2. _For proper incorporation._

3. _For shape, size and proportion of the grains._--The first is

judged by eye, and grains of the size required are obtained by the use

of sieves of different sizes.

4. _Density._--The density is generally obtained in some form of

mercury densimeter, the powder being weighed in air and then under

mercury. In some forms of the instrument the air can be pumped out so

that the weighing takes place _in vacuo_.

5. _Moisture and absorption of moisture._--The moisture and

hygroscopic test consists in weighing a sample, drying at 100 deg. C.

for a certain time, weighing again, &c., until constant. The dried

weighed sample can then be exposed to an artificial atmosphere of

known moisture and temperature, and the gain in weight per hour

similarly ascertained by periodic weighings.

6. _Firing proof._--The nature of this depends upon the purpose for

which the powder is intended. For sporting powders it consists in the

"pattern" given by the shot upon a target at a given distance, or, if

fired with a bullet, upon the "figure of merit," or mean radial

deviation of a certain number of rounds; also upon the penetrative

power. For military purposes the "muzzle" velocity produced by a

powder is ascertained by a chronograph which measures the exact time

the bullet or other projectile takes to traverse a known distance

between two wire screens. By means of "crusher gauges" the exact

pressure per square inch upon certain points in the interior of the

bore can be found.

In the chemical examination of gunpowder the points to be ascertained

are, in addition to moisture, freedom from chlorides or sulphates, and

correct proportion of nitre and sulphur to charcoal.

_Products of Fired Powder and Changes taking place on

Explosion._--With a mixture of the complexity of gunpowder it is quite

impossible to say beforehand what will be the relative amounts of

products. The desired products are nitrogen and carbon dioxide as

gases, and potassium sulphate and carbonate as solids. But the

ingredients of the mixture are not in any simple chemical proportion.

Burning in contact with air under one atmosphere pressure, and burning

in a closed or partially closed vessel under a considerable number of

atmospheres pressure, may produce quite different results. The

temperature of a reaction always rises with increased pressure.

Although the main function of the nitre is to give up oxygen and

nitrogen, of the charcoal to produce carbon dioxide and most of the

heat, and of the sulphur by vaporizing to accelerate the rate of

burning, it is quite impossible to represent the actions taking place

on explosion by any simple or single chemical equation. Roughly

speaking, the gases from black powder burnt in a closed vessel have a

volume at 0 deg. C. and 760 mm. pressure of about 280 times that of

the original powder. The temperature produced under one atmosphere is

above 2000 deg. C., and under greater pressures considerably higher.

Experiments have been made by Benjamin Robins (1743), Charles Hutton

(1778), Count Rumford (1797), Gay-Lussac (1823), R. Bunsen and L.

Schiskoff (1857), T. J. Rodman (1861), C. Karolyi (1863), and later

many researches by Sir Andrew Noble and Sir F. A. Abel, and by H.

Debus and others, all with the idea of getting at the precise

mechanism of the explosion. Debus (_Ann._, 1882, vols. 212, 213; 1891,

vol. 265) discussed at great length the results of researches by

Bunsen, Karolyi, Noble and Abel, and others on the combustion of

powder in closed vessels in such manner that all the products could be

collected and examined and the pressures registered. A Waltham Abbey

powder, according to an experiment by Noble and Abel, gave when fired

in a closed vessel the following quantities of products calculated

from one gram of powder:--

Fractions of Fractions of a

a gram. molecule or atom.

Potassium carbonate .2615 .00189 molecule

Potassium sulphate .1268 .00072 "

" thiosulphate .1666 .00087 "

" sulphide .0252 .00017 "

Sulphur .0012 .00004 atom

Carbon dioxide .2678 .00608 molecule

Carbon monoxide .0339 .00121 "

Nitrogen .1071 .00765 atom

Hydrogen .0008 .0008 "

Hydrogen sulphide .0080 .00023 molecule

Potassium thiocyanate .0004

Nitre .0005

Ammonium carbonate .0002

From this, and other results, Debus concluded that Waltham Abbey

powder could be represented by the formula 16KNO3+21.18C+6.63S and

that on combustion in a closed vessel the end results could be fairly

expressed (rounding off fractions) by 16KNO3+21C+5S = 5K2CO3 +

K2SO4+2K2S2+13CO2+3CO+8N2. Some of the sulphur is lost, part combining

with the metal of the apparatus and part with hydrogen in the

charcoal. The military powders of most nations can be represented by

the formula 16KNO3+21.2C+6.6S, proportions which are reasonably near

to a theoretical mixture, that is one giving most complete combustion,

greatest gas volume and temperature. The combustion of powder consists

of two processes: (i.) oxidation, during which potassium carbonate and

sulphate, carbon dioxide and nitrogen are mainly formed, and (ii.) a

reduction process in which free carbon acts on the potassium sulphate

and free sulphur on the potassium carbonate, producing potassium

sulphide and carbon monoxide respectively. Most powders contain more

carbon and sulphur than necessary, hence the second stage. In this

second stage heat is lost. The potassium sulphide is also the most

objectionable constituent as regards fouling.

The energy of a powder is given, according to Berthelot, by

multiplying the gas volume by the heat (in calories) produced during

burning; Debus shows that a powder composed of 16KNO3 to 8C and 8S

would have the least, and one of composition 16KNO3+24C+16S the

greatest, when completely burnt. The greatest capability with the

lowest proportion of carbon and sulphur to nitre would be obtained

from the mixture /16KNO3+22C+8S.

Smokeless and even noiseless powders seem to have been sought for

during the whole gunpowder period. In 1756 one was experimented with

in France, but was abandoned owing to difficulties in manufacture.

Modern smokeless powders are certainly less noisy than the black

powders, mainly because of the absence of metallic salts which

although they may be gaseous whilst in the gun are certainly ejected

as solids or become solids at the moment of contact with air.

_Brown Powders._--About the middle of the 19th century guns and

projectiles were made much larger and heavier than previously, and it

was soon found that the ordinary black powders of the most dense form

burnt much too rapidly, straining or bursting the pieces. Powders were

introduced containing about 3% sulphur and 17-19% of a special form of

charcoal made from slightly charred straw, or similar material. This

"brown charcoal" contains a considerable amount of the hydrogen and

oxygen of the original plant substance. The mechanical processes of

manufacture of these brown powders is the same as for black. They,

however, differ from black by burning very slowly, even under

considerable pressure. This comparative slowness is caused by (1) the

presence of a small amount of water even when air-dry; (2) the fact

that the brown charcoal is practically very slightly altered

cellulosic material, which before it can burn completely must undergo

a little further resolution or charring at the expense of some heat

from the portion of charge first ignited; and (3) the lower content of

sulphur. An increase of a few per cent in the sulphur of black powder

accelerates its rate of burning, and it may become almost a blasting

powder. A decrease in sulphur has the reverse effect. It is really the

sulphur vapour that in the early period of combustion spreads the

flame through the charge.

Many other powders have been made or proposed in which nitrates or

chlorates of the alkalis or of barium, &c., are the oxygen providers

and substances as sugar, starch, and many other organic compounds as

the combustible elements. Some of these compositions have found

employment for blasting or even as sporting powders, but in most cases

their objectionable properties of fouling, smoke and mode of exploding

have prevented their use for military purposes. The adoption by the

French government of the comparatively smokeless nitrocellulose

explosive of Paul Vieille in 1887 practically put an end to the old

forms of gunpowders. The first smokeless powder was made in 1865 by

Colonel E. Schultze (_Ding. Pol. Jour._ 174, p. 323; 175, p. 453) by

nitrating wood meal and adding potassium and barium nitrates. It is

somewhat similar in composition to the E. C. sporting powder. F.

Uchatius, in Austria, proposed a smokeless powder made from nitrated

starch, but it was not adopted owing to its hygroscopic nature and

also its tendency to detonate.

BIBLIOGRAPHY.--Vanucchio Biringuccio, _De la pirotechnia_ (Venice,

1540); Tartaglia, _Quesiti e invenzioni diversi_ (lib. iii.) (Venice,

1546); Peter Whitehorne, _How to make Saltpetre, Gunpowder, &c._

(London, 1573); Nic. Macchiavelli, _The Arte of Warre_, trans. by

Whitehorne (London, 1588); Hanzelet, _Recueil de plusiers machines

militaires_ (Paris, 1620); Boillet Langrois, _Modelles artifices de

feu_ (1620); Kruger, _Chemical Meditations on the Explosion of

Gunpowder_ (in Latin) (1636); Collado, _On the Invention of Gunpowder_

(Spanish) (1641); _The True Way to make all Sorts of Gunpowder and

Matches_ (1647); Hawksbee, _On Gunpowder_ (1686); Winter, _On

Gunpowder_ (in Latin); Robins, _New Principles of Gunnery_ (London,

1742) (new ed. by Hutton, 1805); D'Antoni, _Essame della polvere_

(Turin, 1765) (trans. by Captain Thomson, R. A., London, 1787); Count

Rumford, "Experiments on Fired Gunpowder," _Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc._

(1797); Charles Hutton, _Mathematical Tracts_, vol. iii. (1812); Sir

W. Congreve, _A Short Account of Improvements in Gunpowder made by_

(London, 1818); Bunsen and Schiskoff, "On the Chemical Theory of

Gunpowder," _Pogg. Ann._, 1857, vol. cii.; General Rodman,

_Experiments on Metal for Cannon, and Qualities of Cannon Powder_

(Boston, 1861); Napoleon III., _Etudes sur le passe et l'avenir de

l'artillerie_, vol. iii. (Paris, 1862); Von Karolyi, "On the Products

of the Combustion of Gun Cotton and Gunpowder," _Phil. Mag._ (October

1863); Captain F. M. Smith, _Handbook of the Manufacture and Proof of

Gunpowder at Waltham Abbey_ (London, 1870); Noble and Abel, _Fired

Gunpowder_ (London, 1875, 1880); Noble, _Artillery and Explosives_

(1906); H. W. L. Hime, _Gunpowder and Ammunition, their Origin and

Progress_ (1904); O. Guttmann, _The Manufacture of Explosives_ (1895),

_Monumenta pulveris pyrii_ (1906); _Notes on Gunpowder and Gun

Cotton_, published by order of the secretary of state for war (London,

1907). (See also EXPLOSIVES.) (W. R. E. H.)

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Groups, Theory of" to "Gwyniad" Volume 12, Slice 6 · 第 40 / 44 题