Engraved by L. Ruffe, after the painting by A. Dawant.]

The members of the Parlement returned from their exile as contumacious

as ever. Against the express command of the king, they persisted in

occupying themselves with religious questions and manifesting a spirit

of opposition to the pretensions of the Papacy. The public excitement

was so great that a wretch named Damiens attempted to assassinate the

king, in 1757, but only wounded him slightly. In 1770, the Duc

d'Aiguillon, Governor of Brittany, having been relieved of his post and

formally accused by the parlement of that province, was brought to trial

before the Parlement of Paris in his quality of peer of the realm. He

was about to be condemned when the king, in a bed of justice, quashed

the proceedings. To the indignant protests of the magistrates, who

suspended their sittings, Louis XV replied by dismissing his minister,

Choiseul, and giving his post to D'Aiguillon. On the night of the 19th

and 20th of January, 1771, a hundred and sixty-nine of the members of

the Parlement were each awakened by two musketeers, who required them to

sign _yes_ or _no_ on the order to resume their official functions.

Thirty-eight signed _yes_, but retracted this consent two days later;

on the following night a huissier notified the members of their

suspension from office, and the musketeers brought them lettres de

cachet which banished them all in different directions. At the end of

the year there were more than seven hundred magistrates in exile. The

king transformed his council into a parlement, under the presidency of

M. Maupeou, from whom it took its name, but it was received with a storm

of popular insult and ridicule. Public opinion throughout the nation was

aroused; all the princes of the blood, excepting one, and thirteen peers

protested to the king "against the reversal of the laws of the State,"

and the name of the _États Généraux_ was openly pronounced in the

parlements of Toulouse, Besançon, Rouen, and even in Paris. "Richelieu

and Louis XIV had destroyed the political importance of the nobility;

Louis XV destroyed the great institution of the magistracy,--what was

there remaining to prop up the ancient edifice and to cover the

monarchy?"

The ribald Parisians circulated this _Pater_, and found amusement in it:

"Our Father who art at Versailles, your name be glorified, your reign is

shaken, your will is executed no more on the earth than in heaven; give

us our daily bread, which you have taken from us; pardon your

parlements, which have sustained your interests, as you pardon your

ministers who have sold them: do not succumb any longer to the

temptations of the Du Barry, but deliver us from the devil of the

chancellor."

In the midst of the general decadence, which affected alike royalty, the

clergy, and the nobles, in the general confusion and inequality of all

laws and procedure, a formidable spirit of investigation began to stir.

The nation had no written constitution, everything depended upon custom,

and was maintained only by a sort of public opinion, which constantly

varied. The contradictions and anomalies in all branches of the public

administration were rendered even more hopeless by the general

corruption and clashing of individual interests: "France has no general,

positive, written law ... which defines all the powers," said Lally

Tollendal in the chambre de la noblesse in 1789. Both the civil and the

penal law bristled with the most flagrant injustice, the accused was

frequently allowed no defence; torture, mutilations, and the

death-penalty were awarded with the most shocking facility and for the

most inadequate crimes,--the complete innocence of the victim was but

too frequently recognized after his execution. "If I were accused of

having stolen the towers of Notre-Dame," said one, "I would consider it

prudent to run away." The right of asylum was still maintained in Paris

in the enclosure of the Temple, as in the Middle Ages; in 1768, "poor

devils were sent to the galleys for having sold certain books, among

them the innocent satire of Voltaire: _L'homme aux quarante écus_."

[Illustration: THE NEW HOTEL DE VILLE, AND THE PONT D'ARCOLE. After a

drawing by Libonis.]

The details of the trial and execution of Damiens, for his attempt on

the life of the king, give a better picture of the times than any

general description. Immediately after his arrest, his legs were torn

with red-hot pinchers, and these wounds were not allowed to heal. He was

confined in the Tour de Montgommery, in a circular chamber twelve feet

in diameter, almost without light and air, strapped down, without the

power of movement, to a mattress, the bottom of which was alternately

pushed up and let down by a jack underneath. His examination lasted

fifty-seven days; he was put to the question, "ordinary and

extraordinary," to discover the names of his accomplices, and finally

condemned to death by torture in very nearly the same phrases as those

which we have quoted in the sentence of Ravaillac. An enclosure was

arranged in the Place de Grève, surrounded by a strong barricade of

planks, pointed at the top, with elongations at the four corners for the

four horses who were to _écarteler_ the criminal; in the centre was a

very solid wooden table, six feet long, four feet wide, and about three

feet high, on which he was to be placed, fastened down with iron plates

over his chest, stomach, and between his thighs, in such a manner that

his body should be perfectly immovable while his limbs were at liberty.

"The roofs of all the houses in the Grève," says the contemporary

_Journal de Barbier_, "and even the chimneys, were covered with people.

There was a man and a woman who fell in a certain locality, and who

injured others. It was remarked that there were very many women, and

even some of distinction, and that they sustained the horror of this

execution better than the men, which did not do them any honor."

From the memoirs of H. Sanson, one of the public executioners, the

following details are quoted by M. de Genouillac. "The _tortionnaire_,

who had charge of the pinchers, and who, by a singular mockery of

circumstances, bore the name of a great seigneur of the time, Soubise,

had assured his chief that he had procured all the implements indicated

in the sentence. When he arrived at the scaffold, Gabriel Sanson

immediately perceived that the miserable Soubise was drunk, and quite

incapable of fulfilling his appointed task. Filled with violent

apprehension, he demanded to be shown the lead, the sulphur, the wax,

and the rosin which Soubise was to have purchased; everything was

lacking, and it was recognized at the same moment that the 'patient'

might arrive immediately, that the pile which was to consume his body

was composed of damp and ill-chosen wood that would be very difficult to

light.

"In contemplating the consequences of the drunkenness of the

_tortionnaire_, Gabriel Sanson lost his head. For some moments the

scaffold presented a spectacle of inexpressible confusion; the valets

ran about distracted, everybody cried out at once, and the unhappy

executioner of the _prévôté de l'hôtel_ tore his hair while deploring

the terrible responsibility which he had brought down upon his head. The

arrival of the lieutenant of the short robe, who had finished disposing

his men in the enclosure, the presence of the procureur général, who

had been sent for, put an end to this disorder.

"The magistrate severely reprimanded Gabriel Sanson.... During this

interval, the valets went into the shops of the grocers of the

neighborhood to provide themselves with what was necessary; but when

they issued from the enclosure, the crowd followed them,--in all the

shops which they entered their purpose was made known and the merchants

refused to sell them, or pretended not to have what they desired; it was

necessary for the lieutenant to send with them an officer to demand, _in

the king's name_, the objects of which they had need."

"This scene was prolonged for such a length of time," says M. de

Genouillac, continuing the narration, "that everything was not yet ready

when the patient arrived on the Place de Grève, and they were obliged to

seat him on one of the steps of the scaffold whilst they proceeded,

under his very eyes, with the final preparations for his death. Damiens

had remained three hours in the chapel; he had prayed continually, with

a fervor and a contrition that had touched the hearts of all those

present. When four o'clock struck from the clock of the Palais, Gabriel

Sanson approached MM. Gueret and De Marsilly, and said to them that the

hour to set out had arrived.

"Although he had spoken in a low voice, Damiens had heard him, for he

murmured, in a feverish voice: 'Yes, it will soon be night;' and after a

pause he added: 'Alas! to-morrow it will be day for them!'

"They raised him up to take him away; he made the motion of a kiss

toward the crucifix; he was put into the tumbril, which took its way

toward Notre-Dame. Before the porch of the church they endeavored to

force him to kneel, but his legs were so broken that he uttered a

piercing cry in endeavoring to stoop; he was obliged to pronounce while

standing the words which the greffier dictated to him.

[Illustration: THE "FORMES ACERBES." After a drawing by Lafitte.

Expression used by Barère in his defence of Joseph Le Bon: "If Le Bon

had employed _formes acerbes_, he had at least shown his devotion to the

Republic." Le Bon caused the execution of more than fifteen hundred

persons; it was he who installed an orchestra at the foot of the

guillotine.]

"He was replaced in the cart and all returned to the Place de Grève,

which was literally full of people belonging to all classes of society.

Arrived at the foot of the scaffold, Damiens asked to speak to the

commissioners; he was carried to the Hôtel de Ville, there he retracted

again the accusation he had made against Gautier, which had been wrung

from him by torture, recommended his wife and his children to M.

Pasquier, and at five o'clock he was set down again on the Place and

they lifted him on the scaffold.

"The braziers in which was burning the sulphur mingled with burning

coals were ready; his arm was attached to a bar in such a manner that

the wrist extended beyond the outside plank of the platform. The

executioner brought up the brazier. Damiens uttered a frightful cry and

writhed; then, that movement over, he lifted his head and watched his

hand burning without manifesting his pain in any other manner than by

the chattering of his teeth. It was one of Sanson's valets, André

Legris, who, for the sum of a hundred livres, undertook the tearing with

pinchers. He carried his instrument over the arms, over the chest, and

over the thighs of the patient, and brought away shreds of flesh; then

he poured into the gaping wounds boiling oil, flaming rosin, sulphur

fused, or melted lead, with which the other valets supplied him.

"Damiens, mad with pain, his eyes immeasurably out of their orbits, the

hair standing on his head, cried, in a voice that made every one

tremble: 'More! more!'

"But he was taken down from the platform, the traces of the horses were

attached to each one of his limbs. Each horse was held by the bridle by

an aid; another was placed behind with a whip in his hand; the

executioner, standing on the platform, gave the signal.

"The four horses sprang violently forward, one of them fell, but the

body of the unfortunate wretch was not dismembered.

"Three times the horses recommenced their efforts, and three times the

resistance of the body made them fall back. Only the arms and legs of

the patient, who was still living, were immeasurably elongated.

"The curé had fainted; the executioners no longer knew what to do. The

spectators, at first dumb with stupor and fright, now uttered

exclamations of horror.

"It was then that the surgeon, Boyer, ascended to the Hôtel de Ville to

ask of the commissioners permission to cut the joints; this was at first

refused, on the pretext that the longer the execution lasted the more

would the criminal suffer, and that this was what was necessary; but the

surgeon having affirmed that the tearing asunder could not be effected

without aid, it was resolved to permit the necessary amputation.

"But there was no instrument.

"André Legris performed the operation with blows of a hatchet, he cut

the arm-pits and the joints of the thighs. The two thighs were first

dismembered, then a shoulder, and it was not till after this that the

wretched Damiens expired.

"A sigh of relief escaped from all breasts.

"But it was not finished: the four members and the trunk were gathered

up and all placed upon the pile of fagots, and the flames arose. The

execution of Damiens had lasted an hour and a quarter....

[Illustration: ROBESPIERRE GUILLOTINING THE EXECUTIONER.

From an engraving in the collection of M. Félix Perin.

"Robespierre, after having had all the French guillotined, beheads the

executioner with his own hand." This caricature cost the engraver his

life.]

"It was observed, when they picked up the body of Damiens to throw it

on the pyre, that his hair, which was brown when he arrived on the Place

de Grève, had become white as snow."

The judgment rendered by the Parlement in the famous case of the diamond

necklace, in the following reign, was received with very different

emotions by the court and the people. It may be remembered that the

Bishop of Strasbourg, Cardinal de Rohan, a member of one of the most

arrogant families of the nobility, anxious to regain the favor of the

Queen Marie Antoinette, had fallen into the snares of a clever

adventuress, Jeanne de Saint-Remy de Valois, Comtesse de la Motte. The

latter was aware that the crown-jewelers, MM. Boehmer and Bassenge, had

offered the queen a necklace of diamonds for the price of one million

six hundred thousand livres, but that she had declined it, saying that

the money would be better applied in the purchase of a vessel of war.

Madame de la Motte proceeded to open fictitious negotiations with the

jewelers in the name of the queen, pretending that the latter had

changed her mind but did not wish the affair to become public, that the

purchase would be made by instalments and through the hands of a great

seigneur of the court. This was the Cardinal Rohan, upon whom she

imposed, by means of forged letters from the queen, skilfully prepared

by her secretary, one Sieur Rétaux de Villette. She even arranged a

brief nocturnal interview in the gardens of Versailles for him, as

related in the last chapter, with a demoiselle from the Palais-Royal

disguised as Marie-Antoinette. A few days later, the cardinal remitted

to the comtesse the sum of one hundred and fifty thousand livres on a

pretended letter; but when she proposed to him, later, to purchase the

necklace himself on the strength of the queen's promise to indemnify

him, he had so many doubts that he went to consult the adventurer

Cagliostro, then in great favor in Paris. The magician pronounced

favorably upon the enterprise; in January, 1785, the cardinal received

the jewels from the merchants in return for a paper signed and sealed by

him but bearing on the margin the words: "_Approuvé_, MARIE-ANTOINETTE

_de France_" in which it was agreed that they were to be paid for in

four instalments of four hundred thousand livres each, the first payment

to be made on the 1st of August following. The queens of France were

never in the habit of adding anything to the signature of their

Christian names. On the first of February the cardinal delivered the

necklace in a casket, in the apartments of Madame de la Motte at

Versailles, to an assumed valet in the royal livery, whom he thought he

recognized, but who was no other than the crafty Rétaux de Villette. The

stones were immediately separated, the comtesse kept the small ones for

herself and sold the larger ones in England. Naturally, the affair came

to light a few months later, and on the 15th of August the cardinal was

lodged in the Bastille.

Great was the excitement; the Papacy even interfered to prevent the

trial of so eminent a churchman by the Parlement, before whom the king

brought the _procès_ in the following month, but the latter maintained

its rights, and on the 31st of May, 1786, pronounced judgment. M. de la

Motte (who had escaped to England) was condemned to the galleys for

life; his wife, to be publicly flogged, branded on both shoulders with

the letter "V," a rope around her neck, and imprisoned for life; Rétaux

de Villette banished for life, without branding or flogging; the

demoiselle D'Olivia discharged; Cagliostro and the cardinal discharged

from all accusation. The acquittal of the prelate was hailed with

applause by the people, and viewed with great displeasure by the court

and the nobility; the blow to the royal prestige was felt to be very

serious, the publicity given to the fact that a cardinal, Grand Almoner

to the Court, had mistaken a courtesan for the Queen of France was

recognized as most unfortunate. Louis XVI banished him to his abbey of

the Chaise-Dieu in Auvergne, ordered him to resign his post of Grand

Aumônier de France, and to return his order of the Saint-Esprit.

[Illustration: LAST EVENT OF THE REIGN OF TERROR: THE CLOSING OF THE

JACOBIN CLUB.

Paris, From the Earliest Period to the Present Day; Volume 2 · 第 20 / 60 题