ACTS, XVII., 22, 23.

_Ye men of Athens_, _I perceive that in all things ye are too

superstitious_. _For as I passed by_, _and beheld your devotions_,

_I found an altar with this inscription_, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. _Whom

therefore ye ignorantly worship_, _Him declare I unto you_.

THE city of Athens was wholly given to idolatry. It was crowded with

altars, dedicated to the supposed superior deities, to deified men, to

abstract virtues, Love, Truth, Mercy, and the like. Whatever new god was

described and recommended to them was immediately recognised, and

thenceforth worshipped; and, besides, the Athenians’ love of something

new, led them to search out for and invent gods for themselves. Hence it

came to pass, that there were more idols in that one city than in all the

rest of Greece: so that Satirist did not much exaggerate when he said

that in Athens you might more easily find a god than a man. It belongs

not to our present purpose to consider how this arose; to contemplate the

strange coexistence of so much superstition and so much cultivation of

intellect, or to strive to enter into the feelings which animated Paul,

when his spirit was stirred within him at the sight of the city wholly

given to idolatry. We pass on to the time when the Apostle stood on

Mars’s hill, in sight of many heathen altars, surrounded by Epicureans

and Stoics and disciples of many other schools of philosophy, some

striving to silence him, others intent upon hearing something new from

him—to meet the contentious gainsayings of the one, to enlist the

curiosity of the other; to make use of their various dispositions, of all

that he saw and heard, in promoting the glory of GOD, and, if it might

be, in leading them to salvation.

It must be borne in mind that some of these news-seeking Athenians

inconsistently enough contended with him, because he taught what was

novel; while others, on that very account, were favourable to him, hoping

that he would set forth some strange gods—some additional objects of

worship to whom they might erect altars. “Ye men of Athens,” he said, “I

perceive from actual observation that you, more than other people, have

great regard for religion.” This is the right meaning of the words

translated: “In all things ye are too superstitious.” It is not likely

that the Apostle would have commenced a speech intended to conciliate and

enlighten them, with words that would at once affront them, and make them

deaf to all else he had to say. Besides, it is clear from what follows,

that he is not directly calling upon them to abandon what was false, but

to understand and accept rightly a truth which they held in ignorance.

“I say nothing to you now upon the many gods whom you worship _by name_,

but, pointing to an altar inscribed to the Unknown GOD (it was probably

in sight) I answer those who contend with me for speaking about the

unknown, and gratify those who want to hear something new, by taking that

altar as my text, and preaching to you about ‘the Unknown GOD’—about no

new god, for He is already the object of your worship; but still about

one of whom much that is new to you may be said. Give ear to me, ye that

are so full of reverence for the gods, while I describe to you an object

indeed of your present reverence, but one of whose nature and operations

and demands upon you, you know nothing.”

Respecting the existence of such an altar, we are told that the Athenians

through the very excess of their idolatry (which led them to look for

gods in every place and circumstance, and to ascribe every event, good or

ill, to the influence of some deity) had on more than one occasion, when

an unusually severe pestilence had visited them, which they could not

connect with any of their known gods, conjectured that it must be the

doing of some god whom they did not propitiate with sacrifices, and,

failing to find out who it was, and yet fearing to neglect his worship,

had caused altars _without names_ to be erected, and offerings to be made

to the nameless being; and that in course of time these altars came to be

described, and to bear a corresponding inscription, as severally the

altars of an “unknown god.” There is no reason to suppose that they

meant to exalt that god above the others, that they had any clearly

defined ideas of the general operations of one unknown Being, much less

that they meant under that title to worship the GOD of the Jews; but with

a kind of natural instinct, a very vague feeling that something beyond

and above what they knew, existed, they had stumbled, as it were, in the

dark, upon a real truth, which was now to be revealed to them. “Whom

therefore ye ignorantly worship—Whom you are right in worshipping, but of

Whose proper worship you know nothing, Him declare I, and reveal unto

you.” You know how St. Paul went on, meeting without mentioning the

errors of the various sects of philosophers, that there was indeed a GOD

who made the world, and all things therein; that He was not a mere idol

of wood and stone (“dwelling not in temples made with hands”), that He

had no such passions, and no such needs as they ascribed to Jove and Mars

and their deified men (“Neither is worshipped with men’s hands as though

He needed anything”), that He was not a sentiment—an ideal thing—a being

bound by fate—an indifferent spectator of men’s ways. “He giveth to all

life and breath and all things.” “In Him we live and move and have our

being.” “He hath appointed a day in the which He will judge the world in

righteousness by the man whom He hath chosen;” to whom He has borne such

signal testimony in raising Him from the dead; in whose name, and at

whose command, I come to tell you of the resurrection from the dead, and

to call you out of the ignorance which GOD will no longer wink at, and to

urge upon you repentance and preparation for judgment. So he spoke of

the unknown GOD. Some mocked, and refused to understand; some were in

doubt and difficulty, and wished to hear more; others began to know Him

who had hitherto been unknown, and clave unto the Apostle, and believed.

And shortly after Paul departed from Athens, never, as far as we know, to

visit again!

It would be interesting to consider the strange rise and spread of

ignorance which in course of time made the GOD, Who had been seen and

heard and walked with in Eden, and had never left Himself without

witness, wholly unknown to the creatures of His hand, and the objects of

His providential care; to contemplate the idolatry of ignorant heathen

man, not seeing GOD in all His works, not able to find Him even when

looking for Him and desiring to worship Him, believing in every god but

the true One, sometimes even offering sacrifices to devils; to discuss,

too, how it is the world by wisdom knows not, and never has known GOD,

that intellect cannot search Him out, that intellect has even blinded

many to whom the unknown GOD was plainly exhibited; to ask how much of

this is natural, how much unnatural, how much judicial—the punishment of

pride, the reward of loving darkness rather than light, because of evil

deeds. But interesting as would be the consideration of “GOD unknown in

the world,” there is a more important theme suggested by the text for us

to dwell on, namely, “GOD unknown in the Church.” “There standeth one

among you Whom ye know not.” Let me speak to you on this, brethren.

Whatever may be the state and disposition of the people whom the

clergyman has to deal with in his various daily ministrations and his

intercourse with the world, once a week, at least, he addresses an

assembly in some sense given to religion. As he stands in the pulpit on

the Lord’s Day he may adopt almost the words of St. Paul on the

Areopagus: “I perceive that you (and such as you) are more than the rest

of mankind GOD-fearing, taking an interest in religion, listening to its

teaching, partaking of its ordinances, supplicating, praising, serving

GOD.”

It may, indeed, occasionally be that some present themselves to see if

there is anything in the church for them to object to, or ridicule; that

others have come in conformity to the fashion, to hear something new, to

see and be seen; to make a show of respectability, to wile away an idle

time; and that many others, though proposing to themselves the observance

of a religious duty, are so formal, so listless, so unreal, that it

cannot be said of them that they are “given to religion.” Nevertheless,

I repeat that the clergyman, as he stands in the pulpit, has before him

the best, _i.e._, the most religious of mankind; not mockers, and

revilers, and persecutors; not gainsayers, and despisers, and forgetters;

but real worshippers—more or less reverential and earnest, more or less

enlightened—of the true GOD. But has he not in these same persons (as

St. Paul had in the Athenians) many worshippers of an unknown GOD? May

he not venture to say to almost all, “Whom ye ignorantly worship, Him

declare I unto you.” Christian worshippers, my brethren, often have many

idols, who share almost equally with GOD their interest and affections

and service. They have, many of them, their “ism,” their Paul, their

Cephas, or Apollos, their favourite dogma, their preferences and

prejudices for some particular rites, and ceremonies, and modes of

worship. In church, and out of church, their religion consists largely

in giving heed to these things: GOD is in their thoughts, but not in all

their thoughts, or not the chief, the engrossing object of their

thoughts; He is one of many objects. You find this out if you listen to

their remarks after service. “Such a chant went well or badly; the

preacher’s manner was pleasing, or the contrary; his language very

ornate, or very bald; the theme one they like, or one they do not like;

the rubric strictly observed, or strangely disregarded;” and so on. Of

course, as all these things are means to an end, and as the end is

gained, or not gained, by their suitableness, or the opposite, it is

lawful and right to give them some consideration: but I put it to you,

brethren, whether they are not too often regarded as themselves the end;

as though, provided they were satisfactory, there was nothing more

wanting; as though they were rightly as much the objects of interest as

the GOD in Whose service they are used, or, rather, as though regarding

them were regarding GOD!

O brethren, we are too attentive to the system—too regardless of the

Centre! We want to know—(to feel, I mean, for the Christian’s knowledge

is of the heart)—that GOD is above all—that where other objects have

anything like an equal share of attention, where they hide Him from us in

His pure essence and direct influence, there He is ignorantly

worshipped—that He is a Spirit, not a chant, a voice, a figure of speech,

a rubric, a turning east or west. Through these we may reach Him; many

of them are steps and accessories to worship; but if in these we rest,

then we set them up as idols, side by side with Him, and prove that to us

He is but as the unknown god of the Athenians.

See, dear brethren, I beseech you, if aught of this old error clings to

you, and pray GOD to clear you from it, and resolve henceforth to strive

to keep clear. Treat means as means—value them; be glad that they are

becomingly afforded you, and rejoice if they help you; but do not let the

best of them beguile you, nor the worst of them hinder you, from finding

and worshipping GOD Himself; from going away filled with thoughts of Him.

“I prayed to GOD; I praised Him; I held communion with Him; I heard the

things of GOD from His messenger, and have now to go and live by what I

have done, and received, and heard.” These are the thoughts to take away

from church with you, and to prove to you that you wisely worship the

known GOD.

I have dwelt much on this part of the subject, because of the general

forgetfulness of it; a forgetfulness which prevents many from rendering

acceptable service to GOD, and from obtaining the full help and comfort

which religion affords to all who rightly use it.

But there are many other kinds of ignorant worship. It is possible to

cast down all idols, and worship GOD alone, and yet err. The so-called

spiritualist does this: the man who supposes that addressing himself

directly to GOD, is sufficient, without the use of appointed forms and

ordinances; who attaches no importance to baptism and holy communion; who

thinks that no grace accompanies their use, or that he can have the grace

without the sign; who says that praying at home is a good substitute for

congregational worship; who boasts that he can read a sermon for himself,

and a better one than he can hear in church; or that the Bible is

sufficiently clear to him without an interpreter.

Such an one ignorantly worships an unknown GOD. He dictates, instead of

obeying; he chooses, instead of submitting to what is appointed for him;

he puts reason in the place of faith; he refuses to walk in GOD’S way of

salvation; he disputes the Divine wisdom in requiring him to be baptised,

and to partake of the Cup and Bread of Blessing; in warning not to

forsake the assembling of ourselves together; in asking, “How shall they

hear without a preacher?” in appointing a standing ministry; he rebels

against GOD, when he disregards these ordinances; he makes GOD a liar

when he presumes to deem them unnecessary. Oh, he has great need that

the GOD whom he ignorantly worships, should be plainly declared unto him!

Again, that man ignorantly worships GOD, who substitutes the forms for

the life of religion; who supposes that a sanctuary service atones for

all want of service elsewhere; who prays in church, but not in his

closet; who hears the Bible read or expounded, but does not search it

diligently for himself; who receives sacraments, but does not foster, and

use, and develop the sacramental grace, which is entrusted to him as an

awful talent to be increased and accounted for; who balances the religion

of Sunday against the worldliness of the whole week; who every seventh

day eases his conscience of its sin, by sighing out the general

confession, and forthwith takes to himself the comfort of the declaration

of forgiveness, and then goes back to his old transgressions and

omissions, till the holy day comes round again. Of course whoever does

this, or any part of it deliberately, is grossly, culpably ignorant of

the GOD whom he professes to worship; but it is not of such that I speak

now. I have in mind professing Christians, persons who busy themselves

about religion, who are regular in their attendance on means of grace,

who never wilfully desecrate the LORD’S day, who knowing that unpardoned

sin separates from GOD, and that without grace, life is unblessed, are

anxious for pardon and grace, and frequently seek them in GOD’S appointed

ways; but yet, forget, are not impressed with the danger of a relapse,

and the sin of non-improvement, and so somehow or other, fall into a

routine of formal religion on Sunday, which is not in their thoughts,

except as a matter that belongs to next Sunday all through the week.

This is to worship ignorantly an unknown GOD—a GOD Who does not accept

intermittent worship, Who bestows pardon only on repentance and amendment

of life, Who gives grace for use, Whose sacraments are meals to sustain

life and strengthen for service, Whose Sabbath is a holy rest to refresh

for holy work, in Whom we live, and move, and have our being, Whose glory

is to be our constant aim, His presence our perpetual joy. But these,

and many other ignorances—such as the disregard of particular attributes,

the picturing for oneself what GOD ought to be like, and so varying the

picture according to the fancy of him who draws it, instead of searching

how, and what manner of GOD He has declared Himself to be, and what

worship is appointed, and therefore acceptable—these, I say, are the

faults of individuals, or of certain classes only. Let me now speak of

an ignorance, a respect in which GOD is more or less unknown, which

concerns us all. And here, dear brethren, my object is not to censure,

to blame you for what you have not, but pointing out to you the GOD whom

Scripture reveals, to help you to correct what is amiss, to fill up what

is wanting in your conceptions of GOD, and so to attain to the

blessedness of knowing Him fully, and to discharge the duty of

worshipping Him in spirit and in truth.

Observe St. Paul, while acknowledging the religious reverence of the

Athenians, evidently deals with them as men who understood not the

truths, the objects, the blessings of religion; as those who when they

had built their altars, and celebrated their holy days, and offered their

sacrifices, thought they had fulfilled all that religion required of

them, and who expected to get nothing by their religion, but exemption

from certain grievous pestilences, or help perhaps in war—mere occasional

miraculous manifestations of dreadful power—who had no conceptions of

sanctifying influence, of moral responsibility, of rewards of

righteousness. To them he declares GOD to be, One not far from them, One

whom they might find, in Whom they then lived and moved, and had their

being, Who henceforth would not wink at any ignorance, Who was at present

treating them, and regarding them with a view to a coming judgment. Now

we are better (thank GOD, who maketh us to differ!) than these Athenians;

but still we want somewhat of the heart-knowledge which Paul would have

impressed on them. We want to be more fully convinced that religion is

not a pastime, but a business; that not only duty, but interest,

momentous interest, is involved in it, especially that it is not a mere

concern and preparation and provision for the future, but a present

substantial reality; that GOD is not the object of distant worship; that

His wrath and His mercy are, not rarely, but constantly, being exercised

here; that He is not a departed LORD, Who has set us to do His work

against His return, and will take no account of us till some far off day;

that He has not left us unrewarded, unpunished, unhelped in the present,

not caring what we are, what we do, what we suffer, so as when He comes

back, we have either done what He appointed, or have assumed the position

of penitents for offence, and supplicants of compassion.

Is it not matter of experience that we are not sufficiently influenced by

the hopes and fears of religion, that we do not adequately reverence GOD,

or seek Him, and rest on Him, because we suppose that He is afar off, and

that all that we have to expect from Him, will only begin to be realised

in the next world? GOD, as a present GOD, is too much unknown to us. We

do not feel that He is now about us; that His eye is watching us, and His

arm upraised over each of us at every moment of our lives; that He is a

guest actually in us, to be honoured and waited on now. We do not know

of His present closeness, of His immediate rewards and punishments, His

pleasure or displeasure, His instant succour, or instant withdrawal from

us, according to what He sees in us. We do all, and bear all in distant

expectation, and therefore we do negligently, and bear feebly and

impatiently. Could we realise the perpetual working, the instant

retribution, the very touching of GOD now, it would be easy to regard and

serve Him, it would be all but impossible to neglect Him. No man could

prefer dross to gold, misery to bliss, death to life, if they were both

offered him at the same moment. No one could hesitate whom to obey, whom

to trust, whom to fear, whom to love, if GOD were seen on the one side,

and fellow man on the other. It is because GOD, and the things of GOD,

are supposed to be far off, that we first prefer the other, and then

practically regard it as that which alone has real existence.

Well, then, this is what we have to mend. I have been urging the mending

on these Sundays in Advent, in striving to show you that there is a GOD

present to superintend, and provide, and care for you in this life, and

in every event and moment of this life; that there is an actual and

immediate judgment of every deed, good and evil, and that there is a

present business of religion, and a direct service of GOD to be now

attended to. It is not head-knowledge that you want, but

heart-perception, and realisation. You want to feel what you must know

(because the Bible has told you that GOD is a GOD at hand, and not a GOD

afar off); that godliness has the promise of the life that now is, as

well as of that which is to come; that the irreligious is condemned

already. No expectation, no delay, no vision. All fulfilled, immediate,

and substantially real. You fancy, perhaps, that it cannot be so. You

urge that it is contrary to your experience; you have served GOD, and not

been rewarded; you have trusted in Him, and not been supported; you have

sinned against Him, and not been punished. Brethren, believe me, you

have not. “Experience” means that which has been ascertained by trial.

Make trial, and all will be proved. Devote yourselves now to GOD, follow

Him, give up for Him to-day, and you shall be rewarded to-day. Sin

against Him to-day, and you shall be punished to-day. Invoke His aid

to-day, and you shall surely have it. Do not prescribe your own mode of

visitation. Be sure that He will use His, and watch for it, and seek to

know it, and then you will have an experience to quote. I only repeat to

you what He has said. When you know Him, you will find that He is true.

Then wait on Him, acquaint yourselves with Him, serve Him in the present,

and look for Him in the present, and you will find Him in the present.

SERMON V.

FAITH AND ITS BLESSEDNESS.

Plain Sermons, preached at Archbishop Tenison's Chapel, Regent Street. Second Series · 第 14 / 32 题