, we might

perhaps be tempted to envy the fate of those whom we commemorate to-day,

who suffered so early for CHRIST’S sake, and as soon almost as they were

born, were put to death. We might judge, too, that the little ones whom

GOD so frequently takes away so soon after lending them, are summoned to

a higher blessedness than we can ever know; and therefore that not only

would it have been gain to die in infancy, but that it is positive loss

to live to years of discretion and responsibility. Let us not err

herein. We believe that the dear innocents, whose first consciousness is

of bliss in heaven, whose reason begins to develop, and their will to

exercise itself, only when sin is impossible, are not only unspeakably

blessed, but that GOD specially loves them, and folds them to His bosom

(as we did here), because of that innocence: no guile, no defilement—all

simplicity and trust. Thankful then in their sober moments are all

bereaved parents who are assured of their departed little ones’ eternal

safety, and are spared the fears and anxieties, the heartrending

realisation of self-will developed, and the world’s evil example

followed, and the devil triumphant. The LORD gave, and the LORD hath

taken away; and, in that He has taken away, from the evil to come, Oh!

blessed be the name of the LORD.

But, brethren, it is only because we fear for the future, that we

thankfully accept such a present. Could we be sure that our little ones

would remain faultless, that they would not abuse the world, nor fall

into great error or misery, that they would grow in grace, and in the

fear of the LORD, and at length surely attain to glory; then, not from

selfishness, but for their sakes, we should covet length of days for

them. And rightly, for there is a better faultlessness, and a

correspondingly higher blessedness than that of infants, who were allowed

no opportunity (and possessed no power) to contract fault: it is the

faultlessness of those who shrink from the allowed opportunity, who

restrain the possessed power, and overcome the persuading will, who pass

through the fire without the smell of it being left on their garments,

who make manifest by a life of self-denials, and resistances to

temptations, and patience and perseverance in well-doing, their

intelligent deliberate love of GOD, and hatred of evil. These are the

tried, the eagerly accepted, the specially loved. These do the LORD’S

work, and set forth the LORD’S glory. These shall indeed be welcomed

with a “Well-done good and faithful servant,” for them shall be reserved

the best seats on the right hand of GOD; and they shall joy in GOD, and

GOD in them, with a peculiar joy, for they are likest unto CHRIST, Whose

spotlessness was preserved among so many defilements, Who with heart, and

mind, and life, consistently, unceasingly served GOD, and Who therefore

is highly exalted, and has a name which is above all other names.

Oh it is no mean privilege, brethren, which you forego, when you leave

the ranks of the faultless, when you shrink from duty, or yield to sinful

pleasure, or contract any stain of ungodliness. Say not, “It is only for

once.” It will surely be for more than once; but if it were not, still

from being faultless that _once_ makes you blotted and blemished. Say

not, “I can repent by and by, and GOD of His mercy will accept me, and I

shall be myself again.” You may not live to repent. Sin may disincline,

the Spirit provoked may leave you; but even if you do repent—though GOD

will undoubtedly forgive, and in a sense restore you—remember, you can

never be as you were before. You may be cleansed, but not as at first

clean; admitted to heaven, but not to the band of the one hundred and

forty-four thousand of undefiled; joined to the glorious choir of the

redeemed, but not allowed, not able to sing the peculiar song of the

faultless.

“But what,” some would say, “is the use of this preaching? We are all

already faulty; we can none of us have a place among these choice first

fruits of GOD’S harvest.” Brethren, faultlessness, pure faultlessness,

is no longer ours; but comparative faultlessness (and Bible

faultlessness, after all, is only comparative freedom from wilful sin)

may, and, I trust, does pertain to many of us; and for each degree of

nearness to faultlessness, if I understand the Bible aright, there is its

peculiar reward. I would put you on your guard against losing that

reward, by sinking to a lower level. I would urge you to hold fast what

you have, to subdue yourselves, to resist the world and the devil, to be

ever on the watch against danger, and to flee speedily from temptation,

if it is too strong to fight against, to seek strength and sanctification

in means of grace, to pray constantly (and strive constantly to make good

your prayer), that CHRIST would keep you from falling, and finally

present you faultless before the presence of His glory with exceeding

joy.

SERMON VII.

PAST MERCIES REVIEWED.

(NEW YEAR’S EVE.)

Plain Sermons, preached at Archbishop Tenison's Chapel, Regent Street. Second Series · 第 16 / 32 题