VI.

This eminence was early reached by Björnson. When but thirty-one

years of age he had written all the best works of his first period,

and they were even then viewed by the public as a completed whole.

No one could overlook his magnificent endowments; it produced rather

a painful effect, however, that no development of them could be

detected. His creative power for a long time remained centered in

one and the same point; but his views of life did not expand; they

remained childish and narrow. Sometimes he could actually be trivial.

Now and then he wrote poems that almost had the tone and coloring

of Northern songs of the people's school-teacher style. Too strong

traces of the influence of Grundtvig could be detected in them. It

is to the credit of this great man (1783-1872), the intellectual

awakener of the Northern peasant classes, that he gave a vigorous

impulse to the education of the people through the establishment of

numerous peasants' high schools. For a leader of the people, however,

the culture represented by his high schools was not adequate, and

for a long time Björnson vainly endeavored to make poetic progress

in the wooden shoes of the Grundtvigians. He kept himself, for the

most part, at a distressing distance from the life and the ideas of

his contemporaries. Or rather, if he did represent the ideas of his

contemporaries, it was involuntarily; they were brought forward in the

theatrical costumes of the ancient Norsemen or of the Scottish Middle

Ages. In "Sigurd Slembe," Helga and Frakark discuss in the year 1127

the relation between the immortality of the individual and that of the

race in phrases which remind us too strongly of the year 1862; and the

same chieftains, whose minds are filled with almost modern political

reflections, who use such expressions as vocation and fundamental law,

and speak of establishing order on a foundation without law, etc., have

the imprisoned Sigurd, from motives of revenge, broken limb by limb on

the wheel; in other words, they are guilty of an action which would

presuppose a far more barbarous inner life than they have otherwise

displayed. People that express themselves in terms indicative of so

much culture do not break their enemies on the wheel; they scourge them

with their tongues.

To this lack of unity in passion and thought was added the unhappy

necessity of the poet to so group and combine his principal dramatic

forms that the mantle of the orthodox church faith should be draped

about them at the moment when the curtain falls. In "Maria Stuart" the

form of John Knox is not subject to the dramatic irony that governs

the other personages. Björnson does not reserve to himself a poetic

supremacy over him: for Knox is destined to step forth from the

theatrical framework at the conclusion of the play, with the pathos of

the poet on his lips, and, as the representative of the people, receive

the political inheritance of Maria. The vigorous combats in "Sigurd,"

as well as the passionate emotions in "Maria Stuart," find their outlet

in a hymn. The action in both dramas is brought to so fine a point

that in one it flows into the crusader's song of the pious Danish

poet Ingemann, in the other into the mystic hymn of the Puritans.

Gradually it began to appear as though the once so rich vein of the

poet was well nigh drained. His later stories ("The Railroad and the

Churchyard" and "A Problem of Life") bore no comparison to his earlier

ones, and the drama "Sigurd Jorsalfar" (Sigurd the Crusader) could be

compared quite as little to the older Norse dramas of the poet. The

last cantos of "Amljot Gelline," which were written several years later

than the rest, are decidedly inferior to those composed in the first

glow of inspiration. Evidently no new ideas germinated in Björnson's

mind. People began to ask if the history of this author was to be that

of so many Danish authors who had grown mute in the prime of their

manhood because their genius lacked the capacity to shed its chrysalis.

Björnson had apparently exhausted his original intellectual capital.

The public wondered if he could acquire new wealth, as the others had

been unable to do.

These years are indelibly stamped on my memory. The mind of youth

experienced somewhat of a pang in comparing the literary condition

of the greater part of Europe with that of the North. There was a

sense of being shut out from the cultured life of Europe. In Denmark,

the elder generation, through its repugnance to everything German,

had interrupted the intellectual intercourse with Germany; the canal

through which European civilized thought had hitherto been received was

obstructed; at the same time, French culture was shunned as frivolous,

and English culture was but rarely comprehended, as the English

language was excluded from the course of studies in the schools of

learning. In Denmark people looked to Norway as the land of literary

revival; in Norway all eyes were turned to Denmark as the land of older

civilization, and people scarcely noticed the lull in Danish culture.

Now while intellectual life faded and drooped, as a plant becomes

blighted in a damp place, the cultivated classes of both countries

believed themselves to be the salt of Europe. People did not know that

the foreign nations they had dreamed of rejuvenating through their

idealism, their Grundtvigianism, their faith, had taken a great start

in advance of them, especially in literary culture. In the leading

social circles of the Scandinavian countries, people spoke of David

Strauss and Feuerbach, as the most narrow-minded circles of Germany had

spoken of them in the period from 1840 to 1850; Stuart Mill, Darwin,

and Herbert Spencer were scarcely known by name, and there was not

the slightest conception of the development of English poetry from

Shelley to Swinburne. Modern French literature was condemned without

any conception of the significance of the fact that the drama and the

romance in France had long since forsaken historical and legendary

material, and had grasped subjects from the immediate present, the only

ones a poet can observe with his own eyes and study. People scarcely

dared raise for themselves so much as a corner of the curtain that

concealed the contemporary world from their gaze.

Eminent Authors of the Nineteenth Century: Literary Portraits · 第 81 / 91 题