THE STRUCTURE OF THE LORD'S PRAYER

'After this manner therefore pray ye.'--MATT. vi. 9.

'After this manner' may or may not imply that Christ meant this prayer

to be a form, but He certainly meant it for a model. And they who drink

in its spirit, and pray, seeking God's glory before their own

satisfaction, and, while trustfully asking from His hand their daily

bread, rise quickly to implore the supply of their spiritual hunger, do

pray after this manner,' whether they use these words or no.

All begins with the recognition of the Fatherhood of God. The clear and

fixed contemplation of God is the beginning of all true prayer, and that

contemplation does not fasten on His remote and partially intelligible

attributes, nor strive to climb to behold Him as in Himself, but grasps

Him as related to us. The Fatherhood of God implies His communication of

life, His tenderness, and our kindred. This is the prayer of the

children of the kingdom, and can only be truly offered by those who, by

faith in the Son, have received the adoption of sons. It gathers all

such into a family, so delivering their prayer from selfish absorption

in their own joys or needs. As our Father 'in Heaven,' He is lifted

clear above earth's limitations, changes, and imperfections. So

childlike familiarity is sublimed into reverence, our hearts are drawn

upward, and freed from the oppressive and narrowing attachment to earth

and sense.

The perfect sevenfold petitions of the prayer fall into two halves,

corresponding roughly to the first and second tables of the decalogue.

The first half consists of three petitions, which refer to God and His

kingdom. They are three, in accordance with the symbolism of numbers

which, in the Old Testament, always regards three as the sacred number

of completeness and of divinity. The second half consists of four

petitions, which refer to ourselves. They are four--the number which

symbolises the creature. The lessons taught by the order in which these

two halves occur do not need to be dwelt upon. God first and man second,

His glory before our wants--that is the true order. For how few of us is

it the spontaneous order! Do we first rise to God, and only secondly

descend to ourselves?

Note, too, the sequence in each of these halves. In the first we may say

that we begin from above and come down, or from within and come

outwards. In the second, the process is the opposite. We begin on the

lowest level with our external needs, and go upwards and inwards to

removal of sin, exemption from temptation, and complete deliverance from

evil. The first half gives us the beginning, middle, and end of God's

purposes for the world. The recognition of His name is the basis of His

kingdom, and His kingdom is the sphere in which alone His will is done.

The second half, in like manner, gives us the beginning, middle, and end

of His dealings with the individual, the common mercies of daily bread,

forgiveness, guidance, protection in conflict, and final deliverance.

The 'name' of God is His revealed character. He hallows it when He so

acts as to make His holiness manifest. We hallow it when we regard it as

the holy thing which it is. That petition is first, because the

knowledge of God as He is self-revealed is the deepest want of men, and

the spread of that knowledge and reverence is the way by which His

kingdom comes.

God's kingdom is His rule over men's hearts. Christ began His ministry

by proclaiming its near approach, and in effect brought it to earth. But

it spreads slowly in the individual heart, and in the world. Therefore,

this second petition is ever in place, until the consummation. God's

rule is established through the hallowing of His name; for it is a rule

which works on men through their understandings, and seeks no ignorant

submission.

The sum of this first half is, 'Thy will be done, as in Heaven, so on

earth.' Obedience to that will is the end of God's self-revelation. It

makes all the difference whether we begin with the thought of the name

or of the will. In the latter case, religion will be slavish and

submission sullen. There is no more horrible and paralysing conception

of God than that of mere sovereign will. But if we think of Him as

desiring that we should know His name, and as gathering all its

syllables into the one perfect 'Word of God'; then we are sure that His

will must be intelligible and good. Obedience becomes delight, and the

surrender of our wills to His the glad expression of love. He who begins

with 'Thy will be done' is a slave, and never really does the will at

all; he who begins with 'Our Father, hallowed be Thy name,' is a son,

and his will, gladly yielding, is free in surrender, strong in

self-abnegation, and restful in putting the reins into God's hands.

The two halves make a whole. The second, which deals with our needs,

starts with the cry for bread, and climbs up slowly through the ills of

life, from bodily hunger to trespasses and human unkindness and personal

weakness, and a world of temptation, and the double evil of sin and of

sorrow, and so regains at last the starting-point of the first half,

Heaven and God. The probable meaning of the difficult word rendered

'daily' seems to be 'sufficient for our need.' The lessons of the

petition are that God's children have a claim for the supply of their

wants, since He is bound, as a faithful Creator, not to send mouths

without sending meat to fill them, but that our desires should be

limited to our actual necessities, and our cravings, as well as our

efforts for the bread that perishes, made into prayers. Such a prayer

rightly used would put an end to much wicked luxury among Christians,

and to many questionable ways of getting wealth. 'Bless my cheating, my

sharp practice, my half lies!' If we dare not pray this prayer over what

we do in 'earning our living,' we had better ask ourselves whether we

are not rather earning our death.

Sin is debt Incurred to God. So Christ taught in the previous chapter by

His parable of agreeing with the adversary; and in the other parables

of the two debtors (Luke vii. 41) and of the unmerciful servant (Matt.

xviii. 23). As universal as the need for bread is the need for pardon.

It is the first want of the spiritual nature, but it is a constantly

recurring want, as this petition teaches us. Forgiveness is the

cancelling of a debt; but we must not forget that it is a Father's

forgiveness, and therefore does not merely, or even chiefly, imply the

removal of penalty, but much rather the unimpeded flow of the Father's

love, and consequently the removal of the miserable consciousness of

separation from Him. The appended comparison 'as we have forgiven' does

not mean that our forgiveness is the reason for God's forgiveness of us.

The ground of our pardon is Christ's work, the condition of it our

faith; but, as we saw in considering the Beatitudes, the condition on

which the children of the kingdom can retain the blessing of the divine

pardon is their imitation of it.

The next petition is the expression of conscious weakness. The forgiven

man, though in his deepest soul hating sin, is still surrounded with

sparks which may fire the combustibles in his heart. If we ask not to be

led into temptation, because we want a smooth and easy road, we are

wrong. If we do so from self-distrust and fear lest we fall, then it is

allowable. But perhaps we may draw a distinction between being tempted

and being led into temptation. The former may mean the presentation of

an inducement to do evil which we cannot hope to escape, and which it is

not well that we should escape. The latter may mean the further step of

embracing or being entangled in it by consenting to it. We do not need

to dread the entrance into the Valley of the Shadow of Death, for if the

Lord be with us we shall pass through it. Our prayer may mean, lead us,

not into, but through, the trial. It is the plaint of conscious

weakness, the recognition of God as ordering our path, the cry of a

heart which desires holiness most of all, and which trusts in God's

upholding hand in the hour of trial.

'Deliver us from evil' is a petition which, in its width, fits the close

of the prayer better than does the translation of the Revised Version.

There seems an echo of the words in Paul's noble confidence while the

headsman's axe was so near, 'The Lord will deliver me from every evil

work.' Entire exemption from evil of every sort, whether sin or sorrow,

is the true end of our prayers, as it is the crown of God's purpose.

Nothing less can satisfy our yearnings; nothing less can fulfil the

divine desire for us. Nothing less should be the goal of our faith and

hope. To the height of meek assurance, and the reaching out of our souls

in desire which is the pledge of its own fulfilment, Christ would have

us attain on the wings of prayer. _They_ can have no narrower bonds

to the horizon of their hopes, nor any lesser blessing for the

satisfaction of their longings, whose prayer begins with 'Our Father

which art in heaven'; for where the Father is, the child must wish to

be, and some day will be, to go out no more.

'OUR FATHER'

'Our Father which art in heaven.'--Matt. vi. 9.

The words of Christ, like the works of God, are inexhaustible. Their

depth is concealed beneath an apparent simplicity which the child and

the savage can understand. But as we gaze upon them and try to fathom

all their meaning, they open as the skies above us do when we look

steadily into their blue chambers, or as the sea at our feet does when

we bend over to pierce its clear obscure. The poorest and weakest learns

from them the lesson of divine love and a mighty helper; the reverent,

loving contemplation of the profoundest souls, and the experience of all

the ages discern ever new depths in them and feel that much remains

unlearned. 'They did all eat and were filled, men, women, and

children--and they took up of fragments that were left five baskets

full.'

This is especially true about the Lord's Prayer. We teach it to our

children, and its divine simplicity becomes their lisping tongues and

little folded hands. But the more we ponder it, and try to make it the

model of our prayers, the more wonderful does its fulness of meaning

appear, the more hard does it become to pray 'after this manner.' There

is everything in it: the loftiest revelation of God in His relations to

us and in His purposes with the world; the setting forth of all our

relations to Him, to His purposes, and to one another; the grandest

vision of the future for mankind; the care for the smallest wants of

each day.

As a theology, it smites into fragments all false, unworthy human

thoughts of God. As an exposition of religion, the man who has drunk in

its spirit has ceased from self-will and sin. As a foundation of social

morals it lays deep the only basis for true human brotherhood, and he

who lives in its atmosphere will live in charity and helpfulness with

all mankind. As a guide for personal life, it gives us authoritatively

the order and relative worth of all human desires, and with these the

order and subordination of our pursuits and life's aims. As a prayer it

is all comprehensive and intended to be so, holding within the perfect

seven of its petitions, all for which we should come to God, and resting

them all on His divine name, and closing them all with a chorus of

thanksgiving. As a prophecy it opens the loftiest vision, beyond which

none is possible, of the final transformation of this world into the

kingdom in which God's will shall be perfectly done, and of the final

deliverance from, all evil of the struggling, sinning, sorrowing souls

of His children.

I desire to try in a series of sermons to set forth what little I can

see of the depth and comprehensiveness of this model of all prayer, and

of its ever fresh applicability to the wants and difficulties of our

days as of all days. But before dealing with that great invocation of

the divine name on which all rests, a word or two must be said touching

the introductory clause.

'After this manner pray ye.' The question which is usually made

prominent in thinking of these words is really a very subordinate one.

Did Christ intend to establish a form, or only to give an example?

Churchmen say, a form; Dissenters generally say, an example. But it

would be better for both Churchmen and Dissenters to try to realise for

themselves what 'this manner' is.

Unquestionably, whether our Lord is giving us a form or not, His chief

object was not to prescribe words. To pray is not to repeat petitions,

and His commandment has for its chief meaning a much deeper one than

that He was giving us either a form which we are to incorporate verbally

with our prayers, or an outline according to which our spoken

supplications are to be shaped. Whether in addition to this we are to

regard the very words as to be used by us, will be determined by each

man and church according as he regards the use of set forms in prayer as

being the true and noblest manner of prayer. Such use is certainly not

inconsistent with the utmost spirituality, but the habitual use of

forms, especially their exclusive use, seems to many of us to be

dangerous, regard being had to the tendency of human nature to rest in

them. And it is not without significance that this very prayer of our

Lord's, which was given as the corrective of vain repetitions and idle,

heathenish chattering of forms of prayer, has itself come to be the

saddest instance in all Christendom of these very faults, while the

beads slip through the fingers of the mechanical repeater of muttered

Paternosters. Instead of wrangling about this subordinate question, let

us try to pray after this manner. We shall find it hard, but blessed. Be

sure that every prayer not after this manner is after a wrong manner.

This prayer helps to reverse our foolish desire to make earth foremost.

The true end of prayer is to get our wills harmonised with His, not to

bend His to ours. Surely if self-denial and submission be the very heart

of Christianity, that should be most expressed in prayer which is the

very sanctuary of religion. The prayers that are to be offered after

this manner will not be passionate, petulant pleadings or prescriptions

to God to do this or that, but in them God and His glory will be first,

I second, and through Him and as He wills.

Ah, brethren! this is an awful requirement of Christ's. Who dare take

such holy words into his lips? It is a hard matter to pray as Christ

taught us. The prayer seems to move in a height of unapproachable

elevation, and the air there is too thin and pure for our gross lungs.

For be it remembered, we are not praying after this manner unless our

lives in some sort repeat and confirm our prayers. Do our hearts seek

first the Kingdom of God and His righteousness? Are our energies given

to this, as their noblest aim, to hallow God's name; or does the very

blood in our hearts throb hot, passionate desires for worldly things,

and God's name and kingdom and will seem dreamy and far-off objects

which kindle no desire in our souls and rule no effort of our lives,

like suns far away which shed little light upon the earth and sway not

its rolling tides, that are obedient to the nearer but borrowed light of

the changeful moon? If so, no matter whether we use this form or not, we

are not praying after this manner.

Look, now, at this first clause, which is the basis of all.

I. The divine Name which is the ground and object of all our prayers. It

is not merely a formula of address, like the superscription on a letter,

but the reality of His character as revealed before us. There is

inseparable from all prayer the effort to conceive worthily of Him to

whom we speak; to raise our souls to that height.

How much of our prayer, even while truest, fails here! We may be

distinctly conscious of our wants; our wishes may be right, and our

confidence may be firm that God will give us what we ask; yet how often

there is no vivid thought of Him filling the mind! How often our prayers

are offered to a mere name! How seldom through the cloud-wrack beneath

His feet do we see His face!

This absorbed contemplation is the necessary preliminary of all real

prayer, and there is a truth in the thought that such losing of self in

gazing on God is the highest form of prayer. We should feel as some

peasant come to court who stands on the threshold of the

presence-chamber, and forgetting his grievances and his embassy, gazes

entranced on the splendour and benignity of his sovereign.

Look, then, at this Name: what it expresses. It is not new. The Jews

dimly had it, and even Greek and other paganisms knew of a 'father of

Gods and men.' The name of Father carries with it primarily the idea of

the Source of life ('we also are His offspring'), and also, secondarily,

that of loving care.

How wonderful, how beautiful, that that earthly relation should find its

deepest reality in God! God be thanked that, 'like as a father pitieth

his children, so the Lord pitieth them that fear Him.'

But the true Christian idea of God's fatherhood is more than all this.

This is a prayer for disciples, for those who alone can really pray. All

men are God's children because all draw their life from Him, were made

in His image, and are objects of His love. But there is a fatherhood and

a sonship which are not universal, and for which another birth is

necessary. Its conditions are plainly laid down by the Evangelist: 'To

as many as received Him, to them gave He power to become sons of God,'

and by the Apostle, 'Ye are the children of God through faith in Christ

Jesus.'

We are made sons through Jesus. We are made sons by faith.

And now, how should this Fatherhood affect our prayers? We shall come

with hope and familiar confidence, for 'your heavenly Father knoweth

what things ye have need of.' Does a father love to have his children

about him? Does a child shrink from telling its wishes to a father? Also

we must bend our wills to His--to a Father.

Contrast that conception with the ideas of God which we are all tempted

to cherish, the slavish one which dwells upon the gulf between God and

man, with the cold deity of 'natural religion,' with the Epicurean

notion of Him which divorces Him from all living interest in His

creation.

Contrast it with the ghastly image which our consciences and our fears

frame, the heathen notion of an avenger and cruel. We do not need to

seek to avert His anger. This mighty word shatters all cowering terror

and abject prostration.

And it is a vow as well as an Invocation, binding us to supreme love to

Him, to obedience to Him, to moral conformity with Him. Be ye perfect as

your Father which is in heaven is perfect. The noblest prayer is 'Abba,

Father.'

Expositions of Holy Scripture Ezekiel, Daniel, and the Minor Prophets. St. Matthew Chapters I to VIII · 第 193 / 281 题