XIV. THE TWO MARKS OF ALL CIVILIZATION

Such a differentiation of society was, among apes, the condition for

any sort of social unity; but control by the few could at the first

have been only rudimentary and intermittent. Fire is not everything,

and was indispensable only on certain occasions, as when the group

were caught unexpectedly in some wintry region. Then the choice for

any man might lie between freezing or obeying. Be it observed that

fire under such circumstances would be shared by all, but the power of

social control would be monopolized by one. Had you been there, but

not the mightiest of your group, the condition of your surviving the

cold would have been that you surrendered whatever individual

initiative you had had. You gained fire, but lost freedom. At this

point, by some innate sense of logical identity, my mind is carried

forward a hundred thousand years to that centre of to-day's highest

civilization--Detroit, and to its very palladium, the Ford Motor

Works. For in that far-famed institution is to be found a very

striking similarity to the primeval monopoly of initiative which arose

with the first control of fire. Mr. Henry Ford has been magnanimously

ready to share profits with his men, but, so far as I can learn, no

iota of the industrial control.

Before I go to the next step towards citizenship, I would call

attention to the fact that thus, near to the beginning of things human,

when the use of fire was introduced, we are able to detect the two

distinguishing characteristics of all civilization, and of trade in

particular, which are the sharing by the tribe of the blessings of

man's mastery over Nature, but, as the condition of the sharing, a

monopoly of power and initiative by the few who dispense the blessings.

So much of good and of goods--but no more--could the mass of men enjoy

as was compatible with the continuance of the master's ascendancy over

the men and over the public. We shall find no other than these marks in

all future civilization, to distinguish it from savagery and barbarism.

The only difference will be that in the period of civilization

proper--that is, from ten thousand years ago to the end of the

fifteenth century after Christ, when the established social order began

to break up--the monopoly of initiative and control is practically

absolute. As we trace the future steps in human evolution, we shall see

how this concentration of power in the hands of rulers occurred. But it

must be further observed that it is not only rudimentary civilization

which we detect as ensuing upon the introduction of the use of fire: it

is trade, socialized wealth, the division of the community into the

"haves" and the "have-nots," the introduction of the working of the

law, that to him that hath shall be given and that from him that hath

nothing but his labor to offer shall be taken with it his liberty also.

It should likewise be borne in mind that with the stealing of fire from

heaven came also that coalition of government with trade, of politics

with commerce, of the monopolists of economic power with the dictators

of life and death, of peace and war, which is manifested to the highest

conceivable degree to-day in the states most assertive of their

leadership in the vanguard of civilization. I said that with the use of

fire came the enslavement of men; but government and enslavement were

one and the same thing. Neither, however, was as yet dominant over

social life.

Is civilization a disease? · 第 20 / 31 题