XVII. CIVILIZATION PROPER

But now at last, only ten thousand years ago, the event occurred which

put forever out of the question any possibility of prudence in any

waywardness of individual whim, or any deviation from the rule dictated

by the owner of things. This time the something that happened did not

cause an increase of man's mastery over physical Nature. It was,

instead, like that initial invention which turned apes into men. And

again, like spoken language, it was a device to facilitate

communication of mind with mind. In some one of the many groups of

beings who had learned the use of fire, arrows, pots, sheep, and

swords, some genius hit upon the idea of written signs as a medium of

communication with those distant in space, and as a means of

perpetuating a knowledge of the will of the dead among his survivors.

But be it observed that only the master, never the man, only the owner

of things, the controller of circumstances, was in a position to embody

and preserve his judgment and desire in written signs. The new art of

writing enhanced the power of rulers, of chiefs. The Pharaoh, not the

fellah, dictated the inscription that was to be engraved. Thus all the

rulers of the past were now able to perpetuate their power by adding

their sanction to the word of the living chief, while no voice from the

ranks of the governed would be allowed to immortalize itself in written

speech. This is the reason that written language introduced

civilization proper. There was no longer any chance for the wildness of

the beast to crop out. Here began the empire of the dead over the

living; but it was the empire of dead rulers over living slaves. The

mastery over Nature and the monopoly of social power thereby became

practically infinite. The tamers were now omnipotent in comparison with

the tamed. It must be noticed that the process of transforming beasts

into citizens was one to which only the tamed, but not the tamers, were

subjected. The ruler stood outside of and above the rule he made. The

law was for his subjects. This was the case with Henry VIII at the acme

of civilization as it had been with the first of the Pharaohs.

Not only the blond beast of prey, but the swarthy also dictated an

ethic for his subjects in order to keep himself in ascendancy. It was

because Nietzsche admired all beasts of prey and felt contempt for

their victims that he hated Jesus Christ and proudly assumed the title

of Anti-Christ. For Christ had set up an ethic which encouraged the

victims to protest and attempt to win back their primeval initiative,

to take over the sovereignty which had been concentrated in the hands

of the mighty and to diffuse it among the nobodies of the tribe. St.

Luke goes so far as to assert that even before Jesus was born his

Mother entertained levelling ideas. Into her lips he puts a song in

which she magnifies the Lord because she believed her Son would bring

down the mighty and exalt them of low degree. But alas! civilization

went on for fifteen hundred years and succeeded in tying Christianity

to the chariot-wheel of monopolized initiative.

Is civilization a disease? · 第 23 / 31 题