I. As to the former, we have here the Coronation of the King.

We need not spend time upon the question which we have no materials for

answering, viz.--What was the 'objective material reality' here? We do

not know enough about what constitutes 'objective material reality,' nor

about what are the laws of prophetic ecstasy and vision, to discuss such

a question as that. Nor is there any need to moot it. It does not matter

one rush whether bystanders would have seen anything or not. It does not

matter in the least whether there was any actual excitation of auditory

or visual nerves. It does not matter whether there was anything which

people are contented to call _material_--a word which covers a depth of

ignorance. Enough for us that this was no fancy, born in a man's brain,

but an actual manifestation, whether through sense or apart from sense,

to consciousness, of a divine outpouring and communication. Enough for

us that the voice which spoke was God's, and that that which descended

was the Spirit of God. As to all other questions, they may be amusing

and interesting, but they are insoluble, and therefore unimportant.

Well, then, taking that point of view, the next question that arises is

as to the purpose of this descent of the Spirit. Plainly, as I have

said, it was the coronation and anointing of the Monarch. But a man is

king before he is crowned. Coronation is the consequence and not the

cause of his royalty. It is but the official and solemn announcement of

a previous fact. No additional power, no fresh authority, comes of the

crowning. And so the first purpose of this great fact is distinctly

stated, in John's Gospel, as having been the solemn, divine pointing out

of Messiah to the Baptist primarily, but in order that he might bear

witness of Him to others. The words which follow are a commentary on,

and part of the explanation of, the descent of the Holy Spirit. They

are God's finger, pointing to Jesus and saying, 'Arise, anoint Him, for

this is He.'

But it must be remembered always that this was neither the beginning of

that divine Spirit's operation upon Jesus, nor the beginning of His

Messianic nature and consciousness; nor the beginning of His Sonship.

That day was not in deepest truth the 'day' on which the Son was

'begotten.' Before the baptism there was the consciousness of

Messiahship witnessed in these words, so singularly compacted of

humility and authority: 'Suffer it to be so now, for thus it becometh us

to fulfil all righteousness'; and before His baptism, and even before

His birth, that divine Spirit wrought His manhood, and ere the heavens

opened, or the dove fluttered down upon His head, He from everlasting

was the Son in the bosom of the Father.

So we see here, I think, if we follow the lead of the Scriptural

teaching, not the beginning of powers or communications, but an advance

in these. Christ's baptism was an epoch in His human development,

inasmuch as it was the public official assumption of His Messianic

office. He came from out of the sheltering obscurity of the Galilean

village nestling among its hills. He had now put His foot upon the path,

set with knives and hot ploughshares, along which He had to walk to the

Cross. Inasmuch as it was an epoch in His development (for His manhood

was capable of growth and maturing), and inasmuch as new tasks needed

increase of gifts, and inasmuch as His man's nature was subject to the

conditions of time, and capable of expansion and increase of capacity,

therefore, I believe that when Christ rose from the waters of baptism,

no new gift indeed was His, but such an advance in the communication to

His manhood of the sustaining Spirit, as fully equipped Him for the new

calls of His Messianic work.

His manhood needed, as ours does, the continual communication of the

divine Spirit, and His manhood, because it was sinless, was capable of a

complete reception of that Spirit. Sinless though He knew Himself to be,

as His own words declare, He yet bowed His head to the baptism of

repentance, which He needed not for Himself, just as He afterwards bowed

His head to a darker, a sadder baptism, which He had to be baptized

with, though it likewise He needed not for Himself, because in both the

one and the other He would make Himself one with His brethren. The

Spirit of God had shaped His manhood ere His birth. The Spirit of God

had been abiding in His holy infancy and growing youth, but now it came

in larger measure for new needs and His Messiah's work.

So, dear friends, we see in Christ, baptized with the Spirit of God, the

realised ideal of manhood, ever dependent, ever needing for its purity

that holy influence, and receiving at every pore that divine gift. What

a contrast to our limited partial reception, broken and interrupted so

often! All the doors that are barred in our hearts by sin, all the

windows that are darkened in our souls by vice and self, in Him stood

open to the day, and brilliantly receptive of the illumination. And so

'the Father giveth not the Spirit by measure unto Him.'

Notice, too, the meaning of the symbol. Think of what John, with his

incomplete though not inaccurate conceptions, expected in the Messiah

whom he proclaimed. To him the coming of the King was first and chiefly

a coming to judgment. There is nothing more remarkable than the aspect

of terror which drapes the old hope of Israel as it comes from John's

lips. He believes that the King is coming, that His coming is to be an

awful thing. Judgment is to go before Him, He bears 'His fan in His

hand,' and kindles 'unquenchable fire,' into which the leafy trees that

have no fruit upon them are to be flung, there to shrivel and crackle

and disappear. This is what he expects at the worst, and at the best a

baptism in the Holy Ghost, from Messiah's hands, which, however, is

likewise to be fiery even whilst it quickens, and searching and

destructive even whilst it gladdens. When, then, his carpenter cousin is

designated as Messiah, John sees two wonders: that this is the Christ,

and that the Spirit which he had thought of as searching and consuming,

should come fluttering down upon His head in the likeness of a dove. Old

Testament symbols and natural poetry unite in giving felicity to that

emblem. 'The Spirit of God brooded on the face of the deep,' says

Genesis; and the word employed describes accurately the action of the

mother-bird, with her soft breast and outstretched wings quickening the

life that lies beneath. The dove was pure and allowed for sacrifice. All

nations have made it the symbol of meekness, gentleness, faithfulness.

All these associations determined the form which the descending

Benediction took.

What then does it proclaim as to the character of the King? Purity is

the very foundation of His royalty. Meekness and gentleness are the very

weapons of His conquest and the sceptre of His rule. The dove will

outfly all Rome's eagles and all rapacious, unclean feeders, with their

strong wings, and curved talons, and sharp beaks. The lesson as to the

true nature of the true Kingdom, which was taught of old when the

prophet said 'Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion, thy King cometh unto

thee, meek, riding on an ass,' and not upon the warhorse of secular

force; the lesson which was taught unwittingly, as to the true nature of

the true Kingdom, when the scoffers, speaking a deeper truth than they

understood, put upon His brow the crown of thorns, and forced into His

hand the sceptre of reed, was taught here--the lesson that meekness

conquers, and that His kingdom is founded in suffering, and wielded in

gentleness. The lesson of the ancient psalm, which in rapture of

prophetic vision beheld the coming of the Bridegroom, and said with

strange blending of images of war and of peace: 'Thine arrows are sharp

in the heart of the King's enemies; in Thy majesty ride prosperously,

because of meekness; and Thy right hand shall teach Thee terrible

things';--that same lesson was taught when the King was crowned, and in

the day of His coronation, that which fell upon His bowed, glistening

head, was the Dove from Heaven, the proclamation that meekness and

gentleness are the garment of Omnipotence.

II. Consider this incident as showing us the gifts of the King to His

subjects.

Christ has nothing which He keeps to Himself. Christ received the Spirit

that He might diffuse it through the whole world. Whatsoever He has

received of the Father He gives unto us. This conception of the gift

that Christ has to bestow upon men, as being the very life-spirit that

dwelt in His manhood, and made and kept it pure, is the highest thought

that we can have of what the gospel does for us. You do not understand

its meaning if you content yourself with thinking of it as simply the

means of escape from wrath. You do not understand its meaning--though,

blessed be God! that is the first part of its mercy to us--if you think

of Christ's gift as only pardon by means of His sacrifice on the Cross.

We must rise higher than that; we must feel, if we would understand the

'unspeakable gift,' that it is the gift of Himself to dwell within us by

His Spirit as the very spirit of our lives. Assimilation by reception of

a supernatural life from Him, is the teaching of Pentecost. Christ is

our life; 'the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made us

free from the law of sin and death.'

Therefore, all Christian men are spoken of in the New Testament in the

same language which is used in reference to their Master. Is He the Son

of God? They are sons through Him. Is He the High Priest? They are

priests unto God. Is He the Light of the World? They are, in their

places, kindled and derived lights. Is He the Christ, the Messias, the

Anointed? 'Ye have an unction from the Holy One,' and He hath anointed

us in Him. So that it is no arrogance, though it may be a questionably

wise form of expression, when we say that the object of Christ's coming

is to make us all Christs, God's anointed, and to make us so because He

Himself in His Spirit dwells in us.

Christ can do that. He can give this Spirit. That is the very thing that

all other teachers cannot do. They can teach tricks of imitation, they

can galvanise men, for a little while, into some kind of copy of their

characteristics. They can give them the principles which they themselves

have been living on, but to repeat and to continue the spirit of the

Teacher is the very thing that cannot be done. 'Let a double portion

fall upon me,' said Elisha; and Elijah, knowing the limits of the human

relationship between master and disciple, could only shake his head in

doubt and say, 'Thou askest a hard thing; perhaps thou wilt get it,

perhaps thou wilt not, but it will not be I that will give it you.' But

Christ says: 'I give My Spirit to you all.'

And let us remember, too, how full of blessed teaching, of rebuke, and

of instruction that symbol is, in reference to ourselves. To all of us

there is offered, if we like to have it, this dove-like Spirit. What

does that mean? Let us for a moment dwell upon the various uses of the

emblem, for they all carry important lessons. Our hearts are like that

wild chaos which preceded the present ordered state of things. And over

the seething darkness, full of all formless horrors and half-discerned

dead monstrosities, over all the chaos of disordered wills, rebellious

appetites, stinging conscience, darkened perceptions, there will come,

if we will (and we may will by His help, which is never far away from

us), gently, but quickening us into life and reducing confusion into

order, and flooding our cloudy night with light, that divine Spirit. The

dove that brooded over Chaos and made it Cosmos, will brood over your

nature, and re-create the whole. 'If any man be in Christ, he is a new

creation.' 'The old things are passed away.' Creator Spirit! create a

clean heart in me.

And then again let me remind you that this emblem brings to us another

cognate and yet distinct hope, inasmuch as the dove was the emblem of

purity and clean for sacrifice. This is the characteristic of the

scriptural doctrine of inspiration, by which it is distinguished from

all heathen and secular conceptions of a similar sort, viz., that it

puts the moral in the foreground, and that the Spirit, which is the

Spirit of truth, and of wisdom and of power, is first and foremost the

Spirit of holiness. So that if a man is not clean, no matter what his

gifts, no matter what his wisdom, no matter what his intellectual force,

no matter what his supernatural and miraculous power, he has not the

Spirit of God in him. The Dove comes, and where it comes there is peace,

there is purity, there is sacrifice. If any man have not the Spirit of

holiness he is none of Christ's.

So, brethren, remember that not in shining faculty, not in piercing

vision into mystery, not in the eloquence of honeyed tongue, nor the

power of a swift hand, not in any of the lesser and subordinate gifts

which the world exclusively honours as inspiration, is the power of the

indwelling Spirit to be manifested. If the Spirit of God is in you, it

is making you clean.

Still further, remember how, as for the King so for His subjects, the

Dove that crowns Him and that dwells in them is the Spirit of meekness

and of gentleness. That is the true force. Light, which is silent, is

mightier than all lightnings. The Spirit, which is the 'Spirit of love,'

is therefore 'the Spirit of power.' The true type of Christian

character, which the gospel has brought into being, looks modest,

inconspicuous and humdrum, by the side of the more brilliant and vulgar

beauties of the world's ideals. Just as the iridescent hues on a dove's

neck, and the quiet blue of its plumage, look modest and Quaker-like

beside gaudy parroquets and other bedizened birds, so the Christian type

of character, patient, meek, gentle, not self-asserting, seems pale and

sober-tinted beside the world's heroes. But gentleness is the mightiest

and will conquer at last. For Christ and Christ's followers go forth,

through universal love to universal power.

And the last suggestion that I offer to you about the significance of

this symbol is one that I freely admit to be fanciful, and yet it

strikes me as being very beautiful. Noah's dove came back to the ark

with one leaf in his beak. That was the prophecy and the foretaste of a

whole world of beauty and of verdure. The dove that comes to us, bearing

with it some leaf plucked from the tree of life, which is in the midst

of the paradise of God, is the earnest of our inheritance until the day

of redemption. All the gifts of that divine Spirit, gifts of holiness,

of gentleness, of wisdom, of truth--all these are forecasts and

anticipations of the perfectness of the heavens. To us, sailing over a

dismal sea, the Spirit comes bearing with it a message that tells us of

the far-off land and the fair garden of God in which the blessed shall

walk.

Dear friends, remember the one condition on which is suspended our

possession of the Spirit of God. It is that we shall have Christ for our

very own by our humble faith. If we are trusting in Him, He will come

and put His Spirit within our hearts. Without Him these hearts are cages

of unclean and hateful birds. But the meek presence of the dove of God

will drive out the obscene, twilight-loving creatures that build and

scream there, and will fill our hearts with the tranquillity, the

purity, the gentleness, the hope, which are 'the fruit of the Spirit.'

Expositions of Holy Scripture Ezekiel, Daniel, and the Minor Prophets. St. Matthew Chapters I to VIII · 第 147 / 281 题